PIRATENEWS.ORG

PIRATE STORE 1

PIRATE STORE 2

DAILY NEWS

BLOGS OF WAR

VIDEO ARCHIVE

PNTV SCHEDULE

MISSION INPOSSIBLE

PIRATE HOLLYWOOD

REDLIGHT SCAMERAS

REVELATION 9-11

OBAMA CRIMES

BUSH CRIMES

GAYGATE

SECRET SOCIETY

BOHEMIAN GROVE

MOON SCAM

HACKING THE MATRIX

DEALS GAP DRAGON

DRAGONATORS

PROHIBITION TIMES

TOWCRIME

NEWS LINKS

PIRATE MYSPACE

COUNTERCOUP

PIRATE NEWSWIRE

PIRATE RSS ARCHIVE



PIRATE NEWS TV BLOG

PNTV 2

CONTACT


SUPPORTERS

WBCR 1470AM
Free Speech Radio
Alcoa, Tennessee

American Autobahn


SEPTEMBER 911 SURPRISE
VIDEO ARCHIVE

CHICAGO JUNE 2006

Tanya in NY Times

LOS ANGELES JUNE 24-25, 2006

911 GRAPHIC NOVELS

PatriotsQuestion911.com - 100+ Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials; 140+ Engineers and Architects; 130+ Professors; 100+ 9/11 Survivors and Family Members; 70+ Entertainment and Media Professionals


9/11 CON ON CSPAN

LA 9/11 Truth Conference a huge success - CSPAN to air segments this week. The 9/11 American Scholars Symposium concluded in Los Angeles Sunday and was extremely well received by the thousand plus in attendance.

A Reuters article summarizing the event presented a reasonably balanced appraisal of the intentions and scope of the conference, mirroring a burgeoning climate of accurate 9/11 truth movement coverage. Reflecting a positive trend embraced by an earlier New York Times article, the Reuters report on the conference mainly sticks to the facts and avoids the scoffing, sneering tone of similar reports about 9/11 events we have seen over the last few years.

The Reuters article has mainly been picked up by foreign news outlets. From previous experience we know that newswire gatekeepers, ostensibly operating out of London, selectively sideline sensitive stories and order them not to receive substantive nationwide attention. The Reuters piece has not been picked up by any US or European news outlet thus far. Reuters is based in London, England, in the heart of the British Empire.

Video footage of Charlie Sheen's appearance as well as a raft of other presentations and interviews with keynote speakers will feature in free video clips and extra footage at PrisonPlanet.TV and Infowars.com over the next two weeks.

Pirate News TV attended the 9/11 Con in L.A. and will also post video of the event ASAP.

American Scholars Symposium - All 24 hours broadcast by PNTV

Anthony Hilder interview of billionaire Jimmy Walter at 911 Con - Video by PNTV

Charlie Sheen speaks at Hollywood 9/11 Conference

911 Conference LA panel discussion

Most Police, Firefighters Now Believe 9/11 Inside Job - NY CITY - Saying that the "entire atmosphere had changed," Alex Jones explained how police support for protesters at ground zero had gone from 20% support two years ago to around 60% support now - with many willing to affirm that sentiment on camera and many knowledgeable about Alex Jones' work and the 9/11 truth movement. "Police just saying 'keep your investigation going, we appreciate you' on video," said Jones. 9/11/2006

Canadian Broadcasting Corp reports that Bush Gang perped the 9/11 terrorist massacres - Professor David Ray Griffen, Loose Change, $60-million blowjobs and "so-called conspiracy theories" exposed as Truth on 9/11/2006

911 Loose Change on CNN with Paula Zahn - Terrorist George Bush Jr perped the 911 Massacres - September 13, 2006

British Broadcasting Corporation reports that Bush Gang perped the 9/11 terrorist massacres - Interview with Professor David Ray Griffin - 10 September 2006

The Debate: Loose Change vs Popular Mechanics - Courtesy of Democracy Now radio

911CitizensWatch.org - 9/11 families demand new investigation on CSPAN broadcast from National Press Club on 9/11/2006

911CitizensWatch.org - On the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, a group presses for a new investigation into the attacks. Participants include the producers of a film 9/11: Press for Truth and relatives of victims. Mr. Thompson is the author of The Terror Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute: A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 9/11 - and America's Response, published by Regan Books. CSPAN broadcast from National Press Club on 9/11/2006

911PressForTruth.com - Myspace trailer for nice Jewish movie tries to point fingers at innocent Arabs and away from Zionist Jews and Jewish Israelis just like Jew Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911. Quote of the Day by US chairman joint chiefs of staff General Dickie Myers: "The goal has never been to get Bin Laden."

9/11 Press For Truth - Full length feature documentary with the Jersey Girls on Google Video


WASH POST ON 9/11 CON

June 26, 2006 - About 1,200 people gathered over the weekend for what organizers billed as the largest conference on the conspiracy theories that consider the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to be a result of official negligence or a U.S. attempt to incite world war.

"There are so many prominent people . . . who have stated that the evidence is overwhelming that 9/11 was an inside job," syndicated radio talk show host Alex Jones said at a news conference.

Conspiracy theorists are convinced that the U.S. military command "stood down" on the day of the attacks, that the hijackers were trained at U.S. military bases and that the World Trade Center towers collapsed because of a series of controlled explosions set before they were hit by two hijacked planes. Suggested motives include expected benefits for U.S. arms and oil conglomerates, and revolutionary plans for a new world order headed by the United States.

Tens of thousands of raucous paradegoers braved a steady downpour and lined Fifth Avenue for the annual gay pride parade. It was one of several gay pride parades across the country over the weekend, including a similar-size one in San Francisco.

The U.S. population -- 299,061,199 as of midday yesterday -- is on target to hit 300 million this fall, and it is likely that the milestone baby, or immigrant, will be a Mexican citizen illegally in the USA. Latinos are driving the population growth and accounted for almost half of the increase last year, more than any other ethnic or racial group, the Census Bureau said.

A University of California chancellor died Saturday in an apparent suicide jump from a 43-story apartment building, authorities said. Denice Dee Denton, 46, the chancellor of the Santa Cruz campus, was depressed about personal and professional problems, her mother, Carolyn Mabee, told the San Francisco Chronicle. Denton had been criticized for demanding $600,000 in renovations to her house on the campus and a $192,000-a-year university position created for her longtime partner, Gretchen Kalonji.


MSNBC TV on Chicago 911

Keith Olbermann mentioned the Chicago 9/11 event on his show this evening in a segment on the recent confessions by treasonous Jew Judith Miller about receiving prior warning of a major attack by Al-CIAduh prior to 9/11. While he provided little detail on the event, it is quite a change to see 9/11 skeptics being given some form of recognition - maybe next they will notice that a former Bush cabinet member presented at the event and believes 9/11 was an inside job himself.

Alex Jones keynote speech at Chicago 911 Con

Dr Steven Jones speech at Chicago 911 Con

Dr Morgan Reynolds speech at Chicago 911 Con

Rick Seigel at Chicago 911 Con

Rick Seigel: Israeli TV's 9/11 helicopter ninjas

Press conference and various speakers at Chicago 911 Con

Alex Jones Bull Horns for 9/11 Truth in Downtown Chicago


500 Conspiracy Experts Meet to Seek the Truth of 9/11

CHICAGO, NY Times, June 4, 2006 — In the ballroom foyer of the Embassy Suites Hotel, the two-day International Education and Strategy Conference for 9/11 Truth was off to a rollicking start. Such was the coming-out for the movement known as "9/11 Truth," a society of skeptics and scientists who believe the government was complicit in the terrorist attacks. In colleges and chat rooms on the Internet, this band of disbelievers has been trying for years to prove that 9/11 was an inside job. It was, in tone, half trade show, half political convention.

There were talks on the Reichstag fire and the sinking of the Battleship Maine as precedents for 9/11. The former owner of a recycling plant outside St. Louis, Mr. Berger joined the movement when he grew skeptical of why the 9/11 Commission had failed, to his sense of sufficiency, to answer how the building at 7 World Trade Center collapsed like a ton of bricks. It was his "9/11 trigger," the incident that drew him in, he said. For others, it might be the fact that the air-defense network did not prevent the attacks that day, or the appearance of thousands of "puts" — or short-sell bids — on the nation's airline stocks.

Such "red flags," as they are sometimes called, were the meat and potatoes of the keynote speech on Friday night by Alex Jones, who is the William Jennings Bryan of the 9/11 band. Mr. Jones, a syndicated radio host, is known for his larynx-tearing screeds against corruption.

At the lectern Friday night, beside a digital projection reading "History of Government Sponsored Terrorism," Mr. Jones set forth the central tenets of 9/11 Truth: that the military command that monitors aircraft "stood down" on the day of the attacks; that President Bush addressed children in a Florida classroom instead of being whisked off to the White House; that the hijackers, despite what the authorities say, were trained at American military bases; and that the towers did not collapse because of burning fuel and weakened steel but because of a "controlled demolition" caused by pre-set bombs.

The movement's answer to the government's report was written by Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University and the movement's expert in the matter of collapse.

A poll released last month by Zogby International found that 42 percent of all Americans believe the 9/11 Commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence" in the attacks. This is in addition to the Zogby poll two years ago that found that 49 percent of New York City residents agreed with the idea that some leaders "knew in advance" that the attacks were planned and failed to act.


Fakes on a Plane - Conspiracy buffs craft their own online WTC movies

VILLAGE VOICE - Oliver Stone and Paramount are intent on getting out the message that World Trade Center doesn't traffic in fringy speculations about the 9-11 attacks—since the unabashedly liberal director's JFK (1991) stands as the most mainstream movie elaboration of conspiracy theory to date.

Studio reps screened portions of the film on Capitol Hill a few weeks ago in a preemptive strike against potential red-state congressional grumblers. And indeed, right-wing pundits have so far embraced the movie: "It is one of the greatest pro-American, pro-family, pro-male, flag-waving, God Bless America films you will ever see," Fox News' Cal Thomas gushed in his syndicated column.

But Stone's attempt at muffling his JFK rep has raised hackles within the burgeoning world of conspiracy theorists. David Slesinger of 911courage.com - one of countless sites devoted to alternative explanations of the events of September 11 - organized a "call to action" to his fellow "9-11 Truth activists." Slesinger proposes staging nonviolent protests on the film's opening weekend by flyering and picketing "suburban mall theaters" that explicitly prohibit such activity, in hopes of garnering media attention through activist arrests. TheResistanceManifesto.com, run by one "John Conner" (presumably self-styled after The Terminator's hero), denounces World Trade Center as "the biggest 9/11 whitewash in history." Asks Conner: "Was Stone used by the Illuminati as an unknowing pawn to whitewash the 9/11 conspiracy theories to the masses?" When lefty news aggregator the Raw Story posted a release linking to Slesinger and Conner, it drew so many readers that Conner's site temporarily crashed from bandwidth overload.

Another site, PrisonPlanet.com, argues that advance clips from World Trade Center seem to include the sounds of bombs going off in the buildings. "Only when Oliver Stone's movie is rolled out nationwide," PrisonPlanet writes, "will we be able to comb through it for more proof that Stone is clued in to the 9/11 truth movement and the complete fraud of the government fairy tale."

Thanks to this active online community, 9-11 Truth seekers don't need Stone to see their theories propounded in cinematic form. In the half-decade since 2001, as a loose congeries of varied political fringe groups and conspiracy hounds melded with a newly radicalized crop of Bush-burnt Americans to form a growing network of like-minded skeptics, the movement has fostered a robust filmmaking subculture of its own. Nearly 20 feature-length videos have been circulating through its ranks, first on DVD, more recently for free through video services like Google and YouTube. Directors have become important figures within the movement.

And the audience is out there—more than you might think. An oft quoted May 2006 Zogby poll found that 42 percent of Americans believed that "there has been a cover-up" about 9-11 on the part of the government and the 9-11 Commission.

With forthright titles like The Truth & Lies of 911, The Great Conspiracy, and September 11th the Con, the Conspiracy, the Cover-Up, these home-brewed affairs play like the audiovisual descendants of old self-published conspiracy books: cheaply made, but spiced with highly idiosyncratic, lurid aesthetics. Their world-historical urgency is often endearingly undercut by an ill-lit, room-toned cable-access vibe, or the pasteboard rented-studio stiffness of a late-night infomercial. Their raison d'être, without exception, is the presentation of "evidence" that key parts of the standard narrative just don't "add up."

The litany of examples changes, but is drawn from a common pool: The twin towers and nearby WTC 7 could only have fallen the way they did from a controlled demolition, key video messages from Osama bin Laden appear to portray a bin Laden impostor, no footage exists of a plane hitting the Pentagon, and so on. The conclusion, always, is that 9-11 was an "inside job." Though the skeptics don't agree on the perpetrators, most point to the Bush administration and neocon high-ups, and nobody seems to think Al Qaeda acted alone. On first viewing, some movies can be powerfully effective. For viewers already distrustful of Bush, they function as epistemological horror films, evoking fears that the state of the world may be even worse than it already is, due not to apparent hubris, negligence, and ineptitude, but rather a thrillingly brilliant cabal of evil elites: the perfect movie villains, and the inverse of the neocons' own terrorist demons.

A few conspiracy films include original interviews with witnesses (or more often, an echo chamber of fellow skeptics). The bulk of footage consists of the analysis of media artifacts found online: website pages of "buried" news stories, animated diagrams, tinny compressed video clips, and neo–Ken Burnsian digital zooms into pixelated photos. In this respect, these Truth movies feel like the birth of a documentary form uniquely native to the online culture: the DIY results of hours upon hours of Googling, blogging, and Photoshopping.

The most shoestring works, like Eric Hufschmid's Painful Deceptions, could barely be called movies, operating merely as multimedia slide shows with theorizing voiceover. [Hufschmid's sister, supermodel actress Sarah O'Hare, is married to Lachlan Murdoch, the son of multi-billionaire Sir Rupert Murdock Jewish Knight of the British Empire who is a citizen of Australia who owns Fox News, is married to Communist Chinese citizen Wendi "Ho" Deng, and they live in Bejing, the capital of Communist China. Hufschnmid's book Painful Questions is still the most professional book about 9/11.] Others, like BYU physicist Dr Steven Jones's 9-11: Scientific and Ethical Questions, are little more than videotaped live PowerPoint presentations (though Jones's soft-spoken Midwestern timbre adds surprisingly powerful drama). The most extreme example of this info- centrism is 911 Stranger Then [sic] Fiction, in which a computer-generated voice reads scrolling text for two hours, occasionally interspersed with a flash of something grabbed from Google's image search. It's so sparsely experimental that one might mistake it for a work of video art. That is, until it begins railing against the "Zionist mafia"-—another unfortunate tendency of the genre.

Other directors have begun to uplift Truthie cinema. Austin, Texas, talk- radio host Alex Jones [heard on WBCR 1470am in Alcoa, Tennessee] has pumped out a string of slicker productions, including Martial Law 9-11: Rise of the Police State, 911: The Road to Tyranny, and Police State III: Total Enslavement, in addition to earlier pre–9-11 videos about other conspiracies. A strident opponent of the "New World Order," Jones cuts a more Michael Moore–esque figure, inserting footage of himself "bullhorning" at protests, interviewing bystanders, and being subsequently harassed by police—and in his recent TerrorStorm, briefly confronts Moore himself. Jones's preacherly theatrics have helped him rack up a few Hollywood connections. Charlie Sheen is an outspoken fan, and Jones has contributed animated cameos in Richard Linklater's films Waking Life and A Scanner Darkly.

22-year-old director Dylan Avery of Oneonta, New York, has emerged as the hot young star of the skeptic set with his 2005 'tude-filled feature Loose Change. Avery claims in a recent Vanity Fair profile that he's received over 50,000 orders for the Loose Change DVD and over 10 million viewings online, and says he's in talks with a number of studios to release an updated cut of the film on September 11, 2006. His name frequently pops up in Technorati's daily list of most searched-for keywords, and his MySpace profile boasts over 3,500 friends. By mainstream media standards, Loose Change remains ultra–low budget, but with Avery's casual, no-nonsense voiceover, tight editing, and hip-hop DJ'd score, it's by far the most accomplished and accessible example of 9-11 Truth cinema, though not free of the questionable fact-sourcing practiced by its peers (most egregious: "According to Wikipedia . . . ").

In true Internet fashion, Loose Change has even spawned a counter-video. Mark Iradian's Screw Loose Change takes on "911 deniers" by subtitling a running commentary over Avery's video, parrying and mocking his arguments as they unfold. William Lewis and Dave von Kleist's woefully titled 911 in Plane Site also generated a critique, Not in Plain Sight. In this case, the attack comes from within the movement: Not in Plain Sight's anonymous author claims that In Plane Site is so full of errors that it must be intentional disinformation created to mislead and discredit the movement. (Not in Plain Sight also includes the most wonderfully bizarre music of any of these works: looping, whoomping synth blurts that resemble discarded takes from the 1980 Flash Gordon soundtrack.)

Despite these limits, the 9-11 conspiracy docs will surely inspire further imitation, and their wiki-style muckraking is bound to dig up something important during an administration addicted to data-fudging and cover-ups. In a world that increasingly seems all fringe and no center, other radical and niche ideologies will undoubtedly embrace the no-holds-barred, blog-friendly, direct-to-YouTube format. With any luck, we'll see a whole new batch three years from now, made by embittered, paranoid conservatives who have been voted out of power.

LONDON GUARDIAN - Oliver Stone immediately plans second 911 documentary.


Click Here For Conspiracy

VANITY FAIR - With $6,000 and a laptop computer, three kids from upstate New York made a documentary about 9/11 that spread across the Internet and threw millions for a loop

Nine-eleven conspiracy theories have been circulating for years, producing millions of Web links, scores of books, and a nationwide collection of doubters known as the "9/11 Truth" movement.

In 2005 the State Department responded by posting some "clues" to "identifying misinformation" on their Web site. "Does the story claim that vast, powerful, evil forces are secretly manipulating events?" it asks. "If so, this fits the profile of a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are rarely true, even though they have great appeal and are often widely believed. In reality, events usually have much less exciting explanations."

One of the first American officials to publicly acknowledge conspiracy theories in connection with 9/11 was President George Bush, who on November 10, 2001, in a speech to the General Assembly of the United Nations, said, "Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September 11."

Yet according to a May 2006 Zogby poll, 42 percent of Americans now believe that the U.S. government and the 9/11 commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks," and that "there has been a cover-up."

For those who can't find information about the alleged cover-up on the nightly news, there is Loose Change, a documentary about 9/11 conspiracy theories which just might be the first Internet blockbuster. Since it appeared on the Web in April 2005, the 80-minute film has been climbing up and down Google Video's "Top 100," rising to No. 1 this May, with at least 10 million viewings.

"We beat the woman getting punched in the face," says its director, 22-year-old Dylan Avery, from Oneonta, New York (population 13,000), referring to an oft watched video.

"We beat the guy who beats his computer with his keyboard," says his producer, 23-year-old Korey Rowe, also from Oneonta and an army specialist who served in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"We beat the [Stephen] Colbert speech," says Jason Bermas, 26, their researcher. "The viral videos, we dominate them."

Told in MTV-style jump cuts, illustrated by high-end graphics, and scored with hip music written by a few of their friends, Loose Change is an investigation into the official story of 9/11 as told by The 9/11 Commission Report, asking a number of highly controversial questions:

What, for example, were the explosions some witnesses heard after the towers were hit by planes? Why was the site of the collapse not treated as a crime scene, and why was the debris shipped off as waste to several foreign countries?

Why were the black boxes from American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 never found, when the passport of one of Flight 11's alleged hijackers, Satam Al Suqami, turned up unscathed a few blocks from the World Trade Center?

How did American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon, disappear into a 20-foot hole, leaving no trace of its 124-foot wingspan on the building? And what's with all the forewarnings that the government ignored?

For the past three months, 20,000 people a day have been clicking on to the official Loose Change Web site, loosechange911.com; more than 50,000 have placed orders for the DVD since its release. ("But we're not really making any money," says Rowe, "because we gave away like 100,000 copies for free.") Millions more have been downloading the film from a growing number of unaffiliated sites.

It's safe to say that, if it were a theatrical release, Loose Change would be one of the most popular—and incendiary—movies in the country right now. Avery and Rowe say they are talking to several major movie studios about releasing a third and "final cut" of the film on September 11, 2006. They wonder if the government may be watching, too. "I hope so," says Avery.

In the opening credits of Loose Change, we hear Mick O'Regan, a host on Australian radio, asking the late Hunter S. Thompson, in a 2002 interview, "How would you rate the American media in their coverage of the events of the attack last September?"

"Well let's see, uh, 'shamefully' is a word that comes to mind," says the father of gonzo journalism. "I've spent enough time, well, on the inside of the White House and political campaigns, and I've known enough of the people who do these things, to know that the public version of the news or whatever event is never really what happened."

Most of what we see on-screen during Loose Change are actually news reports from mainstream-media outlets like CBS News, Newsweek, CNN, the Associated Press, even Fox News—the "loose change" which Avery adds up into a conspiracy theory. "Some people accuse me of like, Oh, you're taking quotes out of context," he says. "I'm giving you the article and the date. Go look it up yourself."

Loose Change runs clips from almost every major TV news organization on that horrible day, wherein we see footage of people escaping the towers, firemen, and reporters who talk of hearing explosions after the planes hit; for some this raises questions of whether there were pre-set bombs going off in the buildings. Here's Bryant Gumbel on CBS: "We understand there has been a secondary explosion on Tower One … "

Freeze-frame images of the towers going down show what some say appear to be demolition "squibs," or horizontal plumes of smoke and debris being ejected during the collapse, also suggesting explosions.

Loose Change also delves into the question of why the United States' elaborate air-defense system failed to thwart the September 11 attacks. The 9/11 Commission Report says "there was no one to blame." The film points to a 20-page instruction from June 1, 2001, issued by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff which reassigned the authority for aircraft interceptions and shoot-downs to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Titled "Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects," the instruction states that henceforth "the NMCC [National Military Command Center] will … forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval." Neither the president nor the vice president is mentioned in the new directive as being part of the chain of command. By military protocol, the authority belonged to Rumsfeld, who later claimed he was "out of the loop."

'Are you sort of suggesting that [9/11] worked in the favor of the Bush administration?," Mick O'Regan asks Hunter S. Thompson in Loose Change.

"Oh, absolutely. Absolutely," Thompson says. "You sort of wonder when something happens like this, well, who stands to benefit? Who had the opportunity and the motive?"

The film's answer to this is the September 2000 report from the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative think tank whose members include Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz. Titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses," it envisions a future of burgeoning defense spending and the overthrow of Saddam Hussein. "The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor," Avery reads from the report in voice-over.

It's a long leap from all this, however, to claiming, "The government did it." There is no conclusive evidence in Loose Change of U.S. government involvement in 9/11. The film relies too heavily on already published reports, some of which have been discredited. For example, the segment on United Flight 93 cites an early story from a Cincinnati ABC News affiliate, WCPO, on the plane's safe landing at a Cleveland airport on the morning of September 11. WCPO later retracted the story.

For the final cut of Loose Change, Avery says, "We're tracking down potential eyewitnesses to the landing of Flight 93 in Cleveland." He also says the third edition of the film will include more on-screen interviews; the first version had only one, with Marcel Bernard, the chief flight instructor at Freeway Airport, in Bowie, Maryland. Bernard recalls that, in early August 2001, Hani Hanjour, one of the alleged hijackers of American Airlines Flight 77, had trouble controlling and landing a single-engine Cessna 172 when he did test runs. "Average or below-average piloting skills," Bernard says.

And yet, according to the official version of events, if Hani Hanjour had been the pilot he would have had to execute a perfect 330-degree turn at 530 miles per hour, descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, in order to crash Flight 77, a Boeing 757, into the Pentagon.

"[Flight 77] could not possibly have flown at those speeds which they said it did without going into a high-speed stall," Russ Wittenburg, a former commercial and air-force pilot, is quoted saying in Loose Change. The film also makes much of the visual similarities between the hole left in the west wing of the Pentagon and damage to buildings done by cruise missiles.

On May 16, the Department of Justice released two Pentagon videotapes of the crash of Flight 77 after a Freedom of Information Act request by Judicial Watch, a conservative government watchdog. "Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77," said Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. The video "shows the nose cone of the plane clearly entering the picture," said Fox News.

You can decide for yourself by watching the Pentagon's video.

Click link for print edition.

Vanity Fair published the USAF NORAD radio air traffic control tapes from 9/11, proving the Bush white House illegally ordered the US military to stand down on 9/11/2001. Pentagon's video.

9/11 TRUTH REVOLUTION



Why The 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away

by Jew Lev Grossman

TIME Magazine coverstory - Turns out, we need grand theories to make sense of grand events, or the world just seems too random.

Take a look, if you can stand it, at video footage of the World Trade Center collapsing. Your eye will naturally jump to the top of the screen, where huge fountains of dark debris erupt out of the falling towers. But fight your natural instincts. Look farther down, at the stories that haven't collapsed yet.

In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it actually blew out the windows. And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the ensuing fires. They were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs you see on film are the detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks.

People who believe the second explanation live in a very different world from those who believe the first. In world No. 2, al-Qaeda is not responsible for the destruction of the World Trade Center. The U.S. government is. The Pentagon was not hit by a commercial jet; it was hit by a cruise missile. United Flight 93 did not crash after its occupants rushed the cockpit; it was deliberately taken down by a U.S. Air Force fighter. The entire catastrophe was planned and executed by federal officials in order to provide the U.S. with a pretext for going to war in the Middle East and, by extension, as a means of consolidating and extending the power of the Bush Administration.

The population of world No. 2 is larger than you might think. A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,010 adults last month found that 36% of Americans consider it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that government officials either allowed the attacks to be carried out or carried out the attacks themselves. Thirty-six percent adds up to a lot of people. This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality.

Although the 9/11 Truth Movement, as many conspiracy believers refer to their passion, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media, it is flourishing on the Internet. One of the most popular conspiracy videos online is Loose Change, a 90-min. blizzard of statistics, photographs, documents, eyewitness accounts and expert testimony set to a trippy hip-hop backbeat. It's designed to pick apart, point by point, the conventional narrative of what happened on Sept. 11, 2001.

For all its amateur production values--it was created by a pair of industrious twentysomethings using a laptop, pizza money and footage scavenged from the Internet--Loose Change is a compelling experience. Take the section about the attack on the Pentagon. As the film points out--and this is a tent-pole issue among 9/11 conspiracists--the crash site doesn't look right. There's not enough damage. The hole smashed in the Pentagon's outer wall was 75 ft. wide, but a Boeing 757 has a 124-ft. wingspan. Why wasn't the hole wider? Why does it look so neat?

Experts will tell you that the hole was punched by the plane's fuselage, not its wings, which sheared off on impact. But then what happened to the wings? And the tail and the engines? Images of the crash site show hardly any of the wreckage you would expect from a building that's been rammed by a commercial jet. The lawn, where the plane supposedly dragged a wing on approach, is practically pristine. The plane supposedly clipped five lampposts on its way in, but the lampposts in question show surprisingly little damage. And could Hani Hanjour, the man supposedly at the controls, have executed the maneuvers that the plane performed? He failed a flight test just weeks before the attack. And Pentagon employees reported smelling cordite after the hit, the kind of high explosive a cruise missile carries.

There's something empowering about just exploring such questions. Loose Change appeals to the viewer's common sense: it tells you to forget the official explanations and the expert testimony, and trust your eyes and your brain instead. It implies that the world can be grasped by laymen without any help or interference from the talking heads. Watching Loose Change, you feel as if you are participating in the great American tradition of self-reliance and nonconformist, antiauthoritarian dissent. You're fighting the power. You're thinking different. (Conspiracists call people who follow the government line "sheeple.") "The goal of the movie was just really to get out there and show that there are alternate stories to what the mainstream media and the government will tell you," says Korey Rowe, 23, who produced the movie. "That 19 hijackers are going to completely bypass security and crash four commercial airliners in a span of two hours, with no interruption from the military forces, in the most guarded airspace in the United States and the world? That to me is a conspiracy theory."

It's also not much of a story line. As a narrative, the official story that the government--echoed by the media--is trying to sell shows an almost embarrassing lack of novelistic flair, whereas the story the conspiracy theorists tell about what happened on Sept. 11 is positively Dan Brownesque in its rich, exciting complexity. Rowe and his collaborator, Dylan Avery, 22, actually started writing Loose Change as a fictional screenplay--"loosely based around us discovering that 9/11 was an inside job," Rowe says--before they became convinced that the evidence of conspiracy was overwhelming. The Administration is certainly playing its part in the drama with admirable zeal. If we went to war to root out fictional weapons of mass destruction, is staging a fictional terrorist attack such a stretch?

But there's a big problem with Loose Change and with most other conspiracy theories. The more you think about them, the more you realize how much they depend on circumstantial evidence, facts without analysis or documentation, quotes taken out of context and the scattered testimony of traumatized eyewitnesses. (For what it's worth, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has published a fact sheet responding to some of the conspiracy theorists' ideas on its website, www.nist.gov. The theories prompt small, reasonable questions that demand answers that are just too large and unreasonable to swallow. Granted, the Pentagon crash site looks odd in photographs. But if the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, then what happened to American Airlines Flight 77? Where did all the real, documented people on it go? Assassinated? Relocated? What about eyewitnesses who saw a plane, not a missile? And what are the chances that an operation of such size--it would surely have involved hundreds of military and civilian personnel--could be carried out without a single leak? Without leaving behind a single piece of evidence hard enough to stand up to scrutiny in a court? People, the feds just aren't that slick. Nobody is.

There are psychological explanations for why conspiracy theories are so seductive. Academics who study them argue that they meet a basic human need: to have the magnitude of any given effect be balanced by the magnitude of the cause behind it. A world in which tiny causes can have huge consequences feels scary and unreliable. Therefore a grand disaster like Sept. 11 needs a grand conspiracy behind it. "We tend to associate major events--a President or princess dying--with major causes," says Patrick Leman, a lecturer in psychology at Royal Holloway University of London, who has conducted studies on conspiracy belief. "If we think big events like a President being assassinated can happen at the hands of a minor individual, that points to the unpredictability and randomness of life and unsettles us." In that sense, the idea that there is a malevolent controlling force orchestrating global events is, in a perverse way, comforting.

You would have thought the age of conspiracy theories might have declined with the rise of digital media. The assassination of President John F. Kennedy was a private, intimate affair compared with the attack on the World Trade Center, which was witnessed by millions of bystanders and television viewers and documented by hundreds of Zapruders. You would think there was enough footage and enough forensics to get us past the grassy knoll and the magic bullet, to create a consensus reality, a single version of the truth, a single world we can all live in together.

But there is no event so plain and clear that a determined human being can't find ambiguity in it. And as divisive as they are, conspiracy theories are part of the process by which Americans deal with traumatic public events like Sept. 11. Conspiracy theories form around them like scar tissue. In a curious way, they're an American form of national mourning. They'll be with us as long as we fear lone gunmen, and feel the pain of losses like the one we suffered on Sept. 11, and as long as the past, even the immediate past, is ultimately unknowable. That is to say, forever.

Note by PNTV - TIME magazine published forged photographs from the Zapruder film of the assassination coup d'etat of President JFK Sr, and locked the Zapruder film in its vault to censor the facts from the public, until Judge Jim Garrison subpoenaed it during his prosecution of CIA agent Clay Shaw. Jew Oliver Stone's 2 documentaries about JFK showed the Zapruder film, which proves Kennedy was shot from the front not the back, and forced Congress to declassify 2-million pages of JFK files, including CIA's and Pentagon's Operation NORTHWOODS in 2000, which included US Govt hijacking US airliners in USA and bombing them by remote control. NORTHWOODS included Operation MONGOOSE, which was discussed in both of Stone's documentaries on the murder of JFK by the US Govt. Note that TIME censored Operation NORTHWOODS from its gullible readers. Government prosecutors and judges use circumstantial evidence every day to arrest and convict millions of US citizens. Even the federal and state RICO Acts specifically name GOVERNMENTAL criminals in its legislation to prosecute organized crime and racketeering.

September 11, 2006

JFK Doodle Predicted "9-11 Conspiracy" - President Kennedy, known for separating his life into compartments, would enclose words and numbers inside circles and boxes. Events long after his death give one doodle an unintended chill: A small circle with the numbers "9-11" contained within. Just to the lower left on the page, the word "conspiracy" is underlined. The doodle is part of a new book, Presidential Doodles, which analyses the jottings of eight commanders in chief.



An indictment of Mr. Conspiracy

But Oliver Stone's WTC movie does show prepositioned bombs exploding throughout the WTC, and does show the controlled explosive demolition of WTC7.

Some Internet sites say Oliver Stone's 'WTC' fails to address what really happened on 9/11.

LOS ANGELES TIMES - Memo to Oliver Stone: Conspiracy theorists have a bone to pick with you.

The filmmaker's latest release, "World Trade Center," does not engage in any of the cloak-and-dagger mumblings that have made the rounds, particularly on the Internet, in the wake of the 9/11 tragedy. All this has conspiracy theorists very disappointed. They figured if anyone would be willing to — as they see it — challenge the "official" version of events, it would be Mr. "JFK" himself.

"Oliver Stone, having done 'Nixon' and 'JFK' and other movies that have been quite revealing, had a chance to use his power to ask a few very damning questions," said Prisonplanet.com radio show host Jack Blood, who is urging a boycott of the film. "Instead, what we have is an establishment movie that certainly condones and endorses the cover story that was given to us by the government on 9/11."

Stone has a simple answer: He wanted to tell the story of two Port Authority officers who tried to save lives that day but ended up fighting for their own. Politics wasn't involved.

Alex Jones, who has an Internet radio show on Infowars.com and Prisonplanet.com, said he doesn't fault Stone for making a movie that honors the heroes of 9/11. "He is allowed to make a movie about this microcosm that was such a big part of 9/11," said Jones. "We know that the police and firefighters were heroes, and I agree with that. But there is concern in the 9/11 truth community that the movie will be used to bolster the official story."

To be sure, there are plenty of alternate views on the events of 9/11.

Some believe the CIA was in on the attacks. Others wonder if bombs had been planted inside the towers. Still others think the U.S. government knew the attacks were coming but chose not to act. In March, actor Charlie Sheen said in an interview with Jones that he too questions the "official 9/11 story."

"It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions." Sheen added: "There was a feeling, it just didn't look like any commercial jetliner I've flown on anytime in my life, and then when the buildings came down later on that day, I said to my brother, 'Call me insane, but did it sort of look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

Sheen also told Jones he wanted an independent investigation of the events leading up to 9/11. "It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families; we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Now with Stone in the mix, there's even more intrigue. Some theorists theorize: Maybe the director himself is part of the 9/11 plot.

"Was Stone used by the Illuminati as an unknowing pawn to whitewash the 9/11 conspiracy theories to the masses?" wondered blogger John Conner. "Was he approached with the project and coerced into a commitment to occupy his time in attempts to thwart any other 9/11 angle from being used? Is Stone a pawn in the game? Perhaps Stone didn't know at the time, and found out too late. Perhaps production had begun, and he was already on board when he found the 9/11 rabbit hole."

The questions just add fodder to the debate.

"At some point you will see a Hollywood film that looks at alternative views of the official 9/11 story," said Jones. "It's just who's got the courage to do it."


Conspiracy theorists just aren't buying the official 9/11 conspiracy theory

CHICAGO SUN TIMES - Professor Kevin Barrett believes the U.S government might have destroyed the World Trade Center. Professor Steven Jones is researching what he calls evidence that the twin towers were brought down by explosives detonated inside them, not by hijacked airliners.

These men aren't uneducated junk scientists: Barrett will teach a class on Islam at the University of Wisconsin this fall, over the protests of more than 60 state legislators. Jones is a tenured physicist at Brigham Young University whose job has made him a hero to conspiracy theorists.

'Things are happening'

Five years after the terrorist attacks, a community that believes widely discredited ideas about what happened on Sept. 11 thrives. Members trade their ideas on the Internet and in self-published papers and in books. About 500 of them attended a recent conference in Chicago.

The movement claims to be drawing credibility from a recently formed group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth.

The organization says publicity over Barrett's case has helped boost membership to about 75 academics. They are a tiny minority of the 1 million faculty nationwide, and some have no university affiliation. But some are well educated, with degrees from elite universities and jobs at schools including Rice, Indiana and the University of Texas.

''Things are happening,'' said co-founder James Fetzer, a philosophy professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth, who maintains, among other claims, that some of the hijackers are still alive. ''We're going to continue to do this. Our role is to establish what really happened on 9/11.''

Many mainstream scientists won't debate conspiracy theorists, saying they don't want to lend them unwarranted credibility. But some worry the academic background of the group could do that anyway.

'Scientist with an ax to grind'

Members of the conspiracy community ''practically worship the ground [Jones] walks on because he's seen as a scientist who is preaching to their side,'' said F.R. Greening, a Canadian chemist who has written papers rebutting the science used by Sept. 11 conspiracy theorists. ''It's science, but it's politically motivated. It's science with an ax to grind, and therefore it's not really science.''

Members of the group believe the government's investigation was inadequate, and they say that questioning widely held assumptions has been part of the job of scholars for centuries. ''Tenure gives you a secure position where you can engage in controversial issues,'' Fetzer said. ''That's what you should be doing.''

But when asked what did happen, members often step outside the data-based culture of the academy and defer to their own instincts.

Daniel Orr, a retired economics chairman at the University of Illinois, said he knew instantly from watching the towers fall that they had been blown apart by explosives. He was reminded of watching an old housing project being destroyed in St. Louis.

David Gabbard, an East Carolina education professor, acknowledges this isn't his field, but says ''I'm smart enough to know that fire from airplanes can't melt steel.''


Presbyterian Church publishes 9/11 conspiracy

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)'s publishing arm has released a book that says President Bush organized New York's Sept. 11 attacks.

The decision by the 160-year-old Westminster John Knox Press, the trade and academic publishing imprint of the Presbyterian Publishing Corp., to attribute the attacks on the World Trade Center brings into the U.S. religious mainstream a conspiracy theory long held by the world's jihadists.

In 'Christian Faith and the Truth behind 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action,' author David Ray Griffin calls the United States the world's 'chief embodiment of demonic power, says he initially scoffed at 9/11 conspiracy theories.

But after investigating he concluded that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition, military personnel were given stand-down orders not to intercept hijacked flights and the 9/11 Commission, ostensibly created to uncover the truth behind the events of 9/11, 'simply ignored evidence' that the administration was involved in the attacks.

Griffin further asserts that such events such as that of 9/11 are part of a long history of 'false-flag attacks,' attacks orchestrated by governments against their own people to garner popular support for military action.

Griffin is a professor at California's Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University, and a codirector of the Center for Process Studies.


Gullible Americans

By Dr Paul Craig Roberts PhD
08/14/06

I was in China when a July Harris Poll reported that 50 percent of Americans still believe that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when Bush invaded that country, and that 64 percent of Americans still believe that Saddam Hussein had strong links with Al Qaeda.

The Chinese leaders and intellectuals with whom I was meeting were incredulous. How could a majority of the population in an allegedly free country with an allegedly free press be so totally misinformed?

The only answer I could give the Chinese is that Americans would have been the perfect population for Mao and the Gang of Four, because Americans believe anything their government tells them.

Americans never check any facts. Who do you know, for example, who has even read the Report of the 9/11 Commission, much less checked the alleged facts reported in that document. I can answer for you. You don’t know anyone who has read the report or checked the facts.

The two co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission Report, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, have just released a new book, “Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission.” Kean and Hamilton reveal that the commission suppressed the fact that Muslim ire toward the US is due to US support for Israel’s persecution and dispossession of the Palestinians, not to our “freedom and democracy” as Bush propagandistically claims. Kean and Hamilton also reveal that the US military committed perjury and lied about its failure to intercept the hijacked airliners. The commission even debated referring the military’s lies to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. (But the Pentagon's version was proven true by the NORAD audiotapes declassified as rebuttal to the 911 Commission lies, proving the White House stand down order, despite pleas by the military to shoot down the aircraft.) Why should we assume that these admissions are the only coverups and lies in the 9/11 Commission Report?

How do you know that 9/11 was a Muslim terrorist plot? How do you know that three World Trade Center buildings collapsed because two were hit by airliners? You only “know” because the government gave you the explanation of what you saw on TV. (Did you even know that three WTC buildings collapsed?)

I still remember the enlightenment I experienced as a student in Russian Studies when I learned that the Czarist secret police would set off bombs and then blame those whom they wanted to arrest..

When Hitler seized dictatorial power in 1933, he told the Germans that his new powers were made necessary by a communist terrorist attack on the Reichstag. When Hitler started World War II by invading Poland, he told the Germans that Poland had crossed the frontier and attacked Germany. (Just like the Reichstag arson of the German Congress, in Operations Himmler and Cannded Goods, Nazi Germany attacked itself and blamed Poland, to start World War 2. These self inflicted terrorist attacks were confessed during the Nurenberg trials and resulted in death sentences for all top German politicians who failed to suicide themselves and their families.)

Governments lie all the time--especially governments staffed by neoconservatives whose intellectual godfather, Leo Strauss, taught them that it is permissible to deceive the public in order to achieve their agenda.

Some readers will write to me to say that they saw a TV documentary or read a magazine article verifying the government’s explanation of 9/11. But, of course, these Americans did not check the facts either - and neither did the people who made the documentary and wrote the magazine article.

Scientists and engineers, such as Clemson University Professor of Engineering Dr. Judy Woods and BYU Professor of Physics Dr. Steven Jones, have raised compelling questions about the official account of the collapse of the three WTC buildings. The basic problem for the government's account is that the buildings are known to have fallen at free fall speed, a fact that is inconsistent with the government's "pancaking" theory in which debris from above collapsed the floors below. If the buildings actually "pancaked," then each floor below would have offered resistance to the floors above, and the elapsed time would have been much longer. These experts have also calculated that the buildings did not have sufficient gravitational energy to accommodate the government's theory of the collapse. It is certainly a known and non-controversial fact among physicists and engineers that the only way buildings can collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints is by engineered demolition. Explosives are used to remove the support of floors below before the debris from above arrives. Otherwise, resistance is encountered and the time required for fall increases. Engineered demolition also explains the symmetrical collapse of the buildings into their own foot prints. As it is otherwise improbable for every point in floors below to weaken uniformly, "pancaking" would result in asymmetrical collapse as some elements of the floor would give sooner than others.

Scientific evidence is a tough thing for the American public to handle, and the government knows it. The government can rely on people dismissing things that they cannot understand as "conspiracy theory." But if you are inclined to try to make up your own mind, you can find Dr. Jones' and Dr. Woods’ papers, which have been formally presented to their peers at scientific meetings, on line at ST911.org.

Experts have also pointed out that the buildings' massive steel skeletons comprised a massive heat sink that wicked away the heat from the limited, short-lived fires, thus preventing a heat buildup. Experts also point out that the short-lived, scattered, low-intensity fires could barely reach half the melting point of steel even if they burned all day instead of merely an hour.

Don't ask me to tell you what happened on 9/11. All I know is that the official account of the buildings' collapse is improbable.

Now we are being told another improbable tale. Muslim terrorists in London and Pakistan were caught plotting to commit mass murder by smuggling bottles of explosive liquids on board airliners in hand luggage. Baby formula, shampoo and water bottles allegedly contained the tools of suicide bombers.

How do we know about this plot? Well, the police learned it from an “Islamic militant arrested near the Afghan-Pakistan border several weeks ago.” And how did someone so far away know what British-born people in London were plotting? (Dozens of British citizens were arrested without charges, without evidence, without bombs, without plane tickets, without passports, without confessions, while 1,000s of airport screeners in USA are illegal aliens. 10,000 illegal aliens invade the wide open US border every day, while US Govt gives those criminal terrorists an unlimited supply of free liquids to help them invade USA and wage Civil War to violently overthrow the US and state governments.)

Do you really believe that Western and Israeli intelligence services, which were too incompetent to prevent the 9/11 attack, can uncover a London plot by capturing a person on the Afghan border in Pakistan? Why would “an Islamic militant” rat on such a plot even if he knew of it?

More probable explanations of the “plot” are readily available. According to the August 11 Wayne Madsen Report, informed sources in the UK report that “the Tony Blair government, under siege by a Labor Party revolt, cleverly cooked up a new ‘terror’ scare to avert the public’s eyes away from Blair’s increasing political woes. British law enforcement, neocon and intelligence operatives in the US, Israel, and Britain, and Rupert Murdoch’s global media empire cooked up the terrorist plot, liberally borrowing from the failed 1995 ‘Oplan Bjinka’ plot by Pakistan- and Philippines-based terrorist Ramzi Ahmad Yousef to crash 11 trans-Pacific airliners bound from Asia to the US.”

There are other plausible explanations. For example, our puppet in Pakistan decided to arrest some people who were a threat to him. With Bush’s commitment to “building democracy in the Middle East,” our puppet can’t arrest his political enemies without cause, so he lays the blame on a plot.

Any testimony against Muslim plotters by “an Islamic militant” is certain to have been bought and paid for.

Or consider this explanation. Under the Nuremberg standard, Bush and Blair are war criminals. Bush is so worried that he will be held accountable that he has sent his attorney general to consult with the Republican Congress to work out legislation to protect Bush retroactively from his violations of the Geneva Conventions.

Tony Blair is in more danger of finding himself in the dock. Britain is signatory to a treaty that, if justice is done, will place Blair before the International Criminal Court in the Hague.

What better justification for the two war criminals’ illegal actions than the need to foil dastardly plots by Muslims recruited in sting operations by Western intelligence services? The more Bush and Blair can convince their publics that terrorist danger abounds, the less likely Bush and Blair are ever to be held accountable for their crimes.

But surely, some readers might object, our great moral leaders wouldn’t do something political like that!

They most certainly would. As Joshua Micah Marshall wrote in the July 7 issue of Time magazine, the suspicion is “quite reasonable” that “the Bush Administration orchestrates its terror alerts and arrests to goose the GOP’s poll numbers.”

Joshua Micah Marshall proves his conclusion by examining the barrage of color-coded terror alerts, none of which were real, and, yes, it all fits with political needs.

And don’t forget the plot unearthed in Miami to blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago. Described by Vice President Cheney as a “very real threat,” the plot turned out to be nothing more than a few harmless whackos recruited by an FBI agent sent out to organize a sting.

There was also the “foiled plot” to blow up the Holland Tunnel and flood downtown New York City with sea water. Thinking New Orleans, the FBI invented this plot without realizing that New York City is above sea level. Of course, most Americans didn’t realize it either.

For six years the Bush regime has been able to count on the ignorant and naive American public to believe whatever tale that is told them. American gullibility has yet to fail the Bush regime.

The government has an endless number of conspiracy theories, but only people who question the government’s conspiracies are derided for “having a conspiracy theory.”

The implication is even worse if we assume that the explosive bottle plot is genuine. It means that America and Britain by their own aggression in Iraq and Afghanistan, and by enabling Israel’s war crimes in Palestine and Lebanon, have created such hatred that Muslims, who identify with Bush’s, Blair’s, and Israel’s victims, are plotting retaliation.

But Bush is prepared. He has taught his untutored public that “they hate us for our freedom and democracy.”

Gentle reader, wise up. The entire world is laughing at you.

Paul Craig Roberts is an economist and a former Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, a former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration, and a prolific and popular journalist. He is nationally syndicated columnist for Creator's Syndicate and Investors Business Daily. He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. He is a graduate of the Georgia Institute of Technology and he holds a Ph.D. from the University of Virginia.


Rudy's Kin Tied to Mob

NEW YORK DAILY NEWS - Father, uncle and cousin surface in new biography.

Mayor Giuliani — a former federal prosecutor who won notice for pursuing the Mafia — had relatives linked to organized crime, including a mobbed-up cousin who was gunned down by FBI agents in 1977, a new book says.

Lewis D'Avanzo, a son of the mayor's uncle and a guest at Giuliani's first wedding in 1968, was a "ruthless and widely feared mob associate" who headed a massive stolen car ring, according to FBI documents and interviews detailed in "Rudy! An Investigative Biography of Rudolph Giuliani," by Village Voice senior editor Wayne Barrett.

Due in stores next week, the book sketches a largely unflattering portrait of the clan, depicting his father, Harold, as a hothead and the "muscle" behind a brother-in-law's loansharking operation, run out of a Brooklyn bar.

Along with cracking heads, it says the mayor's father served time in state prison for a stickup, rarely held an on-the-books job and once was a gunman in a mob shootout in Brighton Beach, Brooklyn.

The book never makes clear how much of the family's alleged dark side is known to the mayor, who has talked lovingly of his father, who died in 1981 of prostate cancer — the same disease that the mayor is fighting.

The mayor's spokeswoman, Sunny Mindel, said yesterday that Giuliani "hadn't seen the book and had no comment." On Tuesday, Giuliani defended his father as "a complete man" who taught him the value of honesty, but the mayor refused to address questions about his father's alleged criminal past.

"The details of his life died with him," the mayor said.

And they almost stayed that way.

Barrett said a source told him the elder Giuliani had spent time behind bars, but the author couldn't find city court records documenting it.

Barrett eventually looked in the 1934 state prison archives in Albany and discovered a single sheet — a Sing Sing Prison receiving blotter — that listed Harold Giuliani at the top of the page. On the next line, Barrett found the key to the story: Harold Giuliani's alias, Joseph Starrett.

Barrett then found all the New York court records under the name Starrett. Initial excerpts of the book appeared in Talk magazine and in this week's Voice; another excerpt was released yesterday.

According to the book, Giuliani's cousin Lewis D'Avanzo was known as "Steve the Blond" and listed as armed and dangerous in FBI bulletins. His criminal record included a 10-year federal sentence for the armed hijacking of a truck loaded with $240,000 worth of mercury. The book alleges that he was suspected of taking part in several murders.

D'Avanzo was gunned down by the FBI in October 1977, when he tried to run down an agent after being stopped on a warrant that accused him and two associates of transporting 100 stolen luxury cars.

Quoting an unnamed friend of D'Avanzo, the book describes a 1962 shootout pitting a local mobster against the mayor's father and Leo D'Avanzo, Lewis D'Avanzo's father.

The book says Leo was later sanctioned by mob bosses for shooting at a Mafia member.

Born two years apart, Giuliani and his cousin attended the same elementary and high schools, but Giuliani's father forbade the two from spending much time together. Giuliani met D'Avanzo's wife, Lois, only once — at the mayor's first wedding, to Regina Peruggi, the book says.

The book says Leo D'Avanzo, who was known in family circles as a black sheep, ran loansharking and gambling operations out of a Brooklyn bar where Giuliani's father worked as a bartender.

In his role as debt collector, his father "broke legs, smashed kneecaps, crunched noses," the book says.

Leo D'Avanzo left town after the shootout, and gave the bar to Harold Giuliani, the book said.

Based on interviews with family members, the book also claims that Joan Ellen D'Avanzo, a cousin who at one time lived with Giuliani when he was a youngster, became a drug addict who was beaten to death in 1973 at age 34. Her cause of death was listed as undetermined, but several family members said she was murdered.

NOTE: When PNTV's John Lee special ordered this book from Borders Books, it was printed with pages backwards and upside down.


9/11 On Trial

London Daily Mirror - Towers that fell 'like a controlled demolition'. Planes that vanished then mysteriously reappeared, and crucial evidence that has been lost for ever.

In the Pentagon, a top secret team drew up a plan to simultaneously send up two airliners painted and numbered exactly the same, one from a civil airport in America, the other from a secret military airbase nearby.

The one from the airport would have military personnel on board who had checked in as ordinary passengers under false names.

The one from the airbase would be an empty drone, a remote-controlled unmanned aircraft.

Somewhere along their joint flight paths, the passenger-carrying plane would drop below radar height, and disappear, landing back at the airbase and unloading its occupants in secret. Meanwhile, the drone would have taken up the other plane's designated course. High over the island of Cuba, it would be exploded in mid-air after broadcasting an international distress call that it was under attack from enemy fighters.

The world would be told that a plane load of blameless American holidaymakers had been deliberately shot down by Fidel Castro's Communists - and that the US had no choice but to declare war and topple his regime.

This Top Secret 'agent provocateur' plan - code named Operation Northwoods and revealed in official archives - dates from 1962 when the Cold War was at its height and was declassified in 2000.


Friendly Fire - U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba

"ABC News - May 1, 2001 - Operation NORTHWOODS may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. Operation Northwoods had called for nothing less than the launch of a secret campaign of terrorism within the United States in order to blame Castro and provoke a war with Cuba." —James Bamford

"In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.

Code named Operation NORTHWOODS, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities. The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.

America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years. The Joint Chiefs at the time were headed by Eisenhower appointee Army Gen. Lyman L. Lemnitzer, who, with the signed plans in hand made a pitch to McNamara on March 13, 1962, recommending Operation Northwoods be run by the military.

Whether the Joint Chiefs' plans were rejected by McNamara in the meeting is not clear. But three days later, President Kennedy told Lemnitzer directly there was virtually no possibility of ever using overt force to take Cuba, Bamford reports. Within months, Lemnitzer would be denied another term as chairman and transferred to another job.

Ironically, the documents came to light, says Bamford, in part because of the 1992 Oliver Stone film JFK, which examined the possibility of a conspiracy behind the assassination of President Kennedy. "The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford."

VIDEO - Operation Northwoods - James Bamford from ABC News


Operation Northwoods

"We could blow up a drone (unmannded) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. The presense of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The US could follow with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existant crew.

Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.

We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States.

Use of MIG-type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping, and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type palnes would be useful. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce that fact. Hijacking attampts against US civil air and surface craft should be encouraged. It is possible to create an incident which would demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civilian airliner from the United States.

An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be subsituted for the actual civil aircraft and the passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases.

The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rondevous. From the rondevous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly to an auxiliary airfield at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.

Meanwhile the drone aircraft will continue to fly the filed flight plan. The drone will be transmitting on the international distress frequency "MAY DAY" message stating it is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by the destruction of aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow IACO radio stations to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.

It is possible to create an incident that will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly Tail-end Charlie. While near the Cuban island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. This pilot would then fly at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary.

The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who performed the mission under an alias would resume his proper identity. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.

A submarine or small craft would distribute F-101 parts, parachute, etc. The pilots retuning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found." — Jewish Zionist General L.L. Lemnitzer, chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff at Pentagon, Memo to Secretary of War Robert McNamara - Subject: Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba - Operation NORTHWOODS, March 13, 1962

(declassifed in 2000)


Sept. 11 plaintiffs wait for answers, resolution( with Trillion dollar class action against members of Bush Gang's Carlyle Group)

BOSTON GLOBE - Nearly 5 years later, lawsuits are stalled.

In the aftermath of Sept. 11, 2001, a tiny percentage of people who lost loved ones or were injured in the attacks sued the aviation industry, spurning a federal compensation fund that ultimately distributed more than $7 billion to more than 5,500 victims.

Now, nearly five years after the historic disaster, roughly 60 lawsuits are still grinding their way through court. And the families pushing ahead with litigation, including numerous New Englanders, are mired in a massive legal case that has become a complicated behemoth for the federal judge overseeing it.

``I've never been in any litigation more frustrating than this," said Frank H. Granito, Jr., a New York lawyer who represents the family of an American Flight 11 passenger and several insurance companies in the matter.

The case pits those who consider the day's events an unpreventable tragedy against others who believe government and aviation officials ignored clear warnings that such an assault was possible. That lapse, in their view, led to the deaths of beloved friends and relatives, and they now want accountability and answers.

For some litigants, their decision to sue was met by public disapproval from skeptics who questioned their motives and dismissed their quest for justice as futile. But in interviews with the Globe, many family members said they are committed to pursuing the case until government, airline, and security officials are held responsible for their roles in the attacks. And they are aware that litigation is a gamble that could produce neither answers nor money, they said.

The New York-based case has been slowed by the federal government's sweeping refusal to release materials on aviation security, outraging lawyers for both sides. It has also been stalled by the South Carolina law firm Motley Rice, which made billions suing the tobacco industry and represents 53 victims in the case, or nearly 60 percent of all plaintiffs. Its clients include the families of Flight 11 pilot Captain John Ogonowski of Dracut, crew member Madeline Sweeney of Acton, Rhode Island native David Angell, creator of the sitcom ``Frasier," and many high-earning New England executives.

``Right now we have it under a magnifying glass, and it's impossible to really determine whether what Motley Rice is doing is a good or a bad thing," said Margaret Ogonowski, a mother of three who was widowed in the attacks, adding that she feels ``well treated by the firm."

``Motley is driving a new course," she said, ``and we have to step back and examine it when it's all finished to make a better determination as to whether they did a good job or maybe they botched it."

While other lawyers have resolved most or all of their cases -- at least 32 of the roughly 90 total lawsuits have settled -- Motley Rice has settled only three. Of the cases left to settle, all but 7 are being handled by Motley Rice, whose founding partner, Ronald L. Motley, said in an interview that his clients ``won't take cheap early money."

The firm is advancing to trial, where it says it can win jury awards larger than the settlements being offered and expose systemic failures that allowed the attacks to take place.

Waiting for a trial date

Motley Rice has maintained its stance despite repeated urgings to settle by US District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, who so far has denied requests by Motley Rice and other firms to schedule a trial. Hellerstein has also chastised Motley Rice, pledged to prevent ``rewarding holdouts who prefer to settle later rather than earlier in the hope that they might be able to use leverage to gain additional funds later on," and warned that not settling could mean ``you will not only be litigating for my lifetime but your grandchildren's lifetime."

Still, many of the firm's clients say they sued not for financial gain, but because they believe litigation will fully reveal whether government and aviation officials could have anticipated and prevented the events of Sept. 11. Some also sued because life insurance and other ``offsets" would have reduced their payments from the compensation fund, which awarded $2 million in death cases and $400,000 in injury cases, on average.

``We did not join this lawsuit or choose to sue for monetary reward," said Carie Lemack, whose mother, Judy Larocque of Framingham, chief executive of a market research firm, died on Flight 11, which originated in Boston. ``It was always about accountability and it remains about accountability today, because reforms that are desperately needed are not happening."

``You only settle when it's appropriate to settle, and if other families felt they needed to settle I can't judge that," said Lemack. ``For people who've chosen not to settle, I completely respect their decision and think the judge owes them a trial date. They deserve that. We deserve that."

Lemack and other plaintiffs reject suggestions that, by suing, they have prolonged an emotional ordeal that delays closure, strains families, presents unknown risks, and potentially enriches the lawyers representing them -- without a guarantee that they will find what they are searching for.

``If by litigating you're looking for answers, you might be disappointed," said Faith R. Arter, board president of the Massachusetts 9/11 Fund, founded to support people who lost loved ones in the attacks. ``Litigation's just not fun, and my real concern is emotional: How much more can you bear? But I want the families to get some peace out of the process, and if that has to be in a trial I support it."

According to several lawyers and plaintiffs in the case, Motley Rice has made unusually high settlement demands, often 5 to 10 times higher than similar plane crash cases. The higher demands stem from Motley's calculations for what it calls ``terror damages" -- compensation for the amount of time frightened victims knew they were fated to die -- of between $750,000 and $1 million a minute, according to those lawyers and clients, who requested that their names not be used because the settlement process is confidential.

Passengers aboard the airliners hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001, are believed to have known for as long as 46 minutes that death was imminent.

``I can tell you categorically we're not saying a minute is worth X or Y," said Donald A. Migliori, a Motley Rice partner. ``But, yeah, we probably value them differently because this is a very different case for us. We are adamant about getting value that is appropriate and reasonable and will stand review by courts of appeal, and whatever that number is, we're going to get it, by verdict or settlement -- and these defendants know we're not bluffing."

Migliori declined to disclose exact valuations, but said some of the firm's demands are ``past the eight-figure number" because the victims had extremely high incomes. Motley Rice will receive part of any settlements or verdicts reached.

Migliori and Motley also vowed to keep fighting for information that the Transportation Security Administration has tried to keep secret, such as airport security measures in effect before September 2001. TSA has also tried to bar plaintiff lawyers from conducting live depositions and to prevent them from hearing responses to their questions.

`Not going to settle'

Depositions of several airline and security company executives, as well as airport security screeners, begin Sept. 11 -- a date some family members criticize as insensitive -- and will be the first test of the Transportation Security Administration's proposed restrictions.

``We are driven to keep pushing for information about what happened, and when that is resolved only then will we stop," said Migliori, who insists Motley Rice is ready to try cases despite the administration's roadblocks.

There are risks to pushing toward trial. The consolidated case encompasses a wide array of claims for deaths, injuries, property damage, and insurance matters, but Hellerstein is trying to settle the death and injury cases first because, he has said, ``these are not just dry negotiations. Lives with extraordinary potential have been wiped out."

However, if Hellerstein senses settlement talks are fatally stalled, he could open settlement negotiations in the property claims for buildings damaged in the attacks, estimated at up to $50 billion, which could rapidly exhaust the roughly $10 billion to $20 billion total insurance coverage in the case. If the cases don't settle and a trial takes place, he has the legal power to reduce an outsized jury verdict.

Motley Rice lawyers say they are unruffled by those possibilities.

``We're not holding out to get more money, and we're not looking for the attention to be drawn to Motley Rice. We're representing our clients and trying to achieve our goals," Migliori said.

Mediations, led by New York attorney Sheila L. Birnbaum, continue this week and could spur additional settlements, as could the depositions of aviation officials slated to begin next month.

If the parties reach a stalemate in some cases, Hellerstein will have to decide whether to end settlement talks and schedule trials, or perhaps a single trial, for whatever cases are unresolved.

Motley, for his part, said depositions ``most certainly will turn out to be meaningless because of the irrational position of the federal government" on, for example, not releasing pre-9/11 security policies. A trial could be inevitable, he said, if certain clients refuse to accept settlements.

``All of these cases aren't going to settle," Motley said. ``They are absolutely not going to settle. My clients have a right to decide to end this, and as long as I've got a client who says, `I don't want their blood money; I want accountability through a jury verdict,' no force on earth can change that."

Motley, who had not handled an aviation case before Sept. 11, is critical of what he describes as ``the cozy relationship between plaintiff lawyers and defense lawyers that exists in the aviation bar after decades of inbred litigating."

Other firms, Motley said, have settled 9/11 cases for ``magnitudes less" than their clients deserved. ``There was an extraordinary system breakdown and an extraordinary failure of aviation security," he added, ``so they ought to have to pay the maximal damages, not the minimal."

The judge has repeatedly prodded Motley Rice to push aggressively for settlements.

``Why aren't you settling your cases?" Hellerstein said to Migliori at a June 8 hearing in US District Court in New York.

``We're working on it," Migliori replied.

``You're not working hard enough. Ms. Birnbaum [the mediator] tells me she is getting no response from you. . . . Tell your colleagues that the judge is getting very impatient with this."

``I will," Migliori said.

``And will not put up with more delay," Hellerstein added. ``There's much too much delay that has gone by and much too much work to be done in this case. I will not tolerate it."

`They're doing a service' In addition to settling three of its cases, Motley Rice is now in ``striking range" on about five others and ``there's optimism on both sides that those numbers can be bridged," Migliori said.

Lawyers for American and United airlines, who are defendants in the case, declined to comment and did not return requests for comment, respectively.

Motley Rice, one of the country's largest plaintiff litigation firms, may be best known for helping the states win a $246 billion settlement from the tobacco industry. The firm has turned the Sept. 11 attacks into a business opportunity, establishing a ``9/11 and antiterrorism" legal practice and hiring Mary F. Schiavo, former inspector general of the US Department of Transportation, in 2003.

Several Motley Rice clients said they have a practical view of the firm's stake in the Sept. 11 cases.

``Of course they're in it for the money," said Loretta Filipov of Concord, whose husband, Alexander, was on Flight 11. ``But they're also doing a service for the country, they're doing a service for the people."

``It's never been about the money," Filipov said of her decision to file a lawsuit. ``There was never any question I'd take money from the government. This was about answers."

August 20, 2006

Motley Crew - Trillion dollar lawsuit sues members of Bush Gang's Carlyle Group for perping the 911 terrorist massacres in USA, and extorts Pirate News TV to shut down its websites

Knoxville Tennessee lawfirm sues members of Bush Gang's Carlyle Group for perping 9/11 terror massacres. - Bush Crime Family trial lawyer James "Go Ahead And Invade Kuwait Mr Saddam" Baker is the Carlyle defense lawyer defending the alleged Arab terrorists. Jewish terrorists who trained the alleged 911 Arab hijackers make second assassination attempt to murder Knoxville lawyers JD Lee and judicial candidate David Lee on Motley 911 dream Team?

Knoxville Tennessee lawfirm sues Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the British Empire's White House staff using RICO Act for perping narcoterror bombing massacre - Bush Sr and CIA confessed they perped the terror bombing of a press conference that killed US journalists in La Penca, Nicaragua, as part of their cocaine trafficking and treasonous terrorist operation. Knoxville lawyer JD Lee was on the Dream Team of 100 trial lawyers for Christic Institute that started the Iran-Contra trials and convictions of Bush Sr's White House staff. Lee took the deposition of US ambassador Lewis Tambs, who was expelled by Costa Rica for using his diplomatic immunity and the US embassy for narcoterrorism by importing cocaine into USA

911 families use RICO Act to sue Bush Crime Family for perping the treasonous 911 terror bombings in USA - Numerous lawsuits filed in US District Courts accuse Bush Jr and Sr and their White House staff for orchestrating the 911 terror massacres in USA as fraudulent pretext to invade Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Iran

911ForTheTruth.com - 911 families use RICO Act to sue Bush Crime Family for perping the treasonous 911 terror bombings in USA. Lawfirm posts court documents from East Coast lawsuits filed in US District Courts

SueTheTerrorists.net - 911 families sue Bush Crime Family for perping the treasonous 911 terror bombings in USA. Lawfirm posts court documents from West Coast lawsuits filed in US District Courts

911 widow Ellen Mariani shares her letter to terrorist President Bush Jr who she sued under RICO Act for perping the 911 Massacres - Mariani tells how JEB Bush illegally seized the business records of Jewish Huffman Aviation that trained the elleged 911 Arab hijackers in Florida, which is the same Jewish narcoterrorists now running Knoxville's McGhee Tyson International Airport

Ellen Mariani - RICO Suit Against Bush - A condensed talk given by Ellen Mariani and her lawyer Phil Berg about their RICO suit against the Bush Administration, seeking the truth about 9/11

Ellen Mariani - RICO Suit Against Bush - "I was disgusted how the 9-11 Commission were yawning, closing their eyes, looking around... they didn't care to be there."

Ellen Mariani - RICO Suit Against Bush - A condensed talk given by Ellen Mariani and her lawyer Phil Berg about their RICO suit against the Bush Administration, seeking the truth about 9/11. Regardless of what you think happened and who was responsible for 9-11, to hear how this widow was treated while Bush flew the Saudis and Bin Ladens out of USA should be enough to make any American mad! Lawsuit documents online at Geocities.com/ForTheTruth911

William Rodriguez in WTC on 9/11 - A 20-year employee at one of the World Trade Center buildings hit on September 11, 2001, Rodriguez risked his life in saving many people and was honored for his heroism. And then Rodriguez testified in closed session to the official 9-11 commission about explosions in the sub-basements before the plane hit. Rodriguez sued President George Bush Jr under the RICO Act for perping the 9/11 Massacres. By INNWorld Report. Phil Berg is his lawyer, formerly with Ellen Mariani

"'Enterprise' means any individual, sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, business trust, union chartered under the laws of this state, or other legal entity, or any unchartered union, association or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity, and it includes illicit as well as licit enterprises, AND GOVERNMENTAL, as well as other, entities."
—Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), TN CODE 39-12-203 (state RICO Act) and US CODE TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 96, Sec. 1961 (federal RICO Act) ("The Enterprise" was the name that the Bush Crime Family called its Iran-Contra narcoterrorist bombing crime spree)


Representative Of Largest 9/11 Families Group Says Government Complicit In Attack

The representative of the largest group of 9/11 families says that the official version of events is a fallacy and that the NORAD stand down and evidence of incendiary devices used to bring down the towers amount to government complicity in the attacks - a conclusion shared by half of the 9/11 families he represents.

Bill Doyle heads the Coalition of 9/11 Families and lost his own son Joey in the collapse of the twin towers.

"If you want to believe what they want to snow you under on like the 9/11 Commission - that's a total fallacy," said Doyle.

"The continuing cover-up is beyond belief," Doyle told GCN radio host Alex Jones.

Doyle questioned why WTC steel that was withheld from NIST for examination for explosives was used instead to build a battleship.

"Isn't it amazing how they got it out of this country within days," said Doyle as he addressed the cover-up of the physical evidence from a crime scene.

Doyle said he had personally talked to six different individuals who were at the World Trade Center site and described incendiary devices before the collapse of the towers.

"It's documented proof that tower 7 was not hit by a plane yet it goes up in flames then the owner of the place Larry Silverstein himself ordered it to be pulled at 4 o'clock that afternoon and all of a sudden it exploded straight down."

"We have two planes fly into the towers and all of a sudden they get blown up within an hour and a half - that's impossible," said Doyle.

Doyle estimated that around half of the family members his organization represents think that there was government complicity in the attacks.

"It looks like there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 if you really look at all the facts - a lot of families now feel the same way."

"Where was NORAD," asked Doyle as he highlighted the implausible gap between the known hijacking times of Flight 93 and Flight 77 and their eventual destruction.

"It was called a step-down - don't do anything - let it happen."

"From everything I look at I'm sure there was a lot of complicity - in the least there had to be a lot of complicity - if you read all the facts there's no way that nineteen hijackers carried out this mission," Doyle told Jones.

Doyle also spoke out on establishment charities withholding large portions of donations from 9/11 families and how 9/11 whistleblowers have been punished meanwhile individuals who facilitated the attacks were rewarded.

Prison Planet.tv members can hear this entire interview by clicking here.

July 8, 2006

CoalitionOf911Families.org


Father Of 9/11 Victim Says Government Ran Attack

Emotional shell game accusation of 'disgracing victim's memories' doesn't jive anymore.

Another 9/11 family member has gone public to rubbish the conspiracy theory that the attacks were planned and executed by nineteen incompetent Arabs with box cutters who were getting drunk in a strip club the night before and barely even made it to the airport on time. Meanwhile, hit pieces against the 9/11 truth movement continue in the lead up to the fifth anniversary of the event.

A familiar emotional shell game on the part of the debunkers is to proclaim that questioning any aspect of 9/11 disgraces the memory of the victims. This tactic is clearly not working anymore especially in light of the fact that Bill Doyle, representative of the largest group of 9/11 family members - says that half now completely distrust the official version of events.

Bob McIlvaine's son Bobby was working for Merrill Lynch in the 103rd floor of the south tower when Flight 175 struck. He was likely one of the unfortunate individuals who obeyed the Port Authority's ridiculous order for workers to stay in the building and not evacuate even after Flight 11 had ploughed into the north tower.

McIlvaine is convinced that the attacks were an inside job orchestrated by elements within the US government.

"Today, there are no ifs or buts in my mind that this was an inside job. The US government orchestrated it with the help of MI6 and Pakistan and Mossad. What they are telling us is bullshit. The hijackers were patsies and Osama bin Laden was set up," McIlvaine told the London Independent.

McIlvaine has since devoted his life to educating others on what really happened on 9/11.

Despite the best efforts of Jewish American Adam Yehiye Gadahn "converting" to Islam and joining the AllCIAduh AllMossaduh terrorist gang to propagandize the reality of the Al-Qaeda myth, Americans are becoming increasingly skeptical of 9/11 and if the recent rash of hit pieces against the 9/11 truth movement are anything to go by, the establishment is stricken with concern. ("Al-Qaeda" is translated and defined as "The Database" computer file of CIA employees in Afghanistan.)

There were another two major 9/11 semi-debunking pieces over the weekend, one in the San Francisco Chronicle and one in Reuters. Expect a deluge of them for the next two weeks as the five year anniversary comes to pass.

The most incongruous sentence from the Chronicle piece is where CIA involvement in 9/11 is characterized as "the epitome of preposterous beliefs that start with a conclusion and work backward to find evidence."

Wasn't it media talking heads and government officials in the hours after the attacks who were reading off the same script and ascribing blame to Bin Laden with no substantiating evidence? Did they then not present alleged "evidence" to work backward to the already pre-determined conclusion? So-called evidence that is insufficient to federally indict Bin Laden for involvement in 9/11 five years after the attack - despite the fact that it took less than three months to indict him for the 1998 embassy bombings. Then the US Govt allowed all of the convicted USS Cole bombers to escape from maximum security prison.

September 4, 2006


AlCIAduh means "SHIT" in Arabic

PRISON PLANET - Existence of "Al-Qaeda" is Crap; quite literally. Did Osama really choose to name his terror network after potty humor or was it a computer database he used to chat with his CIA handlers?

The origins of the name "Al-Qaeda," and its real arabic connotations prove that every time the Bush administration, Fox News, or any individual who cites the threat of "Al-Qaeda," as a mandate for war and domestic authoritarianism, they are propagating the myth that such a group ever existed.

An organization by the name of "Al-Qaeda" does not exist and has never existed outside a falsely coined collective term for offshoot loose knit terror cells, the majority of which are guided by the Pakistani ISI, Mossad, the Saudis, MI6 and the CIA, that were created in response to America's actions after 9/11 - as the recent NIE report shows.

According to the BBC documentary The Power of Nightmares, the infamous footage of Bin Laden marching around with armed soldiers was a ruse on the part of Osama himself, graciously propagated by the lapdog press, in which actors were hired off the streets, given uniforms and guns and told to look aggressive.

Note the video states Bin Laden only took on the Al-Qaeda mantle post-9/11 after the U.S. government began parroting the term. The only error is the now debunked myth that 9/11 was carried out by "Al-Qaeda."

So if the group doesn't exist, where did the name come from?

You have heard before that "Al-Qaeda" roughly translates into "the base," but were you aware that "Ana raicha Al Qaeda" is arabic colloquial for "I'm going to the toilet"?

Would hardened terrorists hell bent on the destruction of the west name their organization after a euphemism for taking a shit?

The truth about where the name "Al-Qaeda" originated explains why no would-be fundamentalist suicide martyr could have been involved in its creation.

Former Leader of the House of Commons Robin Cook, who admirably resigned in protest of the 2003 Iraq invasion, penned a piece in the London Guardian shortly before his death that shed light on the true genesis of the name.

"Al-Qaida," states Cook, "literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians."

Former French Military Intelligence official Pierre Henry Bunel expands, noting that "Al-Qaeda," was an early form of intranet, which was used by Islamic nations and influential families to communicate with each other. It was also used by the "American agent," Osama bin Laden to send coded or covert messages back to his CIA handlers from Afghanistan.

It's worthy to conclude with Bunel's assertion that "Al-Qaeda" as an organization is about as genuine as George W. Bush's Texas brush clearing cowboy image.

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the 'TV watcher' to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money."

October 6 2006

The Next Stage of the 9/11 Truth Movement - Bill Moyer, author of Doing Democracy The MAP Model for Organizing Social Movements, a strategist for Martin Luther King, Jr. who had been organizing and empowering activists for forty years, was with us. He taught that all social movements have been about the struggle between power-holders and the rest of us, that societal myths allow power-holders to maintain their position, and that exposing their secret violation of those myths, ideals, values is a catalyst for social change.


9/11 Conspiracy Factorists Gather in NY

LOS ANGELES TIMES - The scattered movement has mainly gained steam on the Internet, but before the anniversary of the attacks, activists make their voices heard.

Striding into Washington Square Park with a fistful of photocopied circulars and an earnest expression, Eric Williams could have been an environmental canvasser or a hip missionary. In fact, he is a pastry chef — or was until last week, when he quit his job to devote himself full time to proving that the World Trade Center attack was ordered not by terrorists but by officials in the U.S. government.

Williams approached a pushcart vendor from Bangladesh: "Do you believe the official story, that Osama bin Laden and 19 hijackers took down the towers?"

"Yes," said the vendor.

Williams moved on to a Dominican woman. "Do you believe the government allowed the attacks to happen?"

The woman smiled, baffled, and asked her 10-year-old daughter to translate. "Do you believe Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks?" he asked the girl. The child shrugged expressively.

But he hit pay dirt with Nikolaos Vitoroulis, a freshman engineering student at Stevens Institute of Technology who was in the eighth grade at the time of the attacks. Vitoroulis, 18, said he had never believed a fire could cause a building to collapse that way, into its own footprint. The hijacked-plane scenario, he said, "seems a little fishy."

As New York readied for another anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, conspiracy theorists and researchers who belong to a group known as the 9/11 Truth Movement gathered in Greenwich Village. Among them were proponents of the "LIHOP" theory, who believe that members of the government "let it happen on purpose," and the "MIHOP" theory, who hold that government officials "made it happen on purpose."

Polls show that many Americans distrust the government on the subject of Sept. 11. A Zogby International poll taken in May found that 42% believed the government concealed evidence that contradicts official accounts. A Scripps Howard-Ohio University poll taken in August found that 36% believed it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials allowed the attacks to occur because "they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East."

The theories — especially the notion that the towers fell in a controlled demolition — have become widespread enough to prompt official responses.

Last week, Brigham Young University announced that physics professor Steven E. Jones, co-chairman of the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth, would be put on indefinite leave while authorities investigated his claims that the buildings were intentionally demolished using explosives.

"Culturally, as a society, it becomes unhealthy," said Christopher Farrell of the conservative think tank Judicial Watch, which successfully filed suit against the government seeking the release of a video showing American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon. The think tank was hoping to put to rest beliefs that the explosion was caused by a missile.

"If an individual demonstrated this sort of behavior, medical health professionals would recommend they treat it," said Farrell, a former military intelligence officer and the organization's director of investigations and research. "There's healthy skepticism, and then there's unhealthy."

This weekend's gathering in New York drew together strands of a scattered movement that has, until now, gained steam principally through the Internet.

There was radio host and activist Ralph Schoenman, who, during the course of a dizzying two-hour speech Friday, said that "not only was Mohamed Atta monitored by Mossad and the CIA, but he was being run by German intelligence," and that Hurricane Katrina "had been on the drawing board for years" as a way to "de-concentrate population" in inner cities.

There was Harvey Newman, a retired market researcher, who wrote a Caribbean-influenced "9/11 Truth" anthem ("Was the Pentagon building hit by an air-o-plane?/ And if it wasn't, please can you explain?")

There was Korey Rowe, 23, an Iraq war veteran from upstate New York who helped produce the documentary "Loose Change," which has been viewed online 10 million times. His baseball cap twisted backward, Rowe warned the audience about "agents provocateurs" who may have infiltrated the group in advance of anniversary events at ground zero. "We need to identify them now, and we need to remove them," he said.

A man in his 30s, conservatively dressed and soft-spoken, said he told almost no one about his attendance at 9/11 Truth meetings — not his co-workers at a corporate law firm and not his girlfriend. "It's considered part of the loony left," he said. "I'm very careful. I tell people who love me and will accept me for what I am."

For Williams, the former chef who lives in Duxbury, Mass., his fascination with the events of Sept. 11 grew so intense over the last two years that making pastries seemed pointless, then unbearable. He broke up with his girlfriend and now devotes six to eight hours a day to researching and writing, and hosts an Internet radio show and website. He has just sold the German and Turkish rights to two of his books, "The Puzzle of 9/11" and "9/11 101."

Europeans are always interested, he said. Engaging New Yorkers is more challenging. After an hour, he and his team left the park, drained.

Behind them, holding the Sept. 11 pamphlets, were three friends in their 20s. They were sitting on a wall in the sun, resting after a film shoot.

"At first, I thought, 'Oh, my God, a kook,' " said Shelley Rogers, 26, a graduate student in education at New York University.

But her friend Antonio Cisneros, 20, was fascinated.

"I think they're too extreme for me," he said, "but there are a lot of questions that need to be asked." He said he was glad someone was doing it.

Asked if they believed the government would murder Americans for strategic reasons, all three, without pausing, said yes.

September 10, 2006


The Disbelievers - 9/11 Conspiracy Factorists Are Building Their Case Against the Government From Ground Zero

WASHINGTON POST - He felt no shiver of doubt in those first terrible hours.

He watched the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and assumed al-Qaeda had wreaked terrible vengeance. He listened to anchors and military experts and assumed the facts of Sept. 11, 2001, were as stated on the screen.

It was a year before David Ray Griffin, an eminent liberal theologian and philosopher, began his stroll down the path of disbelief. He wondered why Bush listened to a child's story while the nation was attacked and how Osama bin Laden, America's Public Enemy No. 1, escaped in the mountains of Tora Bora.

He wondered why 110-story towers crashed and military jets failed to intercept even one airliner. He read the 9/11 Commission report with a swell of anger. Contradictions were ignored and no military or civilian official was reprimanded, much less cashiered.

"To me, the report read as a cartoon." White-haired and courtly, Griffin sits on a couch in a hotel lobby in Manhattan, unspooling words in that reasonable Presbyterian minister's voice. "It's a much greater stretch to accept the official conspiracy story than to consider the alternatives."

Such as?

"There was massive complicity in this attack by U.S. government operatives."

If that feels like a skip off the cliff of established reality, more Americans are in free fall than you might guess. There are few more startling measures of American distrust of leaders than the widespread belief that the Bush administration had a hand in the attacks of Sept. 11 in order to spark an invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.

A recent Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll of 1,010 Americans found that 36 percent suspect the U.S. government promoted the attacks or intentionally sat on its hands. Sixteen percent believe explosives brought down the towers. Twelve percent believe a cruise missile hit the Pentagon.

Distrust percolates more strongly near Ground Zero. A Zogby International poll of New York City residents two years ago found 49.3 percent believed the government "consciously failed to act."

You could dismiss this as a louder than usual howl from the CIA-controls-my-thoughts-through-the-filling-in-my-molar crowd. Establishment assessments of the believers tend toward the psychotherapeutic. Many academics, politicians and thinkers left, right and center say the conspiracy theories are a case of one plus one equals five. It's a piling up of improbabilities.

Thomas Eager, a professor of materials science at MIT, has studied the collapse of the twin towers. "At first, I thought it was amazing that the buildings would come down in their own footprints," Eager says. "Then I realized that it wasn't that amazing -- it's the only way a building that weighs a million tons and is 95 percent air can come down."

But the chatter out there is loud enough for the National Institute of Standards and Technology to post a Web "fact sheet" poking holes in the conspiracy theories and defending its report on the towers.

Yeah, as if . . .

The loose agglomeration known as the "9/11 Truth Movement" has stopped looking for truth from the government. As cacophonous and free-range a bunch of conspiracists anywhere this side of Guy Fawkes, they produce hip-hop inflected documentaries and scholarly conferences. The Web is their mother lode. Every citizen is a researcher. There's nothing like a triple, Google-fed epiphany lighting up the laptop at 2:44 a.m.

Did you see that the CIA met with bin Laden in a hospital room in Dubai? Check out this Pakistani site, there are really weird doings in Baluchistan . . .

The academic wing is led by Griffin, who founded the Center for a Postmodern World at Claremont University; James Fetzer, a tenured philosopher at the University of Minnesota (Fetzer's an old hand in JFK assassination research); and Daniel Orr, the retired chairman of the economics department at the University of Illinois. The movement's de facto minister of engineering is Steven Jones, a tenured physics professor at Brigham Young University, who's studied vectors and velocities and tested explosives and concluded that the collapse of the twin towers is best explained as controlled demolition, sped by a thousand pounds of high-grade thermite.

Former Reagan aide Barbara Honegger is a senior military affairs journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School in California. She's convinced, based on her freelance research, that a bomb went off about six minutes before an airplane hit the Pentagon -- or didn't hit it, as some believe the case may be. Catherine Austin Fitts served as assistant secretary of housing in the first President Bush's administration and gained a fine reputation as a fraud buster; David Bowman was chief of advanced space programs under presidents Ford and Carter. Fitts and Bowman agree that the "most unbelievable conspiracy" theory is the one retailed by the government.

Then there's Morgan O. Reynolds, appointed by George W. Bush as chief economist at the Labor Department. He left in 2002 and doesn't think much of his former boss; he describes President Bush as a "dysfunctional creep," not to mention a "possible war criminal."

You reach Reynolds at his country home in the hills of Arkansas. His favored rhetorical style is long paragraphs without obvious punctuation: "Who did it? Elements of our government and M-16 and the Mossad. The government's case is a laugh-out-loud proposition. They used patsies and lies and subterfuge and there's no way that Bush and Cheney could have invaded Iraq without the help of 9/11."

They are cantankerous and sometimes distrust each other -- who knows where the double agents lurk? But unreasonable questions resonate with the reasonable. Colleen Kelly's brother, a salesman, had breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on Sept. 11. After he died she founded September Eleventh Families for Peaceful Tomorrows to oppose the Iraq war. She lives in the Bronx and gives a gingerly embrace to the conspiracy crowd.

"Sometimes I listen to them and I think that's sooooo outlandish and bizarre," she says. "But that day had such disastrous geopolitical consequences. If David Ray Griffin asks uncomfortable questions and points out painful discrepancies? Good for him."

Griffin's book, "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11," never reviewed in a major U.S. newspaper, sold more than 100,000 copies and became a movement founding stone. Last year he traveled through New England, giving speeches in whitewashed churches and gymnasiums. He came to West Hartford, Conn., on a rainy autumn evening. Four hundred mostly middle-aged and upper-middle-class doctors and lawyers, teachers and social workers sat waiting.

Griffin took the podium and laid down his ideas with calm and cool. He concluded:

"It is already possible to know beyond a reasonable doubt one very important thing: The destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by domestic terrorists," he says. "The welfare of our republic and perhaps even the survival of our civilization depend on getting the truth about 9/11 exposed."

The audience rose and applauded for more than a minute.

"Reality is a thin line between denial and paranoia." - Author unknown, but often quoted by the 9/11 truth movement

"Me?" You've asked the Rev. Frank Morales, the bohemian Episcopalian minister with the hipster goatee, where he stands on the nature of the conspiracy. We're standing in the ancient graveyard of St. Mark's Church in the Bowery on Second Avenue. "I lean to LIHOP."

The 9/11 truthers share a lieutenant colonel's love of acronyms. They divide themselves into LIHOPS and MIHOPS and differences are not trifling. LIHOP stands for "Let It Happen On Purpose," which means someone inside the U.S. government intentionally let the terror conspiracy go. MIHOP means "Made It Happen On Purpose," and its gradations center on whether Bush was in or out of the loop (a surprising number believe he was clueless) and whether the Mossad or British intelligence was dealt into the deal.

Morales, 57, who came out of the Lower East Side housing projects, spent days at Ground Zero performing last rites for the dead, many little more than a collection of body parts.

"I didn't presume to know who did it," he says. "There was a lot of shucking and jiving. I wonder at what point massive incompetence crosses over into negligent homicide."

To make sense of the truth movement's anger, you need to hit the rewind button to early 2001, with the hindsight of today. There was, as the 9/11 Commission hearings made clear, a bad moon rising. Warnings kept coming of a "high probability" of a "spectacular" terrorist attack. A national security adviser warned Condoleezza Rice there were terrorist cells, probably al-Qaeda guys, in the country. CIA chief George Tenet said the "system was blinking red."

A presidential bulletin on Aug. 6 had a catchy title: "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S." Bush did not discuss it again with Tenet before Sept. 11.

So give the truth movement, many of whom are based in New York City, their props. They may be paranoid, but something nasty came our way. They pore over the paper trail with a Sherlock Holmesian intensity, alert to intriguing discrepancy.

Such as:

Former transporation secretary Norman Mineta told the commission he arrived in the presidential operations center -- under the White House -- at 9:20 a.m. on Sept. 11 and found Vice President Cheney. When an aide asked Cheney about the hijacked plane fast approaching the Pentagon, Mineta says the vice president snapped that the "orders still stand." Mineta assumed the orders were to shoot the plane down. Conspiracy theorists interpret this to mean: Don't shoot it down.

Cheney later said he was not in the operations center until after the plane hit. The commission never mentioned Mineta's contradictory version.

In September 2001, NORAD generals said they learned of the hijackings in time to scramble fighter jets. But the government recently released tapes claiming to show the FAA did not tell the military about the hijackings until three of the four planes had crashed.

That would mean the FAA repeatedly lied. It would also mean, as Griffin points out, that the entire military chain of command stayed quiet about huge inaccuracies for four years "even though . . . the true story would put the military in a better light."

More mysteries pile up. The 9/11 Commission says Flight 77 hit the Pentagon at 9:37. But Honegger says clocks stopped at the Pentagon at 9:32. Then there's the collapse of the twin towers, which Jones, the physics professor, timed at just short of free fall. Griffin cites firefighters, including a captain, who said in hearings and on tapes from that day that they saw flashes and heard the sound of explosions before the collapse.

"It's like the Nazi-facilitated Reichstag fire," Honegger says from her home in California. "They guided and secretly protected it to justify their global agenda."

Let's put aside the could-anyone-do-something-that-spectacularly-twisted? question and touch on practicalities. Isn't the problem with big ugly conspiracies -- from the Gulf of Tonkin to My Lai to the 1961 Pentagon plan to provoke a war by attacking Americans and blaming it on Castro -- that they are too big and ugly to keep secret?

Griffin shrugs. History is littered with government black-bag jobs. "How do you know they can't keep big secrets? Can you be sure you know what you don't know?"

There is a "morning after" quality to the conspiratorial romance. One moment you groove on the epiphanies and the next moment you're lost in a dull haze of "this cannot be a coincidence," "perhaps significantly" and "if so . . ."

What of incompetence? Or the raw absurdity of life? The truth movement makes much of a 2001 BBC report that a half-dozen of the hijackers were still alive. They mention Waleed al Shehri, a pilot who still flies commercial runs in Morocco. But the BBC retracted that.

It turns out the live guy and the dead hijacker spelled their names differently.

Then there's the theory that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon and United 93 did not crash in Shanksville, Pa. But, like, what happened to the passengers? (Among the passengers on Flight 77 was Barbara Olson, wife of former U.S. solicitor general Ted Olson).

"Why should any of us know where it went?" Griffin says. "It could have been it crashed in Kentucky. We don't need a theory where it went."

Chip Berlet, senior analyst at Political Research Associates, a Boston-based left-leaning think tank, is no fan of the 9/11 Commission. He believes a serious investigation should have led to indictments and the firing of incompetent generals and civilian officials.

But he has no patience with the conspiracy theorists.

"They don't do their homework; it's a kind of charlatanism," Berlet says over the phone. "They say there's no debris on the lawn in front of the Pentagon, but they base their analysis on a photo on the Internet . That's like analyzing an impressionist painting by looking at a postcard."

Now comes a loud sigh.

"I love 'The X-Files' but I don't base my research on it," he says. "My vision of hell is having to review these [conspiracy] books over and over again."

Let's move on to Eager of MIT. "Demolition experts say, 'Ohhh, it's all science and timing.' Bull!" Eager says. "What's the technique? If 200,000 tons gives way, where do you think it's going? Straight down."

In the days after Sept. 11, experts claimed temperatures reached 2,000 degrees on the upper floors. Others claimed steel melted. Nope. What happened, Eager says, is that jet fuel sloshed around and beams got rubbery.

"It's not too much to think that you could have some regions at 900 degrees and others at 1,200 degrees, and that will distort the beams."

The truth movement doesn't really care for Eager. A Web site casts a fisheye of suspicion at the professor and his colleagues. "Did the MIT have prior knowledge?" notes one chat room. "This is for sure another speculative topic . . . "

"It is no measure of health to be sane in an insane society." - Krishnamurti

Nico Haupt, a gaunt fellow in black sneakers, black socks, black jeans and black T-shirt, stands up in St. Mark's Church in the Bowery. He holds aloft two blue Oreos boxes taped to resemble the twin towers. A pen juts out, kind of like a Boeing airplane.

For an hour he's shown videos of planes hitting the towers. If you note the glinting sunlight and angle of wings and you're honest about vectors and maybe the hashish is kicking in, you'll realize there were no planes .

Truth movement veterans distance themselves from Haupt, who has a bit of a temper. But Reynolds, the former Labor Department economist, also is a "no-planer."

"There were no planes, there were no hijackers," Reynolds insists. "I know, I know, I'm out of the mainstream, but that's the way it is."

But what about all those New Yorkers who saw airplanes hitting the twin towers? A chuckle rumbles down the phone line. "I don't believe anyone in Lower Manhattan," he says. "You hire three dozen Actors' Equity dudes and they'll say anything ."

Some days the 9/11 truth movement resembles an Italian coalition government -- dissolution is a certainty. Honegger and Griffin believe bombs brought down the twin towers but have little truck with make-believe planes. There's a faction that says the Mossad did it and another that says that's insane, and maybe anti-Semitic.

Where are we going here? There's a Journal of 9/11 Studies, documentaries, CDs and DVDs. Is conspiracy thought getting codified?

"That's our worry, of course," Griffin says. "I want my life back. But how can I ignore that we have become entranced by demonic power, so focused on lust for wealth and control that almost anything becomes possible?"

You reach Honegger a few nights later. She'd like to give it up, too. "I am sitting here in my little office trying to figure out what happened to my country on this day. I wouldn't be a patriot if I didn't try to prove the government's story is preposterous."

September 9, 2006


Full house as leading 9-11 conspiracy factorist has his say

LONDON GUARDIAN - They call it the 9/11 for Truth Movement, and tonight those who believe the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon were carried out by the American government and not jihadist hijackers will gather in London's Conway Hall to listen to one of the biggest figures among a growing number of disbelievers.

Two days before the fifth anniversary of the attacks, David Ray Griffin, emeritus professor of philosophy of religion and theology at Claremont graduate university, and author of The New Pearl Harbor and The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, will ask his audience: "Was 9/11 an inside job?"

He will be joined on stage by the ex-MI5 officer David Shayler, who will introduce the talk, for which tickets have almost sold out. Prof Griffin is a founder member of the 9/11 Scholars for Truth movement in the US. He is joined by 75 academics who write in books, journals and essays that they have overwhelming evidence that shatters the official version of events on that September morning.

And it seems that a growing number of people are listening to them. A recent poll in the US found that 36% of Americans believed it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that their government was involved in allowing the attacks or had carried them out itself. There are many people in the UK who agree with them.

The theories as to what happened on that day, when almost 3,000 people were killed, differ but their unifying theme is that a neo-conservative cabal within the US government staged the events as a pretext to wage wars, become a dominant force in the world and establish "the new American century". The attacks, it is said, were not carried out by al-Qaida terrorists but were a "false flag" event used to justify invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

Films have been made on the subject, websites show countless images that "back up" the claims, chatrooms are screaming with conspiracists and there is a plethora of published material. Much of this argues that the collapse of the Twin Towers was caused by a controlled demolition and not by the aeroplanes which slammed into their sides.

Ian Neal helped form the British 9/11 for Truth Movement, which he says is a "loose network of campaigners who have grown up over the past two years". The official 9/11 commission investigation into the attacks firmly dismissed the conspiracy theories, but those who expound them say this is precisely why there needs to be an independent inquiry.

September 9, 2006


Don't dismiss 9/11 conspiracies

The Sept. 7 article on the 9/11 "conspiracy" vividly displayed the bias of the mainstream press on this issue. By calling the 9/11 movement a "conspiracy" -- a codeword for "wacko" -- you handily discredited it without providing any reasons why you think it is wrong.

If you believe the 9/11 movement is wrong, make your case based on the evidence; don't dismiss it by using a false label to describe it.

September 10, 2006


September 11th, 2001: The Religion of Conspiracy

FRENCH LIBERATION - September 11th was a coup d'etat. That is what the large poster leaning against the wall says. It is also what these one hundred New Yorkers think, as they gather on September 3, in front of the poster, in an East Village auditorium. Some wear buttons reading "Investigate 9/11", others "Expose the fraud".

As on every Sunday evening, the group New York 9/11 Truth is holding an informational meeting. On the program are extracts from the next version of the documentary Loose Change, which has garnered millions of spectators on the Internet since spring 2005.

The arguments, already known to all, are re-sifted in new testimony by experts and independent journalists. Thus, it was not an airliner that smashed into the Pentagon (not enough debris, a virtually intact lawn, and too narrow a breach in the wall); it was not the melting of the steel that caused the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (their structure was too formidable for that) but a controlled demolition by explosives placed in the buildings. Conclusion: the American government (or an entity controlling it) conspired to organize the attacks of September 11 and to thus justify its operations in the Middle East.

"To educate people"

Now, five years after the drama, as the United States prepares to commemorate the attacks, the conspiracist movement has mushroomed with the multiplication of websites, books, films and conferences. "It has really taken off recently," explains Janice Matthews, director of 911truth.org, the principal national organization questioning the official version. "We try to keep pace with our own success." According to a survey carried out in July by Scripps Survey Research Center, a research center of the university of Ohio, 36 % of Americans think that it is "somewhat probable" or "very probable" that the government took part in the attacks or authorized them. But these results drop when those polled are confronted with the conspiracist versions of events. No more than 16 % think explosives, and not the planes and fire, caused the collapse of the two World Trade Center Towers.

The East Village meeting also has on its agenda the program of the September 8th to 12th mobilization. A "peaceful" demonstration at Ground Zero, the scene of the drama, is proposed. There is debate. The meeting ends in confusion. A participant tries to convince the audience that it is necessary to go to Ground Zero on the 10th, "when Bush is there," and not on the 11th. A young activist seeks to convince the participants to take to the street "to inform and educate people." A score of them end up agreeing. They slip on tee-shirts on which one can read: "The real conspiracy theory is the government's version." Then they go up 11th Avenue distributing their leaflets.

This disorderly, swelling procession is the image of the movement. Initiatives abound just like the theories and the Web sites promoting them. "It is a grass-roots phenomenon, people launching do-it-yourself projects," explains Nicholas Levis, 41 years, a New York activist who works as a translator in his spare time. "We lack organization, which is both a strength and a weakness." He himself finds that documentary Loose Change does not present the facts, but recognizes that it has played a decisive part in the movement.

"At the beginning, it was a fictional film about people discovering the truth," says Korey Rowe, the 23 year-old producer of film. "But, as we went along, we discovered more and more evidence until finally it became overwhelming. We had no choice but to make a documentary." (Co-director) Korey Rowe had been in the army and served in Afghanistan and Iraq. Dylan Avery, the 22-year-old director of film, was then a waiter with Red Lobster, a restaurant chain. The budget of documentary was minuscule: 2 000 dollars for the first version, created on a laptop. Released on the Internet in April 2005, the film has spread at a phenomenal speed. Korey Rowe estimates that more than 75 million people have seen it. "For every DVD sold, we distribute three of them free and 20 people see it on the Internet," he explains.

It is in American universities that the documentary has excited the most interest, thanks to students spreading the word. Director of Scripps Survey Research Center Guido Stempel estimates that "the success of these theories is related to increasing mistrust with respect to the Bush government, its lack of credibility and its penchant for secrecy."

That is also one of the arguments most often used by the activists: "Why should we believe the government about this when it lies about everything else?" asks (Les) Jamieson, coordinator of New York 9/11 Truth, at the end of the meeting in the East Village. The conspiracists all remember their "turning point," the conference or reading that led them to join the movement.

"Once that you believe in it, there's no going back, you devote your life to it" says Janette MacKinlay, a 58 year old artist. She lived across from the Twin Towers at the time of the attacks and regards herself as "a survivor." She started to doubt in August 2004, at a meeting in San Francisco, by listening to two Members of the 9/11 Commission, created to shed light on the attacks. "They did not answer any questions. I had the impression it was a cover-up." Se then read a book by David Ray Griffin, a theologian considered as a reference by the conspiracist movement, and "informed herself." Since then, she is the one who has been organizing conferences. "I am a patriot," she says. "I am trying to fight this policy of fear they're subjecting us to."

Kevin Barrett, for his part, describes himself as "a skeptic with respect to the official versions of the great historical events." But this academic specialist in Islam did not take the plunge immediately: "There was initially an emotional effect. People were not able to react rationally." His turning point also came after reading, then passing extensive time on the Internet. "It is the base of communication between people who share information about September 11," he explains.

The principal national organization, 911truth.org, has no name other than its internet address. It links groups in 38 States, survives on individual gifts and pays a salary to its director, 45 year old Janice Matthews, an unmarried mother of six children living in Kansas City.

Another notable organization, Scholars for 9/11 Truth aims at giving academic respectability to the movement by publishing a review on the web. "The goal is to organize researchers," explains Kevin Barrett, one of its members.

"Historically, conspiracy theorists are often people who have succeeded in university careers," observes Mark Fenster, co-author of a book on conspiracy theories (1). Kevin Barrett is today in the center of a polemic because of a course on Islam he teaches at the university of Wisconsin. Steve Nass, a Republican representative, demanded his firing due to his ideas about September 11th. The university administration decided not to buckle.

Mark Fenster distinguishes two categories of conspiracy theorists: "There is a core group persuaded that Bush knew. And there is a much larger segment of the American public that thinks the government has not told the whole truth, and is expressing its dissatisfaction. But they do not necessarily buy into all of the alternative versions." According to him, the dispute about September 11th is part of a tradition of questioning the great historical events in the United States, beginning with the Kennedy assassination.

"Myths" against "scientific truths"

"The success of these ideas took everyone by surprise," remarks 51-year-old Pat Curley. This real estate expert from Phoenix (Arizona) put together a blog, Screw Loose Change, to dispute the film. "There are fewer of us among the debunkers than among the conspiracy theorists" he says. "The Scripps-Howard poll was an enormous catalyst. People said to themselves that this was serious."

In March 2005, the magazine Popular Mechanics published a detailed investigation "to dismantle the myths" about September 11th. It has just developed it into a book (2), prefaced by the Republican senator John McCain. Several sites, created by private individuals, follow the same pattern, opposing the conspiracists' "myths" to scientific "truths." "It is a race to win the acclaim of the public" says University of Florida law professor Mark Fenster, "a race in which the government was kept on the sidelines for a long time. If it answers, it legitimizes the dispute. If it does not answer, it also legitimizes it by giving the impression of avoiding the arguments. It is a difficult position."

Two governmental Web sites have just published pages of questions and answers to refute the conspiratorial ideas. They are the State Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology, an agency of the Commerce Department that spent three years investigating the fall of the Towers. Judicial Watch, a conservative group seeking to promote transparency in government, succeed in obtaining from the latter two films showing the attack on the Pentagon. The conspiracist organizations consider the images unclear. They demand, in addition, the recordings of three other surveillance cameras in the vicinity that were seized by the FBI.

Phoenix real estate expert Pat Curley "would also love" to see these vidéos. But he doubts the effectiveness of any tangible proof on the conspiracists. "Once they are converted, it is impossible to convince them," he notes. Mark Fenster agrees: "It is like a debate between a believer and an atheist. There is no sufficient common ground." "If a piece of evidence does not support their theory, it inevitably becomes part of the plot," says Pat Curley. "The only thing that you can hope for, it is to prevent those who are holding the fort from passing over to other side."

Translation by Professor Kevin Barrett

September 8, 2006


Mythbusters Tackle 911

Armed with a brand new batch of clever inventions and one eye-popping scale model, the intrepid team of Mythbusters decided to test a 911conspiracy theory, that the WTC towers collapsed by controlled demolition.

"We wanted to prove the conspiracy wackos wrong," said the intrepid duo, Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage. "And of course score some big bucks by blowing things up."

According to the New York Times, Mythbusters "may be the best science program on television." Throughout scores of entertaining episodes, the dynamic duo of Savage and Hyneman patiently construct scale models and then smash them, crush them, burn them or blow them up.

"Or blow them down," said Savage, cracking a grin. "All in the name of science."

According to millions of 911 conspiracy theorists, who believe the World Trade Towers collapsed by carefully rigged explosives, the government never proved their case fully. Many suspicions remain. Mythbusters intended to explode the foremost government myth about the 911 terrorist attack--that airplanes filled with fuel could cause a burning steel skyscraper to collapse--and thus prove the conspiracy theorists wrong.

"We usually only blow up pants, toilets and paint cans but we finally decided to explode a popular urban legend and drive a stake through its heart," said Hyneman, standing on Mare Island, former US Navy base.

So the pair hired a team of model makers to build a scale model of one of the WTC towers on the old US Navy base on Mare Island, north of San Francisco. Built to 1/25 scale (25 feet equals 1 foot), like a giant model kit, the scale model tower stood over fifty feet tall. Tens of thousands of miniature steel beams were used, engineered to exact scale, and welded to similar scale model girders in a precise copy of the doomed WTC. Working from blueprints, the model makers even recreated the stout inner core of 47 steel columns, running from three feet below ground to the top floor.

Each face of the 54-foot tower, sheathed in glistening aluminum, measured more than eight feet wide. Additionally, the model makers poured a thin layer of steel-reinforced concrete on each of the 110 floors, to add authenticity to the model, as well as comparable weight.

According to Wikipedia: "All of the original buildings in the complex were destroyed in a massive terrorist attack on September 11, 2001: 1 WTC, 2 WTC, )North and South Towers) and 7 WTC collapsed; 3 WTC (Marriot Hotel) was crushed by the collapses of 1 WTC and 2 WTC; and 4 WTC, 5 WTC, and 6 WTC were damaged beyond repair and later demolished."

"We knew jet fuel must be pretty hot to melt steel beams, and collapse three towers, so we wanted to see for ourselves," said Savage and Hyneman. "We also wondered how jet fuel got hot enough to melt those beams and girders and why that doesn't ever happen in your backyard barbecue grill. We also wanted to know how two women could be standing in plain sight, right there where everyone could see them, on this super hot steel, and not melt like the molten steel that was found later."

So the dynamic duo also built an aluminum Boeing jet plane to scale. The 1/ 25 scale model Boeing 767, only a little more than six feet long by six feet wide, looked puny by comparison to the tower it allegedly destroyed. But in actuality, a full-sized, fully-fueled 767 with passengers weighed close to 387,000 lbs, or more than 190 tons. By contrast, each WTC tower weighed an estimated 500,000 tons.

Mythbusters considered filling their scale model aircraft with fuel (The hijacked planes could carry 23,000 gallons) but decided instead to fill several top floors with kerosene instead. "We couldn't get the model plane off the ground otherwise," said Savage. They had devised an ingenious propulsion system, part catapult, part giant gun, that would fire the cumbersome scale model airplane (minus the highly-combustible jet fuel) into the tower.

"Like ramming a silver SUV going 500 MPH into a shiny square silo," said Savage of his test. "Unfortunately the first model plane we made overshot the WTC and smashed into this two story concrete building belonging to the US Navy. The plane hit at an angle going 500 MPH. Later we picked up pieces of that smashed plane two hundred feet away. One wing detached completely and slid along the building and nearly decapitated a couple of cameramen."

On the second try, the Mythbusters smacked the scale model Boeing exactly on the scale model WTC, almost forty feet up. Striking the tower at a speed of 500 MPH, the model airplane left a definite imprint. The tower shook visibly but remained standing. Seconds later the kerosene ignited. The tower burned brightly, almost exactly as the original WTC burned more than five years before.

"But then the jet fuel, basically kerosene, burnt away within 20-30 minutes. Although we had placed several tons of plastic objects, to simulate office furnishings, throughout the tower, we saw the tower start to smoke less than an hour after ignition."

From a gridwork of construction scaffolding, the pair filmed the tower burning for the first hour and then watched it smolder and smoke for a second hour. And then a third. And a fourth. Eight hours later, at sunset, the tower still stood, smoking like a chimney, but the fire only flickered inside.

"We didn't know what to do next," said Hyneman, looking perturbed. " we know that building manager, Frank Demartini, who died inside the WTC, said the lattice-like steel beam and girder assembly of the twin towers would absorb a big Boeing crash like a mosquito going through screen mesh and remain strong and still standing. But every American saw the towers fall."

Although the inner core of the scale model WTC, those 47 steel columns was bent and shattered, the upper part of the scale model tower never fell. The next day, using precise, laser measuring devices, the dynamic duo measured the distortion of the tower from the scaffold. While the upper segment indicated a perceptible distortion the tower had not collapsed. Nor did they find any molten steel in the sub floor.

Towering Inferno?

Unlike the 32 story steel skyscraper that burned out of control in 2005 and completely gutted the building in Madrid, the twin towers in New York only burned for an hour or so before collapsing. Puzzled, the pair of Mythbusters decided the try to recreate a controlled collapse using a couple of borrowed, US Army flame throwers.

"Our original half hour show, intending to debunk this one urban legend, now became a full hour," lamented Savage. "and from what I've heard, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of 911 urban legends still to be debunked. NORAD, WTC-7, passport...Not enough shows to do them all."

Next the intrepid pair dropped napalm on the tower from a hovering helicopter. "We must have dropped a ton of the stuff and never did find any melted steel later," said Savage, "although for several minutes we got that tower to glow like a fifty foot roadside flare."

Perplexed, the pair wondered if the model makers had built the tower too strong, as an insider prank. Although the scale model still stood, blackened and slightly distorted, the wily experimenters decided to rig several hundred small explosives to the inner core, every eighteen inches, to simulate a heat-weakened WTC.

"According to Popular Mechanics magazine, the WTC fire weakened the system of expansion joints, causing the towers to pancake down and all the concrete to explode like the eruption of Mt St. Helens," said Savage.

Fellow Mythbuster Hyneman concurred. "We tried napalm and that didn't work. So we theorize that the concrete floors in the World Trade Towers must have contained some natural-occurring explosive cement that only occurred in buildings 1,2 and 7. And so we rigged several hundred small explosives to duplicate the explosive quality of the concrete."

"Exactly," said Savage. "How else to explain that concrete exploding into zillions of microscopic dust particles and spreading across miles of lower Manhattan?"

After the Mythbusters rigged 500 cherry bombs and M-80s---"The old style ones that would blow your fingers off," said Hyneman--they stood back and detonated the whole contraption while the cameras rolled. Not surprising, the tower finally collapsed into a pile of miniature beams and girders, proving the government correct. The 911 terrorist attack and the subsequent WTC collapse occurred exactly as described.

Footnote: While the above spoof was satire and never happened (YET), the intrepid Mythbusters have actually experimented with thermite. Yes, our dynamic duo actually used the stuff that MELTS STEEL, in an earlier episode about the airship, Hindenburg. Write, email, fax, or call Mythbusters and ask them to do a WTC show. See how they fare.

NY TIMES FINALLY REPORTS ON THERMITE - Is Mythbusters the Best Science Show on Television?

Why the FBI got away with the first WTC bombing in 1993 - ONLINE JOURNAL - On February 26, 1993, a gray snowy day in Manhattan like the one I write on 14 years later, the FBI and US government failed to stop the van-bomb explosion in the World Trade Center’s basement garage, just as NORAD and the US government failed to stop the airliner blitz on the Twin Towers and Pentagon on September 11, 2001. The FBI put an informant named Emad Salem, a 43-year old former Egyptian military officer, smack dab in the middle of the Muslim protestors. Salem worked the group and became bodyguard for the blind Sheik Abdul Rahman, radical Muslim cleric and group leader. The sheik, coincidentally, had been heavily subsidized by the U S government while in Pakistan in the late 1980s, helping to pump up Muslims to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. When on February 26, 1993, a 1,200-pound bomb in a van exploded in the parking garage under the World Trade Center, purportedly in a government agency parking spot; it was the most destructive terrorist attack on US soil to that time. Its achievement is now supplanted by the 9/11/01 attack. What’s next, a whole city (New Orleans), a region, a blue state? That dark question aside, the ’93 attack killed six people, injured more than a thousand, and racked up a half billion dollars in damage. After the bombing, the FBI further played Keystone Cops and stumbled over themselves to rehire Salem, offering him a million bucks to discover evidence of more terrorist plots. Salem, being a reasonably smart guy, did not trust the boyz to pay up. So he secretly recorded his conversations with FBI agents. In August, as the case approached its trial, news leaked Salem had made tapes of more than a hundred hours of his conversations with FBI agents and handlers. Yet somehow the transcripts were not helpful to the prosecution. In a call to an FBI agent shortly after the bombing Salem complained, “We was start already building the bomb, which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built, uh, uh, uh, supervising, supervision from the Bureau [FBI] and the DA [district attorney] and we was all informed about it. And we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case. And then he ‘the FBI [supervisor]’ put his head in the sand and said, o no, no, no that’s not true, he is a son of a bitch, okay.” Frustrated, Salem told one FBI agent, “You were informed. Everything is ready. The day and the time. Book. Lock them up and that’s that. That’s why I feel so bad.” Another tape revealed Salem asking an FBI agent, “Do you deny your supervisor is the main reason of bombing the World Trade Center?” The agent did not deny Salem’s charge. Shortly after the bombing, FBI agent Nancy Floyd confided to Salem that her supervisions botched the case. Yet, as James Bovard reports, Salem offered to do a switcheroo on the bombers and substitute harmless powder for deadly explosives and prevent any real catastrophe. The FBI turned down his offer. Why? Salem groused to one FBI man that an FBI supervisor “requested to make me to testify [in public] and if he didn’t push for that, we’ll be going building the bomb with a phony powder and grabbing the people who was involve in it. But . . . we didn’t do that.” That’s right, the real explosives were used and the reason lands square in the FBI’s lap. Somehow the FBI got more credit for “solving” the first World Trade Center bombing than it got “blame” for the fact that its informant may have aided in the bombing. Worse, could it be that what was really emerging was a pattern of false flag attacks on the US, going forward to the Oklahoma City bombings of the Murrah Building on April 19, 1995? That bloody catastrophe was supposedly caused by a Ryder Truck containing an ANFO bomb, driven there by two lone gunmen, Timothy McVeigh, executed for it by lethal injection June 11, 2001, and Terry Nichols later jailed for life for it. As of November 8, 2006, Nichols was still trying to blow the whistle on the FBI’s involvement in it and being denied access to reporters. Also, first responders that awful day found two other live bombs and the remains of an exploded bomb. The live bombs were at each end of the building and subsequently removed and defused. The exploded bomb in the middle of the building was the one that caused the major damage and murder. The ANFO truck-bomb blow-up was basically a ruse. In fact, witnesses had noticed, earlier in that week, several men in jumpsuits with “Government Agency Personnel” written on the back, working on wiring in the basement garage of the Murrah building. Thus, there seems to be government (FBI) involvement and subsequent cover-ups in all three domestic tragedies, and with “terrorist” patsies of one kind or another to take the raps. We should also look back to the classic false flag Operation Northwoods, which was designed to make it look like Cuba was attacking the US, so that the US would attack Cuba and remove Castro. JFK may have lost his life, in part, for stopping the operation cold and firing its author, the chief of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Lyman Lemnitzer, in September 1962. Yet, once those same forces found a green light for Kennedy’s assassination in 1963, larger and more frequent false-flag attacks on and off US soil could follow. This to make sure that a populace cowed by fear of some external “ism” would keep fighting it to the death. Tragically, the corrosive enemy was a cancer killing from within for its own hungry agenda. And so, a belated conscious WTC anniversary to all. And dare I say “never forget?” all the facts or perps.


The untold story of September 11

ARGUS UK - Conspiracy theories about what happened on 9/11 began to circulate just days after the attacks, but in recent months they've become a phenomenon with up to 75 per cent of Americans believing their government hasn't told them the whole truth about that tragic day.

World Trade Centre janitor William Rodriguez was there when the aircraft struck the Towers and was decorated for his heroism in rescuing survivors.

Ahead of an appearance in Lewes, he speaks to Angela Wintle about the experience and the disturbing questions he's been asking ever since.

They still haunt his dreams, the ones who didn't get away. He hears their screams for help from the passenger lift, screams he heard as he fled from the stricken World Trade Centre for the very last time.

He sees the faces of his old pals from the Window on the World restaurant, people he met daily over breakfast, who never stood a chance on the 106th floor. He remembers the fixed looks in the eyes of the firefighters as they pushed past him up the stairwell, never to return.

William Rodriguez saved dozens of lives on 9/11, but it's the ones he didn't save he thinks about most.

But, of course, by rights, he shouldn't be here at all. Rodriguez, 45, was a janitor at the World Trade Centre, tasked with cleaning three stairwells in the North Tower. But on September 11, 2001, he overslept and was half an hour late for work.

Ordinarily, he would have been having breakfast in the staff kitchen 106 storeys up when the first aircraf hit at 8.46am. But the Fates were looking down on him that day and he'd only just entered the basement of the building.

"I was on B1 level, talking to my supervisor, when we suddenly heard a massive explosion," he says.

"It was so strong the walls began to crumble and the false ceiling fell on top of us.

"Then, seconds later, there was another explosion way above, which made the building sway from side to side. And this, we later discovered, was the first plane hitting the North Tower on the 90th floor."

Rodriguez became a national hero as a result of his actions that day and was honoured five times at the White House. But all that changed when he started asking some very awkward questions.

Why had he heard a massive explosion from the basement seconds before the first aircraft hit? Why had the building collapsed so suddenly, defying the laws of science? And why were the authorities seemingly intent on hushing up his story?

Incredible though it seems, Rodriguez decided there could be only one explanation. It was a coverup.

And there could be only one reason for a cover-up - the US government itself was behind the attacks.

The suggestion that the US administration would instigate an attack on its own people, wiping out more than 3,000 lives, may seem wholly implausible - but it's a theory that's gaining considerable ground.

A recent poll by the respected New York Times revealed three out of four Americans now suspect the US government of not telling the truth about 9/11. That proportion has shot up from a year ago, when half the population said they didn't believe the official story.

So what could be the reason for this acceleration?

Well, it's largely down to a 90-minute internet movie called Loose Change, in which Rodriguez appears, made for £1,500 on a cheap laptop by three young American men.

A blitz of statistics, photographs pinched from the web, eye-witness accounts and expert testimony, all set to hip-hop music, it poses the question that's now on everyone's lips - did the Bush administration fabricate an outrage against civilians to fool the world and provide a pretext for war on Al Qaeda and Iraq?

Needless to say, White House sources and US intelligence services have roundly denied and condemned the allegations, but nagging suspicions remain and are now being furiously debated on both sides of the Atlantic.

To add fuel to the fire, a documentary series called The Conspiracy Files, shown last Sunday on BBC2, has also explored the unanswered questions surrounding 9/11.

It seems Rodriguez couldn't have chosen a better time for a nationwide speaking tour of Britain, in which he is setting out his conspiracy theory. But then cynics might argue this is no coincidence.

Next Monday, the people of Sussex will have a chance to make up their own minds about his remarkable story when he pitches up at Sussex Downs College in Lewes for one of 22 speaking dates around the country.

Punters will not be disappointed because he does not short-change his public.

An animated speaker, his words pour forth in a torrent and his story has grown polished in the telling.

But let's go back to the beginning, to Rodriguez's beginnings.

William Rodriguez grew up in Puerto Rico, where he was hired as a magician's assistant by one James Randi, the famous debunker of pseudo-science.

Using the name Roudy, Rodriguez exposed faith healers and psychics and was even featured on TV escaping from a chained straightjacket while hanging from a burning rope.

But after emigrating to New York, he discovered there was a lot of competition in the magic business, and to keep the wolf from the door he took a temporary job at the World Trade Centre.

He ended up staying there for 20 years, little realising how dramatically his employment would be terminated.

Rodriguez will never forget the chaos and hysteria that ensued after the first explosion, which seemed to emanate from the building's very foundations.

"I was talking to my supervisor when I heard boom', very loud, and everybody in the room was pushed upwards," he says.

The impact shook the whole building, and everyone in the office - about 15 in all - started screaming.

There was worse to come. Suddenly a man came running into the room, shouting, "Explosion!

Explosion!"

The man was Felipe David, whose job, Rodriguez later discovered, was to replenish the vending machines. He had been standing in front of a lift about 400 yards from the office when a fireball had burst out of the lift shaft.

"His injuries were terrible," says Rodriguez. "All the skin had been burnt off his arms and it was hanging loosely like a flapping shirt sleeve. Parts of his face were missing, too.

"Now you tell me how an explosion from a jet liner could have burnt a man 90 floors down within seconds of impact?"

Lifting the man onto his shoulder, Rodriguez began to make his way to the exit, urging his fellow workers to follow him. But after taking David to a waiting ambulance, he then ignored the shouts of police officers and raced back to the building.

He didn't have far to look to find people in trouble - this time, two victims trapped between two levels in a lift which was rapidly filling with water.

The water was already round their waists and he thought he had no hope of reaching them. But then a silent prayer was answered when he suddenly remembered that ladders were kept in a nearby store cupboard.

Grabbing the longest of the three (by some miracle, it was not chained to the wall like the others), he prized open the lift doors with the help of another man and rescued the two trapped people from a certain watery grave. Then he carried them outside to safety and returned once again to the building.

By this time, firefighters had arrived at the scene.

Rodriguez quickly led them up the stairwell of the North Tower, unlocking doors with a master key, one of only five that opened every door in the building.

And then a series of strange things happened which remain unexplained to this day.

As they ascended the stairwell, they heard a series of massive explosions between the 20th and 30th floors. Then, on the 33rd floor, they heard what sounded like heavy equipment being dragged across the level above.

This was particularly puzzling because Rodriguez knew the 34th floor was empty and had been off limits for weeks due to a construction project.

But on they went, until, at the 39th floor, Rodriguez was ordered to turn back by the firefighters.

It was as he began his descent that he heard the second aircraft hit the South Tower.

Reaching ground level, he was confronted by what looked like a war zone.

The metal-framed front doors to the building had been blown out, leaving a gaping chasm, and the bottoms of the lift doors had been blown open, suggesting a powerful explosion from the basement.

Then the unthinkable happened. Someone yelled, "Don't look back," and he realised the building was coming down.

Frantically looking for cover, Rodriguez raced to the first thing he saw - a fire engine standing only metres away.

"I slid right under the vehicle and then the building collapsed on top of me," he says. "I felt sure I was going to die."

But, of course, he didn't. Instead, remembering the survival training drummed into him as a magician's apprentice, he slowed his breathing and tried to relax as much as possible.

"The only think I could think about was my mother. I didn't want her to have the pain of identifying my mangled body parts. I kept thinking: Oh God, I will never be recognised and my mother won't know who I am.' "

He had reason to worry. As he had raced to the fire truck, he had seen the bodies of what became known as the "jumpers" - the poor souls who had jumped from the building to escape an even worse death inside.

"Their bodies had deteriorated on impact and all you could see were body masses," he says.

Thankfully, for the second time that day his prayer was answered. Two film crews had spotted him running for cover moments before the collapse, and directed rescue services to the very spot where he lay.

Four-and-a-half hours later, he was breathing fresh air again and searching for victims. There wasn't a scratch on his body.

Overnight, Rodriguez was feted as a hero and became a symbol of 9/11.

He was interviewed on countless TV stations and later received a National Hero Award from the Senate of Puerto Rico.

As the months wore on, he became an activist, fighting for tax relief for victims of terrorism, and scholarship programmes for children who had lost their parents on 9/11.

He also helped to set up family support groups and worked on a financial repair programme for victims of September 11.

It wasn't long before the Republicans recognised the power of his appeal, not least to the all important Hispanic community which held 30 million votes in its sway. They asked him to run for office, sending him to train at the Governing Institute to learn about politics.

But all the while questions were nagging away at the back of his mind.

What had caused the explosion that he and countless others had heard in the basement? And why had the Twin Towers fallen so quickly - "like a controlled demolition", as Rodriguez describes it?

The official version was that they had collapsed because their steel columns had melted in the heat from the fuel fires of the two crashed aircraft.

But the science didn't stand up. Steel doesn't melt until it reaches 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit, and open fires of jet fuel - such as those in the Twin Towers inferno - can't rise above 1,700 degrees.

Could it be explosions in the basement helped the Twin Towers on their way?

The makers of Loose Change certainly seem to think so, and show clip after clip of the towers coming down to loud and distinct bangs.

But there were other unanswered questions.

Why were no military aircraft scrambled in time to head off the attacks and why did the President, sitting in a school classroom, show little reaction when an aide told him a second aircraft had crashed into the Twin Towers?

Had he known about it all along?

These were just some of the questions Americans wanted answered, and Rodriguez was among the many who demanded a formal investigation - which ultimately became the 9/11 Commission.

But the Bush administration resisted, arguing they didn't need an inquiry because they already knew who had done it. And that, says Rodriguez, was an affront to every victim of 9/11 and to all their families.

"That's when we knew they were politicising the tragedy."

Rodriguez was one of the last to testify to the Commission and the only witness to speak behind closed doors.

When I ask why, he laughs and says: "Thank you.

I have been asking the same question. Every other testimony was shown on TV. Everyone else had a public hearing."

The interview process was a travesty, he says. They didn't call one of his 20 expert witnesses and his account was edited out of the Commission's report.

"My allegations were never investigated and the perpetrators never caught. The people they did question - the chiefs of the fire and police departments - weren't even in the building. It was a complete whitewash."

In desperation, Rodriguez turned to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which was investigating the collapse of the World Trade Centre, promulgating his theory about the explosion in the basement.

He alleges his claims were rebuffed.

NIST said the explosion might have been caused by a fireball travelling from the aircraft down the central lift shaft. In that case, replied Rodriguez, why were the two people he rescued from the lift not burnt to death?

He also turned to the FBI, but they were wholly uninterested in what he had to say, even when he reported he'd seen a mystery man - "possibly one of the hijackers, although we don't know whether he was attached to the government" - asking questions about the layout of the complex just a few months before the attack.

Dissatisfied, he filed a civil lawsuit against the Bush administration in 2004, claiming a conspiracy.

The government filed a motion in turn, dismissing the case on the grounds of national security.

Rodriguez and his team then responded by filing an affidavit alleging the defendants "had knowledge that the attacks were impending but failed to take countermeasures because they desired such attacks to occur".

In 2005, his attorney also proposed a 9/11 petition to the UN, calling for a resolution of the UN General Assembly for an independent September 11 truth commission.

Needless to say, this has made Rodriguez many enemies and he alleges his apartment has been broken into and his laptop stolen. He has also been placed on the no-fly list.

He laughs. "I'm a national hero but I'm on the no-fly list, which means every time I want to fly, the authorities put me in a room and ask me questions.

"Do I fear for my life? Of course. Several experts in the intelligence and security fields have told me to be careful, and say an attack could come from anywhere at any time."

But he won't give up. He has received a "positive"

response from the British people, who are angry that British soldiers' lives have been lost on the strength of a "fallacy". And he knows support for his cause is growing.

He's even thinking of running as an independent political candidate. But in the meantime, he has something more tangible to lift the gloom. He is going to be a father.

"I married a year ago - to an American reporter, as a matter of fact. And my wife's doctor broke the news.

"He said, Congratulations. You're expecting. And the due date is September 11.' "When I started crying, he said: Oh, it's your first baby.' But my wife said: No, you don't understand. This is the janitor from the World Trade Centre.' And then the doctor started crying, too.

"Now, isn't that incredible?"

26th February 2007


Cindy Sheehan says WTC looked like explosive demolition

Anti-war icon Cindy Sheehan has gone public on her support for the 9/11 truth movement after she told a radio show that the collapse of the twin towers looked like a controlled demolition and that there should be a new investigation into the terrorist attacks.

Sheehan, who made headlines this week after she distanced herself from the Democratic party and the establishment left, joined Alex Jones to share her views on her skepticism towards the official 9/11 story.

Sheehan said her decision to desert the Democrats was sparked last week when the Iraq war funding bill was passed and it was at this point she realized the Democrats had co-opted her simply to help them regain Congress and that they had no interest in ending the war.

Sheehan attacked Hillary Clinton as a "warhawk and a "warmonger" and said there was very little distinction between her and John McCain or Rudy Giuliani.

On 9/11, Sheehan expressed her support for the Jersey Girl's petition, which calls for a new independent investigation of the terrorist attacks, slamming the 9/11 Commission Report as a "total travesty and a smokescreen."

"George Bush and Dick Cheney held hands and testified behind closed doors, not under oath," said Sheehan, adding, "There are many things that just don't add up on that day."

Sheehan questioned why U.S. air defenses were distracted by drills and exercises scheduled for the morning of 9/11 and why standard operating procedure for intercepting errant aircraft was not followed for the first and only time in history.

Speaking on the collapse of the twin towers, Sheehan stated, "It does look to me like a controlled demolition - I'm not an expert - but it does look to me like a controlled demolition - I'm looking at common sense."

"I do see some very high profile people saying it was an inside job," concluded Sheehan.

Click here to listen to Sheehan's interview on the Alex Jones Show

See also:

Sheehan walks for US Congress to fire traitor Nancy Pelosi - Cindy Sheehan, the slain soldier's mother whose attacks on President Bush made her a darling of the anti-war movement, has a new target: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Sheehan, who announced in late May that she was departing the peace movement, said she decided to run against Pelosi unless the congresswoman moves to oust Bush in the next two weeks. "I think all politicians should be held accountable," Sheehan told The Associated Press on Sunday. "Democrats and Americans feel betrayed by the Democratic leadership. We hired them to bring an end to the war." Sheehan said she will run as an independent against the San Francisco Democrat in 2008 if Pelosi does not file articles of impeachment against Bush by July 23. That's when Sheehan and her supporters are to arrive in Washington, D.C., after a 13-day caravan and walking tour starting from the group's war protest site near Bush's Crawford ranch. Although Sheehan has never held public office, she said she already has the name recognition and would not have to run against Pelosi in a primary. "I would give her a run for her money," Sheehan said. Sheehan, who turns 50 on Tuesday, said Bush should be impeached because she believes he misled the public about the reasons for going to war, violated the Geneva Convention by torturing detainees and crossed the line by commuting the prison sentence of former vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. She said other grounds for impeachment are the domestic spying program and the "inadequate and tragic" response to Hurricane Katrina. Sheehan plans her official candidacy announcement Tuesday. Sheehan recently said she was leaving the Democratic Party because it "caved" into the president. Last week, she announced her caravan to Washington, which she calls the "people's accountability movement."

Sheehan: Distinct Chance Of Staged Attack, Martial Law - Sheehan spoke to The Alex Jones Show as she prepares to embark on a two week trek towards Washington to confront Pelosi. "I definitely think that is a distinct possibility, that there will be some kind of attack whether it's manufactured or real....I think it's really possible that these people will do that - why would he [Bush] put in that presidential directive if he didn't need to use it - I think it's really really frightening," Sheehan said. "Does anybody think that [Bush's] recent presidential decision directive wasn't for declaring martial law and suspending elections - that's why they have to be stopped," added Sheehan. "The culture of corruption doesn't stop at the Republican party and people need to realize that Democrats are not our saviors," said Sheehan. "Over 600 soldiers have died since the Democrats took over power and many thousands of Iraqis, the blood is on their hands, they have the power to stop it and support our troops, support the people of Iraq, save America from more threats from the Bush administration and get them out of power," added the anti-war activist.


Project Censored: Unanswered Questions of 9/11

911 Prewarnings - Building 7 Collapse - Flight 77 and the Pentagon - Israeli Involvement - United Airlines Put-options - War Games - Atta and the $100,000 - 9/11 Terrorists Still Alive. A threshold concept facing Americans is the possibility that the 9/11 Commission Report was on many levels a cover-up for the failure of the US government to prevent the tragedy. Deeper past the threshold is the idea that the report failed to address sources of assistance to the terrorists. Investigations into this area might have led to a conclusion that elements of various governments — including our own — not only knew about the attacks in advance, but may have helped facilitate their implementation. The idea that someone in the Government of the United States may have contributed support to such a horrific attack is inconceivable to many. It is a threshold concept that is so frightening that it brings up a state of mind akin to complete unbelievably.


American Airlines says no 9/11 airfones on 757s

Thank you for contacting Customer Relations. I am pleased to have the opportunity to assist you. That is correct we do not have phones on our Boeing 757. The passengers on flight 77 used their own personal cellular phones to make out calls during the terrorist attack. However, the pilots are able to stay in constant contact with the Air Traffic Control tower.

Sincerely,

Chad W. Kinder
Customer Relations
American Airlines


Federal courts subvert 9/11 victim lawsuits

That headline, that question is why we’re here in Judge Hellerstein’s courtroom, this time 14D, half the size of the room for last week’s hearing. Of course, the usual suspects have been rounded up, lawyers for the airlines, the plaintiffs, a US attorney, fewer citizen onlookers, including myself, notebook open. Yet what I will hear will leave me as chagrined as June 14’s double-sized gathering reported in The 9/11 Victim’s Compensation Fund: cui bono?

This time, Judge Hellerstein is to announce a number of remaining victims’ cases to be tried for victims’ families that have not accepted fund money, but wish to take their loved one’s case to court for further inquiry, perhaps even for justice. Judge Hellerstein reminds the room that “the value of settling [for the money] has run its course.” And so? We are left with those who see some principle to stand for in a court trial, in discovery. In questioning how and why, for instance, their loved ones, how nearly 3,000, were murdered, especially given a $50 billion dollar intelligence system and a $500 billion defense budget -- all of which was totally inoperable on 9/11.

Somehow, it seems that the money won’t help those folks, those holdouts, get through the day and over the loss. Yet despite that fact, the good judge tells us, admitting it will probably come back to haunt him, “that money is the universal lubricant.” Ah yes, so let’s get to the greasing and make things turn. It’s going on six years since 9/11 and these hearings are still around.

That reminder leads the judge to a somber lecture that “life is short. And out of the mundane you can fashion something different, a memory for a different degree of pain for each person. Fashion a life beyond the pain. In fact, what is the fairest, most efficient way to get on with our lives? And if the opportunity comes, take it. We are not trying to cut short values or justice. But we have to get past 9/11. Let it go.” That is, despite the unanswered questions, despite these hearings, despite the massive sway of the media to swallow it all and buy the myth like a suit.

Then, rather than announce the cases chosen, the good judge asks both teams of lawyers what is the quickest, most efficient way to have some cases heard and -- subtext -- the whole bunch over with, “a wrap” as they say in the film business. Would it be, as one attorney suggested “to have the folks least uncomfortable, those willing to go forward,” to have their cases selected. Or would it have to do with those in the most manageable jurisdictions? Or should it be by the case itself, the individuals with fewer legal knots, less “discovery” needed, fewer people to grumble for them, fewer children?

Yet, when another lawyer reminds the judge, who has actually thrown out a name himself, Mariani, that is Mrs. Ellen Mariani, by the way the first litigant ever in the fund’s history. And then the lawyer suggests that Miss Mariani is not willing to appear in court. But that is Miss Mariani he is speaking of, the step-daughter of Mrs. Mariani, the original litigant, whose name was taken off her own case, and replaced by her step-daughter’s, Miss Mariani or Loren Peters. Is a lawyer of his accomplishment not aware of who is who?

In fact, when this hour and a half of kangaroo is over, I go over to him and ask him. As some of his distinguished colleagues look on, I ask if he has willfully mistaken Miss Mariani, who was party to having Mrs. Mariani’s name removed from her own two suits, one against the government, one against United Airlines, and replaced with her own, Loren Peters? Has he found a convenient obfuscation to silence the one voice that has cried the longest and the loudest for a trial in a court of law to find out what went wrong on that day to take her husband’s life? Yes, that voice is, was, and will be, Mrs. Mariani.

This in spite of the back-room dealings aided and abetted by Greenberg-Traurig lawyers, and various famous and infamous legal beagles to bring Miss Mariani into the case, and have Mrs. Mariani vanish in obscurity. But here is one person who remembers, who respectfully reminds, who respectfully stands perhaps for thousands, perhaps millions who remember who said what first, and what will not be surgically removed with a slip of the tongue, if that is all it was, though I doubt it. The history is long and complex as Tom Flocco will tell you in NH widow fights 9/11 estate challenge linked to President Bush.

Continued...

June 29, 2007


Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job

Excellent news report. READ IT!

Download Torin's Power Point presentation.

If you want to join Torin in this fight or ask him a question, he can be heard every Saturday and Sunday on the We The People Radio Network from 12 to 2 pm central.


NFL Star Considered 9/11 a False Flag From Day One

November 8, 2007

Former Dallas Cowboys Super-Bowl winner and five time Pro Bowler Mark Stepnoski said in a radio interview yesterday that anybody who still believes the official story of 9/11 is either incredibly naive or in complete denial.

Stepnoski went public in an interview with the Pennsylvania based Erie-Times newspaper on Sunday, but during an interview on The Alex Jones Show he went further and revealed that his questions about 9/11 began on the very day of the attacks.

"I just remember at the time thinking to myself - is this really a terrorist attack on us by a foreign nation or is this a false flag operation being conducted by our government," said Stepnoski, adding that he had carefully studied the Kennedy assassination, Watergate, and the Oklahoma City bombing, which led him to immediately doubt the official story.

"I noticed there were a lot of parallels between 9/11 and that event (Oklahoma City bombing), bombs being found in the building, scientists coming out and saying that an ammonium nitrate bomb could never cause that much damage," said the former NFL star.

"Studying that time period, the Vietnam war, Watergate, all these things that signified cover-up by the government - as time moves on you become more and more aware as a citizen that secrecy is the rule of the day with our government and any time anything revelatory comes to light regarding nefarious activities of our government it's immediately discredited and hushed up," said Stepnoski, praising the role of the alternative media for providing true sources of information that can't be sanitized.

Stepnoski said there were too many instances of foreknowledge regarding 9/11 to be discounted, citing how public officials got warnings not to fly on the eve of the attacks.

"When you think about the similarities to the Oklahoma City bombing, that day the Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearm agents who were employed in that building didn't show up for work - the same way that John Ashcroft got a tip not to fly commercially before 11, the same way Willie Brown got a tip not to fly beforehand," said Stepnoski.

"When you listen to the transcripts of the air traffic controllers on the day of 9/11, the first words out of their mouth was 'is this live or is this an exercise'" said Stepnoski, referring to the multiple exercises that were taking place that dovetailed 9/11 on that very morning.

"Once people become familiar with the protocol that exists, it's readily apparent that the protocol was broken on that day and the events that happened on that day, the way they transpired, that is not commonplace," said Stepnoski, citing NORAD's lack of response in intercepting the errant aircraft.

"It just goes without saying - it was an anomaly, things were purposefully altered that day," he said.

The former Super Bowl champion then discussed the geopolitical maneuverings that preceded 9/11 and gave the Neo-Cons the pretext to launch the attack.

"Our military is now used basically as an instrument to secure and protect oil supplies because that is the lifeblood of our economy," said Stepnoski, adding, "Sixty per cent of the recoverable oil in the world is in the middle east - it's in a piece of land roughly the size of Texas, and that's why I believe Dick Cheney, even though he was subpoenaed several times, he would not release the records from his energy task force in 2001 because that's exactly what was discussed in that meeting."

Stepnoski discussed what he termed the "threshold concept," where people arrive at a point where they had gathered enough information to make the leap beyond the parameters of thinking that have been set for them by the consensus.

"When you look at the information that's out there and the credibility of the sources - anybody now who still believes the official story of 9/11 is either incredibly naive or is exhibiting complete and total denial," said Stepnoski.

Click here to listen to the audio MP3.


Most Americans still believe in conspiracies, despite the propaganda wars

Nearly two-thirds of Americans think it is possible that some federal officials had specific warnings of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, but chose to ignore those warnings, according to a Scripps Howard News Service/Ohio University poll.

A national survey of 811 adult residents of the United States conducted by Scripps and Ohio University found that more than a third believe in a broad smorgasbord of conspiracy theories including the attacks, international plots to rig oil prices, the plot to assassinate President John F. Kennedy in 1963 and the government's knowledge of intelligent life from other worlds.

The high percentage is a manifestation, some say, of an American public that increasingly distrusts the federal government.

"You wouldn't have gotten these numbers a year or two after the attacks themselves," said University of Florida law professor Mark Fenster. "You've got an increasingly disaffected public that is unhappy with the administration."

Fenster, author of the book "Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture," attributed the high percentage in part to the findings of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (also called the 9/11 Commission), which concluded federal officials failed to prevent the attacks, but did not have specific knowledge of the date of the attacks.

An earlier Scripps Howard/Ohio University survey, conducted in July 2006, revealed that more than one-third of Americans thought federal officials assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.

"What (the recent survey) could mean is that people are thinking that the Bush administration is incompetent, that there were warnings out there and they chose to put their attention on other things," Fenster said.

At a time when the price of crude oil has neared $100 per barrel, 81 percent of Americans also said it was "somewhat likely" or "very likely" that oil companies conspire to keep the price of gasoline high.

"It shows that the oil companies are not trusted by a lot of people," said Tyson Slocum, director of the Energy Program of Public Citizen, the consumer watchdog organization founded by Ralph Nader.

Record-breaking quarterly profits stir the pot, too.

"People look at the huge profits and put two and two together," he said. "'Those high prices I'm paying are fueling those profits.'"

Forty-two percent of the American public still thinks some people in the federal government might have known about the assassination of Kennedy in advance.

The survey was conducted by telephone Sept. 24 to Oct. 10 among 811 adult residents of the United States who were selected at random. The survey was conducted by the Scripps Survey Research Center at Ohio University under a grant from the Scripps Howard Foundation and has a margin of error of about 4 percent.

November 23, 2007


Americans: Sheep to the Constitutional Slaughter

Judge Andrew Napolitano is one of American media’s most tenacious defenders of Americans' rights. His official title at Fox News, where he appears regularly on Fox and Friends and The Big Story, is “Senior Judicial Analyst.” But at the often Bush-besotted network, the decidedly skeptical Napolitano thinks of himself more as “House Civil Libertarian.”

He’s the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in New Jersey history, and a former teacher of constitutional law at Seton Hall Law School. He also writes books alerting Americans to how their own government threatens their liberties, including The Constitution in Exile and Constitutional Chaos: What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws. Nick Gillespie interviewed Napolitano for our March 2005 issue.

Reason: The Patriot Act seems to be a special bete noire of yours. What’s the problem with it?

Napolitano: The Patriot Act’s two most principle constitutional errors are an assault on the Fourth Amendment, and on the First. It permits federal agents to write their own search warrants [under the name “national security letters”] with no judge having examined evidence and agreed that it’s likely that the person or thing the government wants to search will reveal evidence of a crime.

Remember that the British government permitted its soldiers to execute self-written search warrants. They called them “writs of assistance,” and they were one of the last straws that caused American colonist to rebel. It’s bitterly ironic that 230 years later a popularly elected government would authorize its own agents to do the same thing that when a monarchy did it, we fought a war of rebellion in reaction—which we won!

Not only that, but the Patriot Act makes it a felony for the recipient of a self-written search warrant to reveal it to anyone. The Patriot Act allows [agents] to serve self-written search warrants on financial institutions, and the Intelligence Authorization Act of 2004 in Orwellian language defines that to include in addition to banks, also delis, bodegas, restaurants, hotels, doctors' offices, lawyers’ offices, telecoms, HMOs, hospitals, casinos, jewelry dealers, automobile dealers, boat dealers, and that great financial institution to which we all would repose our fortunes, the post office.

So FBI agents can write their own search warrant with just the permission of their superior, no judge at all, nobody at the main Department of Justice, and serve it essentially on any entity they want, and if they serve this search warrant on your doctor, lawyer, grocer, or mailman, and that doctor, lawyer, grocer, or mailman tells you they received it, then that doctor, lawyer, grocer, or mailman, can be prosecuted for a felony, face five years in jail. What part of the First Amendment’s “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech” do they not understand?

This creates a Soviet-style conundrum for the recipient, who can’t even tell his or her lawyer or general counsel about getting the search warrant. You can’t hire outside counsel to challenge it, you can’t mention it to your spouse on the pillow, to your priest in confession—not even to a federal judge in a federal courtroom where all language except perjury should be permitted. This is a conundrum the likes of which government has never visited even under the Alien and Sedition Act. If they prosecuted you for criticizing [President John] Adams you could complain about it to your heart’s content without being charged with another crime.

Reason: The Patriot Act was sold as a necessary protection from terror. How has that worked out?

Napolitano: How many people has the DOJ convicted in a jury trial for terrorism based on evidence obtained from the Patriot Act? Zero. They’ve gotten people to plead guilty, to fold, and convicted many on drug trafficking, white slavery, prostitution, gambling, and political corruption, but haven’t gotten a single [terror] case where they presented evidence in a public court before a judge and jury and the jury found a defendant guilty under evidence obtained under Patriot Act.

The most sinful aspect of its passage was how members of the House were not permitted to read it. It was posted on the House Intranet for 15 min [before the vote] and it’s 315 pages long. I read it twice, and it took me 20 hours each time. And you need in front of you not just it, but lots of other statutes, the full U.S. criminal code, to process it. It does lots of amending of other statutes, so you need to reread [those] statues to figure out what government has done by amending that statute.

I was speaking in the Midwest—I don’t want to tell you where, somewhere in the great Heartland—two weeks ago and at the end of my speech, after I said many of these things I’m saying here and in my book, there was a congressman in the audience. He and I socialized a bit, and he said, “Judge, I’m a little ill at ease. I didn’t know until hearing you tonight that the Patriot Act permitted self-written search warrants and criminalized speech about receiving them, and I voted for it twice.”

And I said—knowing how he was going to answer—I asked, “Didn’t you read it? You voted on it.” No, he didn’t have time, he only read the summary. And he didn’t remember the summary talking about self-written search warrants and criminalized speech. He told me many of his colleagues were in the same situation. I said, “WRONG—all your colleagues are in the same situation! No one in the House except maybe leadership read the Patriot Act you voted on!” It’s abominable for the government to tamper with our basic liberties—but it’s inconceivable that they would do so without any debate.

Another platform for that undercurrent is the campaign of Ron Paul. Congressman Paul has rejuvenated almost single-handedly the Goldwater wing of the GOP. Now Reagan tried, before [James] Baker and his boys advised him on how to behave. Now, I loved the man, but if you look at his record and rhetoric, they are two different things. But Ron Paul had made it legitimate again for small government, maximum individual liberty, Goldwater Republicans to come forth and complain about big government, and I am the recipient of lots of those complaints.

The president had said he believes in natural rights. Unfortunately when he signs these bills that take away our rights, he reveals he either doesn’t know what he’s doing or he doesn’t really believe in natural rights. The Patriot Act is not only unconstitutional, it’s unnatural, since it purports to take away that which naturally belongs to us.

Reason: In chapter six, you discuss the very alarming “National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20/51” and the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007. What’s so bad about them?

Napolitano: Those basically allow the president to declare martial law whenever he thinks there’s a state of emergency. Then he—he or she—can use the military to enforce ordinary criminal law and even suspend the authority of state criminal enforcement agencies. This is wildly, fantastically unconstitutional because it allows one human being by declaring emergency–like Pervez Musharraf just did—to suspend rights guaranteed by the Constitution, and Americans don’t even know; there was very little debate or awareness of this.

Bill O’Reilly defended Bush on his declaration of three Americans as enemy combatants, before the Supreme Court told him he can’t do it—and Bush refused to even say why—but Bill said “I trust him, it’s good for him to do that.”

I asked him, “Would you give that power to Hillary Clinton? She could declare you an enemy combatant and dispatch you to Guantanamo.” He just said, “Would you come and visit?” I said, “No….they’d keep me down there too!”

So many of my Fox colleagues, whom I love working with, have such trust and faith in the heart and head of President Bush. But look at the calendar: He’ll be Mr. Bush in 14 months, and unless it’s Ron Paul, God knows what his successor will do with the powers Congress had purported to give him. And I say “purported” because they don’t have the right to actually do all the extraconstitutional things they’ve done.

November 15, 2007




9/11 Con in Hollywood

Pirate News TV attends
American Scholars Symposium


GOVERNOR JESSE VENTURA SAYS 9/11 INSIDE JOB


9/11 Conspiracy Theory by Jesse Ventura found all 4 black boxes at WTC proving ATC gave permission for hijackers in cockpits, Part 1 of 4


9/11 Truth at Bonnaroo Tennessee


9/11 Truth billboard on I40


Charlie "Red Dawn" Sheen gives 9/11 Truth to Obama Bin Laden

Ground Zero NYC 9/11/2008


9.11 widow assassinated by crash of Flight 3407?

Obama cold on push for Bush-era Truth Commission


Law Professor Jonathan Turley says Obama can be arrested for warcrimes if he refuses to arrest Bush for warcrimes



Holy Batshit 9/11 Truth!

Batman The Dark Knight 9/11 Truth 2001 and 2008 - No Batjet crashed into a skyscraper in The Dark Knight movie, so this official movie poster is referring to the Book 2 of DK2, written weeks BEFORE 9/11/2001. Batman assassinated the president of the United States, George W Bush, er, Dick Cheney, er, Lex Luthor, using unmanned aerial vehicles, explosive controlled demolitions and THERMITE. Can you take a hint? Was Heath Ledger murdered in an Illuminati ritual? Batman brags that he is a terrorist assassinating the US secretary of state and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff at the Pentagon. Was The Dark Knight a training textbook for MKULTRA suicide bombers on 9/11? Watch this video to discover who the Joker really is...

Mirror

Alex Jones freaked out on Infowars radio when I mentioned to him that DK2 artist/writer Frank Miller is probably jewish, and how suspicious it was he obviously had prior knowledge of 9/11. Jones targets all who mention "jews" or Israel, unless he does it. Jones reportedly got John Statmiller, Jack Blood and even jew Michael Rivero fired from GCN radio.


Batman in Skull and Bones


Pirate News Censored by 911Blogger

"I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn't go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware. When I finally did watch Loose Change, I went through every emotion you could imagine, from laughing, crying, getting sick to my stomach, to the whole emotional thing. To me questions haven't been answered and are not being answered about 9/11. Two planes struck two buildings....but how is it that a third building fell 5 hours later? How could this building just implode into its own footprint 5 hours later - that's my first question - the 9/11 Commission didn't even devote one page to that in their big volume of investigation. How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity - if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds - how can that be? If you took a billiard ball and dropped it from the height of the World Trade Center in a vacuum it would hit the ground in 9.3 seconds and if you took that same billiard ball and dropped it 10 stories at a time and merely stopped it and started it it would take 30 seconds - if you dropped it every floor of the World Trade Center to the ground, simply stopping and starting it on gravity it would take over 100 seconds to reach the ground. Jet fuel is four fifths kerosene - which is not a hot burning fuel - and they wanted us to believe it melted these steel structured girders and caused these buildings to pancake collapse to the ground. I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes - wouldn't they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust - when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense. Never before in the annuls of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did. Upon looking at the film in super-slow motion and the way the buildings fell and comparing that to the way that they do like a controlled demolition of a hotel in Las Vegas, they both fell identical. I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there's no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition. When I was watching Loose Change with a friend of mine - he happens to work for a company that helps build the Boeing airplanes and they said that when the engines completely disappeared and were destroyed, his response was, excuse my French - bullshit! I turned to him and said why and he said because they're made of titanium steel - they can't disintegrate. We don't want to lose our country, after all it's still our country and until they put us down we have the power."
-Governor Jesse Ventura, Navy SEAL bomber, Governor Jesse Ventura says 9/11 an Inside Job by US Government, April 2, 2008, MP3


Draft dodger Michael "Reagan" orders assassination of controlled demolitions soldiers Governor Jesse Ventura and John Lee at Pirate News TV


The Pilgrims Progess by John Bunyan

"And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. This is the great dragon of chapter 12, Satan or Azazel. He has a number of names, but in each case, he is the king of all the demons, Lucifer, who became Satan."
-Revelation 9:11, Christian Bible, KJV with Forerunner Commentary

Satanic Mormon Mountain Meadows Massacre was a flase flag attack on 9.11.1857 - On Sept. 11 1857, in Utah Territory, Mormons slaughtered a wagon train with more than 120 California-bound settlers from Arkansas. The wagon train was ambushed by a group of men dressed in clothing of Paiute Indians at a location called "Mountain Meadows." A couple of days passed and the settlers saw a party of white men approaching and ran out, thinking they were saved. But it was a trick. These same men had been the attackers dressed as Indians. They disarmed the surprised travelers and proceeded to execute the men, women, and adolescents in cold blood. Only one man, a minor character, a judge and Indian agent John D. Lee was tried with three other unimportant men and was the only one convicted for the massacre. He was executed by firing squad for the crime in 1877, 20 years after the event. Last year, a movie "September Dawn" starring Jon Voight recounted this story. I think the massacre was indeed a mass blood sacrifice on the order of the Druid's harvest 'wicker man' mass sacrifices Julius Caesar wrote described in his The Gallic Wars. I also strongly suspect our 911 mass murder of nearly 3,000 people is in this tradition. A clue that the Federal US Government, the American press and public, and even Mark Twain overlooked was the date - September eleven. The list of 'coincidental' mass violent murders on a grand historical scale having occurred on this date is a long one. Jesus and Lucifer are brothers, each with a God-approved role with humanity. In the story God thinks Lucifer's role is more important than Jesus's talents, so he appoints Lucifer ruler of the world. The real Mormon interest in collecting genealogies is that they believe they souls of the dead can be 'saved' in a ritual handing them over to Lucifer - 'sacrificed' to Lucifer.

“We ought to find the people who are doing this, take them out and shoot them. Really. You take them out, they are traitors to this country, and shoot them. You have a problem with that? Deal with it. You shoot them. You call them traitors, that’s what they are, and you shoot them dead. I’ll pay for the bullets. How about you take Mark Dice out and put him in the middle of a firing range. Tie him to a post, don’t blindfold him, let it rip and have some fun with Mark Dice.”
-Michael "Reagan" Flougher "Flower" Bourgholtzer Radio Show (bastard adopted son of president Ronald Reagan), Nazi NeoCon Michael Reagan puts murder contract on 100-million Americans to kill 9/11 Truth,, 6-10-2008

"Any person who willfully threatens to commit a crime which will result in death or great bodily injury to another person, with the specific intent that the statement, made verbally, in writing, or by means of an electronic communication device, is to be taken as a threat, even if there is no intent of actually carrying it out, which, on its face and under the circumstances in which it is made, is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey to the person threatened, a gravity of purpose and an immediate prospect of execution of the threat, and thereby causes that person reasonably to be in sustained fear for his or her own safety or for his or her immediate family's safety, shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison."
-California Penal Code PEN Section 422

JEWISH ISRAELI MOSSAD TERRORIST BOMBERS ARESTED IN USA ON 9/11/2001 -- ABC NEWS REPORTS ON ISRAELI MOSSAD SPIES ARRESTED ON 9/11/2001

"The FBI has issued a BOLO on suspected terrorists driving a white delivery van from New York City to the Mexican border. The suspects are using ISRAELI passports. They are considered armed and dangerous."
Emergency 911 Dispatch, BOLO (Be On the LookOut), All-Points-Bulletin (APB), City-County Building, Knoxville, Knox County, Tennessee, September 11, 2001, 11am EST -- Fox News Video

Pirate News banned & censored at oxymoronic Truth Action forum - This post is censored and banned at 9/11 TruthAction.org, where partial photos of the 2008 Bohemian Grove attendance list was posted. See the offical Bohemian Club photos the Jewish NeoCons and Jewish NeoLibs don't want you to see.

Pirate News banned & censored at oxymoronic Truth Action forum - This post is censored and banned by Jews at 9/11 TruthAction.org, where partial photos of the 2008 Bohemian Grove attendance list was posted.

"An elite U.S. Army study center has devised a plan for enforcing a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require about 20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly created Palestinian state. But a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) does provide a look at the daunting task any international peacekeeping force would face if the United Nations authorized it, and Israel and the Palestinians ever reached a peace agreement. Located at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., the School for Advanced Military Studies is both a training ground and a think tank for some of the Army's brightest officers. Officials say the Army chief of staff, and sometimes the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ask SAMS to develop contingency plans for future military operations. The exercise was done by 60 officers dubbed "Jedi Knights," as all second-year SAMS students are nicknamed. The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first year of a peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for U.S. troops from both sides. Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: 'Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.'"
—Rowan Scarborough, Washington Times, "U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study," September 10, 2001

"A former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the 1967 Israeli attack on the USS Liberty that killed 34 American servicemen says former President Lyndon Johnson and his defense secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was an accident. In a signed affidavit released at a Capitol Hill news conference, retired Capt. Ward Boston said Johnson and McNamara told those heading the Navy's inquiry to 'conclude that the attack was a case of 'mistaken identity' despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.' It was "one of the classic all-American cover-ups," said retired Admiral Thomas Moorer, a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the attack as part of an independent panel he formed with other former military officials. The panel also included a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, James Akins. 'Why would our government put Israel's interests ahead of our own?' Moorer asked from his wheelchair at the news conference. He was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack. Moorer, who has long held that the attack was a deliberate act, wants Congress to investigate."
-Newsday, Cover-Up Alleged in Probe of USS Liberty -- BBC Documentary, Dead in the Water: The Sinking of the USS Liberty -- USSLiberty.org

"Speaking at the Campus Progress journalism conference earlier this month, Seymour Hersh — a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist for The New Yorker — revealed that Bush administration officials held a meeting recently in the Vice President’s office to discuss ways to provoke a war with Iran. In Hersh’s most recent article, he reports that this meeting occurred in the wake of the overblown incident in the Strait of Hormuz, when a U.S. carrier almost shot at a few small Iranian speedboats. The “meeting took place in the Vice-President’s office. ‘The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,’” according to one of Hersh’s sources. Hersh explained that, during the meeting in Cheney’s office, an idea was considered to dress up Navy Seals as Iranians, put them on fake Iranian speedboats, and shoot at them. HERSH: 'There was a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war. The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build — we in our shipyard — build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. Might cost some lives. And it was rejected because you can’t have Americans killing Americans.'" [Except in Pentagon's Operation Northwoods, the Israli attack on USS Liberty, NATO's Operation Gladio, Operation 9/11, Operation Wildfires, and Operation Katrina]
—Think Progress, To Provoke War, Cheney Considered Proposal To Dress Up Navy Seals As Iranians And Shoot At Them, July 31, 2008

"Congressman John Olver (D-MA) is deeply concerned whether we will actually have an election in November '08, as he believes this administration will likely strike Iran from the air, declare a national emergency, and cancel the '08 elections. He thinks impeachment is a futile waste of legislative energy, will be harmful of democratic '08 victories, and further tighten the "gridlock" he has complained of for the past few decades."
—Ralph Nader attorney at law and presidential candidate in 2000, 2004, 2008, threatened with arrest by George W Bush during the 2000 presidential debates, Ralph Nader quotes Rep John Olver that Cheney will start Iran War and declare martial law if Bush and Cheney impeached -- Iran Attack, Election Suspension, Martial Law in the Cards? -- Cheney determined to strike in US with WMD this summer; only impeachment and removal, or a general strike, can stop him -- Pirate News Commentary: Call their bluff and impeach, and raise them a SWAT raid on the White House (John Lee at Pirate News was Ralph Nader's chauffeur who personally handed Nader VHS copies of 9/11 Road To Tyranny and Dark Secrets Inside Bohemian Grove)

"So what if all this is true? What the hell are YOU gonna do about it?"
-J.D. Lee, attorney at law on the trillion-dollar Dream Team suing members of Carlyle Group for allegedly perping the September 11 attacks, September11ClassAction.com, declaration to John Lee of Pirate News, who sued the Bush Sr White House under the RICO Act for narcoterror bombings during Iran Contra, December 25, 2005

"The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, four princes and other Saudi entities are immune from a lawsuit filed by victims of the September 11 attacks and their families alleging they gave material support to al Qaeda, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday. The ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld a 2006 ruling by U.S. District Judge Richard Casey dismissing a claim against Saudi Arabia, a Saudi charity, four princes and a Saudi banker of providing material support to al Qaeda before the September 11 attacks. The victims and their families argued that because the defendants gave money to Muslim charities that in turn gave money to al Qaeda, they should be held responsible for helping to finance the attacks. The appeals court found that the defendants are protected under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The court also noted that exceptions to the immunity rule do not apply because Saudi Arabia has not been designated a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. State Department."
-Edith Honan, News Daily, U.S. court rules Saudi Arabia immune in 9/11 case, 14 August 2008, In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 06-0319-cv(L), 14 August 2008

"I'd make a great terrorist."
-Mark Loizeaux, owner of Controlled Demolition Inc, paid $3-billion government contract to "demolish" WTC "after" 9/11/2001, bomber of Oklahoma City federal building, "Summer of Destruction 2001" bomber of in History Channel's Wrecking Ball, 7,000 other government buildings, graduate of University of Tennessee College of Civil Engineering at Knoxville, BBC TV: Conspiracy Files 9/11 The Third Tower, July 2008 - The Third Tower Uncut

"The one-hour BBC program The Third Tower should have a positive effect on spreading the truth about what happened to WTC 7. Despite its attempt to debunk by twisting and omitting facts, there is much to cheer about. Here are 30 examples from the program: 1) There is a WTC 7, many have never heard of it.2) No plane hit WTC 7. 3) WTC 7 fell down. 4) Several videos of WTC 7 falling down are shown. 5) The collapse is compared visually to a controlled demolition. 6) Barry Jennings tells of hearing multiple explosions in WTC 7. 7) Barry Jennings was told while in WTC 7 "Get out of there, get out of there now", which sounds very suspicious."
-Dr. Kevin Barrett PhD, candidate for US Congress, and Rolf Lindgren, 9/11 Blogger, "BBC's Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News", July 10, 2008 - The Third Tower Uncut

Barry Jennings murdered before 2008 NIST report on WTC7

"There is a large movement calling itself the Truth movement, which argues that 9/11 was some type of inside job. Even if it is true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean, it doesn't have any significance. Something would have leaked out, very likely [Jewish Operation Northwoods & Israei massacre of USS Liberty, 100s of Israeli Mossad terrorist bombers arrested in USA after 9/11, Saudi hijackers still alive, Bin Laden's denials, etc]. And if it had, they'd have all been before firing squads [except they bribed the military with trillions of dollars], and that would be the end of the Republican Party forever [and the Democrat Party too]."
-Dr Noam Chomsky PhD (Jew), Manufacturing Dissent on 9/11 Truth


George W Bush Impeachment by Congress

"Resolved, that President George W. Bush be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate: Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against President George W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors. In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has committed the following abuses of power.
ARTICLE 33 - In his conduct while President of the United States, George W. Bush, in violation of his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty under Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” has both personally and acting through his agents and subordinates, together with the Vice President, failed in his Constitutional duties to take proper steps to protect the nation prior to September 11, 2001.... Again, there is no evidence that the president held any meetings or took any action to deal with the threats of such attacks. In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office."
—Congressman Dennis Kucinich, THE IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W BUSH - ARTICLE XXXIII - REPEATEDLY IGNORED AND FAILED TO RESPOND TO HIGH LEVEL INTELLIGENCE WARNINGS OF PLANNED TERRORIST ATTACKS IN THE US, PRIOR TO 911, June 9th, 2008 - 5 HOURS OF IMPEACHMENT VIDEO DOWNLOADS - Youtube download of Article 33 re 9/11

"We, the undersigned citizens of Canada draw the attention of the House to the following: THAT, scientific and eyewitness evidence shows that the 9/11 Commission Report is a fraudulent document and that those behind the report are consciously or unconsciously guilty of covering up what happened on 9/11/2001. This evidence overwhelmingly supports the conclusion that World Trade Center Towers 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by demolition explosives and that the official theory of the towers collapsing from the airplanes and the ensuing fires is irrefutably false. We further believe that elements within the US government were complicit in the murder of thousands of people on 9/11/2001. This event brought Canada into the so-called “War on Terror,” it changed our domestic and foreign policies for the worse, and it will continue to have negative consequences for us all if we refuse to look at the facts. THEREFORE, your petitioners call upon Parliament to: (1) Immediately launch its own investigation into the events of 9/11/2001 on behalf of the 24 Canadian citizens murdered in New York City. (2) Act lawfully on the findings of its own investigation by helping to pursue the guilty parties in the international courts."
-Democratic Party Deputy House Leader Libby Davies MP, Canadian House of Commons, PETITION TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN PARLIAMENT, June 10, 2008


Joseph Dwyer before his suicide in 2008

"The March 2003 image became one of the most iconic of the U.S. invasion of Iraq: that of a bespectacled American soldier carrying an Iraqi child to safety. The photograph of Army Pfc. Joseph Dwyer was used by news outlets around the world. After being lionized by many as the human face of the U.S. effort to rebuild a troubled Iraq, Dwyer brought the battlefield home with him, often grappling violently with delusions that he was being hunted by Iraqi killers. His internal terror got so bad that, in 2005, the Long Island native shot up his El Paso, Texas, apartment and held police at bay for three hours with a 9 mm handgun, believing Iraqis were trying to get in. Last month, on June 28, police in Pinehurst, N.C., who responded to Dwyer's home, said the 31-year-old collapsed and died after abusing a computer cleaner aerosol. Dwyer, who joined the Army two days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and was assigned to a unit of the 3rd Infantry Division that one officer called "the tip of the tip of the spear" in the first days of the U.S. invasion, had since then battled depression, sleeplessness and other anxieties that military doctors eventually attributed to post-traumatic stress disorder. The war that made him a hero at 26 haunted him to the last moments of his life. "He loved the picture, don't get me wrong, but he just couldn't get over the war," his mother, Maureen Dwyer, said by telephone from her home in Sunset Beach, N.C. "He wasn't Joseph anymore. Joseph never came home." "He went away to inpatient treatments; none of it worked," his father, Patrick Dennis Dwyer, said. After a PTSD program in Durham, N.C., turned Dwyer away because of a lack of space, Maureen Dwyer said her son received inpatient care for six months at the Northport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, beginning last August. After doctors discharged him in March, she said, his anxieties returned with such intensity that Dwyer's wife, Matina, 30, took their daughter, Meagan, 2, and moved out five days later. Maureen Dwyer said her son married a month before his deployment. She said her son began experiencing serious depression soon after his vehicle in Iraq was hit by a rocket-propelled grenade in 2003. The El Paso shooting was only one of several incidents there, according to interviews. He had a number of driving accidents when, he later told his family, he swerved to avoid imagined roadside bombs; he once crashed over a curb after imagining that a stopped car contained Iraqi assassins. After a July 2007 motorcycle accident, his parents tried, unsuccessfully, to have him committed to a mental institution. After his Iraq deployment ended and with increasing urgency, Dwyer's friends urged him to give up his firearms. His parents worried about his practice of pushing furniture against the interior walls of his Texas home, arming himself with knives and sleeping in a closet. He told his family he was suspicious of counseling. He complained that prescribed drugs were ineffective. They say he turned to sniffing Dust-Off computer cleaner to drug himself to sleep. On June 28, Dwyer called for a taxi to take him to the hospital, but he was too weak to open the door. Breaking through, Pinehurst police Lt. Michael Wilson - who said he had been to the apartment before for earlier incidents - found Dwyer on the floor, coherent but unable to walk. Within minutes, Dwyer was dead. Dressed in his Army uniform, Dwyer was buried Wednesday at Sandhills State Veterans Cemetery, after a Roman Catholic funeral."
-Martin C. Evans, Newsday, "Soldier made famous by 2003 Iraq photo dies - Man shown rescuing child haunted by war after returning home," July 13, 2008 -- uncensored comment by Pirate News


Bush and VA censor news of soldier deaths
This photographer was fired and banned

US Gulf War DEAD 73,846 US soldiers, 1,620,906 disabled

"Remember the 2nd Amendment with the right to bear arms? That's not done for hunting or fishing, Our forfathers put that right in there so that we have the ability to rise up if our country becomes oppressive."
-Governor Jesse Ventura, Navy SEAL bomber, author of Don't Start the Revolution without Me, Colbert Report


9/11 widow Ellen Mariani sues George W Bush under the RICO Act for perping the 9/11 Massacres

"A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the '9-11 official version.' On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin professor, Dr Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, 'It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.' One reason the Israelis are concerned about his appointment is that Mr. Falk has compared Israel's treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust."
-Eli Lake, New York Sun, U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11, April 10, 2008


ABC News producer James Bamford uncovered Operation Northwoods, the Pentagon/CIA plan to perp terrorist bombings in Washington DC, sniper assassinations in USA, and hijack fake CIA airliners by remote control

"Former Hitler Youth accused pedophile Joseph Ratzinger will be visiting the World Trade center 'Ground Zero' site in Southern Manhattan on April 20, Hitler's birthday. The NYPD, Sercret Service and the Vatican Swiss Guard will all be on security duty when Pope Benedict is in town. Sunday will be the highlight when he goes down to ground zero and up to Yankee Stadium and officials warn the best way to get around will be mass transit."
-WCBS, Nazi Pope in WTC visit on Hitler birthday, April 11, 2008

"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq," Ma'ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favor." Netanyahu made the comments during a conference at Bar-Ilan University on the division of Jerusalem as part of a genocide, er, peace deal with the Palestinians who survived the slaughter. Meanwhile, Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad cast doubt over the veracity of the September 11 attacks Thursday, calling it a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. "Four or five years ago, a suspicious event occurred in New York. A building collapsed and they said that 3,000 people had been killed but never published their names," Ahmadinejad told Iranians in the holy city of Qom. "Under this pretext, the U.S. attacked Afghanistan and Iraq and since then, a million people have been killed only in Iraq."
-Haaretz, Israeli prime minister Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel, April 16, 2008

Physics 911: Gravity on WTC was 0.1 KiloTons of TNT but debris and dust exploded with over 8.5 KiloTons of TNT

9/11 families banned from secret Gitmo trials of tortured patsies, er, "9/11 Masterminds"
PS: This is what torture sounds like

9/11 victims sue Bush using RICO Act
Bush Gang accused of perping 9/11 Massacres
Mariani vs Bush, Cheney, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld
RICO lawsuit at 911ForTheTruth.com

Pirate News family lawfirm settles 9/11 lawsuits
Motley crew vs Carlyle Group
Lee Lee & Lee

9/11 Motley widows say 9/11 Inside Job with no hijackers and bombs in World Trade Center

9/11 widows call for new investigation re White House 9/11 Commission ties in Feb 2008

9/11 Comission Report based on false confessions by CIA waterboarding torture

Martial Law Prosecutors Accuse Pentagon and Jr Bush White House of Rigged 9/11 Courts Martial

PNTV EXCLUSIVE!
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE AUDIO:
Cheney Says Bin Laden Innocent On 9/11

Bin Laden Says Bin Laden Innocent on 9/11

9/11 Jewish Attorney General Eliot Spitzer Blackmailed in Israeli Mafiya Prostitution Ring and Resigns as Governor of 9/11 Coverup

Spitzer's Real Scandal: $7-billion Amicus Brief for World Trade Center bomber Larry Silverstein


Eliot Spitzer and Hillary Clinton love female prostitutes like Cathy O'Brien

"The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer. US soldiers are dumb stupid animals who are good for nothing but pawns for our foreign policy."
-Sir Heinz "Henry" Kissinger Jewish Knight of the British Empire, German citizen and Israeli citizen, Communist Russian spy code named "Bor", recruiter of Nazi warcriminals in Project Paperclip, convicted warcriminal and wanted felon, George W Bush's nomination for director of his 9/11 Commission coverup

"With politicians like these, who needs terrorists?"
-Congressman Ron Paul MD USAF OBGYN for President

"Bin Laden supposedly confessed to the Al Qaeda September attack to the two towers in New York, while all the intelligence services of America and Europe know that the disastrous attack was planned and realized from the American CIA and the Mossad with the aid of the Zionist world in order to accuse the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part in Iraq and Afghanistan."
-President Francesco Cossiga, Italian president: Intel agencies know 9/11 was an Inside Job (President Cossiga declassified NATO's Operation Gladio false-flag terror bombings in Western Europe after World War 2, Corriere della Sera, 30 Novembre 2007

"So what if all this is true? What the hell are YOU gonna do about it?"
-JD Lee, attorney at law on the trillion-dollar Dream Team suing members of Carlyle Group for allegedly perping the September 11 attacks, September11ClassAction.com, declaration to John Lee of Pirate News, who sued the Bush Sr White House under the RICO Act for narcoterror bombings during Iran Contra, December 25, 2005

Statements or entries generally
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
-18 US Code §1001

by John Lee
PirateNews.org
June 26, 2006
updated weekly

KNOXVILLE, TENN - The ASS Con this weekend was the largest "press conference" yet for reporting 9/11 Truth. College professors, a Congressional candidate and USAF fighter pilot, a WTC hero, a WTC pro blogger TV host, news radio jocks, Hollywood directors and actors, and the world's richest home builder spoke in Los Angeles to a packed house of 1,200 truthseekers. Thousands more were turned away, due to inability to afford a stadium to seat everyone.


Professors convince Doctors of 9/11 Truths that most everyone else recognized as blatantly obvious 5 years ago - 3 out of 4 doctors have now been sabotaged and retaliated against - Dr Steven Jones fired by BYU and withdraws from Scholars for 911 Truth


Treasonous anti-Semitic Jewish ADL Masonic Mossad mafia terrorist cell makes fraudulent claim to Congress that 9/11 Truthseekers are terrorists


PNTV attacked by treasonous anti-Semitic Jewish ADL Masonic Mossad mafia terrorist cell on History Channel


PNTV applauds RBN Radio and Dr Webster Tarpley PhD with their decision to follow the advice on this page, to broadcast live from the DC911Truth.org symposium in Washington DC, on November 11, 2006. This will also be posted free on RBN's archives. Thank you RBN and John Stadtmiller. The symposium is at Arlington Campus of George Mason University from 10am to 5pm on Saturday, 11 November 2006. Posted at 911Blogger.com.

Will future 9/11 conferences learn the lessons learned at ASS Con, such as the 9/11 Accountability: Strategies and Solutions Conference? Doubtful, judging by the lack of Press Passes and high price of admission. The "press" that did show up appeared to be Zionist provocateurs. And the fact that Alex Jones announced that week that he was paying his lawyers a lot of money to sue and destroy Republic Broadcasting Network. Jones already destroyed RBN's archives of American Scholars Symposium. The week after the con the FCC and FBI raided Jones' nemeses on pirate radio in Austin, Texas, who were affiliated with RBN. 9/11 Accountability con confessed on its website that it censors all reporting of the facts that anti-Semitic "Jews" and Israel led the massacres on 9/11, to falsely blame the Arab Semites: "As a result of the controversy surrounding Eric D. Williams, he has stepped down from involvement in the 9/11 Accountability Conference. The 911 Accountability Conference does not support Holocaust denial, nor does the 9/11 Truth Movement. No speaker listed here is known to have published works related to the Holocaust. We support and encourage an open and respectful exchange and dialogue among all persons concerning September 11, 2001." No TV coverage? No live radio broadcasts? Only token Muslims and minorities? Another Zionist exercise in containment, fronted by Patriots For Profit?


Music video Ode to the Neocons

MUSIC VIDEO & MP3 DOWNLOAD: ODE TO THE NEOCONS
by Dr Steven Jones PhD at American Scholars Symposium
Re-edited by PNTV

Dr Jones fired by Masonic Mormon Brigham Young University


PNTV broadcast Sept 16, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 1, Pre-event Press Conference, 1 hour - Mirror

PNTV broadcast Sept 23, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 2, Professor James Fetzer PhD (Part 1), 1 hour - Mirror

PNTV broadcast Sept 30, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 3, Professor James Fetzer PhD (Part 2), 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Oct 7, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 4, Professor Webster Tarpley PhD (Part 1), 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Oct 14, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 5, Professor Webster Tarpley PhD (Part 2), Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones (Part 1), 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Oct 21, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 6, Alex Jones (Part 2), 1 hour. This video was partially censored by covert operatives infiltraiting CTV


WTC 7 was never hit by an airliner nor by falling debris yet collapsed just like a Controlled Demolition by explosives, coincidentally after Jewish Australian WTC renter Larry Silverstein confessed on PBS TV America Rebuilds that he approved the "PULL" of WTC 7, which is defined by Webster's Dictionary as an intentional DEMOLITION. CIA HQ was in WTC 7, and Mafia mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani Knight of the British Empire was named for likely promotion to CIA director. Silverstein profited by a $7-Billion insurance claim from the terrorism on 9/11/2001. Webster's Dictionary defined "TERRORISM" as "A MODE OF GOVERNMENT BY TERROR"


9/11 Eyewitness Barry Jennings in WTC7 - In exclusive video, NYEMA command bunker employee discusses seeing, hearing and feeling massive explosions in Building 7 before collapse of Twin Towers, and walking over dead bodies in WTC7

Loose Change 3 Update: Security officer details explosions inside WTC7 - The Alex Jones show welcomed Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Burmas to discuss an exclusive interview they have conducted with an individual (Barry Jennings) with high level security clearance who was inside the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 and has descibed and detailed explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of any of the buildings at ground zero on 9/11. The interview, to be featured in the forthcoming Final Cut of Loose Change is currently under wraps but the creators have allowed some details to leak purely to protect themselves and the individual involved who has asked to remain anonymous until the film is released. "We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark." The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby: "It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out." He was then told by firefighters to get twenty blocks away from the area because explosions were going off all over the World Trade Center complex. The key to this information is that the individual testifies this all happened BEFORE either tower collapsed, thus building 7 was at that point completely undamaged from any falling debris or resulting fires. It also means that explosions were witnessed in WTC7 up to eight hours before its collapse at around 5.30pm. Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them. What makes all this information even more explosive is the fact that this individual was interviewed by the 9/11 Commission as they conducted their so called investigation. Avery and Burmas successfully contacted the individual after discovering a TV interview he did on 9/11 while they were trawling through news footage from the day in research for the Final Cut. June 2007

WTC 7 Emergency Head Was Building Collapse Specialist - The former New York City chief emergency manager Jerome Hauer, whose office was the 23d floor bunker of WTC 7, was also a building collapse specialist, according to New York Times. Hauer was also Managing Director of Kroll Associates - the company that provided security for the WTC complex on 9/11 - and he also betrayed advance knowledge of the anthrax attacks a week before they happened. In a July 27 1999 NY Times article entitled What Could Go Wrong? It’s His Job to Know, Hauer is given a glowing write-up by journalist Randy Kennedy. “There is one story he tells in which this fascination is quite literal….But another illustration, a bit more metaphorical, is hard to miss when you walk into his office on the 23rd floor of 7 World Trade Center, otherwise known as ”the bunker,” the $13 million bulletproof, hurricane-proof, blackout-proof emergency crisis center opened by the city last month.” The article describes Hauer’s role, “As the city’s chief emergency manager, Mr. Hauer oversees the response to building collapses, of which there have been no shortage over the last three years.” “For much of his professional life, it has been the task of Jerome M. Hauer, 47, to know a lot about how things work so that when they stop working — when they fall down, when they get blown down or blown up, when they freeze or burst or burn out — he knows what to do. Like all self-described emergency junkies, he sits around all day thinking up horrifying ways for things to be destroyed and people to die and then hoping that all his plans stay on the shelf. If he were to update his resume, the ''types of emergencies handled'' category would read something like this: helicopter crash, subway fire, water main break, ice storm, heat wave, blackout, building collapse, building collapse, building collapse. His mother, Rose, a vice president for nursing at Beth Israel Hospital, helped him get a job in the hospital's morgue as what pathologists call a ''diener'' -- German for servant. ''As the junior guy,'' he explained, ''I was the one responsible for all the dirty work: cutting open the gut and cleaning it and pinning it and making it ready for the pathologist to review.'' And did he enjoy this? ''Well, it was fascinating. The first week was a shock. But I got used to it after a while, like anything else.'' In a city where many emergency services fiercely guard their own turf, the introduction of an umbrella office to coordinate these services has created a few crises in itself. In particular, Police Commissioner Howard Safir has been involved in a long-running turf war with Mr. Hauer over who gets to call the shots at many city emergencies.

PNTV broadcast Oct 28, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 7, billionaire Jimmy Walter, 1 hour. This video was partially censored by covert operatives infiltraiting CTV

PNTV broadcast Nov 4, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 8, Alex Jones' Terrorstorm, 2 hours 20 minutes. Includes Jones' introductory comments with Charlie Sheen, the world's highest-paid TV actor. This episode was heavily censored by covert operatives infiltraiting CTV. The entire last 1 hour and 21 minutes were cut, and replaced by an unscheduled old repeat episode "cruising the fucking crack houses on Magnolia Avenue", and "dancing bitches" (homosexual transvestites aka Judge Bill Swann and Gene Patterson?) at the Electric Ballroom stripping to "Pussy Real Good" and "I'm Gonna Fuck Your Man". This was of course Election Week, when the treasonous terrorist gang calling itself the Republican Party (aka Gay Old Perverts) was attempting to steal another "election" with help from the sodomite vote, in order to obstruct justice and keep dictator George Bush Jr et al from arrest and death penalty for perping the domestic terrorist attacks in USA on 9/11/2001. Replayed in its entirety as a Special Event TBA

PNTV broadcast Nov 11, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 9, Alex Jones' Q&A, 50 minutes

PNTV broadcast Nov 18, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 8, Alex Jones' Terrorstorm. Includes Jones' introductory comments with Charlie Sheen, the world's highest-paid TV actor. Special event presentation. 2 hours 20 minutes

PNTV broadcast Nov 25, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 10. Dr Steven Jones PhD professor of physics reports his scientific conclusion that Thermate incendiary explosives bombed the WTC on 9/11/2001. Professor Jones was fired by BYU in retaliation for this lecture in Truth. Part 1, 1 hour. CTV robot started this broadcast 3 minutes early

PNTV broadcast Dec 2, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 11. Dr Steven Jones PhD. Part 2, 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Dec 9, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 12. Dr Steven Jones PhD. Part 3, 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Dec 16, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 13. Day 2 Panel Discussion with Dr James Fetzer PhD, Dr Webster Tarpley PhD, Dr Bob Bowman PhD and Dr Steven Jones PhD. Also broadcast by CSPAN. 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Dec 23, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 14. Panel Discussion Part 2 with Dr James Fetzer PhD, Dr Webster Tarpley PhD, Dr Bob Bowman PhD and Dr Steven Jones PhD, plus Q&A. Also broadcast by CSPAN. 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Dec 30, 2006 - American Scholars Symposium New Years Remix. Host Alex Jones remixed by Revere Radio Network and PNTV. 1 hour

PNTV broadcast Jan 14, 2007 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 15. Loose Change #3 Part 1

PNTV broadcast Jan 21, 2007 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 16. Loose Change #3 Part 2. PNTV now listed on TV Guide Channel!

PNTV broadcast Jan 28, 2007 - We take a break from 911 Con for some torture by copsters in Tennessee, caught on hidden audiotape. Lester Siler's screams provide graphic instruction on what it sounds like to stand up for the US Constitution against a Police State Death Squad. Plus PNTV's interview with General Janis Karpinski, commander of Abu Ghraib Death Camp. Dictator Bush gives his State of Dis Union speech to Congresshos. Music by Inner Circle, Team 13 and Counter coup. PS: Siler's wife is a GENIUS!!! How many wives would allow their husbands to be tortured, for a $19-million payday?

PNTV broadcast Feb 17, 2007 - Replay of TERRORSTORM with introduction by Alex Jones at American Scholars Symposium

PNTV broadcast Feb 2, 2008 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 17. William Rodriguez Part 1.

PNTV broadcast Feb 23, 2008 - American Scholars Symposium Episode 18. William Rodriguez Part 2.


CSPAN intentionally confused Theories with FACTS

911 Con on CSPAN:
Saturday 29 July 2006
08:00 PM EDT; 11 PM EDT
Tuesday 1 August 2006 at 6:10 PM EDT
September 11th Terrorist Attacks
Alex Jones Productions
Los Angeles, California
ID: 193155 - 06/25/2006 - 1:30 - $24.95
C-SPAN.ORG

CSPAN - American Scholars Symposium Panel Discussion - Google Video

CSPAN - American Scholars Symposium Panel Discussion - YouTube in 7 parts

"Watched the C-SPAN version this weekend. Interesting. Raise hell. But I'm afraid the mainstream just can't handle a conspiracy theory of this magnitude. They are right that the New York Times is in on it, though, but not exactly like they think. The Times is now irrelevant, even though the TV talking heads still quote it from time to time. Anything to gain more traction in public opinion against Bush and co. is good, though. They have to be taken down. But there are plenty of high crimes and misdemeanors to go around, without having to prove that rogue intel wings were in on training the 9/11 hijackers. I've already reported part of this story, the part about the CIA and FBI being connected to the hijackers through the drug trade in Central America and Florida. But it's just not a story frame that can be sustained. If true, America is over an done for. It may be anyway, but those with real money and power will find a way to prop it up..."
-Professor Glynn Wilson, University of Tennessee Knoxville (alma mater of the Loizeaux family, owners of Controlled Demolitions Inc bombers who were paid a $7-billion contract to "demolish" the World trade Center), Locust Fork Radio, LocustFork.net, email to John Lee at Pirate News


911 Con on CSPAN

AmericanScholarsSymposium.org - Official video download page

911 Con on C-SPAN: Panel Discussion on Sunday - Captured, encoded and uploaded by PNTV. 1:50 hours, 75mb - download ASAP


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Doug Loizeaux at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC showed how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX British Royal Demolition Explosive shape CUTTER charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

History Channel's The Wrecking Ball - In summer of 2001, Knoxville's Controlled Demolitions Inc demonstrate how they install Linear Cutting Devices to bomb 7,000 buildings. CDI was paid $7-Billion govt contract to "demolish" the World Trade Center. Plus Australian Jewish billionaire Larry Silverstein, confesses on PBS TV's America Rebuilds to agreeing with NY Fire Dept to bomb Wolrd Trade Center 7 with 100s of preinstalled bombs. Silverstein profited from the 9/11 terrorist bombings thanks to an uncontested $7-Billion insurance claim. Silverstein had only rented the entire WTC for 6 weeks

9/11 First Responder Heard WTC 7 Demolition Countdown - A 9/11 first responder has gone on the record to describe how he heard a demolition-style countdown precede the collapse of WTC 7, eyewitness testimony that dovetails with other EMT's and rescue personnel who were also told that Building 7 was going to be "brought down". Earlier this year, we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse. In addition, former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer described hearing bombs tear down the building as he fled the collapse. Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert, Kevin McPadden traveled to ground zero completely of his own accord and spent the next four days searching through the rubble and nearby buildings for survivors. In a speech given at this week's 9/11 truth events in New York City, McPadden describes the shocking details of what he witnessed shortly before WTC 7 imploded into its own footprint. In a taped interview with us after the event, McPadden made it clear that he and onlookers clearly heard "three, two, one" from the radio before the building collapsed. The following video from CNN clearly shows firefighters and police telling the public to get back because Building 7 was about to come down and in the words of the cameraman was about to "blow up."

Controlled Demolition Inc on History Channel and PBS America Rebuilds - Knoxville natives proving how the WTC was bombed on 9/11, as Australian Israeli Jew Larry Silverstein confesses that he and Mafia transvestite mayor Sir Rudy Giuliani Knight of the British Empire bombed WTC 7

Controlled Demolition Inc on History Channel and PBS America Rebuilds - Knoxville natives proving how the WTC was bombed on 9/11, as Australian Israeli Jew Larry Silverstein confesses that he and Mafia transvestite mayor Sir Rudy Giuliani Knight of the British Empire bombed WTC 7

"The ruins of the Oklahoma City federal building, ripped open by a bomb and left tottering precariously until the dead were removed, are etched in the American mind. When the signal finally came to destroy the remains of the building, a UTK alumnus' company did the job. Controlled Demolition Inc. collapsed the Murrah Building with less than 100 pounds of dynamite placed strategically at 200 points in the superstructure. The job was typical of the delicate, dangerous work Mark Loizeaux (Knoxville '71), his brother Doug, and their father, John D., do. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Maryland. The federal building demolition was more dangerous than most of Controlled Demolition's jobs because the remains were so unstable. The company's workers partially rebuilt some areas of the building to help con-trol the collapse. And unlike the April 19 bomb blast that shattered windows a mile away, the demolition operation barely vibrated nearby buildings. John D. founded CDI in the late 1940s. In 1960, at age 11, Mark began learning the business from his father and eight years later became the nation's youngest blaster. When John D. was injured in an accident, 18-year-old Mark interrupted his pursuit of an architecture degree at UTK and returned home to run the family business. After his father recovered, Mark re-enrolled, this time majoring in business. Soon after he graduated, he became president of CDI. Mark supervises the company's contracts, insurance, and engineering and takes charge of some field operations. His brother, Doug, is vice president responsible for field operations and personnel. He personally packed explosives in the Oklahoma City federal building. Stacey Loizeaux, Mark's daughter, is a licensed blaster and frequently a project manager. She was born in Knoxville while her dad attended UTK. CDI has brought down many well known structures including the Dunes Hotel in Las Vegas and the Andrew Jackson in Nashville. The Sheikh A. Akakl Center in Saudi Arabia, part of which collapsed during construction, was another of CDI's big blows. A company brochure says CDI brought down the remainder of the building without damaging facilities just two feet away on two sides."
-Carolyn Mitchell and Bob Gilbert, Tennessee Alumnus, The Electronic Edition of the University of Tennessee Alumni Magazine, "Good out of Evil: An alumna from Oklahoma City takes heart - Alum's Firm Demolishes Federal Building," Fall 1995

C-Span Firestorm: 9/11 Truth Symposium Gains Momentum

Concerned Citizens and 9/11 Questions Meetups By City - Knoxville, Tennessee listens to WBCR 1470am for Listeners Club Meetings, Truth concerts and video presentations


911 Con: American Scholars Symposium at Sheraton Downtown LA

911 Con: Panel Discussion on Sunday - 4 professors, WTC survivor and Hollywood directors present the facts of the current US Civil War. As recorded by CSPAN, but so far has been 100% censored by CSPAN. Free low-res Google Video version of Pay Per View by PrisonPlanet.TV, but not linked at AmericanScholarsSymposium.org - 1 hour 30 minutes

911 Con: Highlights - 1 hour


BYU Physics professor Dr Steven Jones tested the WTC steel and found Thermite and Thermate incindiaries as routinely used in explosive demolitions of skyscrapers by Controlled Demolitions Inc. The owners of CDI graduated from College of Civil Engineering at University of Tennessee Knoxville, and were paid a $7-Billion govt contract to "demolish" the WTC with their partner BFI. The CEO of BFI William Miller lives in a suburb of Knoxville. Most of the WTC evidence was destroyed in Communist China, India and Knoxville Tennessee. Knoxville mayor Victor "Victoria" Ashe, Bush Jr's alleged boytoy, was promoted to US ambassador to Poland, dubbed "The Most Jewish Nation In Europe". Pirate News producer John Lee filed felony criminal charges and civil class actions against Ashe and his 9/11 contractors for felony car theft, but Knox County prosecutor Randy "I Employ Convicted Serial Killing Mass Murdering CIA Drug Dealing Hitmen" Nichols is obstructing justice by hiding this complaint from the Grand Jury. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

911 Con: Dr Steven Jones - BYU physics professor's Powerpoint presentation of laboratory tests proving the WTC was felled by explosive demolitions using 10,000 Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermate incendiary devices per tower, with the precise sequence controlled by computer programmer


911 Con: Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice - WTC remained molten for months after 9/11/2001, and melted resolidified steel was found in 50-pound blobs which is what Dr Jones tested - Super Thermite bombs act instantly which explains why the WTC Complex collapsed at the freefall speed of gravity with giant mushrooms clouds blowing sideways, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" - Dr Jones got a standing ovation for his presentation of the Kareoke parody of the song Every Breath You Take by the Police

911 Con: Dr Steven Jones - Keynote speech re preinstalled Thermate melting the WTC

911 Con: Dr Steven Jones music video - Lyrics of professor's parody of Police song, "Every Breath You Take" (video plus MP3 download), Powerpoint PDF

Music Video: Ode to the Neocons - Parody of "Every Breath You Take" by the Police, Professor Steven Jones and Dale Tippet

Fun with Thermite - Braniac Tee Vee plays with Hellfire. As seen in USA on G4 TV

Dr Steven Jones 'Lifting the Fog' Berkeley Lecture - This is the latest recording of a live webcast of Steven Jones' presentation from the Lifting the Fog conference held on the campus of UC Berkeley thanks to 911Truth.org

Buy your Thermite on EBay - DIY favorite for professional arsonists, scientists, professors and chemistry students

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - British Big Brother Corporation video shows reporter talking about WTC collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background

BBC destroyed all its 9/11 historical videotapes - "The 9/11 conspiracy theories are pretty well known by now. The BBC addressed them earlier this month with a documentary, The Conspiracy Files, shown within the UK. Until now, I don't think we've been accused of being part of the conspiracy. But now some websites are using news footage from BBC World on September 11th 2001 to suggest we were actively participating in some sort of attempt to manipulate the audience. As a result, we're now getting lots of emails asking us to clarify our position. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today 'so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy.'"

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - British Big Brother Corporation video shows reporter talking about WTC collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies. This amazing clip was on Google Video, but was removed within hours of the story breaking. A You Tube upload (still processing) is embedded above but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at this link and also here. A WMV link is here (on our server) and a Quicktime here. Bit torrent versions of the file can be found here. An avi version can be found here. We are attempting to compile numerous mirrors of the video file. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark. We expect the surviving links to quickly disappear, so we've also uploaded an FLV file to our own server. Click here to download. You'll need a free player that plays FLV files, a selection of which can be found here. Please use this download to create mirror copies in all formats and e mail the links to us. To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot. The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - British Big Brother Corporation video shows reporter talking about WTC collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background

WTC 7: "Keep your eye on that building, it'll be coming down soon." - This is exactly what EXPLOSIVE demolitions look like


911 Con: Note angled shape-charge cutter bomb cuts in basement of WTC on 9/11/2001. Note MOLTEN METAL SLAG on ALL steel columns in basement of WTC. Diagonal cuts using diagonal Thermate cutter charges allow gravity to pull a building down plus explosive Kicker Charges to knock the columns sideways - Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice

"When a crime scene involves the detonation of explosives, and the possibility of undetonated materials exist, an experienced contractor is needed to preserve evidence critical to ongoing investigations while dealing with any explosives discovered. Responding first to the request of the General Services Administration (GSA), and subsequently that of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI), was able to assist in analyzing the integrity of the unstable Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Controlled Demolition Incorporated's team coordinated with rescue and body retrieval efforts by authorities, salvaged evidence for the FBI's investigation, prepared the building for implosion, and completed the demolition sequence in a continuous work program. Controlled Demolition Incorporated is equipped to work closely with governmental agencies under complex project scenarios that demand professionalism and attention to detail while working under difficult site, political and emotional conditions. Controlled Demolition CDI is recognized as the innovator and global leader in the controlled demolition and implosion of structures. Loizeaux family owned Controlled Demolition - CDI has an unmatched 52 year 7000 structures international track record for environmental operations, controlled demolition, explosive demolition and implosion of buildings bridges and other structures."
Controlled-Demolition.com, "ALFRED P. MURRAH BUILDING IMPLOSION", Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, May 24th, 1995 (CDI was paid a $7-Billion contract to "demolish" the WTC, with its partner at OK City, Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI), owned by Knoxville's William Miller)

Dr Steven Jones and Dr Webster Tarpley - World Crisis Radio interview discussing their lectures at the American Scholars Symposium. Sulfer added to Thermite makes Thermate, to reduce the melting point of steel by almost 50%, allowing the WTC collumns to be cut "like a hot knife through butter". Radiation measurements were allegedly normal (despite 1,000 of exploded radioactive smoke detectors), so Dr Jones theorized that no nukes were involved at WTC. Why the steel was still red-hot, weeks after 9/11, was not explained, but probably the conspirators were igniting unburnt Thermate to destroy the evidence, before allowing removal of the evidence. Saturday, July 15, 2006


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Loizeaux family at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC show how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX Royal Demolition Explosive shape CUTTER charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - NOTE THE ANGLE OF THE CUT IS GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

911 Con: William Rodriguez - WTC keymaster was eyewitness to massive explosions in the basement of WTC, was invited to the White House, was the last surviving rescuer pulled from the rubble on 9/11, and is currently sued the Bush Gang under to RICO Act for perping the 9/11 Massacres. 50 minutes by PrisonPlanet.TV

911 Con: Dr James Fetzer - Pay-per-view at PrisonPlanet.TV

911 Con: Dr James Fetzer - Dr Fetzer discussed his ambush on Fox TV's Hannity and Colmes, and how the ex-marine ripped their heads off for not doing their homework. The very next day, Norman Mineta resigned from the Bush White House. Mineta testified to Bush's 9/11 Commission that he eyewitnessed Dick Cheney giving the order to the US military to stand down and allow the aircraft to strike the Pentagon


911 Con: Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice - WTC remained molten for months after 9/11/2001, and melted resolidified steel was found in 50-pound blobs which is what Dr Jones tested. Dr Jones details these facts in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

911 Con Panel: Dr James Fetzer

911 Con Press Conference: Alex Jones

911 Con: Alex Jones


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Loizeaux family at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC show how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX Royal Demolition Explosive shape CUTTER charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

911 Con: Charlie Sheen

911 Con: LT Col Robert Bowman PhD - 10 minute clip. Also a 2nd video of Charlie Sheen at 9/11 Con by TheBlackPacket.com

911 Con: LT Col Robert Bowman PhD - Free full-length speech demanding abolition of CIA and arrest of the Bush Gang for treason. Vietnam combat pilot and Star Wars director Dr Bowman ran for US president in 2004, and is a Democratic candidate for US Congress in 2008. "We must root the terrorists out of Washington DC! We need trials for treason." Bowman celebrated his 50th wedding anniversary at the 911 Con

911 Con: LT Col Robert Bowman PhD - Star Wars director Dr Bowman ran for US president in 2004, and is a Democratic candidate for US Congress in 2008 at Bowman2006.com. Full pay-per-view keynote speech at PrisonPlanet.TV

LT Col Robert Bowman PhD vs Beavis & Butthead, er, Vanity and Combs - Bowman, for unknown reasons, always refuses to discuss details of the 9/11 treason, which is suicide in a debating contest or ambush on Anti-American Australian Jewish Commie-Chinese Knight of the British Empire-owned Fox TV

911 Con: Terrorstorm - Full length pre-release documentary by Alex Jones debuts at 9/11 Con


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Loizeaux family at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC show how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX Royal Demolition Explosive shape CUTTER charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

911 Con: Loose Change 3 - Media Mafia clips and interviews shown at 911 Con

Loose Change V3 - Final cut. Includes an opening disclaimer that the use of copyrighted footage (Naudet film) does not imply agreement or permission by the copyright holders. The French Naudet gang alleged sued the Loose Changers, which is suspicious, since it's suspicious the Naudets were "coincidentally" videotaping the sidewalk sewars with FDNY at the exact moment impact by the "Boeing 737" not the 767.

911 Con: Anthony Hilder interviews billionaire Jimmy Walter - Video by John Lee and PNTV was censored by Google Video


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Loizeaux family at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC show how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX Royal Demolition Explosive shape CUTTER charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

It was a great 24-hour nonstop press conference, without the press. Essentially, it was nothing more than the usual radio preachers preaching to their choir. Now it's up to bloggers and webmasters to tell the Truth, as usual, but only for folks who know how to google. CSPAN, CNN and BBC were there, but their minders banned and censored all their broadcasts. No local TV news coverage in LA. No live radio coverage - not even from the talk hosts present, who report the 9/11 Truth every day on Genesis Communications Network and Republic Broadcasting Network. No real print coverage. Typical disinfo psyops by censorship and containment. That's why God invented cheap videocams and CATV.

This historical event proved that John Lee is Knoxville's only TV journalist, in both local and national news, and that PNTV is Knoxville's only source for news. That's scary, with a sub-zero income thanks to kidney damage and stolen Social Security pension and stolen Veterans Administration pension. My previous trip to Hollywood was during recovery for a collapsed lung. But combat jouralism is never easy during a Civil War.


VIDEO DOWNLOAD: HISTORY CHANNEL WRECKING BALL and PBS TV AMERICA REBUILDS - Loizeaux family at CONTROLLED DEMOLITION INC show how to bomb the World Trade Center using military RDX Royal Demolition Explosive shape charges set at a diagonal angle similar to STEALTH THERMITE, STEALTH THERMATE and SUPER-THERMITE - After the Cutter Charges cut the steel in half the KICKER CHARGES OF DYNOMITE are used to push the TOP half of the steel columns sideways one floor at a time in a controlled demolition - Plywood box covers the diagonal RDX shape charges on all 4 sides of the column - CLICK PHOTO FOR FREE DOWNLOAD

Controlled Demolition Inc on History Channel and PBS America Rebuilds - Alice Cooper sings "Welcome to my nightmare" during short clips from History Channels' "Wrecking Ball" episode, as CDI bombs perfectly good govt buildings all over USA, during their "Summer of Destruction" in 2001. CDI owner engineers graduated from University of Tennessee in Knoxville, home of mayor Victor Ashe, now Bush Jr's ambassador to Poland (CIA redition torture death camps). CDI's $7-billion partner at World Trade Center "after" 9/11/2001 was Browning Ferris Industries, the $40-billion waste cartel HQed in Knoxville. Notice how CDI installs British RDX "cutter charges" in a diagonal position on steel beams, exactly as seen at WTC scrap after 9/11. CDI was required at WTC, because many of the Thermate cutter charges did not explode, and had to be detonated by CDI before removal from the rubble, so this resulted in molten steel for days, weeks and months after 9/11, as the unburned Thermate was ignated by CDI, burned off, then was removed and destroyed in Communist China, and melted down in Knoxville.

"Self-hating Jewish anti-Semite" Dr Henry Makow PhD: Bush, Israel Involved in 9-11 - Governments have always invented threats in order to pursue aggression and make their people sacrifice their lives, wealth and freedom. If you believe Israel and the West are under attack by Islamic extremism, you are being fooled. There is growing evidence that Israel was involved in the 9-11 attack and is plotting new terror scares to keep the GOP in power. A Report of the German Intelligence Service (BND) says Israel's Mossad helped the "Arab terrorists." Germany has not denied that this report is authentic and no one has refuted it. "These investigations disclosed in late May of 2001 that an attack was to be made against certain specified targets in the American cities of Washington and New York. But it was apparent that the Mossad was not only fully aware of these attacks well in advance but actually, though their own agents inside these Arab groups, assisted in the planning and the eventual execution of the attacks. On August 6,2001, the German ambassador Ischinger informed George W. Bush of the exact time and place of the attack. Bush thanked the ambassador and said he was aware of it. The "Voice of the White House" Friday produced a transcript of a telephone conversation between the Israeli Embassy and AIPAC, the Israel lobby. The speakers discuss fabricating terror attacks and scares in order to influence the November elections. People would rather believe a lie than admit they have been deceived, even if their pigheadedness may have fatal consequences. Israel was not created so Jews can have a "national homeland." The Rothschilds who are Freemasons created Israel in order to advance their plan for world dictatorship. August 11, 2006

Super RDX is bombs are only manufactured by Israel - Around 6:20 am, October 23, 1983, a terrified city is awakened by a deafening explosion. The ground shakes. Have the Israelis begun another bombing rampage? A towering mushroom cloud billows from the rubble of what had been the U.S. barracks at Beirut International Airport where the 1st Battalion 8th Marines had been sleeping. The truck that blew up the Marine Barracks was loaded with 666 pounds of enhanced RDX "rag bombs." The Israelis call RDX, "rag bombs," because they use it to kill "rag-heads" or to blame bombings on "rag-heads." Also, the "safest" way to handle it is in "rags" that have been soaked in RDX and dried. Their planted bombs often look like a pile of dirty "rags." The only active sources of RDX in 1983 were the United States, Canada, France, Sweden, China - and Israel. But even 666 pounds of RDX (the most powerful, non-nuclear explosive in the world) couldn't have done the damage caused by "The largest non-nuclear explosion in history." Only "enhanced RDX," an Israeli specialty, could have caused that holocaust. The RDX that killed our Marines was "enhanced" with propane gas and primed with PETN boosters or detonation cord, according to Yosef Bitar, Lebanon's top explosive expert. Bitar is an expert; between 1975 and 1983 he had defused 1,870 bombs! The Beirut bombing that killed 241 U.S. Marines was "the largest non-nuclear explosion in history," according to General Paul X. Kelley, past-Commandant of the Marine Corps. The author of this news report, RBN talk show host and AFP reporter Christopher Bollyn, was kidnapped and tortured by electroshock, by Jewish Police State Death Squad in Chicago in August 2006, as punihment for reporting on Israeli involvement in 9/11. See the video of Kay Griggs, wife of Colonel Griggs, an assassin for USMC, testified that her husband and US Navy Intelligence had prior knowledge of the bombing of the USMC barracks in Lebanon. Just like USS Liberty.

American Scholars Symposium censors itself

Don't we have enough problems without shooting Indy media in the mouth?

Question: "I don't get video streaming, my internet connection isn't good enough. Are you gonna come out with a DVD of the Conference?"

Alex Jones: "That is on the burner, to do. We're finishing up the official Terrorstorm, that should be ready in about two and a half weeks. As soon as that's done, I frankly think the Bilderberg footage I got is more important. But I may try to make both films simultaneously, a Bilderberg film slash American Union film, and then also might put together a double CD set of four hours of the Conference."
—Infowars.com Radio, WBCR 1470am, July 20/21, 2006 ( audio download)

So, Mr Jones is not even going to post his 24-hour 911 Con on his pay-per-view PrisonPlanet.TV...

911 Con: ORDER bootleg DVDs of all 24 hours of American Scholars Symposium


Large musclebound black man sabotaged all videocams on video stage. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Combat journalism vs COINTELPRO

Some of the videos posted so far were sabotaged by a suspected LAPD undercover copster or fire inspector sitting on the video platform and shaking it on purpose while blocking the fire escape. Roidhead refused to move when video crews repeatedly told him to, because it was shaking the videocams so bad. There were plenty of available seats. That was obviously his mission for Uncle Scam, since CNN, BBC and CSPAN were all there.

To be fair, perhaps the reason CSPAN has refused to broadcast its videotapes, and why network TV and local TV have refused to attend this event, is due to Alex Jones' and Kevin Smith's insistance that all video crews sign a contract promising to never resell their videotapes. Video crews are banned from broadcasting ANY press conferences from this event, by limiting their videos to 30 minutes, which is only 1/2 to 1/3rd the length of a press conference. This contract ensures that no TV production company will ever broadcast a 9/11 press conference, since their lawyers will never allow them to sign such a contract. All local and national TV news companies resell their broadcast via videotapes of all news programs, at a cost of at least $30 per hour per tape.

911 Eyewitness - Watch Thermate melt the WTC just seconds before the collapse and listen to explosive demolitions in WTC BEFORE the collapse. Video by 911 Con speaker Rick Seigel at 911Eyewitness.com


WTC evidence was destroyed in Communist China, India and Knoxville Tennessee. Diagonal cuts using diagonal Thermate CUTTER charges allow gravity to pull WTC down in a controlled demolition at the speed of gravity in 10 seconds

This contract with Alex Jones also forbids any TV crew from broadcasting the entire event, for free. Repeated attempts by PNTV to contact ASS before the event, for permission to broadcast the entire event, were met with denials. When TV crews spend $1,500 per person to attend a press conference, it makes no sense to be banned from broadcasting their work, so why attend? This ain't no sports event, with exclusive TV broadcast rights for advertising revenue. This is a homicide investigation, and attempt to save this nation - and save the world.

PNTV is the only video producer to renegotiate those contracts, at the event, with signed contracts with each individual speaker, and with the agent for Alex Jones, to allow full broadcast on CATV. No other media outlet jumped through that legal hoop. CTV Corporation in Knoxville demands its producers sign contracts waivering all right to broadcast "outside content" on Cable Access TV, which censors all broadcast of productions by Alex Jones, and by 100s of other great truthtellers. Knoxville's CTV is owned by Scripps Howard COMCAST ATT. Mr. Scripps and Mr. Howard are members of Bohemian Club, so this contract bans CTV broadcasting Alex Jones' Dark Secrets Inside The Bohemian Grove. Other CATV owners are adopting this policy of censorship via CATV contracts, for example, Time Warner in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Thus the 9/11 Con can only be broadcast in the Knoxville market if PNTV does the camerawork.

Dozens of alternative video crews recorded the entire 24-hour press conference, most using $5,000 videocams in HDV, requiring broadcast quality computer systems to edit the high-resolution video files. But according to their media contracts, none are allowed to broadcast their hard work, reducing their costly efforts to mere home videos.


Colonel Bob Bowman PhD, cancerous 9/11 Truthteller, Vietnam fighter pilot, Star Wars commander, past US presidential candidate and current Democratic candidate for US Congress, told PNTV that the national a state parties refuse to support him, but the local party in Florida provides enthusiastic financial backing, perhaps because Bowman does not specifically say anything about who perped 9/11 and how they did it, other than Bush and Cheney should be arrested for ordering the military to stand down and let USA be attacked

What's needed is for these lone videographers to pool their video, archive it online, with high-resolution raw WMV video files on the free Indy servers, such as Archive.org, suitable for copyright-free download and re-edit by broadcast studios, to create a free worldwide indy television network. Even if the Media Mafia chooses to ignore this almost-live video feed, Cable Access TV producers like PNTV can broadcast this news in every major city in USA.

Most, if not all, of these alternative media journalists were required to pay $75 for tickets to attend this "press conference". Such a requirement ensures that no TV crew will attend an event they have to buy tickets for. What benefit is a "press pass" if journalists are treated as mere spectators, without any right to report a story? American Scholars Symposium, judging by its website, has no intention of selling DVDs of its 9/11 Con.

Likewise, Alex Jones of Infowars.com apparently has no intention of selling DVDs of his own 9/11 Con, judging by removal of links to the store at AmericanScholarsSymposium.org, and no mention of 9/11 Con DVDs on his radio show. Jones only promotes his old version of Terrorstorm, as shown at the 911 Con, before he starts selling his new version of Terrorstorm, which might include tidbits from his 911 Con. Then he went on vacation to the beach. WTF?

The American Way includes getting paid for doing one's job. Or else you literally starve to death. The problem is when American Greed takes over, and conmen perp massive scams on the goyim. $75 for admission is a steep price to pay for the same old Truth available "free" on the ether and the ethernet, but the opportunity to meet, greet and network is worth it - and, IF those in attendance are actually willing to meet, greet and network - and IF they are willing to appear on REAL TV and tell the Truth to the entire nation. If the answers are YES, then $75 is a wise investment.

Those spectators who complain about the steep ticket price of the 911 Con, and who bite what few Truthtellers attack the Media Mafia on their own battlefields, without actually joining a battle themselves, are not doing Truth any favors. Who's the disinfo artist, the person who oversells, or the person who never sells anything? To sell professionally, and survive, requires a high-energy level, although many types of personalities can succeed. Selling is always required to survive, when a manufactured product is fighting for marketshare on a battlefield of bullshit. There's certainly far worse things to waste your money on than Truth, such as the $65 ticket (etc) for 100,000 sheeple to attend 4 days of cartoon Comicbook Con in San Diego in July. Fans pay $200 for tickets to attend the New World Odor's Formula One Grand Pricks, even back when I drove the F3 support race in the early 1990s. At least, that's what I scalped my extra pit passes for.


USA and Democracy are not allowed by the World Trade Organization Martial Law Police State in Seattle Washington

If the answers are NO, then it's time to Identify Friend or Foe (IFF), kick it up a notch, and take Truth to the next level. EVERY city and county needs YOU to run Truth on YOUR own Cable Access TV show. Every city and town needs YOU to broadcast Truth on pirate FM. Better yet, buy your own licensed AM or FM radio station, or TV station, just like you would invest in any other business. Buy your own webhosting and/or ISP - profit from the monopolized internet bottlenecks. Websites only reach the most-intelligent of Truthseekers who know how to search. CATV and pirate FM reach the sheeple, and lead the wisest of the flock away from the slaughterhouse, and give them a fighting chance for survival, and perhaps even Freedom.


Police State of California vs democracy and uSA
Wooden and rubber bullets kill just like stun guns

Note that protests are only as good as the television coverage, which is always censored by the Media Mafia, even when 500,000 peacenik pussies protest Bush, War and genocide of US citizens. Besides, intelligent protesters should be just as heavily armed for self defense as the US Police State Death Squads, and armed with videocams and the power for citizen's arrest and lawful use of deadly force and justifiable homicide against gangsters in govt (i.e. the Battle of Athens, Tennessee in 1947).

Imagine 500,000 US citizens marching on the White House on 9/11/2006, armed with only full riot gear, Level-3 body armor and helmets, chemgear, Lexan shields, clubs, stunguns, pepperspray, semi-auto and full-auto defensive assault rifles and .50-cal BMGs and grenade launchers, to make a citizen's arrest on George Walker Bush and his Gang. That ain't no militia, that's citizenship. That's not Revolution, that's Countercoup.

"COME OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE WITH YOUR HANDS UP!" would make a great soundbite on TV, with Jr Bush and Cheney led away in handcuffs, again.

Study CSPAN and BBC archives of Boris Yeltsin walking up to Gorbachev, speaking the words, "You're fired and under arrest for stealing $3-Billion!", and taking control of a superpower without firing a shot. The Russian Parliamentarians just smiled and clapped, watching the overthrow of a Communist dictator from their ringside seats.

But only protesters who are illegal alien criminals get TV coverage from the Media Mafia (who organized the protests months in advance, aka Jewish Clear Channel traitors), to sell Bushes' wide open US borders and merger of USSA with Mexico, Canada and the British Commonwealth empire. CATV exposes the local networks as the frauds that they are, and will eventually force them to report more and more Truth. But only if YOU start your own CATV show. Every city and county needs dozens of such CATV shows for Truth to have a winning impact. So don't back off just because your town has one or two Truthtellers on CATV. Repetition is the Mother of Learning, selling, and brainwashing. Everybody is intelligent enough to figure out how to do these things. AND they help you sell whatever it is that you sell everyday, already. And these are great steppingstones into polyticks, if and when you decide to infiltrate Gangsta Govt.

Many hours research on the web, and listening to a lucky interview by Dr Steven Jones on RBN Radio, turned up a buried but unmentionable link to Justice Television, on ST911.org. Apparently, Justice Television is providing the ONLY DVDs of the American Scholars Symposium. Dr Jones complained that even his superstar report on Thermite was buried on the Scholars for 911 Truth website. The same website that censored Eric Hufschmid, who wrote the most professional book on 9/11 so far. Although Hufschmid was webmaster for ST911.org, he was not allowed to link to his own website, where his videos were posted online for free download. Hufschmid is censored by the Zionist Jews, Zionist Christian oxymorons and Zionist Communist Atheists, for reporting the obvious indisputable fact that dozens of Jews perped the 9/11 terrorist massacres. Hufschmid's sister, supermodel actress Sarah O'Hare, is married to Lachlan Murdoch, the son of multi-billionaire Sir Rupert Murdock Jewish Knight of the British Empire who is a citizen of Australia who owns Fox News, is married to Communist Chinese citizen Wendi "Ho" Deng, and they live in Bejing, the capital of Communist China. Hufschmid's sister was kidnapped off the face of the planet after her marriage into the Murdock crime family.

911 Con: ORDER bootleg DVDs of American Scholars Symposium

Alex Jones profited by $100,000 gross during this event, so why censor TV crews from broadcasting the event, which is worth $1,000,000s of free publicity? Sure, Jones has $10,000s in regular monthly bills to fire up his transmitters and internet servers, and to pay payrole for his radio, CATV and web crew. PNTV broadcasts to 110,000 homes in Knox County, on Channels 6 & 12, worth $100,000s if sold on the advertising market. All the more reason to benefit from the free publicity of a nationwide media blitz. Who was giving Jones this bad legal advice?

WTC survivor William Rodriguez has contracted with a personal agent, who forces him to sign a contract forbidding all interviews without paying a large fee, of an unknown amount. This would require an expensive team of lawyers to negotiate these expensive contracts. His contract will also result in total censorship of his story from all TV networks, who all demand the legal right to sell videos of their news broadcasts. Who gave him this bad legal advice? Charlie Sheen's Hollywood lawyers may also have insisted upon such waivers from the media reporters. Sheen is the highest TV sitcom actor in the world, at $350,000 per episode, plus a percentage of gross profits as owner of the series Two and a Half Men (aka The Odd Couple), in addition to his blockbuster Scary Movie 4, which pokes fun at Bush Jr's bizarre alibi on 9/11/2001.


911 Con: Thermate lava sparks falling from WTC 1 minute before collapse, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

Thermite Music Video - Watch Thermite melt a car's engine block in 5 seconds. Notice the identical appearance to the previous video of molten steel spraying ouf of WTC 30 seconds before it's "collapse". Anyone can purchase Thermite, which is a common chemisty school experiment, and used for welding and incendiary explosives by US Govt. Thermite is composed of powdered iron-oxide rust and powdered aluminum-oxide, and burns at 2,500 degress Centigrade (4,500 degress Fahrenheit). Thermite was invented in 1893 and patented in 1895. Jet fuel burns at under 1,000 deg F in uncompressed air, and the official reason the WTC melted was due to "paper fire" not kerosine fire

That's like the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund forcing "beneficiaries" to sign contracts forbiding future litigation, in return for accepting a million dollar bribe, er, settlement. Before the checks arrive, the potential beneficiaries cower in fear of "saying the wrong thing", as if that will ruin their "insurance" claims. After all, look what happened to Ellen Mariani, whose ex-lawyer Phil Berg, who is Rodriguez' current lawyer, was scheduled to speak on his current RICO terror case vs Bush, but was a no-show.

A better solution is to ban all 9/11 speakers who insist upon journalists signing contracts and paying fees, rather than queer the deal, or no deal with journos.

A standard condition for purchase of seminar tickets includes an agreement clause for "Photo Release": "We occasionally use photographs of our show participants in our promotional material. By virtue of your attendance, you agree to usage of your likeness in such material." This is the adhesion contract for Videomaker Magazine's two-day seminiars, costing $400. Videomaker also produces its vidcasts from such events.


Magician Willie Rodrigruez was the Keymaster of the WTC, was the last rescuer rescued from the WTC demolition, was eyewitness to giant explosions in the WTC basement before the first airliner hit, was invited to the White House to shake Junior's hand, and sued President George Bush Jr under the RICO Act for perping the treasonous terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001. Rodriguez eyewitnessed an Employee of Aramark with the flesh exploded off his body in the basement, while the CEO of Aramark was safely playing golf with Jewish homosexual pedophile billionaire Warren Buffet, at US Air Force Strategic Air Command HQ in Omaha Nebraska, and hid in the bunker with Bush Jr on 9/11. Aramark has no-bid cost-plus blank-check food service contracts at University of Tennessee in Knoxville, and is paid a bonus for every employee fired, resulting in massive turnover to fraudulently boost profits on that govt contract. Aramark ran the restarant in Windows Of The World in WTC, where so many jumped to their deaths. Rodriguez said the WTC security videocam HQ in the basement was abandoned BEFORE the first aircraft crash and before the first explosion in the basement. The Port Authority security guards with the master keys for escape and egress escaped the building without opening any of the stairwells. Rodriguez and the firemen heard explosions in the lower floors while climbing the staircases. FDNY collapsed on the 27th floor and could not walk any higher due to exhaustion. He gave dust masks to survivors in WTC due to the acrid smoke from amonium nitrate bombs. The only floor he did not unlock was an empty floor where he heard massive movement of heavy equipment. Rodriguez on only allowed to testify to the 9/11 Commission in Top Secret session, even though he was just a janitor. He turned down bribes to be a Congressman or have a TV show to shut him up. Rodriguez is censored from speaking about Jewish, Zionist and Israeli perpetraition of the 9/11 Massacres. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

The 9/11 conference in Chicago, earlier that same month in June, also required news crews to sign similar contracts, as condition for issuance of a press pass.

What should have happened:

Since independent alternative journalists were forbidden by contract from covering this event, Alex Jones' team of video and web experts should have posted online ALL 12 hours per day of video, at the conclusion of each day's press conference. The videotape of each segment should have should have been captured and edited by laptop computer in their hotel room, then uploaded instantly to the Indymedia websites for instant international distribution for free. Print journalists anywhere in the world could then watch the event in time for print deadlines, and take direct quotes from the speakers, almost in real-time. High-resolution video would be uploaded to Archive.org, suitable for instant download and broadcasting by TV networks anywhere in the world. This is virtually as good as live TV converage, but without the need for million-dollar satellite upload trucks.

This is how the alternative media can outflank the multinational anti-American Media Mafia. This is the ONLY way to outflank the Media Mafia.


911 Con: Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7. Super Thermite bombs act instantly which explains why the WTC Complex collapsed at the freefall speed of gravity in 10 seconds with giant mushrooms clouds blowing sideways, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

After 24 hours, news is no longer timely for TV networks and daily newspapers, so instant gratification is mandatory, if a press conference is to be covered by the press. However, PNTV is very interested in obtaining all video from the 9/11 Con. Contact John Lee ASAP, who will post the contact info and links for all interested 9/11 Indy video producers, on PNN - the Pirate News Network.

AmericanScholarsSymposium.org - Official video download page

Two weeks after the event, most videos were still not posted on the 9/11 Con's official website. Google Video has more 9/11 Con videos posted than the 9/11 Con website. Nor were they all posted on Alex Jones' pay-per-view CATV website, at PrisonPlanet.TV. There's no need to post fancy editing tricks, just post the facts, unedited and unmixed. Include some or all of the audience questions, since it gives a rare gauge of public outrage, and some of the questions were dead on target. And I waited 6 months for my PrisonPlanet.TV subsciption to start, since I paid to renew it in December 2005. I consider it an educational expense for CATV School.


Jimmy Walter invested $10-Million in fullpage 9/11 Truth ads in NY Times and USA Today, but LA Times censored his 9/11 Truth. Billionaire Walter toured Europe, Asia and South America meeting with world leaders and the public to report 9/11 Facts. Walter's family business constructed over 100,000 residential homes with Jim Walter Homes, a world record on planet Earth. 9/11 Eyewitness Rick Seigel videotaped molten metal poaring out of WTC one minute prior to the explosive demolition, caused by Thermite, Thermate incindiaries and Super Thermite explosives as proven by Professor Steven Jones' laboratory testing

Was Alex Jones just overwhelmed with the nuts and bolts of running this press conference? It was certainly a huge effort on his part, even with his team of helpers. Did Jones make these mistakes in good faith?

Future 9/11 press conferences MUST learn from these mistakes. Unless, of course, the COINTELPRO disinfo agents want to censor those events from TV and print, and have already infiltrated the 9/11 Truth media. Just like they've already infiltrated the 9/11 Dream Teams of trial lawyers, prosecuting lawyers, judicial lawyers, political lawyers and pro se prosecuting lawyers (aka "cops"). This is the admitted game plan for the New World Order to overthrow USA, by protecting the guilty domestic terrorists from arrest and prosecution.

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
—William Colby, Director CIA, assassinated 60,000 people via CIA Death Squads in Vietnam Wars with Phoenix Project ("drowned" in a suspicious "canoe crash" while cooking dinner in Washington DC, the night before testifying to Congress about Bush Sr's Iran-Contra narcoterrorist bombings)

"There are some things the general public does not need to know and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows."
—Katharine Graham, chairman of Washington Post Company, lecturing CIA agents at CIA HQ in Langley, Virginia (promoted after the previous chairman, her husband Philip, allegedly murdered himself)


911 Con: Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice - WTC remained molten for months after 9/11/2001, and melted resolidified steel was found in 50-pound blobs which is what Dr Jones tested - Super Thermite bombs act instantly which explains why the WTC Complex collapsed at the freefall speed of gravity with giant mushrooms clouds blowing sideways, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

"When a crime scene involves the detonation of explosives, and the possibility of undetonated materials exist, an experienced contractor is needed to preserve evidence critical to ongoing investigations while dealing with any explosives discovered."
Controlled-Demolition.com, "ALFRED P. MURRAH BUILDING IMPLOSION", Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, May 24th, 1995 (CDI was paid a $7-Billion contract to "demolish" the WTC, with its partner at OK City, Browning-Ferris Industries (BFI), owned by Knoxville's William Miller)

The "alternative media" is now enforcing a serious challenge to the Media Mafia for control of the ether. Have the CIA, Mossad and MI6 already seized control of the alternative journalists, via their usual techniques of bribery, extortion and murder? Gary Webb, Hunter Thompson and NY Times' ENRON editor are just 3 of at least 4-dozen journalists assassinated by the Bush Gang since 2001, in this current Civil war for control of USA.

BBC TV, CNN TV and CSPIN all sent camera crews to cover 5% of the speakers. British Reuters, New York Times and the Washington Post did their professional best to censor all topics from their sheeple, as if mere mention of existance of an event qualifies as "news reporting". Actual reporting of events thus falls upon the narrow shoulders of unpaid prosumer video crews and bloggers, as usual. Even KPFK FM Pacifica Mexican corporate radio in Los Angeles apparently failed to report on the ASS Con, while selling 9/11 DVDs at 400% markup, in its $1-million panhandle drive. Pacifica's Divine Forces hiphop did hammer LA with 9/11 Truth music and rants, a breath of sanity in the land of fruits and nuts. But Pacifica's million-dollar 9/11 blitz ended that same weekend, and the 9/11 DVDs were removed from its website.


9/11 Eyewitness Rick Seigel videotaped molten metal poaring out of WTC one minute prior to the explosive demolition, caused by Thermite, Thermate incindiaries and Super Thermite explosives as proven by Professor Steven Jones' laboratory testing

The most professional coverage of the 24 hours press conference was by its host Alex Jones, host of Infowars Radio. Jone's crew - or somebody's crew - manned the multiple videocams broadcast inside the ballroom to the audience via 2 big-screens. Jones is broadcast daily by WBCR 1470am in Alcoa, Tennessee. WBCR also broadcasts Jack Blood, also from GCN Radio Network, and Webster Tarpley from RBN Radio Network, who also spoke to the 9/11 Con. LA's own Anthony Hilder was the only producer to bring his own TV studio for interviews of 9/11 superstars. Unfortunately, part of the Sheraton's ceiling fell, knocking unconscious his camera crew while interviewing yours truly. Like being trapped in an episode of The Twilight Zone - FOR REAL. And my underpaid camera crew of me, myself and I had a short circuit between the headsets, with intermittant mike malfunctions throughout the weekend. At least I was able to repair my computer harddrive's boot crash upon my return to Kville, using only a vaccuum cleaner and free internet repair charts.


WTC 7 was never hit by an airliner nor by falling debris yet collapsed just like a Controlled Demolition by explosives, coincidentally after Jewish Australian WTC renter Larry Silverstein confessed on PBS TV America Rebuilds that he approved the "PULL" of WTC 7, which is defined by Webster's Dictionary as an intentional DEMOLITION. CIA HQ was in WTC 7, and Mafia mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani Knight of the British Empire was named for likely promotion to CIA director


PBS TV America Rebuilds - Jew Larry Silverstein, Australian renter of entire WTC complex, who profited by $7-billion insurance claim on 9/11, confesses on TV that he and Mafia mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani Knight of the British Empire bombed CIA's WTC7 with 100s of prepositioned explosive charges. Webster's New World Dictionary - "PULL: to tear down, demolish, or overthrow". Additional video of Bush Jr ordering United Nations Corporation to "beware conspiracy theories about the attacks on September 11."

Controlled Demolition Inc on History Channel and PBS America Rebuilds - Alice Cooper sings "Welcome to my nightmare" during short clips from History Channels' "Wrecking Ball" episode, as CDI bombs perfectly good govt buildings all over USA, during their "Summer of Destruction" in 2001. CDI owner engineers graduated from University of Tennessee in Knoxville, home of mayor Victor Ashe, now Bush Jr's ambassador to Poland (CIA redition torture death camps). CDI's $7-billion partner at World Trade Center "after" 9/11/2001 was Browning Ferris Industries, the $40-billion waste cartel HQed in Knoxville. Notice how CDI installs British RDX "cutter charges" in a diagonal position on steel beams, exactly as seen at WTC scrap after 9/11. CDI was required at WTC, because many of the Thermate cutter charges did not explode, and had to be detonated by CDI before removal from the rubble, so this resulted in molten steel for days, weeks and months after 9/11, as the unburned Thermate was ignated by CDI, burned off, then was removed and destroyed in Communist China, and melted down in Knoxville.

My job in the US Air Farce was loading nukes on supersonic bombers, firing up a jet engine, climbing in the cocpit and ops checking the entire weapons system, and catching Gulf War Syndrome from sabotaged vaccines and radioactive Depleted Uranium and Plutonium. I also was a demolitions specialist, hired by Uncle Scam to sabotage and blow up nukes, aircraft and air-force bases with C4 and detcord. Those were easy jobs compared to operating a videocam in a combat situation at the 9/11 Con.


911 Con: Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice - WTC remained molten for months after 9/11/2001, and melted resolidified steel was found in 50-pound blobs which is what Dr Jones tested - Super Thermite bombs act instantly which explains why the WTC Complex collapsed at the freefall speed of gravity with giant mushrooms clouds blowing sideways, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

CIA agent Ray McGovern, who confronted Dick Cheney on live TV over his WMD fraud in Iraq, was censored from the 9/11 Con by a "family emergency". British Military Intelligence secret agent David Shayler and his MI5 wife were also censored from the 9/11 Con, when US Dept of Homeland Security put them on the Terrorist No Fly List with Senator Ted Kennedy. Bush family business partner USAma Bin Laden is NOT on the No Fly List, and the FBI Most Wanted Poster declares that USAma is NOT wanted for the 9/11 attacks, since there's zero evidence that he perped the massacres, quoting from the FBI. That same week, the CIA reported it was closing its "Catch Bin Laden Office".


Rock jock Jack Blood vs 911 treason. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

A most-depressing fact of this trip was the successful overthrow of USA by Mexico. Perhaps 50% of air travelers were unAmerican, speaking a foreign language. Perhaps 100% of hotel and restaurant employees were speaking an unAmerican language, presumably because of the job requirement of speaking Mexican as condition to employment. Mexican language TV and radio were the norm in Lost Angeles. Even the phone book was printed in Mexican for Mexicans. That same week, illegal alien, Austrian citizen, Nazi Party kinder and gay porn star Arnold Schwarzennegger refused to send 1,500 National Guard troops to the US border to defend USA, preferring to send them to die in Iraq. Bush Jr's TSA Homeland Security screeners include 1,000s of illegal aliens at LAX, strip searching every slave boarding every flight.


911 Con: Melted steel column from WTC resolidified into a blob - Dr Steven Jones PhD discussed the irrefutable proof that Thermite, Thermate and Super Thermite incendiaries were used to melt 3,000 steel columns in each of the WTC Towers plus WTC7 - Dr Jones explained that Thermate contains sulfer which reduces the melting point of steel by 50%, just like salt reduces the melting point of ice - WTC remained molten for months after 9/11/2001, and melted resolidified steel was found in 50-pound blobs which is what Dr Jones tested - Super Thermite bombs act instantly which explains why the WTC Complex collapsed at the freefall speed of gravity with giant mushrooms clouds blowing sideways, as Dr Jones details in "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?"

As my departure flight was refueling, I was reminded that Knoxville International Airport is now operated by the 9/11 terrorists. TACair is contracted as Fixed Base Operator for all civilian aircraft at McGhee Tyson. The CIA players at TACair trained the 9/11 terrorists and rented them aircraft, according to the official 9/11 Commission Report. They also owned an airliner seized while loaded with $50-million in CIA cocaine.


Dr Webster Tarpley has a radio show on WBCR 1470AM and is author of 911 Synthetic Terror Made In The USA, American Leviathan: Administrative Fascism Under the Bush Regime, and The Unauthorized Biography of Homosexual Pedophile Narco Kingpin George Bush Sr. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Maryville Daily Times reported and FBI declared in court documents that over $1-billion/year in cocaine flows through McGhee Tyson airport and Tennessee National Guard Base (not counting Bush Gang's CIA dope running in Iran-Contra), where Skull & Boner Fredrick Smith has his FedEx terminal. FedEx inherited the CIA's Evergreen Aviation (Air America) contract to deliver mail from the Afghan poppy plantations, where heroin production increased 1,000% after Jr Bush promoted a Knight of the British Empire to president of Afghanistan. TACair is also linked to Israeli Jewish felon and Congressional bagman Jack Abramoff.


Homo statue of Jewish King David & homo Jewish King George 1st

The hub flight from Knox to LA included at stop at Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the British Empire International Homosexual Pedophile Terrorist Narco Kingpin Airport in Houston, Texas. I would have videotaped Sir George's statue, but that would have resulted in my arrest as a terrorist. Sir George's bronze likeness of Saddam Hussein was stationed in front of the illegal aliens strip searching US citizens for Israeli citizen Jew Michael Chertoff, Jr Bush's Communist Czech-born director of US Dept of Homeland Security and Wide Open NAFTA Borders.


Tommy Pallotta premiered Hollywood's A Scanner Darkly by Blade Runner's Philip K. Dick, starring Alex Jones, Keanu Reeves, Winona Ryder, Woody Harrelson and Robert Downey Jr, depicts a near future America that lost the war on drugs and capitulated into the tentacles of a Police State control grid

None of the airliners at Knoxville Intl airport were manufactured in USA. The creepy coast-to-coast flight from LA to NJ was on a Boeing 757, prewired from the factory for robotic remote control, as required by Pentagon's Operation Northwoods terrorist treason. Boeing, the Pentagon's expert on Killer kamikaze robot aircraft, now builds its airliners in Communist China. Russian mafiya speaking Russian invaded Knoxville on the flight from NJ to Knoxville, after a 2-hour No Fly Zone dodging the Weather War on Pennsylvania.

The scariest part of the trip was realization that PNTV was the only TV and print news outlet in Knoxville to cover this lifesaving event - poverty and Peter Principle notwithstanding. "Learning by experience" is no substitute for professional news coverage. Bohemian Grovers at Knox News Sentinel, and the Skull & Boner deputy mayor at WATE TV, of course, censored this event from their gullible victims, er, viewers. Gangsta Govt is winning its Civil War for the New World Odor. Evil fourishes when good men and women give their counterfeit scrip to Chinamart, Blockbuster and NPR, instead of supporting PNTV.


Dr James Fetzer ordered the immediate arrest of the Bush Gang for perping the domestic terrorism and mass murder on 9/11. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Can God save a USA that's DOA and RIP? Would he want to? Do YOU care?

PS: If you can't figure out the 9/11 Scam, your intelligence is too impaired to figure out the 1,000s of other scams of Gangsta Govt.

See also:

American Scholars Symposium A Huge Success - Attendees from around the globe attest to 'best 9/11 truth conference ever'

9/11 + The Neo-Con Agenda: A Few Thoughts from the Infowars Team

Worldwide Media Covers LA 9/11 Conference

KPLC TV: Filmmaker Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen to Appear Saturday at 9/11 Truth Conference in Downtown Los Angeles


Dr James Fetzer rips heads off Hannity and Colmes, shites down necks, says Lockheed Martin's Norman Minetta testified that Cheney ordered Pentagon defenses to stand down and allow "Flight 77" to hit the Pentagon, then Mineta resigned from the White House the very next day

How to talk to the Media Mafia: Dr James Fetzer rips heads off Hannity and Colmes on Faux News

9/11 Scholars for Truth Professor Kevin Barrett on Hanity & Colmes

Bush Conspiracy in 9/11 Now A College Course - PhD at North Carolina Wesleyan College offers 9/11course for college credit and is looking for answers government has never given. The course, entitled "9/11: The Road to Tyranny", was the brainchild of college professor Jane Christensen, who saw the social need to explore the many questions about the WTC attacks and the war on terrorism. The required and suggested course readings of POL 495, which began in January and ends in May, are also a good roadmap for others interested in learning more about the events before, during and after 9/11. Some of the required texts and website readings include: Infowars 911 archive, Alex Jones' Infowars.com (which includes September 911 Surprise by Pirate News).

Photos from 9/11 Conference

Infowars.com coverage of 9/11 Conference

Scholars for 9/11 Truth


Dylan Avery and Gulf War slave Corey Rowe presented their Loose Change 9/11 documentary, as featured by Vanity Fair magazine. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Loose Change V2 - 10-million free downloads on Google Video, ranked it #1, unlike PNTV's video of billionaire Jimmy Walter at 911 Con that was censored by Google Video. Starts with Pentagon's Operation Northwoods, the Rosetta Stone of 9/11. Fun with Google Earth. Interview with suicided snuff kiddie pornographer at Bohemian Grove Hunter S. Thompson. Greek Helios 737 flying by remote control crashed with all bodies frozen solid. Witnesses reported the smell of Cordite bombs, secondary explosions and censored videos at the Pentagon. A B-17 hit the Empire State Building not a B-52. Witnesses described multiple explosions and controlled demolitions of the WTC. Molten steel found at WTC 2 months after 9/11. Attempted censorship by the Media Mafia and French Naudet Bros killed Loose Change 1 & 2, resulting in Loose Change 3. Funding for stamping 150,000 DVDs of Loose Change came from the Jewish billionaire Simon family, who are partners with Australian Jewish billionaire Larry Silverstein, who confessed to bombing his WTC on 9/11 to profit by $7-billion insurance fraud. 50,000 copies of Loose Change were sold, and 100,000 copies were given away. Loose Change gives Bush Gang all the credit for perping 9/11, but censors the Jewish Zionist Israeli British Empire perpetraitors of 9/11. To be fair, a 1-hour video can only cover 1% of the evidence, which is why September 911 Surprise is a miniseries, that actually includes 9/11 Truth music videos, unlike Loose Change that uses generic instrumental music

Vanity Fair says Bush Gang perped 9/11 - With $6,000 and a laptop computer, three kids from upstate New York made a documentary about 9/11 that spread across the Internet and threw millions for a loop. I asked (Dylan Avery, director of Loose Change), what he thought was going to happen with the 9/11 issue. "Second American Revolution. I really think there's going to be anger. There's going to be a lot of anger. I think a lot of people are really pissed off, and I think the people who aren't pissed aff are going to be even more pissed off than the people who already are. Because when it becomes irrefutable public record that 9/11 was done by our government, the shit is gonna hit the fan. People are going to be upset. You can't stop it. People say, Awe, we need a peaceful revolution. We need to peaceably change things. Trust me, that's a great idea - I'm all for it. But Americans are violent, especially when they've been lied to, especially over something like this. So much has been lost because of 9/11 - I mean, families have been shattered (then bribed to shut up). There's so much pain (compensated with million-dollar bribes in hush money). So many people has just got - fucked. It's the only way to put it." (Note that the Revolutionary War was against the British Empire. With NAFTA and SPPNA Jr Bush has merged USA with Canada which is a member of the 53 nation British commonwealth, so USA has now officially lost the Revolutionary Civil War with England)

911 Con, CSPAN and Vanity Fair force Pentagon to release "NORAD Tapes" - Only 30% of tapes by military air traffic controllers released. None of the tapes come from NORAD's Cheyenne Mountain bunker, says Lt Col Bob Bowman PhD. Tapes proved Cheney ordered NORAD to stand down and let the jets hit their targets, proved Flight 93 landed safely, proved "Flight 93" was shot down by USAF pilots who disregarded their illegal orders, proved a Boeing 737 hit WTC 1 not a 757

Corey Rowe - The Iraq Experience - Director of Loose Change tells what it's like to massacre innocent civilians for Uncle Scam

Alex Jones' Terrorstorm trailer debuts at 9/11 Con

Terrorstorm - Full length documentary by Alex Jones in 2006 includes the London 7/7 bombings and interviews with British MI5 agent David Shayler who was forbidden to attend the 9/11 Con by US Dept of Homeland Security

911 L.A. Conference re-cap - Coverage of the panel discussion covered by C-Span. Panelists included Dr Bob Bowman, Dr Steven Jones, Alex Jones, Dr Jim Fetzer, and Dr Webster Griffin Tarpley. Also played "10 Second Freefall" by Three Shoes Posse. PNTV ain't the only media mogul with technical failure. 1 hour 30 min by RadioactiveRadio.org


Sheen dumps crazy stripper exwife for portly radio jock Alex Jones

And Charlie Sheen did appreciate my two video productions I handed to him - Alex Jones Remixed and September 911 Surprise Episode 1. He especially liked my parody of his dad in The Dead Zone of The West Wing. Looks like I'm commuting to Hollywood every 6 months, with Pirate News TV winning awards on Hollywood Blvd, hanging out with superstars and starlets. Does that make me a star?

More videos will be posted ASAP.


911 Con: Anthony Hilder interviews Jimmy Walter who invested $10-Million bribing the Media Mafia to advertise 9/11 Truth - This video by John Lee and PNTV was censored by Google Video

Mishpucka Mafia vs 9/11 Truth

Subject: Google Video upload successful!
Date: Thu 07/13/06 09:45 PM
Thank you for uploading your video to Google Video. The video can now be viewed.

Google Video: "Your video has been rejected"

"Your video 'Jimmy Walter at American Scholars Symposium' was rejected because it didn't comply with our Program Policies. Videos submitted to our program are subject to an initial review to ensure that they comply with our guidelines. When videos do not meet our standards, we disapprove them."

"I have a signed contract to videotape Jimmy Walter. I have a signed contract to videotape Anthony Hilder, plus I supplied this video to be included in his next documentary movie. I have a signed contract with American Scholars Symposium, where I filmed this video at their public press conference in Los Angeles last month, where CNN, CSPAN and BBC also videotaped. Are you censoring this video for some other reason? If so, then please state the specific reason why you are censoring this video from the public."
-John Lee, executive producer, PIRATE NEWS TV

"Hi John,
Thanks for your email. We appreciate you contacting us about your video. We apologize if the disapproval was made in error. We reversed the decision made on your video and it should now be live in our index. For your convenience, we have included the link to your video below. We appreciate your patience during this process.
Sincerely,
The Google Video Team"


CLICK TO DOWNLOAD VIDEO - 911 Con: Anthony Hilder interviews Jimmy Walter who invested $10-Million bribing the Media Mafia to advertise 9/11 Truth - Walter, who gives away books and videos by Eric Hufschid, declared that Hufschmid is blacklisted by the Zionists, including Zionist Jews, Zionist Christians and Zionist atheists - Hufschmid's half sister married the son of Zionist Jewish Knight of the British Empire Sir Rupert Murdoch, the pornopimp owner of Fox News. Sir Rupert Murdoch is a current citizen of Australia who is married to a current citizen of Communist China. Hufschmid's sister was kidnapped off the face of the planet after her marriage into the Murdock crime family - Video by John Lee and PNTV

Anthony Hilder, a videomaker not employed by the 9/11 Con, interviewed Jimmy Walter. Walter is heir to the largest home building empire in the world, who invested $10-million of his own money to buy advertising from the Media Mafia, as bribes to do their jobs and report the facts of 9/11. Hilder volunteered for a Walter safari to interview 7 of the surviving suicide bombers from 9/11/2001. When asked about Eric Hufschmid's excellent book (by far the best so far), and his 9/11 videos, Jimmy admitted, "Eric has come up against a conspiracy by the Zionists, who blackballed him," his punishment for discussing Israeli involvement in the 9/11 attacks (as reported by Fox TV), and for reporting the fact that less than 6-million "Jews" died in THE Holocaust (when even the curator of the Polish Holcaust Museum at Aushwitz testified that millions less than 6-million died).


Leon Catlett of Speak Out America on KKVV in Las Vegas and Anthony Hilder explain how Secret Societies of terrorists rule the world, including Skull & Bone ambassador to Poland and felonious ex-mayor of Knoxville Victor "Victoria" Ashe, who is George Bush Jr's gay lover, according to testimony by Leola McConnell, a gubernatorial candidate for Nevada, who participated in a 3-way with Ashe and Bush as their dominatrix. She also eyewitnessed Ashe's arrest in Washington DC for sex crime. Ashe was fired from the Tennessee legislature by the Tennessee Supreme Court for election fruad and perjury, and a class action for fraud and felony charges for theft were filed against him by John Lee. Alleged homicide victim on 9/11, Barbara Olson, was allegedly arrested while faking her death in Poland. Ashe spent $150,000 taxdollars on Satan's penis as a tombstone for the 3,000 human sacrifices on 9/11. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Jewish crimes are not limited to 9/11 Truth in California. Knoxville is where the US District Court illegally kidnapped legal resident Ernst Zundel, who dared publish a book written by an historian in England, that asked the question, Did Six Million Really Die? The US marshals were following the illegal orders from the Jr Bush White House, implemented by CURRENT Israeli citizen Michael "Butcher Of New Orleans" Chertoff (born in Communist Czechoslovakia, and now Jewish Director of US Dept of Homeland Security And Wide Open Borders). Zundel was kidnapped by US Govt Death Squads from his home in Pigeon Forge without charges, tortured by dogs in the Blount County "Justice" Center without charges, deported to solitary torture in Canada for 2 years without charges, deported to Germany without charges, then mistriled in Germany for the crime of free speech. Zundel's wife, Dr Ingrid Zundel, who is a US citizen, faces immediate arrest if she attends the mistrials of her husband in ZioNazi Germany, for the crime of webmasting. Meanwhile, the US Gangsta Govt refuses to arrest and deport 40-million criminal alien terrorists, murderers, drug dealers, slave traders, pedophiles, cannibals, rapists, robbers, bioweapons, tax-dodgers, welfare-cheats from USA, and is opening the borders to 200-million more.


Separated at birth in Communist Czechoslavakia, Jew Michael Chertoff is a current citizen of Israel - He hired Communist KGB General Primkov at $2-million/year to run US Dept of Homeland Security for wide open US borders and internal Police State Gulag

Victor Ashe is suspected of being "Jewish" (ASHkeNAZI), since wealthy Jews in East Tennessee love him so much they travel to Poland, just for Ashe to preside over their wedding. Did Skull & Bones mayor Victor "Victoria" Ashe have anything to do with Zundel's illegal rendition, for his gay lovers in the Bush White House? Is that why Bush Jr promoted him to US ambassador to Poland, "the most Jewish nation in Europe"? Or did Ashe flee USA, because John Lee of PNTV filed felony criminal charges against him? Ashe waivered his day in court to dispute his alleged arrests for homosexual crimes, when his team of government trial lawyers quashed subpoenas by John Lee filed in Knox County Circuit Court.

Meanwhile, Skull & Boners named Bush and Ashe eat off Adolf Hitler's silverware and worship the Jewish Swastika, and the son of Austria's top Nazi in parliament, illegal alien gay porn star Arnold "I Admire Hitler And Want To Be A Dictator" Schwarzennegger, was promoted to governor of Mexican California, after a meeting in England with Jewish billionaire Warren Buffet and Jewish trillionaire Lord Rothschild.

911 Con: ORDER bootleg DVDs of American Scholars Symposium - Democracy Digest Volume 89: 9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda: Facing the Facts on 4 DVDs - $3 donation per DVD

Related news:

September 911 Surprise by PNTV

9/11 Music Videos by PNTV

9/11 Truth Music

9/11 Truth Music


Combat cameraman attacked in 9/11 Twilight Zone. Photo by John Lee and PNTV

Illuminazi 9/11 by Anthony Hilder

911: The Greatest Lie Ever Sold by Anthony Hilder

911: The Greatest Lie Ever Sold by Anthony Hilder

911: The Greatest Lie Ever Sold by Anthony Hilder

The Illuminati and the Council on Foreign Relations - Over 40-million people have enjoyed this lecture from 1967 on Secret Societies by Myron C. Fagan, produced by Anthony Hilder


A dark scan of Amerika's future at 911 Con

Exclusive: 24 Minutes of A Scanner Darkly - Watch the first quarter of the movie right now on IGN! In theatres on July 7, 2006

Linklater On A Scanner Darkly: "It's The World We're Living In" - Surveillance, war on drugs and terror themes parallel reality. "What's the next step - you cross the street at night and you get a ticket for jaywalking because biometrically it can read who you are?" said the director. "This is really about right now - it's easy to imagine a future where the endless unwinnable drug war would sort of meld in with the endless unwinnable war on terror - and how governments and corporations profiteer and the effects of that on the individual - the numbing effects," said Linklater. During a nationally syndicated radio interview, Linklater told host Alex Jones that the actions of the Bush administration were, "The most extreme I've seen in my lifetime - in American history - this kind of executive branch grab of power is so unprecedented - it's frightening." "Man, is he in over his head as the President of the United States - that's your worst combination of someone not prepared with their impulses being almost wrong every time - it's painful to watch as a Texan." "That's our role, that's our duty - that's what the founding fathers certainly wanted - a kind of a robust dialogue where everyone's a little unsatisfied - what we have now is a small group who are very satisfied - they've taken total control," said Linklater. "Once you own the media and the outlets and you can control the debate to such a large degree, I wonder if the dissenting voices can even be heard." Linklater also says that his efforts to disseminate documentaries which point the finger at the US government for involvement in 9/11 have changed paradigms for several A-list Hollywood stars - including Bruce Willis. "Bruce is a pretty 'thinking radical' kind of guy," said Linklater.

Hollywood's Bruce Willis Now 9/11 Truther - Linklater said he had handed out DVD’s on set which carried claims that 9/11 was perpetrated by the US government to erect a police state to Bruce Willis, one of the stars of Linklater’s upcoming Fast Food Nation. “He said it put him in such a head space that he will be quiet on issues of national policy.” Linklater said Willis had told him in an e mail that the videos had changed his entire political paradigm.


Jewish South Park 9/11 is a crappy work of art

South Park 9/11 Remix - Comedy Central's rebuttal to American Scholars Symposium. Download and upload to CIA Google Video and Youtube every month

South Park 9/11 Remix - Comedy Central and South Park promote 9/11 Truth website. Bush Crime Family kidnaps 9/11 Truthers. George Bush Jr's coup d'grat for 9/11 webmaster. Sanitized for your protection from turdblossum and faggot jokes. Alternate ending remixed by PNTV.

South Park 9/11 Remix - Viral video censored by Jewish NeoCon terrorists at Google Video NSA CIA HQ, after 100,000 downloads

South Park 9/11 Remix - Google mirror. Censored by Jewish NeoCon terrorists at Google Video NSA CIA HQ after 10,000 downloads

South Park 9/11 Remix - Mirror download

South Park 9/11 Remix - Censored by Jewish NeoCon terrorists at YouTube (owned by Google)


South Park promotes 911Truth.org as Govt PsyOp

South Park 9/11 Remix - Mirror download in Windows Media

South Park 9/11 - The world’s biggest conspiracy of all time will finally be uncovered when Eric Cartman exposes the true culprit behind the September 11th attacks. An attempted assassination in South Park means no one is safe from the people who are the real brains behind the 9/11 conspiracy. When Kyle and Stan hit the road in search of the truth, they come face-to-face with the masterminds who pulled off the most elaborate, intricate and flawlessly executed operation in American history. Broadcast date 10-11-6 (9-11-01 upside down), the same day a baseball player crashed his plastic airplane into the New York City skyline, bouncing off a skyscraper owned by the builders of the new World Trade Center. The skyscraper did not fall down.... Full length uncut unless censored by Google


Bush apologist Kyle arrested as Jewish Anthrax terrorist by Govt provocateur

South Park 9/11 - The world’s biggest conspiracy of all time will finally be uncovered when Eric Cartman exposes the true culprit behind the September 11th attacks. An attempted assassination in South Park means no one is safe from the people who are the real brains behind the 9/11 conspiracy. When Kyle and Stan hit the road in search of the truth, they come face-to-face with the masterminds who pulled off the most elaborate, intricate and flawlessly executed operation in American history. Full length Episode 1009 Mystery of the Urinal Deuce with uncensored numerology, turdblossum and faggot jokes. Warning that Uncle Scam has infiltraited 9/11 Truth websites. Censored by Google?


Bush Crime Family kidnaps 9/11 Truthers

South Park 9/11 - Full length but soon censored by Google?


Bush Jr's coup d'grat for 9/11 webmaster

South Park 9/11 - The world’s biggest conspiracy of all time will finally be uncovered when Eric Cartman exposes the true culprit behind the September 11th attacks. No one in South Park is safe from the people who are the real brains behind the 9/11 conspiracy. When Kyle and Stan hit the road in search of the truth, they come face-to-face with the masterminds who pulled off the most elaborate, intricate and flawlessly executed operation in American history... Broadcast date 10-11-6 (9-11-01 upside down) on Comedy Central TV network. On Sept 11, 1994 Frank Corder allegedly crashed his airplane into the White House. QuickTime trailer and clips unless censored by SouthParkStudios.com codecs

Homosexual incestuous South Park Republicans equate 9/11 Truthers with Anti-Semitism, Numerology and Cartman's Jewish crap - Cartoon jabs at 'retarded' public, Charlie Sheen, citing Bush incompetence. The popular cartoon South Park launched a 9/11 hit piece, claiming that the "one-fourth" of Americans who believe the attacks were an inside job are "retards." The episode equates the 9/11 truth movement with anti-semitism, a pointless and insignificant investigation into the misuse of a bathroom, numerology, and the selfish, racist, spoiled and more-or-less evil show character Cartman, who frequently attacks the character Kyle for transgressions he blames on Jews. Full length on Google (censored?), segments on YouTube

South Park 9/11 - Full length, Season 10, Urinal Deuce episode

South Park 9/11 - Full length, Season 10, Urinal Deuce episode

South Park 9/11 - Full length download requires BitTorrent software

South Park 9/11 - Full length download in Quicktime

We'll Be Watching You! - Black T-shirt brigade attacks NY City on 9/11/2006, as imortalized by South Park

South Park: Harmless entertainment? Or more Zionist subversion? - South Park is a cartoon produced by Trey Parker and Matthew Stone (a popular Jewish name). In March 2004 the creators of South Park tried to make Mel Gibson appear psychotic with a rude cartoon called "The Passion of the Jew". In October 2006 the creators of South Park tried to convince their audience that people who don't believe the official story about the September 11th attack are retarded. You may wonder, "Why should I care about the South Park cartoons?" The reason is that 9/11 was a Zionist Job, and South Park promotes Zionist propaganda. It is also one of Comedy Central's top shows, supposedly watched by millions of people, including children. You wouldn't want Al Capone's gang or Jeff Dahmer to produce deceptive television shows for your children, so why do we let Zionists flood our television with propaganda? The Zionist denying, Useful Idiots such as Michelle Malkin, will promote a South Park cartoon when they believe it will instigate anger among or towards Muslims. This implies that the people who create and promote South Park are working with the Zionist criminal network in some way. It has been five years since the 9/11 attack occurred, and virtually everybody who is still defending the official story should be considered a possible member of the Zionist criminal network. South Park is distributed by Comedy Central, which also produces The Daily Show by Jon Stewart (aka Jonathan Stuart Leibowitz). The Daily Show is supposedly one of the primary sources of information about the world to teenagers and college students. Is The Daily Show a "harmless" comedy program? Some people, such as professors Baumgartner and Morris of East Carolina University, believe the show encourages destructive attitudes among children by ridiculing government leaders without encouraging discussions, research, or anything productive. Jon Stewart lies about 9/11, Israel, Zionism, uranium, and a lot more. He entertains Goyim students with Zionist propaganda. Why are we putting up with this? Do you really think it is just a coincidence that the effect of his deception is to encourage cynicism, hopelessness, hatred of Muslims, ignorance of Zionism, and pity for Israel? That's why PNTV remixed South Park 9/11. Note that Eric Hufschmid's sister married the son of billionaire Sir Rupert Murdock Jewish Australian Knight of the British Empire, owner of Fox TV. WARNING: EXTREME OBSCENE ARISTOCRAT JOKE BY SOUTH PARK, even if it's true.

Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation

The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist

Disinfo Examples and Responses

MKZine.com

9/11 music downloads - 911Blogger.com

AntiBush music by Todd "Ben Frank" Hyde for Congress

WING TV at WTC Ground Zero on 9/11/2005
WING TV in Village Voice
But why didn't WTV have a videocam?
Why wasn't 9/11 Truth at WTC?
Where will YOU be on 9/11/2006?


May 2002 headline on declassified Jr Bush White House PDB alibi titled: "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the U.S.", then Bush took a month long vacation at his dude ranch in Waco Texas, where he is terrorized by riding horses and where Laura Bush confessed on TV that George Bush Jr masterbates horses for their sperm

"When it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States, do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?"
Telling the truth: 16%
Hiding something: 53%
Mostly lying: 28%
New York Times & CBS News
October 14, 2006

ALEX JONES REMIXED
music video by Pirate News TV - 1-hour
music soundtrack remixed by Rob Revere
As provided to all speakers at the 911 Con


CTV broadcasts
September 911 Surprise

Shockumentary miniseries deprograms the sheeple, infuriates traitors

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. - September 911 Surprise is a 9-hour video archive documenting the evidence from the terror attacks on 9/11/2001. Never before has such an extensive collection of eyewitness testimony been presented in one video series. Much of this evidence has never before been seen on TV. This Hollywood award-winning miniseries is based upon the Pirate News' website, September 911 Surprise, as discussed on world-wide radio and seen on Japanese TV on 9/11/2004.

September 911 Surprise
video downloads:

Episode 1
CTV Channels 6 and 12
Friday night (2 am Saturday), Nov 19, 2005:

    Main Topics:
  • 9/11 Radio Dispatch Tapes
  • 9/11 Music Videos
  • PNTV Anime News
  • West Wing 9/11 Dead Zone

Part 1 - 1 hour

Part 2 Special Report
Robocop Spy Cam Scam
- 10 minutes

Episode 2
CTV Channels 6 and 12
Friday night (1 am Saturday), Nov 26, 2005

    Main Topics:
  • 9/11 Toons
  • PNTV Anime News
  • 9/11 Alibis
  • JFKs Music Video
  • Nixon's Confession to JFK coup
  • Operation Northwoods 9/11
  • Assorted 9/11 Music Videos

Part 1 - 55 minutes

Part 2 - 55 minutes

Episode 3
CTV Channels 6 and 12
Friday night (midnight Sat 12:01am), Dec 17, 2005

    Main Topics:
  • 9/11 Toons
  • PNTV Anime News
  • Uncensored Music Videos
  • Secret Societies
  • AshkeNAZI Khazar NeoCon/NeoCom "Jews"
  • 200 Israeli Terrorists Arrested in USA
  • Israeli Citizen Heads US Homeland Security
  • President Arnold the Nude Gay Nazi
  • Assorted 9/11 Music Videos

Part 1 - 60 minutes

Part 2 - 60 minutes

Episode 4
CTV Channels 6 and 12
TBA Friday/Saturday nights

Episode 5
CTV Channels 6 and 12
TBA Friday/Saturday nights

Episode 6
CTV Channels 6 and 12
TBA Friday/Saturday nights

Selected scenes:

September 911 Surprise video archive
backup link

September 911 Surprise - The original website as seen on History Channel

Play video files with Windows Media Player. Be sure to install the player program after you download it. Adjust internet browser, firewall and virus blocker "security" settings to allow download and viewing of video files. Radio.indymedia.org video hosting handles a huge volume of traffic, causing occasional crashes, so try again later if host is overloaded.

September 911 Surprise features the music video rage of Hollywood director John Lee, winner "Best Music Video" at Los Angeles Music Awards in 2005. Original music by John Lee with Counter Coup, and many other whistleblowing artists with axes to grind - that you will ONLY hear on PNTV.


USAma Bin Laden terrorizing New York City

“The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders’ rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations.”
—Usama bin Laden (Saudi Arabian), CNN News, "Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks," September 17, 2001

"We found another excellent website that details much of the evidence of government prior knowledge and involvement, September 9-11 Surprise. You have got to see this website!"
—Alex Jones, Infowars.com, GCN Radio Network, WBCR 1470AM Alcoa, TN, October 31, 2001

"John Lee, we want to use your website, September 911 Surprise, to report your photo of Major Rick Gibney, who shot down United Airlines Flight 93, according to your interview with Colonel Donn de Grand Pre. The show will be broadcast on Japanese TV on September 11, 2004."
—Junko Kawaoka, TopspinCreative.com, Asahi TV, New York City

Continued...



9/11 documentary producer dies mysteriously while hunting the Bush Gang for murdering his father on 9/11

Dan Wallace speaks about 9/11 Truth - Famous last words. Was Dan murdered by the same criminals as his father?

FDNY told WTC 7 to be bombed by FDNY - NYPD cops heard bombs in WTC 7 - Loose Change 3 interviews: "I was real close to Building 7 when it fell down... That didn't sound like just a building falling down to me while I was running away from it. There's a lot of eyewitness testimony down there of hearing explosions. I didn't see any reason for that building to fall down the way it did. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn't hear any... I didn't hear any creaking, or... I didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming 'get away, get away, get away from it!'... It was at that moment... I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself... Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit's hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you're hearing "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom." I think I know an explosion when I hear it... Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they're saying... Nothing to account for what we saw... I am shocked at the story we've heard about it to be quite honest."


WTC 7 was never hit by an airliner nor by falling debris yet collapsed just like a Controlled Demolition by explosives, coincidentally after Jewish Australian WTC renter Larry Silverstein confessed on PBS TV that he approved the "PULL" of WTC 7, which is defined by Webster's Dictionary as an intentional DEMOLITION. CIA HQ was in WTC 7, and Mafia mayor Sir Rudolf Giuliani Knight of the British Empire was named for likely promotion to CIA director. Silverstein profited by a $7-Billion insurance claim from the terrorism on 9/11/2001. Webster's Dictionary defined "TERRORISM" as "A MODE OF GOVERNMENT BY TERROR"


WTC 911 Responders told WTC 7 to be bombed by FDNY - "There were explosions. There were flashes. There was molten metal running down the I-beams of the basement levels like lava flows. I've never seen anything like it. Yes, planes hit the buildings - anybody who says otherwise is a moron. But the explosions - the rapid, symmetrical, sequential explosions - they happened." He explains how he and others were in the basement of one of the towers helping injured victims when he saw "One of the huge steel and concrete support pillars with an 8 foot section blown out of the center of it." Looking around, Mike saw other support columns that were in the same condition, prompting rescue personal to ask "how could someone have rigged all these explosives?" "We stood outside listening to the explosions," states Mike, "One after the other, every minute or so. At one point, about 10 minutes before the first collapse, a 30 foot or so section of the courtyard exploded straight up into the air. Just before the collapses, a series of deep, below ground explosions, then numerous explosions in the buildings upper floors. Then we ran. We felt the same deep explosions before the second collapse. This was not just the planes." The rescue worker concludes emphatically, "The buildings were rigged, there is no question about it." Perhaps of even more interest, the EMT relates the fact that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.


New autopilot will make another 9-11 impossible?

Boeing patents secret Operation Northwoods TM

by CHRISTOPHER LEAKE
UK Daily Mail
March 4, 2007

A hijack-proof piloting system for airliners is being developed to prevent terrorists repeating the 9/11 outrages.

The mechanism is designed to make it impossible to crash the aircraft into air or land targets - and enable the plane to be flown by remote control from the ground in the event of an emergency.

Scientists at aircraft giant Boeing are testing the tamper-proof autopilot system which uses state-of-the-art computer and satellite technology.

It will be activated by the pilot flicking a simple switch or by pressure sensors fitted to the cockpit door that will respond to any excessive force as terrorists try to break into the flight deck.

Once triggered, no one on board will be able to deactivate the system. Currently, all autopilots are manually switched on and off at the discretion of pilots.

The so-called 'uninterruptible autopilot system' - patented secretly by Boeing in the US last week - will connect ground controllers and security services with the aircraft using radio waves and global satellite positioning systems.

After it has been activated, the aircraft will be capable of remote digital control from the ground, enabling operators to fly it like a sophisticated model plane, manoeuvring it vertically and laterally.

A threatened airliner could be flown to a secure military base or a commercial airport, where it would touch down using existing landing aids known as 'autoland function'.

After it had landed, the aircraft's built-in autobrake would bring the plane safely to a halt on the runway.

Boeing insiders say the new anti-hijack kit could be fitted to airliners all over the world, including those in the UK, within the next three years.

The latest move to combat airline terrorists follows The Mail on Sunday's disclosure three weeks ago that scientists in Britain and Germany are developing a passenger-monitoring device.

This will use tiny cameras linked to specialist computers to record every twitch, blink, facial expression or suspicious movement made on board flights in order to identify potential terrorists.

A Boeing spokesman said : "We are constantly studying ways we can enhance the safety, security and efficiency of the world's airline fleet.

"There is a need in the industry for a technique that conclusively prevents unauthorised persons gaining access to the controls and threatening the safety of passengers.

"Once this system is initiated, no one on board is capable of controlling the flight, making it useless for anyone to threaten violence in order to gain control."

Boeing confessed to TREASON, a crime punishable by death, while building Boeing airliners in Communist China.


Independent Investigators Release Suppressed Blueprints of Destroyed World Trade Center Tower

911Blogger.com
March 27, 2007

A coalition of independent 9/11 investigators and journalists today announced the online publication of a set of original blueprints of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. The set is composed of over 200 never-before-published drawings, including plans, elevations, and details, given to physicist Dr. Steven E. Jones by an individual interested in a more complete analysis. Groups presenting the plans include Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, 9-11 Research, and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, said, "We cannot truly understand what happened in these historical structural failure events when we are not allowed access to the construction documents." Gage believes that, given the profound differences in the official collapse theories, the need for more investigation is clear. "First they come up with the "pancake theory", then they changed it to the "column failure theory". We don't believe that either of those theories are supported by the available evidence."

Since the 9/11 attacks, numerous groups and individuals have challenged the official explanation that the Twin Towers experienced total structural collapse due to a combination of aircraft impact and fire damage. Challengers assert that the WTC Towers were destroyed by pre-planted explosives, rather than fires and impact damage.

"The only theory that is supported by the evidence is controlled demolition with explosives," Gage says. "You could never get a collapse event of that speed through 80 floors of intact steel structure. The laws of physics simply don't allow it."

WTC BLUEPRINTS ONLINE - A whistleblower that was on a team working for Silverstein Group in 2002 has made public an extensive set of detailed architectural drawings of the World Trade Center, that prove beyond any doubt that the official reports into the collapse of the towers misrepresented their construction. The blueprints provided consist of 261 drawings included detailed plans for the North Tower (WTC 1), the World Trade Center foundation and basement, and the TV mast on top of the North Tower. Most of the drawings can be viewed here. The blueprints, unlike those of any other publicly funded building, have been withheld from public view since the 9/11 attacks without explanation and were even unavailable for viewing by the team of engineers from the American Society of Civil Engineers, who were assembled to investigate the collapses by FEMA, until they had signed legal documents which bound them to secrecy and demanded that they never use the information against the buildings' owners as part of a lawsuit. Within each trade tower there were 47 steel columns at the core and 240 perimeter steel beams. 287 steel-columns in total.


Psychiatrists and Psychologists agree: Government's 9/11 Story is Crazy

Should people who question the government's version of the events of 9/11 have their heads examined? Well, the following psychiatrists and psychologists have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false. Moreover, many of these mental health experts have concluded that the government's account is so obviously false that people who believe the government's version are in psychological denial.


Lucky Larry Silverstein Warned Not To Come To Work On 9/11

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, May 14, 2007

New York 9/11 truth activist Luke Rudkowski claims WTC complex leaseholder Larry Silverstein and his daughter got a warning on the morning of 9/11 not to come to work that day - his source? - Silverstein's own security guards.

Rudkowski and his protest group We Are Change protested Silverstein outside the new WTC 7 building last month and were confronted by Silverstein's security entourage who proceeded to harass the group before calling in a fake bomb threat to the NYPD in an attempt to have the demonstrators arrested.

"We talked to their private security staff, we talked to people who were there with Larry on 9/11 - they said he got a phone call telling him not to show up to work and he called his daughter up and his daughter also never showed up to work," Rudkowski told a radio show this past weekend.

Obviously, Silverstein arrived later in the day but the claim that he was given foreknowledge of an incident at the World Trade Center before the first plane had crashed is a bombshell revelation, perhaps even shadowing his infamous "pull it" comment.

Interestingly, Silverstein told the Wall Street Journal on Saturday that his wife had forced him to fulfil a doctors appointment on the morning of 9/11, meaning he would miss his usual breakfast date at the Windows on the World restaurant, which was located on the 107th floor of the World Trade Center's north tower.

Was Silverstein getting his alibi out ahead of time?

In addition, it has since come to light that one of the thug security guards who intimidated We Are Change protesters during a demonstration outside the new WTC 7 and called in a false bomb threat to frame the group, was recently fired by Silverstein Properties.

Rudkowski is now seeking legal representation to explore a possible lawsuit against the security guard, who also threatened the activists with "30 days in the hole" as well as claiming their cell phones were guns and that the wires coming out of their bags were bombs.

NYPD police later arrived to investigate the bomb threat but the protesters were left alone as it immediately became apparent that the security guard had made a hoax bomb report, a serious crime.

Such knowingly misleading and false information is not only malicious and immoral, but has been made specifically illegal under the Anti-Hoax Terrorism Act of 2003 and expanded for more stringency in 2004 and the Terrorism Prevention Act of 2006, not to mention long-standing protections against defamation and public endangerment. There are also many state and local laws prohibiting such activity.

Rudkowski is of the opinion that Silverstein Properties promptly fired the security guard in an attempt to offset potential litigation.

Rebuilding Ground Zero

After an eternity of politicking, the real construction begins.

BY STEVE MALANGA
Opinion Journal
May 12, 2007

Larry Silverstein began spending every morning at the World Trade Center shortly after he inked a 99-year deal to operate the complex in July 2001. The New York developer would have breakfast at Windows on the World, the restaurant on the 107th floor of the North tower, and then meet for several hours with tenants. But on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, he was at home, dressing for a doctor's appointment his wife had made for him, instead of at his usual table at Windows. "I had said to my wife, sweetheart, cancel my doctor's appointment. I have so much to do at the Trade Center," he recalls. "She got very upset and told me I had to go. As it turns out, that saved my life."

While he was still getting ready for his doctor's appointment, Mr. Silverstein learned that the first plane hijacked by terrorists had struck the North tower. He turned on his television just in time to see the second plane fly into the South tower. No one at Windows on the World survived.

NOTE BY PNTV: ARAMARK Corporation was the restaurant contractor on the top floor of World Trade Center. On 9/11/2001, the CEO of ARAMARK was playing golf at NORAD Strategic Air Command Golf Course in Omaha, Nebraska, with the other WTC CEOS, and with Jewish multi-billionaire pedophile insurance owner Warren Buffet. This is the same US Air Force bunker where George Bush Jr hid out with them on 9/11, after hiding behind the little children and their Satanic car-theving goat story. Omaha is pedophile capital of USA, as proven by CIA lawyer John DeCamp, as reported in his autobiography, The Franklin Coverup, and proven in courts of law. ARAMARK has the no-bid cost-plus blank-check government restaurant contract at University of Tennessee in Knoxville (alma mater of Controlled Demolition Inc), which literally pays itself a government bonus every time it fires an employee or closes a restaurant (such as the University Club). How do I know this? My wife was employed by ARAMARK, and successfully proved these facts in a court of law.


Red Dawn FOR REAL: Media Mafia admits Bush bombed USA on 9/11

Charlie Sheen's $40M weekend: Scary Movie 4 tells TRUTH with 9/11 jokes

Access Hollywood: Charlie Sheen to narrate Loose Change 3 - Charlie Sheen has been lined up to take part in a 9/11 documentary, his reps confirmed to Access Hollywood. Sheen is involved in the production of "Loose Change," a new version of a documentary suggesting the US government was behind the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. The current version of the documentary is availabe on YouTube. The actor's reps declined to reveal more details about Sheen's involvement in the project, but Page Six reports he will be narrating a new version of the film. In an interview on the Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network a year ago, Sheen expressed his views on 9/11 saying, "It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Loose Change 2 to be In-Flight Movie for Virgin Atlantic - HAHAHAHAHA!

SHEEN RETHINKS 'NUTTY' 9/11 FILM?

NY Post
May 27, 2007

SUPPORT for the loopy 9/11 documentary "Loose Change" - which argues that the World Trade Center terror attack was part of a secret U.S. government conspiracy - is quickly losing steam.

A source tells us Charlie Sheen "is having second thoughts" about being involved in an updated version of the flick, which has a huge following on YouTube. As Page Six reported in March, Sheen had agreed to narrate the ridiculous flick, presumably to give it some needed Hollywood sizzle.

The conspiracy documentary got a further boost earlier this month when Virgin Atlantic announced it would offer the current, narration-free version as an in-flight movie choice. But just days later, it scrapped the idea. "After Virgin announced it, bloggers went nuts and there was so much negative feedback that [the airline] a few days later nixed it," the source said.

After we revealed Sheen's participation, the "Two and a Half Men" star told Extra: "It's a story that needs to be told. It's a story about the truth, and the truth needs to be exposed. It's not just me, not just the Hollywood community [that] is standing up saying what you have given us doesn't make sense. We just want better answers." As for Sheen now pulling his support, the star's flack, Stan Rosenfield, did not return calls over two days.

Another proponent of the "Loose Change" theory is Rosie O'Donnell, who trumpeted her feelings about it on "The View" and her blog, making ABC brass nervous and infuriating some viewers.

O'Donnell reportedly had booked the film's producers, Korey Rowe and Dylan Avery, on Thursday's show. But after getting into a fight with Elisabeth Hasselbeck Wednesday, and after her chief writer was caught defacing Hasselbeck's photos with mustaches, O'Donnell left the show.

"Loose Change" pushes the widely debunked "controlled demolition" theory, which claims the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were blown up from within. It alleges the jet-fuel fires inside the towers weren't hot enough to melt the buildings' steel beams.

Those claims were soundly refuted by Popular Mechanics magazine, which meticulously shot down every single one.

Sir Rupert Murdoch, "Jewish" Australian Knight of the British Empire, is married to Wendi Deng, a card-carrying Communist Party citizen of Communist China. They live in Bejing, the capital of Communist China. The Murdochs own Fox News, Direct TV, TV Guide Channel. MySpace and The Sun pornographic "newspaper". Since the Communist Manifesto bans ownership of private property, the Communist Party of China now owns Fox News. The Commie Manifesto was written by Jew Karl Marx in London England. NY Post Page 6 editor Dick Johnson was arrested for extorting bribes to not write libelous lies about the rich and famous.

Charlie Sheen Responds To New York Post Hit Piece

Prison Planet
May 28, 2007

Charlie Sheen has issued a brief statement in response to a New York Post article that claimed he was having "second thoughts" about his involvement in Loose Change Final Cut and the 9/11 Truth Movement as a whole:

"My views and convictions regarding the events of 9/11 have not wavered. I still firmly believe the citizens of this great country, especially the family members of those tragically lost, deserve a much more accurate and thorough investigation surrounding the horrific events.

"The suspicious fact that certain relevant testimonies were not included in the Keen Commission's final report, discredits the majority of their findings. A bi-partisan, democratically selected panel needs to be established that would include (but not limited to), victim family members, firefighters, rescue workers as well as key eye witnesses to the various crime scenes. Not some tepid rehash of Bush-serving lap-dogs cherry picking evidence to support erroneous and fictional "Magic Bullet" explanations.

"We will not tolerate any testimony behind closed doors from subjects not placed "Under Oath". We will not tolerate the real and hard questions being dismissed for reasons of "National Security". We will not tolerate our freedom of speech being dismantled and ignored as not to "Disrespect the deceased".

"I'm baffled as well by the fact Bin Laden's crimes listed on the FBI's most wanted list DO NOT include those of 9/11. If you do not believe me, see for yourselves.

"As far as "Loose Change - Final Cut" is concerned, I await the newest version to be presented to me, at which point I will make my decision to participate (or not) based on the film's content and merit.

"I remain patriotically steadfast."

Charlie Sheen

RELATED

Martin Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story - "Up until last year, I was very dubious," said Sheen, "I did not want to believe that my government could possibly be involved in such a thing, I could not live in a country that I thought could do that - that would be the ultimate betrayal," he added. "However, there have been so many revelations that now I have my doubts, and chief among them is Building 7 - how did they rig that building so that it came down on the evening of the day?" said Sheen. "How convenient," said Sheen, "When did they rig that building? That's the most interesting question and I have not received a satisfactory answer - nobody could give me an answer to how you rig the building - what a coincidence - two weeks prior and then bring it down on the day, that is the one thing that I have not got a sensible answer about from anyone," he concluded.

George Carlin Questions "Received Reality" Of 9/11 Story - Asked what he thought of the 9/11 truth movement and how Bill Maher's show was interrupted by truthers last week, Carlin responded, "I always question the received reality." "The consensus reality is often intentionally misleading," he added. Asked if he would support a new investigation into 9/11, Carlin was skeptical, stating, "They don't investigate themselves in this country - it would be a whitewash, it would be like the Kennedy thing, it would be like everything." "The people who are in charge do what they want and they will always do what they want, power does what it wants to and I wouldn't trust an investigation," Carlin concluded.

Korey Rowe Could Be Sent Back To Iraq - Korey Rowe, one of the producers of the huge 9/11 truth film Loose Change, may be sent back into the heart of battle in Iraq within a month if he is officially returned to his unit according to a story run by the New York Daily Star today. July 31, 2007

9/11 Truth Retaliation: Loose Change producer Korey Rowe Arrested Again for Desertion Despite Honorable Discharge Papers - SWAT team raid while he was watching the TV show COPS. All charges dropped. 21 July 2007

9/11 Truth Retaliation: Infowarrior Kevin Smith arrested - SWAT raid for alleged traffic ticket and illegal eviction with theft of all his personal property. All charges dropped. This was one day prior to the Live Free or Die Concert at the home of IRS Truth POWs Ed and Dr Elaine Brown, which Smith was streaming live on TV on his servers. Friday 13th July 2007

9/11 Firefighters Testified that Bombs were in the WTC - Firefighter John Schroeder, assigned to Engine Company 10 directly across the street from the World Trade Center complex, holds back tears and describes his first-hand experience on Sept. 11th in an emotive interview with We Are Change and Loose Change. Much of Schroeder's testimony directly contradicts the official story and the 9/11 Commission, to which he spoke but was ignored. Perhaps the most important aspect of Schroeder's testimony is his recollection that there was a distinct gap between the plane striking the north tower and the elevators exploding. "We're standing there in the lobby....all of a sudden we hear (explosion noise) and the elevators exploded like something out of a Bruce Willis Die Hard movie," said Schroeder. "People just come running out of the elevators on fire....I was like what is going on here, something's up here - I mean the plane's up there now there's fire down here?" "We said something's wrong here - I mean the plane hit up on the 80th floor - 5 minutes later and the elevators are suddenly exploding on the first level - why?" asked Schroeder.

9/11: Total Proof That Bombs Were Planted In The Buildings! - Listen to bombs for yourself, as broadcast in NY City on 9/11/2001, then censored down the memory hole


Duty, Honor, Country: An Open Letter to the New Generation of Military Officers and Soldiers Serving and Protecting Our Nation

By Dr. Robert M. Bowman
Lt. Col., USAF, ret., Br> National Commander, The Patriots
patriotsquestion911.com
September 11, 2007

"The Nuremberg Principles says that we in the military have not only the right, but also the DUTY to refuse an illegal order. It was on this basis that we executed Nazi officers who were 'only carrying out their orders'... The Constitution which we are sworn to uphold says that treaties entered into by the United States are the 'highest law of the land,' equivalent to the Constitution itself. Accordingly, we in the military are sworn to uphold treaty law, including the United Nations charter and the Geneva Convention... Based on the above, I contend that should some civilian order you to initiate a nuclear attack on Iran (for example), you are duty-bound to refuse that order. I might also suggest that you should consider whether the circumstances demand that you arrest whoever gave the order as a war criminal."

Dear Comrades in Arms,

You are facing challenges in 2007 that we of previous generations never dreamed of. I'm just an old fighter pilot (101 combat missions in Vietnam , F-4 Phantom, Phu Cat, 1969-1970) who's now a disabled veteran with terminal cancer from Agent Orange. Our mailing list (over 22,000) includes veterans from all branches of the service, all political parties, and all parts of the political spectrum. We are Republicans and Democrats, Greens and Libertarians, Constitutionists and Reformers, and a good many Independents. What unites us is our desire for a government that (1) follows the Constitution, (2) honors the truth, and (3) serves the people.

We see our government going down the wrong path, all too often ignoring military advice, and heading us toward great danger. And we look to you who still serve as the best hope for protecting our nation from disaster.

We see the current Iraq War as having been unnecessary, entered into under false pretenses, and horribly mismanaged by the civilian authorities. Thousands of our brave troops have been needlessly sacrificed in a futile attempt at occupation of a hostile land. Many more thousands have suffered wounds which will change their lives forever. Tens of thousands have severe psychological problems because of what they have seen and what they have done. Potentially hundreds of thousands could be poisoned by depleted uranium, with symptoms appearing years later, just as happened to us exposed to Agent Orange. The military services are depleted and demoralized. The VA system is under-funded and overwhelmed. The National Guard and Reserves have been subjected to tour after tour, disrupting lives for even the lucky ones who return intact. Jobs have been lost, marriages have been destroyed, homes have been foreclosed, and children have been estranged. And for what? We have lost allies, made new enemies, and created thousands of new terrorists, further endangering the American people.

But you know all this. I'm sure you also see the enormous danger in a possible attack on Iran , possibly with nuclear weapons. Such an event, seriously contemplated by the Cheney faction of the Bush administration, would make enemies of Russia and China and turn us into the number one rogue nation on earth. The effect on our long- term national security would be devastating.

Some of us had hoped that the new Democratic Congress would end the occupation of Iraq and take firm steps to prevent an attack on Iran , perhaps by impeaching Bush and Cheney. These hopes have been dashed. The lily-livered Democrats have caved in, turning their backs on those few (like Congressman Jack Murtha) who understand the situation. Many of us have personally walked the halls of Congress, to no avail.

This is where you come in.

We know that many of you share our concern and our determination to protect our republic from an arrogant, out-of-control, imperial presidency and a compliant, namby-pamby Congress (both of which are unduly influenced by the oil companies and other big-money interests). We know that you (like us) wouldn't have pursued a military career unless you were idealistic and devoted to our nation and its people. (None of us do it for the pay and working conditions!) But we also recognize that you may not see how you can influence these events. We in the military have always had a historic subservience to civilian authority.

Perhaps I can help with whatever wisdom I've gathered from age (I retired in 1978, so I am ancient indeed).

Our oath of office is to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Might I suggest that this includes a rogue president and vice-president? Certainly we are bound to carry out the legal orders of our superiors. But the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) which binds all of us enshrines the Nuremberg Principles which this country established after World War II (which you are too young to remember). One of those Nuremberg Principles says that we in the military have not only the right, but also the DUTY to refuse an illegal order. It was on this basis that we executed Nazi officers who were "only carrying out their orders."

The Constitution which we are sworn to uphold says that treaties entered into by the United States are the "highest law of the land," equivalent to the Constitution itself. Accordingly, we in the military are sworn to uphold treaty law, including the United Nations charter and the Geneva Convention.

Based on the above, I contend that should some civilian order you to initiate a nuclear attack on Iran (for example), you are duty- bound to refuse that order. I might also suggest that you should consider whether the circumstances demand that you arrest whoever gave the order as a war criminal.

I know for a fact that in recent history (once under Nixon and once under Reagan), the military nuclear chain of command in the White House discussed these things and were prepared to refuse an order to "nuke Russia ." In effect they took the (non-existent) "button" out of the hands of the President.. We were thus never quite as close to World War III as many feared, no matter how irrational any president might have become. They determined that the proper response to any such order was, "Why, sir?" Unless there was (in their words) a "damn good answer," nothing was going to happen.

I suggest that if you in this generation have not had such a discussion, perhaps it is time you do. In hindsight, it's too bad such a discussion did not take place prior to the preemptive "shock and awe" attack on Baghdad . Many of us at the time spoke out vehemently that such an attack would be an impeachable offense, a war crime against the people of Iraq , and treason against the United States of America . But our voices were drowned out and never reached the ears of the generals in 2003. I now regret that I never sent a letter such as this at that time, but depended on the corporate media to carry my message. I must not make that mistake again.

Also in hindsight, President Bush could be court-martialed for abuse of power as Commander-in-Chief. Vice President Cheney could probably be court-martialed for his performance as Acting Commander- in-Chief in the White House bunker the morning of September 11, 2001.

We in the U.S. military would never consider a military coup, removing an elected president and installing one of our own. But following our oath of office, obeying the Nuremberg Principles, and preventing a rogue president from committing a war crime is not a military coup. If it requires the detention of executive branch officials, we will not impose a military dictatorship. We will let the Constitutional succession take place. This is what we are sworn to. This is protecting the Constitution, our highest obligation. In 2007, this is what is meant by "Duty, Honor, Country."

Thank you all for your service to this nation. May God bless America , and sustain us in this difficult time. And thanks for listening to the musings of an old junior officer.

Respectfully,

Robert M. Bowman, PhD, Lt. Col., USAF, ret.
Caltech PhD in Nuclear Engineering and Aeronautics, decorated combat fighter pilot (101 missions in Vietnam), and former head of Presidents Ford and Carter's 'Star Wars' program; candidate US Congress (D-FL)

See also:

Pilot who flew 2 planes used on 9/11 doesn't believe official conspiracy theory - Vietnam combat pilot Russ Wittenberg: "I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11... Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don't believe it's possible for... a so-called terrorist to train on a 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns,.. pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G's... I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it."


Willie Nelson Questions 9/11 Official Story On National TV

Prison Planet
February 21, 2008

Willie Nelson: 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Willie Nelson re-iterated comments first made on The Alex Jones Show about the implosion of the World Trade Center twin towers on 9/11, telling Democracy Now that he has questions about the official story.

JUAN GONZALEZ: The FCC is watching, yes. I’d like to ask you about one of your views or perspectives that’s raised a lot of controversy, obviously, your sense of—or your reaction to what happened on 9/11 and your questions that you have about the events of that terrible day.

WILLIE NELSON: Well, I have a lot of questions. I think a lot of people have a lot of questions. I think 85 or 90 percent of the people in this country say, “What?” I mean, a plane hit this building, and it fell kind of like that. And another plane hit that building, and it fell kind of like that. About the same time it fell, this one fell the same way. It looked like an implosion somewhere, you know? And then, all of a sudden, the third building fell, and no plane hit it. So, naturally, I’ve got questions.

Nelson appeared for a second time this week on Alex Jones’ show and called for Bush to be impeached, fearing that an “event” before the end of the year could lead to the presidential election being cancelled.

Willie Nelson: Impeach Bush, “Throw The Bastards Out” - "If you break the law you have to pay for it one way or another and if these guys haven’t broke the law nobody has. We went through a couple of elections now and we didn’t do anything, we thought we did but come to find out that the voting machines are crooked, everything’s stacked against us, the politicians that we vote for won’t stay and fight and they won’t count the votes. It could be anything and anything will work because they have everyone scared to death, I just think there are people out there who will do anything to stay in power, anything to keep what they have, they’ve already proven they’ll do anything to keep it. I was talking about the third building that nothing hit and yet it fell as if it was hit the same way, all three buildings fell the same way, but the third building wasn’t hit by anything." 9/11 was an inside job.

Willie Nelson: I’d Rather Have an Electric Chair Named After Me Than a NAFTA Toll Road


Governor Jesse Ventura says 9/11 an Inside Job by US Government

Infowars.com
April 2, 2008

"I kicked myself when it initially happened that the light didn't go off but I was so shocked that this thing had even taken place that I apologize for not being more aware. When I finally did watch Loose Change, I went through every emotion you could imagine, from laughing, crying, getting sick to my stomach, to the whole emotional thing. To me questions haven't been answered and are not being answered about 9/11. Two planes struck two buildings....but how is it that a third building fell 5 hours later? How could this building just implode into its own footprint 5 hours later - that's my first question - the 9/11 Commission didn't even devote one page to that in their big volume of investigation. How could those buildings fall at the speed of gravity - if you put a stopwatch on them both of those World Trade Center buildings were on the ground in ten seconds - how can that be? If you took a billiard ball and dropped it from the height of the World Trade Center in a vacuum it would hit the ground in 9.3 seconds and if you took that same billiard ball and dropped it 10 stories at a time and merely stopped it and started it it would take 30 seconds - if you dropped it every floor of the World Trade Center to the ground, simply stopping and starting it on gravity it would take over 100 seconds to reach the ground. Jet fuel is four fifths kerosene - which is not a hot burning fuel - and they wanted us to believe it melted these steel structured girders and caused these buildings to pancake collapse to the ground. I was on the site within two weeks after it happened and I saw none of these pancakes - wouldn't they all be piled up in a huge mass on the ground and yet everything was blown into dust - when you look at it from that aspect none of it makes any sense. Never before in the annuls of history has a fire caused a steel structure building to fall to the ground like these two did. Upon looking at the film in super-slow motion and the way the buildings fell and comparing that to the way that they do like a controlled demolition of a hotel in Las Vegas, they both fell identical. I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there's no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition. When I was watching Loose Change with a friend of mine - he happens to work for a company that helps build the Boeing airplanes and they said that when the engines completely disappeared and were destroyed, his response was, excuse my French - bullshit! I turned to him and said why and he said because they're made of titanium steel - they can't disintegrate. We don't want to lose our country, after all it's still our country and until they put us down we have the power."
-Governor Jesse Ventura, Navy SEAL bomber, Alex Jones Radio Show MP3, April 2, 2008

Gov Jesse Ventura on the Alex Jones Show, Part 1

"Remember the 2nd Amendment with the right to bear arms? That's not done for hunting or fishing, Our forfathers put that right in there so that we have the ability to rise up if our country becomes oppressive."
-Governor Jesse Ventura, Navy SEAL bomber, author of Don't Start the Revolution without Me, Colbert Report, April 7, 2008

"A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the '9-11 official version.' On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin professor, Dr Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, 'It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.' Mr. Falk yesterday did not return e-mails and phone calls asking for a comment. But in 2004 he wrote the foreword to the book 'The New Pearl Harbor,' by Professor David Ray Griffin. Mr. Griffin has posited that such an inside job is the likely explanation for the attacks. When asked for a comment about the appointment of Mr. Falk, a former American ambassador to the United Nations Corporation, lunatic John Bolton said, "This is exactly why we voted against the new human rights council." A spokesman for the American embassy at the United Nations offered no comment yesterday when asked. Mr. Falk's selection to the post as rapporteur has already prompted the government of Israel formally to request that Mr. Falk not be sent to their country. The Israeli press has reported that he may even be barred from entering the country. One reason the Israelis are concerned about his appointment is that Mr. Falk has compared Israel's treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust."
-Eli Lake, New York Sun, U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11, April 10, 2008


9/11: The Truth is out there

By Peter Barber, editor
London Financial Times
June 7 2008

“It is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11.”
-Michael Meacher, UK Member of Parliament

“If there ever was great cause for impeachment, it would be over 9/11.”
-Gore Vidal, writer

Cynthia McKinney asks which is the UN food bomb and which is the US bomb in Afghanistan? Out of 535 members of Congress, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney was the first to break the consensus of silence and point to the obvious - that the Bush administration had received advance warningsof an attack, and that this called for a full investigation. On September 10, 2001 McKinney grilled Sir Donald Rumsfeld Knight of the British Empire and General Richard Myers how the Pentagon lost $2-Trillion taxdollars from the Pentagon CAFR "pension" funds, but got no answer. Now the Pentagon has "lost" $7-trillion since 9/11, thanks to Pentagon's Israeli comptroller Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who coincidentally owns a company that builds killer robot jetplanes.


When Cynthia McKinney [2008 Green Party presidential nominee] speaks the words of Martin Luther King Jr, they resound through the church with some of King’s cadence. “A time comes,” declares the former US congresswoman from Georgia, “when silence is betrayal.” The congregation answers with whoops and calls of “That’s right!” King was talking about America’s war in Vietnam. More than 40 years later, before the packed pews of the Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Los Angeles, McKinney is speaking of the American government’s war on its own people. The shock and awe phase of this conflict, we had been told earlier, began on September 11 2001, when the Bush administration launched attacks on New York and Washington, or at least waved them through.

According to a show of hands that February afternoon, several hundred people in the immaculate church believe this to be true. Some came in T-shirts bearing the words “9/11 was an inside job”. One wore a badge demanding that you “Examine your assumptions”. Quite a few bought the DVDs on sale in the foyer, most of which bore photographs of the Twin Towers spewing smoke. They had all come to hear the message of Architects, Engineers & Scientists for 9/11 Truth, one of the dozens of groups across the US which campaign to persuade us that everything we think we know about 9/11 is wrong.

Last winter, “Investigate 9/11” banners seemed to be popping up all over the place. Bill Clinton was heckled by “truthers” in Denver while campaigning for his wife. Truthers picketed the Academy Awards in LA – despite this year’s winner of the best actress Oscar, Marion Cotillard, reportedly being one of them. But then, she’s French. Literature lovers in that country pushed Thierry Meyssan’s L’Effroyable imposture (The Appalling Fraud) – which asserts that 9/11 was a government plot to justify invading Iraq and Afghanistan and increase military spending – to the top of the bestseller list in 2002.

Country music star Willie Nelson is assuredly not French, but a week or so before the Oscars he described as naive the notion that the “implosion” of the Twin Towers was caused by crashing jets. Meanwhile the European Parliament screened the Italian documentary Zero, in which Gore Vidal, Italian playwright Dario Fo, and Italian MEP Giulietto Chiesa blame the US government, not al-Qaeda, for 9/11. The following month, Japanese MP Yukihisa Fujita raised his own doubts about the official story at a seminar in Sydney. A busy season for the “9/11 Truth” movement.

The events of 9/11 were recorded in many thousands of images, from crisp agency photographs to amateur camcorder footage. Every recorded trail of smoke, every spray of sparks is pored over by an army of sceptics, collectively described as the 9/11 Truth movement. They believe that the key to the mystery is hidden somewhere within the pictures, just as some people think that clues are contained in the Zapruder film which captured the moment of John F. Kennedy’s assassination. Allied against them is a smaller group of rival bloggers who have taken it upon themselves to debunk what they claim are dangerous conspiracy theories.

There is some evidence that the Truthers are swaying the rest of us. A New York Times/CBS News poll in 2006 revealed that only 16 per cent of Americans polled believed the Bush administration was telling the truth about 9/11. More than half thought it was “hiding something”. This is not the same as believing the government actually launched the attacks, but a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll the same year found that more than a third of those questioned suspected that federal officials assisted in the attacks or took no action to stop them so that the US could go to war.

The Truthers certainly believe that they are on a roll. The crowd in the Immanuel Presbyterian Church seemed electrified. As the donated sound system pumped out angry rap, a giant video screen showed images of protesters demanding a new investigation into 9/11. The symbols and the language were borrowed from the civil rights struggle, but the truthers are an eclectic group, including anti-Bush, anti-war liberals and anti-government libertarians. A young man in a “Vote Ron Paul” T-shirt scuttled through the hall, filming us as we took our seats on wooden pews.

First up was Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect who founded Architects, Engineers & Scientists for 9/11 Truth, which now claims to have 379 professional members. Gage told us that the collapse of the Twin Towers could not have been due merely to gravity, the impact of the airliners and the resulting jet fuel fires – which would not have been hot enough to weaken the steel sufficiently. Behind him on the video screen was the south tower of the World Trade Center. Smoke poured from its upper floors. A respectful silence fell over the audience, followed by gasps as the building appeared to dissolve before our eyes.

While I have seen this footage countless times, it seems that I had clearly never understood what I was seeing. The destruction of the Twin Towers, along with the collapse of the nearby 47-storey World Trade Center 7 building, had all the hallmarks of controlled demolition, according to Gage. They all came straight down, almost at the speed of a free-falling object, right into their own footprints. Steel-framed buildings had never collapsed because of fires before. On this day three did, one of which, “Building 7”, was not even hit by an aircraft.

Gage, who had worked himself into a fever, exhorted the audience to stand up and be counted: “A country is at stake.” Then he welcomed on to the stage the star of the evening, Steven Jones. A softly spoken physicist, Jones is the movement’s designated martyr and seems to promise what the truthers so desperately need: scientific credibility.

Jones entered into Truther lore in 2006 when he was put into early retirement by Brigham Young University in Utah after giving public lectures on his paper “Why indeed did the WTC buildings collapse?”, which he published on the website of the university’s physics department. Jones contended that the towers were demolished by cutter charges which had been placed throughout the buildings, probably involving an incendiary called thermite. BYU’s College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences and the structural engineering faculty, followed by the university administration, disowned him.

Still, Jones is no fool. He has published more than 50 scholarly papers, including pieces on cold nuclear fusion in journals such as Scientific American and Nature. He invented a cooker which uses solar power and has donated models to poor families in the developing world. Jones tells us he believes laboratory testing of dust from Ground Zero will reveal residue from a thermite reaction.

As soon as the seminar is over, Jones is mobbed by people asking him to pose for photos and offering their own views on the 9/11 plot, as well as others such as the presence above our heads of chemtrails (deadly toxins sprayed by unidentified aircraft, which some believe are part of a secret global depopulation programme). This is the world Jones now inhabits – it seems a long way from a Utah physics department. I ask him later by phone if he has any regrets about publishing that fateful paper: “No regrets. I’ve thought of Galileo a few times. He got a little worse than I did, I suppose.”

Jones is typical of many 9/11 researchers in that the subject has taken over his professional life. Down the coast in Santa Barbara is another of the movement’s luminaries. On the beach at Isla Vista, one of the most expensive real-estate spots in the US, lives David Ray Griffin, a former theology professor. As his dogs scratch excitedly on the sliding door, Griffin explains that America’s primary faith is not Christianity, but nationalism. “Other countries do really terrible things. Our leaders never would. And that [belief] has been the biggest impediment to getting people to look at the evidence, because they just know a priori that that is ridiculous.”

Griffin now thinks the evidence to the contrary is incontrovertible. Until 2002, he had busied himself far from the rancour of public controversy writing rather obscure philosophical books and teaching philosophy of religion at the Claremont School of Theology. But the course of his research changed abruptly when he heard a visiting British theologian question the official account of 9/11. Two years later, Griffin’s The New Pearl Harbor, with a foreword by British MP Michael Meacher, became a touchstone in the 9/11 Truth movement. He has since written others, including one detailing the “omissions and distortions” of the 9/11 Commission, the report of which fits the definition of “conspiracy theory” neatly, he says. “They started with the conclusion that al-Qaeda did it and didn’t even consider the alternative that it was an inside job.”

Griffin was a script consultant on Loose Change Final Cut, part of the internet phenomenon that set off the current explosion of low-budget 9/11 DVDs. The previous version was viewed more than 10 million times on Google Video, according to Vanity Fair. In 2002, armed only with a laptop and off-the-shelf video production software, Dylan Avery, an 18-year-old resident of Oneonta, New York, set about making a fictional film about discovering, with his friends, that 9/11 was orchestrated by the US government. At some point in his research, Avery had a “Dude, this shit is real!” moment and Loose Change entered the realm of agit-prop documentary. Final Cut makes a bold new allegation: the Twin Towers were packed with deadly asbestos, which would have cost billions to clean up. “If you bring down the buildings,” says Griffin, “not only do you not have to pay ... to clean them up, somebody is going to make billions of dollars on the insurance.”

September 11 as insurance job? This seems to expand the circle of conspirators somewhat. Griffin ventures another possible explanation: the psychological impact. “You had these massive explosions, which rather looked like a nuclear blast,” he says. “That’s always been the deep fear of America. In the run-up to the Iraq war, that’s what they were talking about – we cannot wait until we have a nuclear cloud.”

Griffin offers one further speculation, this time on a question which is controversial even among 9/11 sceptics: what hit the Pentagon? Thierry Meyssan was the first to claim that it was not Flight 77 – an American Airlines 757 carrying 64 passengers – but a cruise missile that hit the west wall of the Pentagon at 9.37am on September 11. Websites have followed suit, pointing to the apparent lack of plane debris on the Pentagon lawn and the fact that the hole left in the outer ring of the building looks too small to accommodate the wingspan of a 757. Retired US Air Force captain Russ Wittenberg from Pilots for 9/11 Truth asserted that no inexperienced pilot could have performed the manoeuvre the 9/11 Commission concluded that al-Qaeda conspirator Hani Hanjour pulled off that morning: a 330° turn, 2,200ft descent, a full-throttle dive and then a 530 miles per hour plunge at ground level into the Pentagon. Call it “the magic plane theory”: doubters believe that, just as the bullet that killed Kennedy appeared to defy the laws of physics, so the plane that struck the Pentagon was like no other in existence.

And just as Nasa [sic] was forced to counter claims the moon [sic] landings were faked, these and other claims have forced the US State Department into the debunking business. Its Identifying Misinformation website states that debris from Flight 77 was indeed recovered, as were the remains of passengers and crew. Many witnesses saw the plane come in, and a number of passengers made phone calls to their loved ones telling them their flight had been hijacked [sic].

There is also another obvious problem: if a missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to Flight 77? sic - read Pentagon's Operation Northwoods for that answer] “There was a rumour that an airliner had gone down on the Ohio/Kentucky border and that was taken very seriously early on by the Federal Aviation Authority,” says Griffin. It later rejected the story. But Griffin claims the only evidence that Flight 77 was aloft after that was an alleged phone call from [estranged] Barbara Olsen to Ted Olsen, the solicitor[liar]-general of the United States.

So how does he explain that phone call? Ted Olsen is a Bush administration insider [Bush v Gore], he says. Another possible answer, though, is “voice-morphing technology”. This would also explain the flurry of phone calls from United Airlines Flight 93, which, as the official story has it, crashed in a Pennsylvania field after passengers revolted against their hijackers.

It’s not just supporters of the official story who roll their eyes at these claims. They put Griffin in the camp of the “no-planers”, at least as far as the attack on the Pentagon is concerned. The no-planers enrage the rest of the Truthers [sic], who accuse them of sabotaging the credibility of the movement. The claim that no plane [sic - no airliner] hit the Pentagon is a Trojan horse, they say – disinformation that serves the conspirators [sic - read Operation Northwoods]. Some – such as former MI5 whistleblower David Shayler – have even asserted that no planes, but missiles disguised by “cloaking technology”, hit the Twin Towers. Shayler, incidentally, proclaimed himself the Messiah last year [and was one of many who reported the lawsuit of MI5/6 agents on trial for bombing Britain for the British Empire].

If the 9/11 truth movement is fighting a kind of asymmetric war against official sources of knowledge, it is also battling itself. As the movement morphs into an international activist group, it recognises that if it is to convince middle Americans, it must distance itself from its exotic fringe. Once, it was the Mihops versus the Lihops. These factions, who sound like warring species from an H.G. Wells story, are those who believe the government Made It Happen On Purpose and those who think it Let It Happen On Purpose. The Mihops are in the ascendancy.

The genesis of all this can be traced back to a schism that followed the first real attempt to bring scholarly credibility to the 9/11 sceptics. In 2005, Steven Jones was invited to form a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth by [US Marine Corps Colonel] James Fetzer, a professor in the philosophy department at the University of Minnesota and the author of some 20 books on the philosophy of science and artificial intelligence. Fetzer teaches critical thinking, and is nothing if not critical. He has been campaigning for more than a decade to prove that the Zapruder film is a hoax perpetuated by the same government intelligence agencies that orchestrated JFK’s assassination [as confessed by Operation Northwoods].

But within a year, Jones had written to all members of Scholars announcing that he and others no longer wanted to be associated with Fetzer, who was, in the rebels’ opinion, holding them up to ridicule. [US Marine Corps Colonel] Fetzer had backed a theory by Judy Wood, a former assistant professor in mechanical engineering at Clemson University, proposing that the Twin Towers were brought down by a “directed energy” weapon developed as part of the US government’s Star Wars programme. It prompted a stampede to a new group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, headed by Jones. Confusing the two groups would be like mistaking Monty Python’s Judean People’s Front for the People’s Front of Judea: this was a major doctrinal split. [see White House defended by Star Wars laser cannon]

Fetzer’s view is that any serious inquiry into what happened on 9/11 should look at all possibilities. Supporters of the directed energy hypothesis keep popping up at 9/11 Truth lectures to heckle what Python fans might call the “splittist” thermite theorists. Among the advocates of the Star Wars theory is [Reagan/Bush employee] Morgan Reynolds, perhaps the first prominent US government official to claim that 9/11 was an inside job. At the time of the attacks, Reynolds was chief economist at the US Department of Labor.

Some Star Wars supporters, in turn, accuse proponents of the thermite hypothesis of being government shills. One, on CheckTheEvidence.com, alleges that Jones’s public denunciation of Star Wars theories is actually a Trojan horse; he notes that Jones once worked at Los Alamos, where directed energy weapons are researched. This line of conjecture also entangles Norman Mineta, US transportation secretary on September 11 2001. Mineta was the man who grounded all civilian aircraft on that morning. But he was also once vice-president of Lockheed Martin, a founding member of the Directed Energy Professional Society [and killer robot aircraft] ... In this outer reach of the blogosphere, no one is ever more than six degrees of separation from the heart of the conspiracy.

Jones did, in fact, do post-doctoral research at the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility for the University of Wyoming, but he says it was peaceful and non-weapons-related. He says the more out-there theories, including those of the no-planers, are harming the movement. “First, they discourage others who are trying to do serious work, and they tend to be quite vocal about their heckling,” he says. “More serious is that when we’re really trying to look at an evidence-based approach, we get lumped in with these people and then dismissed as a whole.”

Two days before Jones’s lecture in LA, his erstwhile colleague was taking his own campaign on the road on the other side of the country. After addressing Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth in New Hampshire, [US Marine Corps Colonel] Fetzer was off to that seat of academic respectability, Yale University. To prepare for our meeting, I watched a DVD of a 9/11 symposium he held in his new hometown of Madison, Wisconsin last year. The star of this show was Alfred Lambremont Webre, a judge on former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad’s alternative international War Crimes Tribunal in Kuala Lumpur and co-author of the Space Preservation Treaty. He delivers what might be the most momentous opening line in the history of town hall seminars. “Fellow Citizens... 9/11 was a false flag operation by an international war crimes racketeering organisation to provide a pretext to engage in a genocidal and ecocidal depleted uranium bombing of central Asia, Afghanistan and Iraq in order to secure vast oil and uranium reserves [and prevent their use to multiply oil prices and destroy USA]; to roll out a terror-based national security state system worldwide and ... to implement the final stages of a world depopulation policy.” There are two more “false flag” operations in the pipeline, he says. The first is the war against asteroids, the second the “war against the evil aliens” [according to president Ronald Reagan and Sir Heinz "Henry" Kissinger Knight of the British Empire].

Hearing this, you either experience the thrill of revelation or the sinking feeling that the person you are listening to is having some kind of breakdown. Within 30 minutes, Webre has folded into the 9/11 plot the Skull & Bones society at Yale University – or the “Brotherhood of Death”, as he [sic - Skull & Bones] calls it – neocon think-thank the Council on Foreign Relations [founder of the United Nations Corporation], the [British Lords] Rothschilds, the Queen [on trial for murder of Princess Diana and family] and the City of London [financial district]. I wondered how all these conspiracies could be maintained without the whole conceit unravelling.

The answer, of course, is that there is only one conspiracy. Pearl Harbour, the moon [sic] landing, JFK [Sr & Jr], 9/11, the Illuminati, the Black Helicopters, Skull & Bones, chemtrails: all faces of the same demon. The plot goes all the way to the top, and all the way back in time. You could come to believe that it involves everyone except yourself – at which point it’s all over for you. And as I listened, I just waited for him to say the Word. And, inevitably, Webre brought it all back to the “international neo-Zionist organisation” [founder of socialism, communism, fascism and banksterism].

I asked [US Marine Corps Colonel] Fetzer about this as we sat in a cafe across from Yale, home of the Brotherhood of Death: how did he keep his scholars on message? “It’s obvious to me that you have to consider all the possible alternatives,” he says. “You can’t exclude any, lest, as you proceed in your investigation and eliminate hypotheses, you eliminate the true hypothesis because you’ve never allowed it to be considered.”

[US Marine Corps Colonel] Fetzer’s talk later that night does not go well. A Yale student had promoted the lecture on Facebook Events, but fellow students had apparently been unwilling to add their names, which anyone can see, perhaps for fear of ridicule. Only six show up. When it becomes clear that Fetzer is implicating some kind of Star Wars weapon, the two next to me begin scrolling distractedly through their mobile phone messages. Within 10 minutes, they have left.

The conclusion of the 9/11 Commission – the official story – is that the 2001 attacks got through because those charged with protecting America had not truly conceived of the threat: in its author’s evocative phrase, they had suffered a “failure of imagination”. After trawling the internet in search of 9/11 Truth, it seems to me the American imagination is strong. “Americans are very good at dreaming up these scenarios,” says Lewis Lapham, the former Harper’s magazine editor and a prominent critic of the Bush administration post-September 11. “We are open to all kinds of magical theories,” he says, citing the continuing fascination with the assassination of JFK. “We are also good at creating religions.” Lapham thinks the theory that 9/11 was an inside job follows in this long tradition, but also reflects cynicism among Americans towards their government. He does not accept that the Bush administration planned 9/11 or even allowed it to happen. Nonetheless, he thinks a new investigation [coverup] is warranted. In 2004, Harper’s ran a trenchant piece describing the 9/11 Commission as a “whitewash” and a “cheat and a fraud” for downplaying evidence that warnings of the al-Qaeda threat were ignored. Such flaws allowed space for alternative theories to develop, Lapham says.

In this, there are shades of the Warren Commission into the assassination of President Kennedy [read Operation Northwoods], which served merely to deepen popular distrust. But if we have seen the likes of the 9/11 Truth movement before, it also represents something new. “With the Kennedy assassination, pretty soon after the events themselves there were fairly significant questions being raised by people of all types and stripes about what actually happened,” says Mark Fenster, a University of Florida law professor and author of Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture. “But whereas then it was a generalised, amorphous kind of response, the amount of organisation – politically and through alternative media – is far more striking now than it was back then.”

Perhaps the 9/11 Truth movement is what one would expect in the dying days of an unpopular administration, and with no end in sight to a costly war [$10-trillion taxdollars, trillions in higher oil prices, 80,000 dead US soldiers, 600,000 disabled US soldiers, 2.6-million genocided Iraqis who had nothing to do with 9/11]. Whether it can maintain momentum when that government leaves office next year is anyone’s guess. In the meantime, some on the [treasonous Communist] left accuse it of letting the leaders they so vehemently distrust off the hook [bullshit]. “They make a mockery of [civil rights] causes by associating their nonsense [sic - Truth] with genuinely important issues [sic - like bogus "global warming" a/k/a sunshine requiring higher taxes for United Nations Corporation], and by diverting a large number of people who should know better into a unicorn hunt,” says British writer and activist George Monbiot. Monbiot is regularly heckled by 9/11 Truthers at public events after accusing them in The [London] Guardian [of the American-hating British Empire] of undermining genuine political opposition. His first column on the Truthers prompted a near-record number of postings on the paper’s Comment Is Free website – 777 [London 7/7 bombings perped by the British Empire and Mafia mayor Sir Rudy "Julie" Giuliani Knight of the British Empire] – many accusing him of being part of the conspiracy [duh].

“It’s very interesting to see,” he says, “particularly in the United States, how the anti-war movement has been largely co-opted in many places by the 9/11 Truth movement. And we desperately need an active anti-war movement [that refused to admit the nonstop Iraq War by Bush Sr, Clintons and Bush Jr started in 1990], because there is a lot of reckoning to be done.”

Glossary of doubt

No-planers: People who claim that it wasn’t an aircraft, but a missile, that hit the Pentagon on September 11 2001. Some have taken it a step further and argued that no aircraft hit the twin towers, either. What the world saw that day, these sceptics argue, was either video trickery or cruise missiles disguised through image technology as aircraft.

Mihops: Truthers who believe the US government “Made it happen on purpose”, “it” being the destruction of September 11.

Lihops: A more moderate strain of truther who believe the government “Let it happen on purpose”.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth: Started by James Fetzer, the group advocates looking at all possible explanations of what happened on September 11, no matter how improbable.

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice: The more moderate splinter group of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, led by Steven Jones. Endorses an “evidence-based approach” to questioning the 9/11 story.

Censored self-inflicted terror by Financial Times: Pentagon's Operation Northwoods, NATO's Operation Gladio, and MI5/6 IRA Shaylergate...

See also: Pentagon's Nano Thermite, a/k/a nanothermite, a/k/a Super Thermite explosives at WTC with "near detonation flame propagation speeds for many payload critical applications".


Virginia Tech Massacre is relevant to the 9/11 Massacres, via the Bath School Massacre


BATH SCHOOL BOMBED IN MICHIGAN BY INSIDE JOB CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF ONE TON OF PREINSTALLED EXPLOSIVES - CONVICTED BOMBER WAS AN ELECTED POLITICIAN WORKING INSIDE THE SCHOOL WHO PERSONALLY WIRED THE DYNOMITE

"It's relevant that the worst school slaughter in USA was perped by an elected govt official, using a controlled demolition of preinstalled explosives, in an inside job. Sound familiar? Virginia Tech Massacre is kindergarten compared to what an elected member of a government school board did to little children in Michigan USA. But nobody discusses a ban on politicians. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. This US politician also became the world's first suicide car bomber. The VA Tech shooter's sister was employed by CIA and Condi Rice, and Bush personally ordered the local police to stand down to allow the mass murder to succeed, just like he did on 9/11. This was the week of April 18th, which is the anniversary of the start of the US Revolutional War against the British Empire, at the Battle/Massacre at Lexington and concord, over King George's ban on 50-caliber assault rifle muskets. April 18 is also the anniversary of the massacres at Columbine High School, Oklahoma City and the Christian church in Waco/Crawford, all of which involved legislation to ban guns. This week, Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced a bill to ban self defense, by banning all handguns and semi-auto rifles and shotguns. The VA Tech shooting successfully killed the impeachment bill against Dick Cheney, to be filed that week by Kucinich. The shooting also killed Rosie O'Donnell's scheduled interviews that week with 9/11 firefighters. Tax Day got zero coverage that week, when the big story was Aaron Russo's new documentary proving the income tax is voluntary, and was never ratified by state governments, as required by law."
—John Lee, Pirate News TV Blog, Bath School Massacre: US politician bombs US school - 45 dead, 18 April 2007

"With all due respect and sympathy to the victims and their families of the Columbine and McDonald's shootings, the Oklahoma bombing, and other mass murders, they were not the worst mass murders of children in the US. On May 18, 1927, 45 people, mostly children, were killed and 58 were injured when disgruntled and demented school board member Andrew Kehoe dynamited the new school building in Bath, Michigan out of revenge over his foreclosed farm due in part to the taxes required to pay for the new school."
—Ronald D. Bauerle, The Bath School Disaster

"The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, USA, on May 18, 1927, which killed 45 people and injured 58. Most of the victims were children in second to sixth grades attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest act of mass murder in a school in U.S. history. The perpetrator was school board member Andrew Kehoe, who was upset by a property tax that had been levied to fund the construction of the school building. He blamed the additional tax for financial hardships which led to foreclosure proceedings against his farm. These events apparently provoked Kehoe to plan his attack. On the morning of May 18, Kehoe first killed his wife and then set his farm buildings on fire. As fire fighters arrived at the farm, an explosion devastated the north wing of the school building, killing many of the people inside. Kehoe used a detonator to ignite dynamite and hundreds of pounds of pyrotol which he had secretly planted inside the school over the course of many months. As rescuers started gathering at the school, Kehoe drove up, stopped, and detonated a bomb inside his shrapnel-filled vehicle, killing himself and the school superintendent, and killing and injuring several others. During the rescue efforts, searchers discovered an additional 500 pounds (230 kg) of unexploded dynamite and pyrotol planted throughout the basement of the school's south wing."
—Wikipedia, Bath School disaster

Cheney Impeachment delayed by convenient school shooting at VA Tech - Sister of alien shooter employed by CIA and Bush's nappy ho Kinda Sleazy Rice

Virginia Tech another Jewish Trench Coat Mafia school massacre? - At Columbine, Jewish shooters asked victims their religious preference, then only shot the Christians


BOSTON TEA PARTY ON DEC 15/16 2006
1st Tea Party destroyed Opium WMDs of the British Empire


VIDEO FROM NYC ON 9/11/2006

Bush family's terrorism in Gunpowder Plot to bomb British Parliament celebrated on 400th aniversary by Hollywood's V for Vendetta


Bush ancestor Thomas Percy's head on a stick in British Parliament in 2006


SEPTEMBER 911 SURPRISE
VIDEO ARCHIVE

September 911 Surprise
The original website as seen on History Channel

THE DARK KNIGHT 911 TRUTH

The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access, electronic-only journal covering the whole of research related to 9/11/2001. All content is freely available online


9/11 Magazine by GlobalOutlook.CA


FROM FREEDOM TO FASCISM


Aaron Russo proves that 9/11 was an Inside Job by Gangsta Govt - "How many of you believe that two buildings fell on September 11, 2001?" FreedomToFascism.com


Terrorists employed by Federal Govt bomb and arson cities in Tennessee, Southern USA and massacre 1,000,000 US citizens

During the war the town and surrounding country suffered severely. The depot was burned, and much other property destroyed and carried away by both armies. At the close of hostilities, however, the unexcelled resources of this section soon restored it to its former prosperity, and at the present time Sweet Water is the largest shipping point between Knoxville and Chattanooga.


False Flag Operations: Declassified Military Documents Show How US Government Planned Terrorist Attacks Against its Own Citizens

YAHOO NEWS, PRWEB – As reported by ABC News, stunning military documents codenamed Operation Northwoods were declassified in recent years and show how in 1962, the top US military leaders planned an operation to create terror attacks against its own cities and kill US citizens.

The documents state that through the fabrication of false evidence, the US would blame Cuba and gain public support for an unpopular war against Castro. They included developing a fake Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, the use of airplanes, and much more.

For further details, the now declassified military documents are available at the National Security Archive of the George Washington University.

In his newly published book "Towers of Deception – The Media Cover-Up of 9/11," Barrie Zwicker, writes about Operation Northwoods and many other such operations that the military and intelligence community refer to as "false flag operations."

Zwicker is a lifelong journalist who was a media critic for 35 years and who often appeared on Canadian national TV and radio.

His book explains that these covert operations are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities, such as other countries or terrorist groups, to help demonize them and justify wars for geopolitical reasons and for financial gains.

The term "false flag" is derived from the naval warfare concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own.

The ABC News article dated May 1, 2001 explains that Operation Northwoods was approved and signed by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Eisenhower appointee Army General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, and was presented to Kennedy’s Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962.

A year earlier, President Eisenhower, apparently aware of such dangers, had warned the nation during his January 17, 1961 farewell address:

"In the counsels of Government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together."

General Lemnitzer, the Eisenhower appointee and highest ranking officer of the US military in 1962, recommended that Operation Northwoods be run by the military. It was signed and approved by all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the panel comprising the highest-ranking members of each major branch of the Armed Forces.

As per the ABC News article, the only reason why Operation Northwoods did not materialize in 1962 was because it was apparently turned down by President John F. Kennedy.

By law, the President of the United States is the commander in chief. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the Army, the Marine Corps, the Navy, the Air Force and the Coast Guard, are all under his command.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff website explains that based on the Goldwater-Nichols DOD Reorganization Act of 1986, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is today the principal military adviser to the President but doesn’t exercise military command over any combatant forces.

The ABC News article quotes author of "Body of Secrets – Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency," James Bamford, a former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight. He says that if such war plans against American cities were put into operation, it would have amounted to treason.

Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution states: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them..."

Bamford goes on to say that around that time, "the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published its own report on right-wing extremism in the military, warning a ‘considerable danger’ in the ‘education and propaganda activities of military personnel’ had been uncovered. The committee even called for an examination of any ties between Lemnitzer and right-wing groups. But Congress didn't get wind of Northwoods..."

Media critic Zwicker says that today, Congress and journalists have access to the declassified documents of Operation Northwoods and that the media must indeed reflect on Eisenhower’s warning of vigilance and be willing to learn and investigate more, publish more and broadcast more information about false flag operations to help prevent such acts of treason from being committed in the future.

In his controversial book critical of both the 9/11 "official story" and the media coverage of the events, Zwicker goes through the history of false flag operations dating back to the 1600s, and among many examples, cites the February 27th,1933 fire of the German Parliament (Reichstag fire) three days prior to Germany’s federal election.

Historians later documented that the fire had been authorized by right-wing Nazis where Hitler used the event to declare a state of emergency and pressured the German President, Hindenburg, to sign a decree abolishing most of the human rights provisions of the Constitution.

Recently, on August 29th 2006, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld recounted what he called "the lessons of history," including the failed efforts to appease the right-wing Adolf Hitler regime of the 1930s.

"I recount this history because once again we face the same kind of challenges in efforts to confront the rising threat of a new type of fascism," said Rumsfeld.

As a senior media critic, Zwicker strongly recommends that all media people indeed follow Rumsfeld’s suggestions in learning the lessons of Nazi history. He points to researching Hitler’s rise to power and how he created a fascist state where there was suppression of the opposition through secrecy, terror, torture and censorship, all justified under nationalism and patriotism.

He also believes that journalists should research and publish more about how Hitler's Nazis manipulated the German population into wars, using psychological manipulation and behavior modification by inducing trauma and fear in others, a process of trauma-based mind control referred to in the now declassified CIA files of "MK ULTRA."

Zwicker believes that the media must investigate and report on whether these fear-based psychological manipulation techniques have been or are being put into application by US leaders in our post 9/11 world, as they appear to be. 9/11 caused much trauma and fear.

Concerned with the direction that the US has headed since 9/11, Dr. Robert M. Bowman, referring to the Bush / Cheney administration during a radio interview, said: "I think there's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government.”

Bowman is a retired United States Air Force Lieutenant Colonel, a recipient of the Eisenhower Medal, a former head of the US "Star Wars" space weapons program during the Reagan administration and one of America’s foremost experts on National Security.

He commented about the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all of our enemies combined."

Bowman is part of a group of notable experts called the "Scholars For 9/11 Truth" made up of professors, engineers, former intelligence and military personnel, journalists, attorneys and many other professionals who say that the 9/11 attacks raise a red flag because they have many elements of false flag operations, such as a "stand-down" of the military defense on that day, one that must be questioned.

The group, made up of several dozen scholars, believes that the media must no longer ignore the fact that a growing number of them are calling for truly independent investigations into 9/11, including investigations to look into the evidence that points towards a possible false flag operation.

The group’s call for a truly independent 9/11 investigation appears to resonate with a growing number of mainstream Americans.

A May 2006 Zogby poll of 1,200 adults nationwide found that 45% of those surveyed said that Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success.

Part of the popularity of this growing awareness may be due in part to the millions of people who have viewed one of the most watched online videos of all time, called "Loose Change," which addresses false flag operations and raises serious new questions about the official government 9/11 story.

The Zogby poll also showed that more than 42 percent believe that the government and the 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks.

The mainstream American public has not been alone in their frustration from lack of answers about the official 9/11 story. Addressing the White House commissioned 9/11 investigation, a September 1st, 2006 Associated Press article states that:

"The Sept. 11 commission's chairmen, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, said in their recently published book that the commission found it mind-boggling that authorities claimed that their air defenses had reacted quickly. In the book, ‘Without Precedent,’ Kean and Hamilton said the panel was so frustrated with repeated misstatements by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered an investigation into possible deception."

On August 9th, 2006, referring to their book and to this issue, CNN’s Lou Dobbs as saying: "But the fact that they were (would) continue and perpetuate the lie, suggests that we need a full investigation of what is going on and what is demonstrably an incompetent and at worst deceitful federal government."

The historic reality of the deception of false flag operations is confirmed by former Justice Department prosecutor, John Loftus, who once held some of the highest security clearances in the world with special access to NATO Cosmic, CIA codeword, and Top Secret Nuclear files.

Loftus has been sought after for his terrorism expertise by Fox News, MSNBC, ABC, and many other media across the USA. In a radio interview, when asked about "Operation Northwoods," he said "Sure, yeah, yeah. But you know it, there were thousands of those plans."

In his book, Zwicker elaborates that false flag operations are the least-recognized, highest impact category of human deceit. He says: "False flag op is the indispensable, most dependable device rulers use to mobilize their populations, especially behind wars the rulers want."

According to a radio interview on Vancouver’s Coop radio, Zwicker believes that it is not impossible that such future events have already been planned in order to move the US towards Martial Law.

The media critic has concluded that not unlike Germany in the 1930s, a relatively small right-wing extremist group of rulers want more and more power, and will gradually further eliminate civil liberties by manipulating people’s minds using more Orwellian language.

He says that if the media doesn’t start paying more attention, there will be increased oppression of opposition that will likely move America, and perhaps other Western countries, towards a gradual further elimination of civil liberties. He calls this the path towards a new fascism, one controlled by a small group of ruling elites who perpetuate war after war, such as a never-ending "war on terror," to maintain their power and control.

Dr. Steven Greer has met and spoken to many intelligence, military, government and corporate whistleblowers who explain that to sustain and expand their existence in their current form, the military, industrial, intelligence, laboratory complex need a constant influx of new enemies.

Greer was told that conflicts would evolve "from Cold War, to Rogue Nations, to Global Terrorism, to the ultimate trump card: A hoaxed threat from space."

On a brighter note, Zwicker believes that our current path of enmification, the art and consequence of enemy-making, can be reversed if, for example, the media investigates terrorist attacks to find out if they are false flag operations, expose deception, and keep the ruling elites and their circles accountable, not unlike how the Washington Post covered Watergate in the early 1970s.

The Washington Post did a story about Fred Burks in December 2004. He is a whistleblower and former senior State Department language interpreter to top-level politicians such as President Bill Clinton and President George W. Bush.

Based on his website that exposes cover-ups, Burks believes that we first need to speak candidly about what's happening in the world at present and move beyond secrecy and fear. He concludes that the more informed we are, the more difficult it will be to perpetuate the deception of any future false flag operations.

Burks supports choices that lead to a more spiritual and purpose-centered life of "Compassion In Action," as referred to by President Bush on December 12, 2002.

He also believes that when we walk our talk, we can inspire others to lead in a way that creates a brighter future for all.

Burks’ philosophy resonates with Zwicker’s message about how, by working together in exposing the deception of false flag operations, the media and people from all levels of society can help prevent them, reduce the manufacturing of fear and hate, and improve the human condition.

Zwicker will be speaking at the Great Hall at Cooper Union in New York City on September 10th, 2006, a conference where he will be joined with Dr. Robert Bowman and other researchers who are encouraging the media to further learn about false flag operations.

September 7th, 2006



Bin Laden, FBI Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings, NOT 9/11?!

Washington Post - Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is a longtime and prominent member of the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list, which notes his role as the suspected mastermind of the deadly U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa on Aug. 7, 1998.

But another more infamous date -- Sept. 11, 2001 -- is nowhere to be found on the same FBI notice.

The curious omission underscores the Justice Department's decision, so far, to not seek formal criminal charges against bin Laden for approving al-Qaeda's most notorious and successful terrorist attack. The notice says bin Laden is "a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world" but does not provide details.

The absence has also provided fodder for conspiracy theorists who think the U.S. government or another power was behind the Sept. 11 hijackings. From this point of view, the lack of a Sept. 11 reference suggests that the connection to al-Qaeda is uncertain.

"There's no mystery here," said FBI spokesman Rex Tomb. "They could add 9/11 on there, but they have not because they don't need to at this point. There is a logic to it."

David N. Kelley, the former U.S. attorney in New York who oversaw terrorism cases when bin Laden was indicted for the embassy bombings there in 1998, said he is not at all surprised by the lack of a reference to Sept. 11 on the official wanted poster. Kelley said the issue is a matter of legal restrictions and the need to be fair to any defendant.

"It might seem a little strange from the outside, but it makes sense from a legal point of view," said Kelley, now in private practice. "If I were in government, I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was."

Bin Laden was placed on the Ten Most Wanted list in June 1999 after being indicted for murder, conspiracy and other charges in connection with the embassy bombings, and a $5 million reward was put on his head at that time. The listing was updated after Sept. 11, 2001, to include a higher reward of $25 million, but no mention of the attacks was added.

The FBI maintains a separate "Most Wanted Terrorists" list, which includes bin Laden and 25 others who have been indicted in U.S. federal courts in connection with terror plots. But this second bin Laden listing also makes no mention of Sept. 11.

August 28, 2006

VIDEO - Jr Bush don't care about arresting Bin Laden - In July 2006, the New York Times reported that a CIA counterterror unit named Alec Station, a 10-year old subdivision tasked with finding bin Laden, had been closed down. In addition, former CIA director Buzzy Krongard told the London Times that bin Laden should stay free and it was better off for the world for him to remain at large. On two separate occasions President Bush has publicly stated that he is no longer interested in catching bin Laden.

“The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders’ rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations.”
—Usama bin Laden (Saudi Arabian), CNN News, "Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks," September 17, 2001

"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them."
—Usama bin Laden, Ummat, BBC Monitoring Service, "Usama bin Laden Says Israeli Regime is Behind the 9-11 Attacks," September 28, 2001

QUESTION: "Mr President, in your speeches, you rarely mention Osama Bin Laden. Why is that?"
GEORGE BUSH JR: "I don't know where he is. I just don't spend that much time on him."
WhiteHouse.gov

GEORGE BUSH JR: "I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
—March 13, 2002

“On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, 202-324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said: 'The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11. Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11. The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11'”
—Ed Haas, Muckraker Report, "FBI says, 'No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11'," June 6, 2006

Tony Snow: "I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?"
Dick Cheney: "That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place. So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—WhiteHouse.gov, The Tony Snow Show, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006 (Snow was promoted to White House Press Secretary, then in May, all televised news conferences were cancelled for the remained of Bush Jr's presidency, as punishment for Steven Colbert's especially vicious roasting of Bush Jr at White House Correspondents Dinner. Tony Snow was a writer for Jewish world Review and was an employee of Fox News. Fox is owned by Australian citizen and porno kingpin Sir Rupert Murdock Jewish Knight of the British Empire who is married to a citizen of Communist China. The verb "snow" is defined as "lie". The word "fox" is defined by Websters Dictionary as "artful dodger, cheat, trickster, slick operator, slyboots, sly dog, con artist; see also cheat 1, rascal.")

"A new tape showing Osama Bin Laden meeting with September 11 hijackers days before the attack has served to boost the Bush administration's war on terror agenda as the fifth anniversary of 9/11 nears, yet one of the hijackers who appears in the tape is reported elsewhere as still alive and completely unconnected to the terror plot. The tape purports to show Bin Laden meeting with alleged 9/11 hijackers Wail Alshehri and Hamza Alghamdi days before the attack in Afghanistan. After reports emerged that some of the named hijackers were still alive the FBI quickly changed its story to claim that some of the hijackers had stolen the identities of other individuals. Innocent people who saw their photograph amongst the 19 terrorists complained to their embassies yet the same mug shots are still used to this day and the FBI has made no effort to revise the list. Telling therefore it is that Wail Alshehri was one of the accused hijackers reported by the L.A. Times to still be alive and protesting his innocence in Saudi Arabia after 9/11. So how can Alshehri appear in a tape meeting with Bin Laden when he had no involvement with the plot whatsoever and is presumably still alive today? Does the Alshehri in the videotape look similar to the innocent Alshehri who was framed for the attacks? Why does the mainstream media refuse to even ask these questions, instead just blithely relaying the propaganda?"
Infowars.com, Fake Bin Laden video tape shows alleged 911 hijackers who are still alive, September 8, 2006

VIDEO - Bush Jr: Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11

WHITEHOUSE.GOV - Tony Snow: "I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?" Dick Cheney: "That's correct." — The Tony Snow Show, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006


GOP candidate says 9/11 attacks were a hoax

NASHUA TELEGRAPH - A Republican candidate for this area’s congressional seat said Wednesday that the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In an editorial board interview with The Telegraph on Wednesday, the candidate, Mary Maxwell, said the U.S. government had a role in killing nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, so it could make Americans hate Arabs and allow the military to bomb Muslim nations such as Iraq.

Maxwell, 59, seeks the 2nd District congressional seat. The Concord resident opposes the incumbent, Charles Bass of Peterborough, and Berlin Mayor Bob Danderson in the Republican primary Sept. 12.

Maxwell would not specify if she holds the opinion that the government stood by while terrorists hijacked four domestic airliners and used them as weapons, or if it had a larger role by sanctioning and carrying out the attacks.

But she implicated the government by saying the Sept. 11 attacks were meant “to soften us up . . . to make us more willing to have more stringent laws here, which are totally against the Bill of Rights . . . to make us particularly focus on Arabs and Muslims . . . and those strange persons who spend all their time creating little bombs,” giving Americans a reason “to hate them and fear them and, therefore, bomb them in Iraq for other reasons.”

She said this strategy “would be normal” for governments, citing her belief that the British government – and not the Germany military – sank the Lusitania ocean liner in 1915. The deaths of Americans on the cruise liner helped galvanize U.S. support to enter World War I, and benefited England, she said.

In turn, the Sept. 11 attacks “made the ground fertile” for more stringent laws, such as the Patriot Act, and the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, Maxwell said.

Near the end of the interview, Maxwell pounded her fist on the table and asked editors of The Telegraph why they weren’t publishing more stories about the government’s role in the terrorist attacks or proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Maxwell has no political experience. She lived abroad for the past quarter-century with her husband, George, a pediatrician, and only recently returned to the U.S., she said.

In the hour-long interview, Maxwell spoke at length about Constitutional law, U.S. law, nuclear weapons proliferation, and other domestic and foreign policy issues.

Maxwell said the U.S. should withdraw from Iraq. She also questioned whether Congress authorized the war and said its members can’t explain that 2002 vote. (Congress authorized the use of force to defend this country’s security and enforce United Nations resolutions on Iraq.)

“Legally, we shouldn’t have gone to Iraq if Congress can’t explain why,” she said.

Maxwell described herself as a strict Constitutionalist, a candidate who wants to bring the country “back to basics.” The Constitution grants more power to the legislative branch than the other two branches, but Congress has allowed the executive and judicial branches to diminish its influence, she said.

She also said the U.S. shouldn’t immerse itself in the international community by signing trade and security pacts. These agreements have weakened national sovereignty, she said.

August 24, 2006


The enduring conspiracy factor

TORONTO STAR - For many Americans, the most bizarre and unlikely terror-attack scenario involves a bearded man sitting in an Afghanistan cave and 19 guys with box cutters.

The World Trade Center towers were brought down by controlled blasts secretly placed in the buildings.

The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

United Airlines Flight 93 never crashed near Shanksville, Pa., but actually landed in Cleveland. Its passengers were quickly evacuated and were never heard from again.

Five years after the most reported and recorded cataclysmic event in world history, one would expect the conspiracy theorists to have been pushed to society's margins, gathering to swap their stories in dingy interstate motel rooms.

Think again.

As time passes, more and more Americans are convinced the most bizarre theory is that 19 guys with box cutters, directed by a bearded man in a cave in Afghanistan, pulled off the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

An inside job? A government murdering nearly 3,000 people, most of them U.S. citizens, in order to justify a Middle East invasion in its thirst for oil?

Those who believe that are not crackpots, says Mark Fenster, a University of Florida law professor and author of Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture.

"The largest part of this group is made up of people who are increasingly disillusioned by the Bush administration. They look at the Iraq war, the response to Katrina and other things gone wrong and they believe there isn't anything these guys wouldn't do to stay in power.

"If you believe they are incompetent and evil and they lie to you, you are willing to contemplate anything."

Indeed, ask Kevin Ryan, a leading figure in the conspiracy movement, and he'll tell you what started him down the conspiracy path.

"I first began to be suspicious ... after it was clear the Bush administration had lied to us about the reasons for going to war in Iraq," says Ryan, who was lab director at an Underwriters Laboratory subsidiary in South Bend, Ind., until he was fired after questioning official reports on the collapse of the twin towers.

"Since then, I've wondered when the lying began."

Ryan has a lot of company — in print, on videotape and all over the Internet.

Loose Change, a punchy, fast-paced documentary that makes extensive use of clips from live TV coverage, has been viewed by more than 10 million people on the Internet. The 90-minute video, made for $6,000 by 22-year-old Dylan Avery, also has become a classic on American university campuses.

A book by French author Thierry Meyssan, The Horrifying Fraud, outlines how the U.S. military was behind the attacks. It was a bestseller in France in 2002.

In Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action, David Ray Griffin, a professor emeritus of philosophy and theology at California's Claremont School of Theology, accuses the Bush administration of orchestrating the attacks.

Some of the leading conspiracy theorists are scientists, engineers, theologians and university professors, 75 of whom formed Scholars For 9/11 Truth.

According to a poll by Scripps Howard News Service, more than one-third of respondents think government officials "either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action to stop the attacks because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East."

Sixteen per cent of those polled believe secret explosives brought down the towers; 12 per cent believe a cruise missile was fired into the Pentagon.

Conspiracy theories in the United States date back at least to questions about who really killed Abraham Lincoln in 1865.

To this day, people will tell you that the 1969 Apollo moon landing was staged in Hollywood; that the 1986 explosion of the Challenger space shuttle was deliberate; that the U.S. government continues to cover up the crash of an alien spaceship in Roswell, N.M., in 1947.

There is no shortage of Hurricane Katrina survivors in New Orleans who swear they heard the levees being blown up.

But not since the heyday of JFK assassination theories — the gold standard against which all conspiracy scenarios must be measured — have so many Americans believed their government is lying to them.

Fenster says the John F. Kennedy assassination and the 9/11 attacks are huge events that have been officially explained by tiny scenarios, something people find unsatisfying.

"The Kennedy assassination was of such historical significance that the explanation that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone sounds weird," he says.

"Similarly, it is unsatisfying that a guy in a cave and a bunch of guys with box cutters pulled this off."

The power of the conspiracy movement is such that it has led the U.S. State Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to post rebuttals on their websites.

The State Department counters claims about Flight 93, that it was either safely landed in Cleveland or was shot down by a missile, by pointing to a "definite struggle" between hijackers and some passengers heard on the flight's cockpit voice recorder.

Last May, the U.S. military released video of American Airlines Flight 77 crashing into the Pentagon in a bid to quiet theorists who are convinced the extremely small hole in the building and the paucity of damage done are inconsistent with a Boeing 757 crashing at top speed.

The State Department says the theory that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile ignores the fact that the bodies of the crew and passengers of Flight 77 were found at the crash site.

The officials also point to numerous eyewitnesses who saw the jetliner approaching the Pentagon.

Conspiracy theorists counter with their own witnesses who say they saw a missile.

A book published by Popular Mechanics magazine pointed out that planes don't leave complete images, including outlines of a wing, "like a cartoon" when they fly into buildings.

Yeah, but what about the mass "put options" — stock trades that pay off only if a stock drops — on United Airlines and American Airlines stock just before the fateful day?

The 9/11 Commission agreed unusual stock trading did take place prior to the attacks but deemed the cause of each instance to have been "innocuous."

What about the September 2000 report by the Project for a New American Century — which counted Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Iraq war architect Paul Wolfowitz as members? It argued that American hegemony could best be spurred by "a catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbour."

What about the Osama bin Laden video in which he takes credit for the attack? Why is he writing and eating with his right hand? Isn't he left handed? Who is that really in the video?

What about this? How about that? Who? Why? Why not?

The questions never end, but the foundation of all 9/11 conspiracies is the manner in which the twin towers collapsed. And what about the collapse of another World Trade Centre building, WTC 7, which wasn't hit by either jetliner?

In Hamilton, Frank Greening, a retired Ontario Hydro physical chemistry scientist, followed the conspiracy debate and developed a computer code to recreate the rate of collapse of the towers.

He expected his study would lend credence to the conspiracy theorists, but to his surprise, it showed that trauma at upper levels could indeed bring down the buildings in the manner and rate that occurred.

"I too wondered how these buildings could collapse in such an amazing fashion," says Greening in a telephone interview. "How could a building come down from the top-down like that?"

He tried to separate political motives from the science and is now convinced the conspiracy theorists who speak in scientific terms "are dragging science through the mud" while gaining unjustified credibility with the general public.

"A lot of what they are saying is science fiction. But if you package it in a certain way, it can be quite convincing."

Greening is trying to arrange a face-to-face debate with conspiracy scholars because he has become frustrated trying to deal with them by email.

"They just started to ignore me if they were hearing things they didn't want to hear," he complains.

After he posted his rebuttal on The Journal of 9/11 Studies website, he was accused of being a Bush toady.

"Frankly," he says, "some of the reaction freaked me out."

Back in Indiana, Ryan says he's just an "average American" seeking answers as part of what theorists call the 9/11 Truth Movement.

He's convinced that, like White House claims about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, the official reports on 9/11 are demonstrably false.

"Many people will not give up the Bush administration conspiracy theory unless they are given a better — perhaps more outrageous — story," he says.

"But we are all affected by the first false story, and if we don't realize that soon, we will see more terrorism, more suffering and more lies."

September 10, 2006


The plot thickens

TAIPEI TIMES - As the fifth anniversary of Sept. 11 nears, academics query the official version of events and claim the US government was complicit in the attacks.

Shards of glass and dust from the World Trade Center towers sit on professor Steven Jones's desk at Brigham Young University in Utah. Evidence, he says, of the biggest cover-up in history -- one too evil for most to believe, but one he has staked his academic career on exposing.

The attacks of Sept. 11, Jones asserts, were an "inside job," puppeteered by the neo-conservatives in the White House to justify the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries, inflate military spending and expand Israel.

"We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone," says Jones. "We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the bottom of this."

While this sinister spin strikes most American academics as absurd, Jones, a physics professor, is not alone. He is a member of 9/11 Scholars for Truth, a recently formed group of around 75 US professors determined to prove 9/11 was a hoax. In essays and journals, they are using their association with prominent universities to give a scholarly stamp to conspiracy theories long believed in parts of Europe and the Arab world, and gaining ground among Americans due to frustration with the Iraq war and opposition to President Bush's heavily hyped "war on terror."

Their iconoclastic positions have drawn wrath from rightwing radio shows and caused upheaval on campuses, triggering letters to newspapers, phone calls from parents and TV cameras in lecture halls.

In the Midwest, 61 legislators signed a petition calling for the dismissal of a University of Wisconsin assistant professor, Kevin Barrett, after he joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth. Citing academic freedom, the university provost defended Barrett, albeit reluctantly.

A Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll taken during the summer indicates that Americans are increasingly suspicious of the government's explanation of the events of 9/11: 36 percent said it was "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that federal officials either participated in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, or took no action to stop them, "because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East".

For most of the world, the story of Sept. 11 begins at 8.45am on Sept. 11 2001, when American Airlines flight 11 smashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center. But, tumble down the rabbit hole with Jones, and the plotline begins a year earlier, in Sept. 2000. A neo-conservative group called Project for a New American Century, which included the US defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, and the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, brought out a report arguing for a global expansion of American military and economic supremacy, and for the US to transform itself into a "one-world superpower." The report warned that "the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor".

The group, in concert with about 20 others, orchestrated the attacks of Sept. 11 as an excuse for pre-emptive global aggression against Afghanistan, then Iraq and soon Iran, the academics say. And they insist that they have amassed a wealth of scientific data to prove it.

It is impossible, says Jones, for the towers to have collapsed from the collision of two airplanes, as jet fuel doesn't burn at temperatures hot enough to melt steel beams. The horizontal puffs of smoke -- squibs -- emitted during the collapse of the towers are indicative of controlled implosions on lower floors. The scholars have collected eyewitness accounts of flashes and loud explosions immediately before the fall.

The twin towers must, they say, have been brought down by explosives -- hence the container of dust on Jones's desk, sent to him unsolicited by a woman living in lower Manhattan. He is using X-ray fluorescents to test it for explosive materials.

What's more, the nearby World Trade Center 7 also collapsed later that afternoon. The building had not been hit by a plane, only damaged by fire. WTC 7 housed a clandestine CIA station, which the scholars believe was the command center for the planning of Sept. 11.

"The planes were just a distraction," says James Fetzer, 65, a recently retired philosopher of science at the University of Minnesota. "The evidence is so overwhelming, but most Americans don't have time to take a look at this."

But Jonathan Barnett, professor of fire protection engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Massachusetts, calls such claims "bad science." Barnett was a member of the World Trade Center Building Performance Study, one of the government groups that investigated the towers' collapse.

Reluctantly, he has familiarized himself with the scholars' claims -- many of them have emailed him. Yes, it is unusual for a steel structure to collapse from fire, Barnett agrees. However, his group and others argue that the planes' impact weakened the structures and stripped off the fireproofing materials. That caused the top floors of both towers to collapse on to the floors below. "A big chunk of building falling down made the next floor fall down, and then they all came down like a deck of cards," Barnett says.

The collapse of WTC 7 was also unusual, he admits. However, firefighters do not usually let a fire rage unabated for seven hours as they did on the morning of Sept. 11, because they had prioritized the rescue of victims. "The fact that you don't have evidence to support your theory doesn't mean that the other theory is true," Barnett says. "They just made it up out of the blue."

Since the attacks, the US government has issued three reports into the events of the day, all of which involved hundreds of professors, scientists and government officials. The 9/11 Commission, a bipartisan group, issued a 500-page, moment-by-moment investigation into the hijackers' movements, concluding that they were connected to Osama bin Laden. The National Institute of Standards and Technology, a government agency, filed 10,000 pages of reports examining the towers' collapse. And the Federal Emergency Management Agency weighed in, examining the response to the attacks.

"To plant bombs in three buildings with enough bomb materials and wiring? It's too huge a project and would require far too many people to keep it a secret afterwards," says Christopher Pyle, professor of constitutional law at Mt Holyoke College. "After every major crisis, like the assassinations of JFK or Martin Luther King, we've had conspiracy theorists who come up with plausible scenarios for gullible people. It's a waste of time."

But Barrett says the experts have been fooled by an "act of psychological conversion" not unlike the tactics CIA interrogators use on their victims. "People will disregard evidence if it causes their faith to be shattered," he says. "I think we were all shocked. And then, when the voice of authority told us what happened, we just believed it."

History has revealed that governments have a tradition of misleading the public into going to war, says Barrett, and the next generation of Americans will realize the truth. "Europe and Canada are way ahead of us on this."

The Sept. 11 scholars go to great lengths to portray themselves as rational thinkers, who have been slowly won over by a careful, academic analysis of the facts of the day.

However, a study of the full extent of their claims is a journey into the increasingly absurd: Flight 93 did not crash in Pennsylvania but landed safely in Cleveland; desperate phone calls received by relatives on the ground from passengers were actually computer-generated voices from a laboratory in California. The Pentagon was not hit by American Airlines Flight 77, but by a smaller, remote-controlled A-3 Sky Warrior, which shot a missile into the building before crashing into it.

Many of the 9/11 scholars have a history of defending conspiracy theories, including that the CIA plotted both the Lockerbie bombing and the plane crash of John F Kennedy Jr. and his wife, and that "global secret societies" control the world.

Professor Robert Goldberg, of the University of Utah, wrote a book on conspiracy theories, Enemies Within: the Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. He recounts a history of religious and political leaders using conspiracy theories for personal and political gain. The common enemy is usually Jews, big government or corporations. The public laps it up, either because these theories are more exciting than the truth, or out of emotional need.

"What the conspiracy theorists do is present their case with facts and figures: they have dates, meeting places and always name names," he says. "The case is always presented in a prosecutorial way, or the way an adventure writer presents a novel. It's a breathless account. They are willing to say hearsay is a fact, and rumor is true, and accidents are never what they seem.

"One of the stories is that a missile hit the Pentagon, and all the data is there. But what is missing is: what actually happened to the plane and the people on it? Conspiracy theorists avoid discussion of those facts that don't fit."

Perhaps it is no coincidence that the public's willingness to believe conspiracy theories parallels their dissatisfaction with the Bush administration. In recent years, the American public has felt misled over false claims that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and that Saddam Hussein was connected to Sept. 11.

Many fear infringements on their civil liberties now the National Security Agency has gained access to phone billing records from telecommunications companies, the Bush administration has engaged in wiretapping without court warrants and there are thousands of cases of indefinite detentions of American and foreign citizens without trial. Those who criticize the Bush administration's "war on terror" are accused of being unpatriotic.

By taking their criticisms to such extremes, though, the scholars risk caricaturing the opposition. None the less, they are pushing on, and imploring Congress to reopen the investigation.

"We're academics and we're rational, and we really believe Congress or someone should investigate this," says David Gabbard, an East Carolina education professor and Sept. 11 scholar. "But there are a lot of crazies out there who purport that UFOs were involved. We don't want to be lumped in with those folks."

September 10, 2006


Young filmmakers dedicated to exposing a 9/11 conspiracy

SYRACUSE POST STANDARD - It shaped up as a routine day in the crusade. Soon, a TV crew would arrive. Later, the radio stations would call. Between news interviews, they'd polish speeches for this weekend's pilgrimage to ground zero, and take turns in the shower.

"We had CNN last week, and we have CNN again on Sunday," said Korey Rowe, 23, of Oneonta, pacing a house suitably cluttered by its three bachelor occupants. "It just goes on and on. We have so many different countries coming, sometimes I don't even know who they are Yesterday, a buddy came over, and he's like, 'What reporters are these?' And I say, 'I don't know France?' And they were from Switzerland."

Rowe, a former U.S. soldier who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, is one of three Otsego County young filmmakers behind Loose Change, an 89-minute documentary that may just be the most watched movie that people never heard of.

Available online and free, their film has become a touchstone for the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement, an ardent political fringe that accuses the Bush administration of perhaps the greatest treachery in history.

They say the U.S. government not Osama bin Laden plotted the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. They say a military missile or drone not hijacked American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. They say pre-set bombs not heat from burning jet fuel caused the World Trade Center towers to collapse. They say actors not passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 made the frantic cell phone calls that preceded the crash near Shanksville, Pa.

"If we don't do something about this right now, it's very possible that they're going to pull off another terror attack," said Jason Bermas, 27, their webmaster, who grew up in 9/11, nearby Fort Plain. "If that happens, it's going to get a lot worse."

The overwhelming scope of the movement's accusations generally bring reactions of disbelief, ridicule and anger. But core believers won't back down.

Conspiracy Web sites appeared shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks, but the movement lacked a catchy, watchable package until "Loose Change" appeared.

The film was conceived four years ago in Dylan Avery's laptop.

After being rejected by film school, Avery, now 22, worked odd jobs and wrote a fictional screenplay about a young guy obsessed with a 9/11 conspiracy. The deeper he delved, the more Avery became the character in his story. About two years ago, he dropped the fiction angle and made a documentary.

In his film, Avery reads more than 300 snippets of evidence above a stream of graphics, news footage and rap music. It found an unprecedented market.

In May, with an estimated 10 million viewings, "Loose Change" hit No. 1 on Google Video's Top 100 most-watched sites. Earlier this week, "Loose Change: Second Edition Recut" ranked 13th, with an earlier version at No. 27, and a German-language version at No. 46.

The filmmakers claim 100 million people worldwide have seen "Loose Change," but a sure number is anybody's guess. On top of streaming video, downloads and thousands of DVD copies, the film also has aired on TV in Venezuela and is scheduled to appear in Australia.

Last month, Vanity Fair magazine spotlighted the filmmakers, saying their work "just might be the first Internet blockbuster." Time magazine called their film "a compelling experience," and a recent U.S. News & World Report described it as "superficially persuasive."

This weekend, the fifth anniversary of 9/11, the trio are in New York City, scheduled to speak in public and appear on CNN - including a possible sparring match on the cable network's "Glenn Beck Program."

For months, they have fielded the questions.

"Generally, they're boilerplate," said Rowe, who is listed as executive producer. "'How did it start? Why did it start? Are you afraid for your life? Are you being handled by Zionists? Are you a Vatican assassin? Are you CIA disinformation?'

"But in the media stories, they don't want to touch our evidence," he continued. "CNN came and did a story on the phenomenon of Americans not believing their government. CNN is like, 'Why wouldn't everyone believe the government?' Like, it's totally new to them that no one is going to believe this government?"

The film's evidence spawns wide-ranging interpretations. Believers watch the towers falling in freeze-frame and see bombs preceding each floor's collapse. Skeptics see ejected smoke from the downward crush. Believers see the Pentagon crash site and ask, "Where is the plane?" Skeptics say the pictures prove only that camera angles can be incomplete.

And if a missile hit the Pentagon, what happened to the real Flight 77 passengers? They were killed, the filmmakers insist, probably never aware of the plot.

Nor will Thursday's newly released videos of the 9/11 hijackers with bin Laden change most believers. It's just another part of the cover-up, the Web sites say.

"Everyone says, 'It's just too big to believe,' " Bermas said. "But you've got to understand that the Republicans and the Democrats are both owned by the lobbyists. Your senator or congressman cannot win without special-interest money, and those lobbyists work for the same corporations that own the media. What we have is corporate-sponsored government, and the politicians and media back off."

Not that this is new. Conspiracies became part of Americana long ago.

Forty-three years after his assassination, many still debate who shot John F. Kennedy. The best-selling book "The Da Vinci Code" claims a 2,000-year-old cover-up in the Catholic Church. So 9/11 was bound to inspire its own mythology.

But "Loose Change" adds a few new wrinkles.

"A documentary brings with it automatically a sense that what you're seeing is true," said Syracuse University adjunct professor and filmmaker David Coryell. "The fact is that documentaries are almost never neutral. . . . They are a matter of many choices made by the filmmakers."

Coryell said the interest in "Loose Change" resembles the Internet groundswell for "The Blair Witch Project," a 1999 horror movie originally promoted as a true story. Both films were made on shoestring budgets - "Loose Change" cost about $6,000 - and both lured audiences with a hunger to believe, or just be shocked.

And the distrust is out there.

In a recent Scripps Howard News Service poll, 36 percent of Americans surveyed said they believe the U.S. government "either assisted in the 9/11 attacks or took no action" to stop them. Twelve percent said they believe a cruise missile fired by the U.S. military - not a hijacked plane - hit the Pentagon.

Avery, Bermas and Rowe say they hope to unveil "Loose Change: The Final Cut," at next year's Sundance Film Festival, which could lead to a nationwide theatrical release.

"Six months from now, hopefully, we'll be looking at our movie posters . . . going into the theaters," Bermas said. "Long range, personally, I'd like to just live a regular American life watching the Yankees, checking out 'The Simpsons' on Sundays and making movies for fun. But I don't see that now."

While each admits enjoying the spotlight, they also said they have come to sense its heat. Wherever they go, folks either seek to fit them for halos or aluminum foil hats.

"There's always the guy who comes up to you with a stack of papers, and he says, 'You gotta see these! The Jesuits did it! I can prove it!' " Bermas said. "And I'm like, 'Uhhhh.' "

"Or one person will give you a flier, and then another person will give you a flier about THAT person," Avery added.

"And then a third person comes up to you with both of their fliers," Rowe said. "And he's written in notes between the spaces!"

They laughed, until someone noticed the clock. The TV crew would be pulling down the driveway. Time to get ready; the global conspiracy needed to be exposed.

September 9, 2006


Conspiracy Types Lecture Regular Folks at Ground Zero

VILLAGE VOICE - The fifth anniversary of 9-11 brought more sorrow and anguish to New York, but also more questioning of the official narrative of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Hundreds of 9-11 conspiracists paraded across the street from ground zero Monday with their brazen signs—"9-11 WAS A U.S. BLACK OP"—during the solemn reading of the names of the 2,749 who perished in the twin towers. A surprising many people stopped to listen and seriously consider the "proof" offered by members of the so-called 9-11 truth movement , who spent the day lecturing people about how the towers were felled by explosives. (See the photo slideshow here .)

"Well, I do have questions," remarked one woman who came by on her lunch hour. "Like how were these hijackers who could barely fly a Cessna supposed to have piloted big planes into these buildings?" A manic guy with bleach-blond hair seized on that to launch a rant about the maximum flame temperature of jet fuel and the physics of molten steel, dismissing recent efforts by the U.S. State Department and the National Institute of Standards and Technology to counter such rampant, freeform "expertise" as yet more "propaganda."

"Idiots!" shrieked a man overhearing him. "You guys probably believe Elvis is still alive."

But if people have doubts about what happened, it shouldn't be surprising considering the lengths the Bush administration has gone to manipulate 9-11 and distort pre-war intelligence to justify the war in Iraq. And when people needed clear information about the air quality downtown, the feds instead gave them false assurances .

If truth is the first casualty of war, the Bush administration committed a massacre. A startling 36 percent of Americans now believe the Bush administration either perpetrated the attacks or failed to stop them because it wanted to go to war in the Middle East.

Forty-two percent of Americans believe the U.S. government and 9-11 commission are in some way covering up the truth of 9-11, according to a Zogby poll in May.

Particularly egregious is that the Republican co-chair of the 9-11 Commission, Thomas Kean, agreed to be a paid advisor to ABC's myth-making docudrama " The Path to 9-11 ," which was scripted by conservatives , and which aired last night amid frequent references to its containing "composite" characters and incidents, and "time compression . . . used for dramatic purposes."

If the person charged with investigating the "truth" of 9-11 lends his name to a partisan, fictionalized version, what are people supposed to believe?

Now the conspiracy crowd is using the missing WMDS and numerous other omissions and distortions pushed by the Bush administration to justify all sorts of crackpot theories.

"Go and research it, find out the truth, 9-11 was an inside job!" syndicated radio host Alex Jones bellowed from a bullhorn during a 2 p.m. rally across the street from ground zero that drew more than 300 people.

With his folksy baritone and evident love of the spotlight, Jones is the conspiracy left's version of Rush Limbaugh. "The U.S. is being looted by the globalists," he shouted from inside the protest pen, as police commanders grimaced. "They needed the terrorist attacks to get the people behind their agenda. I wish it wasn't true, that it was just a conspiracy theory. Because it's scary as hell, but it's the truth. This country is too great to be taken over by a bunch of murderous thugs."

After about an hour, Jones led the crowd on a march to New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's office to lambaste him for supposedly refusing to investigate why the rubble and remains of the World Trade Center were so hastily carted away.

"The sleeping giant has arisen—we won't be silenced," declared Jones. He went on to explain to the media how the decision to stage a new Pearl Harbor on 9-11 was made not by Dick Cheney and the neocons, but was dictated from on high by David Rockefeller, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Queen Elizabeth of England, and the other financiers of the secretive Bilderberg Group that controls world resources from behind the scenes.

Back at ground zero, the mood had shifted from a solemn ritual to something more akin to a street fair. Evangelicals preaching Armageddon competed with a string quartet, a Japanese Kabuki dancer, and a rally for the "forgotten" undocumented workers who died during the WTC attacks or were sickened cleaning contaminated office buildings. There was even a group lobbying to "free Pakistan."

It was all too much for Craig Laitta, a contractor from the Upper West side who balked at a born-again Christian woman bearing a sign proclaiming her support for President Bush.

"I have a personal memory here, at this spot, and you just destroyed it," said Laitta, who lost a friend on 9-11 and helped clear rubble from the pile. "You don't go to a funeral and make political statements."

Later, a guy in an FDNY cap nearly punched an anti-war activist parading though the crowds of mourners and onlookers with a neon green sign that shrieked "LIARS!"

But overall, there seemed more willingness from grieving New Yorkers to tolerate dissent, either because people have grown more used to it, or because the "truth" of 9-11 has never seemed more muddied.

"Everyone is coming out with their own investigations, their own documentaries . At this point, I don't know what to believe," sighed Claudette, a Jamaican woman from the Bronx who declined to give her last name.

"It took me five years to come here and stand here. That's how hurt I am," added Claudette, an insurance claims adjuster who works less than a block away, and who said she lost friends in the collapse.

Claudette wasn't troubled by the political sniping around her as she stared up at the twin columns of light projected into the night sky during Monday's closing ceremony. "I worked down here for 18 years. This is where I used to shop. Here will always be my towers. I'm still imagining my towers," she said, her eyes glistening.

September 12, 2006


President Chavez says US may have orchestrated 9/11

By Sarah Ferguson

ASSOCIATED PRESS - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Tuesday that it's plausible that the U.S. government was involved in the Sept. 11 attacks. Chavez did not specifically accuse the U.S. government of having a hand in the Sept. 11 attacks, but rather suggested that theories of U.S. involvement bear examination. The Venezuelan leader, an outspoken critic of U.S. President George W. Bush, was reacting to a television report investigating a theory the Twin Towers were brought down with explosives after hijacked airplanes crashed into them in 2001. “The hypothesis is not absurd ... that those towers could have been dynamited,” Chavez said in a speech to supporters. “A building never collapses like that, unless it's with an implosion.” “The hypothesis that is gaining strength is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world,” Chavez said. “Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq.” Chavez has said the U.S. launched those wars to ensure its political and economic power. The U.S. government says al-Qaida chief Osama bin Laden masterminded the attacks. September 12, 2006

Tony Snow: "I want to be clear because I've heard you say this, and I've heard the President say it, but I want you to say it for my listeners, which is that the White House has never argued that Saddam was directly involved in September 11th, correct?"
Dick Cheney: "That's correct. We had one report early on from another intelligence service that suggested that the lead hijacker, Mohamed Atta, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague, Czechoslovakia. And that reporting waxed and waned where the degree of confidence in it, and so forth, has been pretty well knocked down now at this stage, that that meeting ever took place. So we've never made the case, or argued the case that somehow Osama bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."
—WhiteHouse.gov, The Tony Snow Show, "Interview of the Vice President by Tony Snow", March 29, 2006

QUESTION: "Mr President, in your speeches, you rarely mention Osama Bin Laden. Why is that?"
GEORGE BUSH JR: "I don't know where he is. I just don't spend that much time on him."
September 911 Surprise - Episode 2

GEORGE BUSH JR: "I don't know where he is. I have no idea and I really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
—March 13, 2002

“On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, 202-324-3000, to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said: 'The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11. Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11. The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11'”
—Ed Haas, Muckraker Report, "FBI says, 'No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11'," June 6, 2006

“The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it. I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons. I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders’ rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations.”
—Usama bin Laden (Saudi Arabian), CNN News, "Bin Laden says he wasn't behind attacks," September 17, 2001

"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks. I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in control of the American-Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid by them."
—Usama bin Laden, Ummat, BBC Monitoring Service, "Usama bin Laden Says Israeli Regime is Behind the 9-11 Attacks," September 28, 2001

"A new tape showing Osama Bin Laden meeting with September 11 hijackers days before the attack has served to boost the Bush administration's war on terror agenda as the fifth anniversary of 9/11 nears, yet one of the hijackers who appears in the tape is reported elsewhere as still alive and completely unconnected to the terror plot. The tape purports to show Bin Laden meeting with alleged 9/11 hijackers Wail Alshehri and Hamza Alghamdi days before the attack in Afghanistan. After reports emerged that some of the named hijackers were still alive the FBI quickly changed its story to claim that some of the hijackers had stolen the identities of other individuals. Innocent people who saw their photograph amongst the 19 terrorists complained to their embassies yet the same mug shots are still used to this day and the FBI has made no effort to revise the list. Telling therefore it is that Wail Alshehri was one of the accused hijackers reported by the L.A. Times to still be alive and protesting his innocence in Saudi Arabia after 9/11. So how can Alshehri appear in a tape meeting with Bin Laden when he had no involvement with the plot whatsoever and is presumably still alive today? Does the Alshehri in the videotape look similar to the innocent Alshehri who was framed for the attacks? Why does the mainstream media refuse to even ask these questions, instead just blithely relaying the propaganda?"
Infowars.com, Fake Bin Laden video tape shows alleged 911 hijackers who are still alive, September 8, 2006


Some still can't,or won't, believe What really happened on 9/11

MARIN INDEPENDENT JOURNAL - On the fifth anniversary of the terror attacks, do we really know?

Some are convinced we haven't been told anything even remotely close to the true story.

A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,000 adults, conducted last month, indicated that more than a third of Americans - an astonishing 36 percent - believe the Bush administration had something to do with the attacks, either by allowing them to happen or actually carrying them out, so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.

Somewhat grudgingly, Time magazine acknowledged this week that the so-called "9/11 Truth Movement" is "a mainstream political reality."

If that's the case, these tens of millions of Americans cannot all be crackpot conspiracy theorists or wackos with Internet connections and too much time on their hands.

They are people like Dwight Loop, the 54-year-old owner of Cobalt Sun, a gallery and performance space in Sausalito.

At 7:30 tonight at his waterfront theater, Loop will be screening 9/11: Press For Truth, a documentary based on the HarperCollins-published book "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson.

"Press for Truth" tells the stories of three women who lost loved ones on 9/11 and their demands for answers. It's being advertised as "the film the government doesn't want you to see - a courageous and powerful indictment of our government's cover-up of the truth about 9/11."

Loop, a baby boomer who describes himself as "a history buff," said, "I've been interested in things in U.S. history that have been unexplained. I was 11 when (President John F.) Kennedy was killed. That had an effect on my life."

Asked if he accuses the government of a role in Sept. 11, he doesn't hesitate to say, "Oh, absolutely. What happened afterward was even more of a giveaway - the administration's lack of willingness for an investigation, stonewalling an investigation for so long. Things like that pointed to the suspicion that they were covering up something."

The 9/11 tragedy has spawned a cottage industry of documentaries, videos and books on various conspiracy theories and mysterious facts contradicting the official account.

One of the new documentaries, 9/11: The Myth and the Reality, will have its world premiere tonight at the Grand Lake Theatre in Oakland.

9/11: The Myth and the Reality, is by Ken Jenkins, a 59-year-old San Rafael video producer and editor. Jenkins videotaped several talks and lectures, including one at the prestigious Commonwealth Club in San Francisco, by Professor David Ray Griffin, PhD, author of "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11," and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions."

Both of Griffin's books present evidence that purportedly indicates that members of the U.S. government were behind the attacks.

Jenkins has illustrated his documentary with hundreds of graphics and clips. He will be on hand for a Q&A session after tonight's premiere.

He admits that he was skeptical about the various conspiracy theories floating around in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. He thought 9/11 was merely "blowback" - terrorists lashing out at U.S. policy in the Middle East.

But he began to question the official story after reading the mounting evidence of a cover-up - not in the mainstream media, where that kind of opinion is generally ridiculed and discredited - but on the Internet, where the 9/11 Truth Movement was born and where it continues to flourish.

"I wasn't, quite honestly, paying that much attention," he recalled. "But I kept reading information that countered the official account, and I thought, 'There's something not right here.' I investigated the Kennedy assassination, and this looks similar. There's an official story and a bunch of stuff that doesn't add up."

Jenkins said he believes the war on terror is a replacement for the Cold War, and that 9/11 was the work of a small number of government officials in key positions, directing events and pulling strings behind the scenes.

He refers to 9/11 as "a false flag operation" - making it look like another group is behind the attacks - or "state-sponsored terrorism."

"State-sponsored terrorism as a way of manipulating populations to support wars is very common," he said. "It is almost the only way any wars are ever done. They are always based on some kind of lies, deceptions and false-flag operations. I didn't know that at first. It took me weeks to understand it. Now that I know that, in retrospect, it all seems obvious."

It was obvious from the beginning to Byron Belitsos, owner of Origin Press, a 10-year-old publisher of books on spirituality, health and lifestyles in San Rafael.

In 2004, the 53-year-old Fairfax resident produced a conference called "The 9/11 Truth Convergence" at College of Marin. It featured speakers such as Jim Marrs, who wrote the conspiracy book "Inside Job," which Belitsos published. It has just been republished as "The Terror Conspiracy."

As an early and impassioned conspiracy theorist, Belitsos was viewed as something of a kook. He points out that, unlike the Bush administration's official conspiracy theory, he has nothing to gain by promoting what he feels is the real story - that "a rogue element" within the government worked behind the scenes to make the attacks happen.

"Why would someone like me, who has been respected in Marin, who is a publisher of books on spirituality and health, why would I get in trouble with everyone I know, lose a girlfriend and generally cause a mess in my life because I can see this other conspiracy theory?" he said with obvious emotion. "Where is my motive? Let's compare motives. They had a lot to gain. I had nothing."

Lately, though, as the 9/11 Truth Movement gains momentum, Belitsos feels less and less like a lone voice crying out in the wilderness.

"In the last few months, it's become popular," he said brightly. "It's the fastest-growing thing. It's astounding what the polls are saying."

The polls are reflecting the opinions and feelings of people like Wendy Tanowitz of Ross, a 60-year-old progressive political activist.

She doesn't consider herself an expert on the subject, but she says she "was always a little suspicious of the official story about 9/11 and has since concluded that the attacks were an inside job perpetrated by some in our own government.

"This is something most people will find difficult to accept," she said, "but the weight of the evidence is overwhelming."

Tanowitz sums up her belief with bumper sticker wisdom: "I love my country, but I fear my government."

September 19, 2006


Taking to the streets on 9/11 2006

ONLINE JOURNAL - On the morning of 9/11, I couldn't watch the reading of names on NY1.Not five years in a row. I clicked off the ritual of bereaved families, somber politicos and media scripters and went to work on the computer. Before I knew it, it was 1 o'clock. Something gnawed. I needed to go down to Ground Zero, at least to pay my respects to the gone. Yet what I found was very alive. Thousands of 9/11 Truth Movement members shouting ,, "9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job.” This interspersed with the raspy voice of Alex Jones booming the facts of the Towers' demise on a bullhorn. But this was no bull. This was a whole new ballgame.

There were cordons of cops in black and blue, white shirt officers, the brass, the suits, the shooters with burp guns and helmets, tactical cops in caps. There were police cars, SUVs, double-decker tourist buses crawling down Church Street, beeping traffic streaming up it, both sides lined with protestors in front of the PATH train entrance, the entrance to the hole, Ground Zero, visitors gawking, some raising fists, with or against us.

But above all the chant went on: “9/11 was an inside job, 9/11 was an inside job.” I slipped inside the passionate crowd of protestors whose black t-shirts were lettered in white: “Investigate 9/11.” Suddenly, that warm September sun, that cloudless sky, that 9/11 day, felt good again. We were alive and kicking.

Some passersby looked dumfounded that such a thought could be spoken: “9/11 was an inside job.” Others smiled, like someone finally got up the guts to say it out loud. Some screamed back, “Don't help the terrorists.” One provocateur tried to start a fight. He was shooed away. The two sides of the street echoed the chant.

And to the north, silver green, glassy, shining, the new Tower 7, lucky Larry's baby, looked down, ominously alone if not mostly empty, reminding us it never was hit by a plane, but somehow “was pulled,” and somehow was the first and only Tower to be rebuilt. After all, Larry owned it, not just leased it like the other buildings, and managed to make upwards of $500 million on its rebuilding. It is now the headquarters of Silverstein Properties.

Larry's exact words were . . ."I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull, and we watched the building collapse.” Ah, “someone said to pull it.”

Someone asked, “Is that Tower 7?” I said, “Yes. And that's Vesey Street. South of it used to be Tower 6, the Customs House building; behind it the North Tower, behind that the South Tower." I spoke in the faint lulls in the chants and Alex's voice. Two young guys asked me more questions. I was happy to answer. Others chimed in. We had a chat room before you knew it. Everyone had info, nothing had gone unnoticed.

Democracy was still alive if seriously wounded in America. And this was what I was yearning to hear and see, the public voice raised to max volume. The tiers of police were hearing it, too, as were firemen. One near us wore a faint smile that said in silence, “Jesus, they know about the cutter charges, the explosions, top and bottom.” Yes, we knew about it.

Facts and figures, bits of newspeak and irony passed back and fourth. After all, this was the crowd that had showed up at St Marks Church, starting Friday night at 7 pm to hear about “9/11 As Pretext For Afghanistan and Iraq Invasions.” To hear Alfons Olzsewski, 9/11 Vets For Truth, Korey Rowe, the producer of Loose Change 2, Elaine Brower, Member of World Can't Wait, a son currently in Iraq. That was followed by a session on “9/11 As Pretext for the Current Middle East Aggression,” with the venerable Ralph Schoenman from WBAI's Taking Aim.

This was the crowd, too, that came from near and far for the feast of information on Saturday at 3 pm: “9/11: Presenting the Evidence,” with Jim Marrs, Tom Foti, Barry Chamish Barb Honegger, Howie Hawkins, Sander Hicks. This was the crowd that came Sunday to pack the Great Hall of Cooper Union from 1 pm on. It came for the 9/11 Breakthrough Rally. I was lucky enough to attend with some friends.

The speakers were Professors Judy Wood , Steven Jones and Jim Fetzer . And there was Jesse Richard, Ralph Schoenman, Jim Marrs, Wayne Madsen, not to mention Kevin Barrett, Ian Wood, Faiz Kahn, Dr. Robert Bowman, Lynn Pentz, Car Person, Les Jamieson, and Fr. Frank Morales of St. Mark's Church, all of whom have made important contributions to 9/11 Truth.

After the dinner break, Alex Jones delivered a progress report on activities and a sneak preview of the final cut of Loose Change , with new interviews and research. LC's creators were there, Dylan Avery, Jason Berman, Korey Rowe, along with the 9/11 music artist Immortal Technique .

It was communion and confirmation with everything one had read and thought and/or written about. It was a transformation that made one feel there was still intelligent life on earth, that you weren't a lone nut imagining all this. No wonder I had the blues Monday morning trying to watch the TV. In fact, I couldn't go near it all weekend. A lot of Chinese food and my friends who'd attended helped Sunday night, everyone buzzing back and forth across the table, ideas flying about like the chicken and broccoli.

I was seeing people come alive. Come out of the stupor of 9/11 on this fifth anniversary. I was seeing transcendence over the phony movies, the CNN Situation Room , the Bush butt-kissing, the drone of talking heads, the glitzy computer graphics, stupid experts, wooden suits, the lot of them. What a pleasure to touch base with reality. Therefore, I was feeling the danger of the USAPATRIOT Act, the corruption of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. That this march could be taken away, that these people could be arrested and prosecuted at someone's whim.

But what a pleasure to be on the street with this battalion of brave souls, shattering the silence, giving those souls in the air reason to live again. The purpose was to honor their horrific passing with the truth, to break through the lies, the same that had hung over us like the nuclear-pulverized clouds of the Towers. The concrete dust, radiation, and asbestos contamination had fallen in the lungs of first responders, of those fleeing from the buildings, of those helping others to live, many of them dying as we spoke against this ongoing apocalypse that had calcified the city and nation for so long.

Here we were, marching from Ground Zero across Maiden Lane east to Broadway. I thought of Dr. William Pepper, who had spoken on Sunday. He was the great human rights lawyer who had stayed with the Martin Luther King case for 25 years and finally won a civil suit for the King family against the CIA, Army Intelligence, FBI and Memphis Police. The jury, thanks to his hard work, had found them not James Earle Raye guilty for the assassination of King. In addition, they government had to award the King family the $1 financial remuneration it had asked for, for that priceless life that it and the world lost.

On Sunday, Pepper had said, “You've spoken the truth to power, you've provided the evidence, and it has not mattered to those in power. Now it's time to go to Washington, notify them you're coming, then come, build a camp in Washington, let thousands come, let celebrities come and protect you. And everyday, go to Congress, to the representatives, the senators, go to their meetings, bring up your issues, and show them your evidence. And don't leave till you are heard and something is done.” Those words, as far-fetched as they might sound to some, echoed in my ears as the real deal.

Out here on Broadway, it seemed like we were taking a first step. I turned to the left and there was the bank of Brown Brothers Harriman, as bold as day. As the chants continued, I turned to a marcher and said, “That's the bank Prescott Bush and his father-in-law George Herbert Walker used to finance the Nazis.” And the marcher turned back and said, “Right, with the Union Bank and the Fritz Thyssen German Military Industrial Complex.” I said, “Roosevelt shut them down in 1942, seized their assets,” and the marcher said, “Under the Trading with the Enemy Act.” Right. There was no dumb stare, no dropped mouth. He knew. They knew. And those that didn't, listened, heard.

And what amazed me was that Brown Brothers Harriman was still there, its white type face boldly set on a brown (as in brown shirt) background, sprung back like the ideology of the elites itself. And now Bush Jr. was co-opting the language of fascists and Nazis to apply to those who fought back against him and his morally bankrupt friends and worshippers. What irony.

But the march snaked on, blocks long, the signs bobbing, the voices rising over the traffic, the elaborate police escort, over the stares of the afternoon crowds, reaching the high windows of office buildings where faces peered, wondering what was going on. Democracy was going on, the right to assemble, the right to protest, the right to grab the country back from the criminal syndicate that swiped it.

We arrived at 120 Broadway , which had been home to that sordid political past dating back to 1917. Today it is one of Silverstein Properties, proclaimed by two silver plaques, one on each side of the guarded doorways. And the chant suddenly changed to “Pull It, Pull It, Pull It, Pull It,” echoing Silverstein's order “to pull” his Tower 7 eight hours after the first two Towers fell. But how could “they pull it” without weeks of preparation? Setting up the 47 story building for its fall couldn't be managed in a matter of hours.

Again some people stopped, without a clue. Others gave us the power fist. Tourists gawked, thinking what the hell was this (America, I thought) as others frowned, as if making a ruckus was bad form. Be nice. Don't blow the gray ashes of 9/11 off the streets and the buildings, the headstones in the graveyard of Trinity Church. Don't wake the dead to haunt those ‘getting on with their lives.'

Yes, that was what we were told. Giuliani said, “Go to a ballgame. Get on with your lives.” And let him scoop up the evidence, steal it away and smelt some of it in some distant nation; the mayor who had placed his Office of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor of Tower 7, supposedly a secure bunker next to the most desired target in the Western world. The mayor who knew the building was to be pulled and was out on the streets playing president by 9:15 am .

But now, in spite of all, life had returned to Broadway. And the buildings looked at us and the church and the ghosts in the air. And the word passed to move on, around the corner towards Elliott Spitzer's offices, located on the upper floors of 120 Broadway. We called to him, raised our voices, to the would-be governor of New York, the same who's had the 9/11 evidence since October 2004, presented by Justice for 9/11 . It is the basis for a suit against the government on behalf of the people of New York, those murdered and injured on 9/11, including the victim's families. But Spitzer never responded. Busy campaigning?

And as we stood there, the bankers buzzed by in their suits. As did the nervous traders and brokers from the nearby Stock Exchange, cordoned off with permanent and concrete police barriers. Here the cobblestone streets were narrow, old as the Republic, and now shadowed by the huge buildings of commerce, shuffling millions, billions, trillions of dollars electronically around the earth, to hell and back, with a couple of trillions each year for laundering, at least a half-billion from drug money, to keep the market bubble afloat. Then, like bad blood, it would be infused into the economy again. In fact, corporate America was addicted to drug money and money laundering.

A young man with a strong Irish accent turned to me, looked up and said, “My god, it's like a giant graveyard. You can't see the sky. No light seeps in. I can't imagine working here. What must this do to people who work here?” I pointed to the granite columned façade of the Stock Exchange and said, “This is where the magic happens, my friend. This is where the money's made and lost. Where America rises and falls. Where the rich get richer and the poorer get fired. It's a maze. And right now we're trapped in it.” “Well, it's a maze of a graveyard,” he said. We agreed.

We wound through the narrow sidewalks and streets past tiny shops, delis, pizza stands, side by side with the huge buildings. The black and white battalion chanted, raised their signs. And people came out to look, to support and chastise. A few young hoods threw hard looks at us and got big smiles back. A few firemen outside a bar, maybe one too many thrown back, gave us hard looks as well. There was an exchange of words but all remained cool.

We came out of the graveyard maze at Park Row, skirting the park and City Hall, bunkered with police cars, the new normal, facing the parking lot of rush hour Brooklyn Bridge , oh harp and altar of the fury fused , with cop cars flashing red lights, creating that unsettling feeling of police state of mind New York.

We headed towards the court buildings, walked under a giant walkway arch connecting two buildings, in which the chant, “9/11 was an inside job” amplified exponentially, as if another thousand voices had been added. We exited into One Police Plaza, police headquarters, greeted by a new band of black and blue uniforms. Oh boy.

Alex Jones had been stopping all along the way to give brief press interviews, between belting out speeches, literally for hours. He spit out very fact you could think of concerning the explosions, the conspiracy of NORAD, the CIA, to fill the sky with planes for a dozen terror drills, to totally confuse the FAA and the air traffic controllers, the total breakdown of all reactive systems, of a half a trillion dollar a year intelligence machine intended to protect us. Now Jones was sitting on a brick bench surrounded by 9/11 Truthers and interviewers. He looked tired but undaunted. This time some young guy got up on a stone embankment and began to speak.

I can only paraphrase his appeal. It went something like this: “We haven't come here to antagonize the police. Our purpose is to find justice, to reveal the true perpetrators who took the lives of their fellow policemen and other victims on 9/11. And we expect when the full truth is revealed that the police will be marching side by side with us.” A huge round of applause rose from the marchers. Would that we could diffuse this animosity between citizens and centurions in the bitter Pax Americana.

The speaker continued, “We know you have lost friends, maybe family members, men and women who worked close with you. Some with us today have too. My brother-in-law was a cop. I don't think we're all that different inside.” He stood there, a guy in his 30s, above the crowd, like a coach speaking to a team, encouraging the players to work together to win. It was the last thing I expected. No more fiery rhetoric or stunning facts. Just one man speaking from the heart to the heart.

The 9/11 crowd burst out in applause and cheers when he finished. The police blinked. One senior guy in a suit wrote down what he heard. Was that a sign of emotion, of being touched? Maybe the 9/11 Breakthrough broke through again. After his words, the speaker thanked us all for attending and asked us to disperse, to home or to St. Marks Church for some refreshment.

At that point, Alex Jones got up to remind the crowd that Tuesday, the next day, we should all gather at the offices of the Council on Foreign Relations at 58 East 68th Street near Park Avenue.

The CFR, Jones explained, was the uber organization that pulled all the strings.

William Blasé writing in The Conspiracy Archive , describes the CFR and the New World Order this way: “If one group is effectively in control of national governments and multinational corporations; promotes world government through control of media, foundation grants, and education; and controls and guides the issues of the day; then they control most options available. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the financial powers behind it, have done all these things, and promote the "New World Order," as they have for over seventy years.

“The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life. Its' "experts" write scholarly pieces to be used in decision making, the academics expound on the wisdom of a united world, and the media members disseminate the message.” So this was the key organization for all concerned to know about.”

Having received our marching orders, we turned, walked out under the huge arch from One Police Plaza towards Broadway, one of Walt Whitman's favorite streets, spanning the length of Manhattan. Somewhere in the great beyond, America's greatest poet (and lover of Mannahattan) winked at us for a day well spent, for grief redressed, for coming together, for raising voices, for taking a step towards unification.

And, as a postscript, it is a cruel irony though not a surprise that the 9/11 Truthers were equated in August by CNN reporter Christiane Amanpour with the “sky terrorists liquid explosive plotters” (whatever happened to them). This was as Paul Joseph Watson wrote in the linked article, “The latest brazen attempt to vilify anyone who disagrees with the official 9/11 fairytale. “Other recent 9/11 hit pieces have slandered the 9/11 truth movement as having a violent extremist undertone. No incidents of violence at any 9/11 truth convergence or protest have ever occurred and organizers consistently advocate purely peaceful demonstrations.” I second that.

So, at the end of the day, the face of disinformation would continue to shill for the terror-meisters, both of whom were building their private illicit fortunes expounding this crap. Thus if it takes taking to the streets to dispel it, we must do it. If it takes bringing the tents and the thousands to Washington to set the record straight, we must do it. Whatever it takes for peace, love, harmony to return, we must do it. But pitch in, America. The time for action is short. Freedom is an incomparable and exhilarating feeling. But once lost, it takes lifetimes to recover.

September 18, 2006


USCENTCOM Sergeant Blows Whistle On 9/11 Inside Job

An individual describing himself as a Sergeant stationed at MacDill AFB claims he witnessed unusual preparations for a potential airplane hitting the base on the morning of 9/11 and publicly questions the NORAD stand down and the demolition of the twin towers. Many have reacted to the claims by warning of a hoax designed to poison the well of the 9/11 truth movement.

In a letter that first appeared on the 9/11 Veterans For Truth Website, Sergeant Lauro "LJ" Chavez responds to a Cincinnati Post hit piece article by outlining his own doubts about the official version of 9/11 and his personal experiences of the strange prelude to the events of that morning.

"From 1995 till 2002 I was a Sergeant in the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into, our building the world trade center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, where classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified over the Secret level."

"Back to the morning of 9-11; the command was busy with this training exercise. We were instructed to bring all our gear in to prep for a mock (staged) deployment to the Middle East. On the morning of 9-11 I had been on base prepped and ready to go since about 0400am. During my time at the base that morning, they were setting up barriers around the command and placing gun posts on the roofs. When I questioned one of the security officers about the machine gun and shoulder fired rockets on the roof I was given the answer its a precaution for a plane attempting to crash into this building."

Chavez said that he was in a "Secure Compartmented Information Facility), which is basically this underground bunker command post for USCENTCOM," watching the real and exercise radar blips from planes on an aerospace grid and that intercept planes were sent up from Andrews AFP to deliberately ensure the capital was left largely defenseless.

Chavez later relates his colleague's first reaction to the collapse of the twin towers.

"To delve even further, as Im standing there watching the towers collapse, next to me is one of my good friends and a former commander of the Army Corps of Engineers. He is a demolitions expert. He was even more surprised than me. When the towers collapsed he kept saying this isnt right, this isnt right. When I asked him what he was talking about he told me that steel buildings dont fall down that way. Even if they are struck by objects; he went on to say that in theory if the top 10 floors were hit, then possibly just that part of the building would fall over and off, but the rest would remain standing. When I asked him, not understanding the implications of demolitions, he told me that it looked as if they were brought down by controlled demolitions. I was utterly amazed, but after he said that it did sort of appear that way."

Chavez's DD214 Honorable Discharge

September 25 2006

Radio interview on Infowars Sept 25, 2006


USCENTCOM Sergeant'S Letter to the Editors

CENSORED BY CINCINATTI POST - Thought I'd share this rant with all you Veterans - It kills me when idiots don't do their homework...

Greetings Mr. White,

I felt it necessary to follow up to a recent story that was published in Cincinnati Post. It was the 1 in 3 believe 9-11 conspiracy theory. I must admit that at first I was overwhelmed with joy that our local paper was actually starting to have real journalism and talk about real issues. Then I read the story and it was a total debunk to make the actual people around the world who feel there was something not right about 9-11, to look like over reacting conspiracy theorists.

See the Article - Email Editors @ Cincy Post

Im utterly outraged. My 9 year old daughter could have done more research in this, as opposed to just trying to throw the publics ideas and feelings out. Is this not what journalism is supposed to represent - real issues? There have been many, many polls done in major cities that actually ask people how they felt about the 9-11 tragedy. One such poll is called the Zogby poll; which was offered in New York City.

Honestly I could care less what is done with this letter, but I feel that I should speak my mind and Ill tell you some things that I have not told many people at all. From 1995 till 2002 I was a Sergeant in the United States Army. Not only this, but I was stationed at United States Central Command, which is located at MacDill AFB in Tampa Florida. I was on active duty when 9-11 happened. In the days prior to the tragedies, we were involved in many exercises. Some of these exercises included the scenarios of hijacked planes crashing into, our building the world trade center, the White House, Sears Tower, and the Pentagon. These drills or exercises as we called them, where classified Top Secret. Having a Top Secret rated clearance I was dumbfounded that they would ever push a training exercise above the level of Secret. Over my 8 years in the Army, I had participated in many exercises around the world, none of which were ever classified over the Secret level.

Ill start by saying a few months prior it was announced by President Bush that Dick Cheney would be heading up operations over NORAD our North American Aerospace Defense Command. Along with many of my peers, we were shocked. Over the years, if you research NORAD, it has always been under the command of a Military officer. It was done this way because the defense of this country has always been in the hands of such. Prior to the months before 9-11 this was all of the sudden changed. Like I said, if you research NORAD and the command structure you will find that it was imposed long ago that the military should be in control of the order to scramble planes in the defense of American air space. For some strange reason, Bush changed this and gave that power to a civilian person on his Staff team yes I know, very interesting.

Back to the morning of 9-11; the command was busy with this training exercise. We were instructed to bring all our gear in to prep for a mock (staged) deployment to the Middle East. On the morning of 9-11 I had been on base prepped and ready to go since about 0400am. During my time at the base that morning, they were setting up barriers around the command and placing gun posts on the roofs. When I questioned one of the security officers about the machine gun and shoulder fired rockets on the roof I was given the answer its a precaution for a plane attempting to crash into this building.

So, I was standing in the SCIF (Secure Compartmented Information Facility), which is basically this underground bunker command post for USCENTCOM, when the first plane hit. We were watching the fly patterns of all the planes on the aerospace grid. This contained not only all commercial flights at the time, but all military flights, and fake enemy planes that were supposedly put on there for the exercise. Many of the planes sent to intercept the fake blips were scrambled from Andrews which is an air defense AFB for the East Coast. They were sent across the US and left very few planes to defend the capital. After the first plane hit the tower we were all in disbelief. After the initial shock was over, our questions were what are the odds this could happen for real, during a training exercise thats covering the same scenario? We were all at wits end. Then to top all of this off, Cheney gave NORAD the order to stand down scrambling jets to intercept. A few moments later tower 2 was hit. Only after the Pentagon was hit, did he give the orders to scramble the jets to intercept the plane bound for the White House.

All of this is very interesting to me it sickened me so that I left the Army after coming back from an 8 month deployment to Afghanistan. There were just too many questions that no one could answer, too many things that did not make sense. How is it possible to have a training exercise about planes hitting the WTC and then actually have planes hit the WTC? This kind of thing just does not happen unless its pre-planned. What reason would there be to have this type of exercise on that morning, Ill tell you if you are placing fake planes all over the north American aerospace grid then you have no way of knowing which planes are real and which are fake. Then to thicken the plot you put a civilian in charge of NORAD so that the military does not have the power to initiate the order for jets to be scrambled to intercept. If the military would have still commanded power over NORAD they would have scrambled jets because they would have simply followed the procedures that had been in place for this type of situation for years and years and scrambled jets.

To delve even further, as Im standing there watching the towers collapse, next to me is one of my good friends and a former commander of the Army Corps of Engineers. He is a demolitions expert. He was even more surprised than me. When the towers collapsed he kept saying this isnt right, this isnt right. When I asked him what he was talking about he told me that steel buildings dont fall down that way. Even if they are struck by objects; he went on to say that in theory if the top 10 floors were hit, then possibly just that part of the building would fall over and off, but the rest would remain standing. When I asked him, not understanding the implications of demolitions, he told me that it looked as if they were brought down by controlled demolitions. I was utterly amazed, but after he said that it did sort of appear that way.

Ill tell you what gave this whole thing away was building 7. If they would not have brought this building down, then they probably could have gotten away with it all. It was the most amazing site I have ever seen. Not only was it amazing, it bore reality to the truth of the situation something was not right here. Now, Im going to tell you all I have learned, but I urge anyone to just spend 1hr reading about this incident on the internet and learning the facts. There have been numerous scholars, numerous physicists that have analyzed this over and over and over again. And they all come to the same conclusion, something does not add up. Building 7 was never directly hit by a plane. Now it was stated that a piece of one of the towers fell onto the side of building 7 and caught one of the floors on fire. A few moments later we all witnessed the most perfect example of controlled demolitions to ever be caught on camera. It could not be proved that building 7 fell due to fire. My friend and I standing there in the SCIF watching in uninterruptible awe with all those other military members; watching building 7 fall perfectly onto its footprint; my friend stating that it was beautifully done.

We all knew then we all realized that this was not some group of unorganized cave dwellers from Afghanistan orchestrating a perfect hit on American soil. It was impossible. Shortly after the Pentagon was struck I called my close friend that I went to Basic Training with. All civilian lines were down and I had to contact him via STU which is a black line classified phone system. He did not answer, but one of his soldiers did. I asked if SGT Worthington was ok and he said yes. I asked if the plane did severe damage and he told me I didnt see any plane. Then when I finally got to speak to my friend, he started acting strange saying he could not talk about the incident over this line. He was shipped off overseas a few weeks later and I never to this day have had the chance to speak with him.

The Pentagon crash tape was released a few months back after 5 years. You need to watch that tape no where can you see a plane strike the Pentagon. This is because it was not a plane. I cannot tell you exactly what hit the Pentagon, but its unanimous; it was definitely not a plane. I can assure you that there is more than one CCTV camera around the Pentagon. On September 25, 4 days before my 25th birthday, I deployed to Afghanistan. Over the 8months I was there I had never seen one intelligent Afghani soldier. They were all tattered and scrawny and could barely shoot their weapons straight. This does not mean that there were not men that could fly a plane, but after what I saw it was extremely hard to believe they could be taught to fly a sophisticated piece of aeronautical equipment.

My point Mr. Editor is that I spent 8 months in combat watching my brothers die in the name of Freedom. I killed, in the name of Freedom and to this day my brothers are still being killed for this illusionary war we call the War on Terror. Where the enemy has no face where there is no clear objective. In this War, anyone with ill thoughts toward this country can be defined as a terrorist. Well, I guess that includes me in this group as well as everyone else who questions the events of 911, because we all hold ill thoughts toward the leadership of this country and I say the real terrorists in this world sit right in the heart of its capital.

I have bled for this country and would do so again in a heart beat but only to protect its people, the true Americans that live here. I would never again offer my life under the leadership whose real goal is oil and money. The same ones who staged the most perfect illusionary tactic in our history that was a pretext to a war on terror that would never again go away. Their goal was to scare the American public into submission making it easier for the world powers to do their evil and get away with it.

Now that may sound like a typical conspiracy theorist I guess, but how many do you actually talk to? Im not here saying that Aliens came down and used laser beams to bring the towers down or control the planes that were flown; Im telling you as a sane, logical and intelligent individual, something does not add up about this. Earlier this year I was watching the Discovery channel. They have a PBS program called Rebuilding America. This particular episode was about the WTC building 7. They interviewed Larry Silverstein (the owner) about building 7. He stated on national TV the following which is the direct quote and can be found here: http://www.wtc7.net/pullit.html

I remember getting a call from the, ER, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

I actually have the program recorded and you are more than welcome to come by my house and watch it. He actually stated this on national TV. I was so amazed that I almost shat myself. I could not believe he actually stated this on a nationally broadcasted TV program. You can ask any person who has done controlled demolitions please interview someone they will tell you it takes weeks of planning to do this. We are expected to believe that this was facilitated and planned in a matter of hours for building 7, while the damn thing was on fire you have got to be kidding me. If that is not enough to make you believe something was fishy well then nothing will ever do.

Since that time there have been numerous scholars, some of which have actually been publicly broadcasted on CSPAN. The latest program was called: Theories about 9-11. American Perspectives and you can watch this (which I advise you do) per this link: Theories about 9-11 (American Perspectives) or you can go to www.c-span.org and look under their video/audio section to find this title. Its an outstanding video and encompasses the thoughts of not only the American public, but also Dr Steven Jones from Brigham Young University a physics professor that actually received a piece of the rubble from the WTC. Not only does he profoundly agree that building 7 was a controlled demolition he can prove it. After he analyzed the piece of debris they found; there were large traces of sulfur and Thermite found. If you did not know, Thermite is a chemical compound found in many explosives including C4 which I have used many times in the Army. It leaves a distinct smell and identifiable residue upon explosion. Dr Jones found large traces of this from the rubble.

Sir, there are many things that I never wanted to know for one that the government that is supposed to be caring for the American people could be corrupt. This was the last thing that I ever wanted to be true but its time we wake up and smell the bullshit because its permeating throughout the American public and we are all starting to realize whats really going on. If your news station actually did a similar Zogby type poll here in Cincinnati, I think you would find that a lot more than 1/3 of the people believe this. I know tons just in this area.

I could literally write you 100 pages of truths that could prove that 9-11 was an inside job, but Id probably just be passed off as some crazy conspiracy theorist. Instead I want to give you the tools to look for yourself because the quest for wisdom is a journey we must all take alone. So, to you I add the following links and if you just spend a small portion of your day reading and watching some of this footage, who knows you may wake up and stand along side the rest of us in utter amazement.

Respectfully,

As you can see, Im not your typical conspiracy theorist I actually have a good job! I thought at first I might send you this from an anonymous email address, but you know what now you know Im not just some stupid kid. Thanks for taking the time to read.

Respectfully,

Lauro "LJ" Chavez
Director of Information Security
Domin-8 Enterprise Solutions
513-492-5831
lchavez@domin-8.com
www.domin-8.com
As the guardians of technology; security shall be our shield and vigilance our sword

Thanks to the Internet, one of the few freedoms we have left, these truths can be sent to the public. Thank God we dont have to rely on news media to get this information out to everyone!

See also:

Pentagon Whistleblower - TSgt Tami Lee and Pirate News TV's John Lee fire 4-star general leading Desert Storm during the US invasion of Iraq, then TSgt Lee was hired by SecDef Dick Cheney at the Pentagon. New book publishes over 500 pages of official Inspector General evidence, testimony, photopgraphs, reports and publications. TSgt Lee retired from USAF and joined Tennessee Army National Guard.


Governor Jesse Ventura Highlights Government Plan To Attack U.S. Cities & Kill Americans

AUSTIN, TEXAS - In a sit-down video interview recorded on Monday night, former Minnesota Governor, pro-wrestling star and actor Jesse Ventura told radio host Alex Jones he found it very disturbing in light of what happened on 9/11 that the U.S. government had once planned to "attack certain cities within the United States," as a pretext for war.

Ventura was in Texas doing media events in support of independent Texas gubernatorial candidate Kinky Friedman. In this explosive interview Ventura sounds off on a number of controversial subjects and the direction in which America is heading.

"In the early sixties the Pentagon had an operation called Operation Northwoods and it never came to reality but it was on the table that our military would attack certain cities within the United States and make it look like Cuba did it to justify an invasion of Cuba," said Ventura.

"It never happened but just the simple fact that they contemplated it and it was actually on the table in the Pentagon I find that just very disturbing - that they would even consider using our military to try to justify an invasion of another country."

Ventura, a former Navy Seal, then cited the Gulf of Tonkin cover-up as an example of how false provocations are staged by governments to lead nations into war.

"It was very disappointing to believe in your country that they would lie to you to get into a war - that they would perpetrate a lie and that the media would go along with it - it's a real eye opener and you realize that if they would do it in the sixties they'll do it again - and if it works once it will work again - government very much operates that way," said Ventura.

Ventura said that shortly after he found out the truth behind the Gulf of Tonkin, Robert McNamara paid a visit to Harvard where Ventura was teaching and he had to be "locked up in a room" so that he wouldn't confront McNamara.

Ventura questioned the interception and tracking of Payne Stewart's Lear Jet in October 1999 and compared the incident to the total lack of air defense response on 9/11.

"Where were our planes - when all of this was going on....to my knowledge at no time did we have any fighter planes up in the air - why?"

Citing cover-ups that led to the Vietnam war and the JFK assassination, Ventura stated that it was not "beyond reason to not at least consider that the government certainly would do things like that."

Ventura said that it was via his 25-year research of the Kennedy assassination that he came to learn about the Gulf of Tonkin and Operation Northwoods.

"I don't believe for one minute the Warren Commission," said Ventura, asking that if the assassination represented the actions of Lee Harvey Oswald alone why would the information pertaining to it have to be kept secret under national security for 20 years.

"I've been to Dealy Plaza and I don't think he could make the shot," said Ventura, "it was a difficult shot with a target going away from you and dropping and not only that - he had to shoot through a tree."

Ventura said the fact that Oswald was never proven guilty in court of law itself proves he was simply convicted by public and government opinion.

"There's no definitive evidence that he did it in my opinion," concluded Ventura.

Ventura was asked if an exchange of liberty for security was a reasonable price to pay and responded by highlighting the Bush administration's mishandling of the Hurricane Katrina crisis in New Orleans.

"The country can't protect you - you have to protect yourself," said Ventura.

"They had two weeks to prepare for that and couldn't save anybody - how are they going to save you from a terrorist attack," said Ventura, "I don't buy that we're any more safe than we were prior to 9/11."

"It was very interesting that Richard Nixon had the 82nd Airborne in there when the hurricane hit back in the seventies within 24 hours and yet this President didn't do a thing for eight days."

"For people who say well you can't blame President Bush - yes I fully blame him for the hurricane," said Ventura.

"Every time the government tells you they're going to protect you be prepared because you're going to lose your rights," said Ventura, saying that he would prefer dealing with terrorism rather than accepting an erosion of personal liberty.

"These were also the same people that told us there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - so take it with a grain of salt - they were wrong once they could be wrong again."

Ventura said the Democrats and Republicans were destroying the election process and allowing the elections "fall victim to a system of bribery," but blamed the American people for sharing an apathy that means they don't get involved and don't care beyond their own lives. He was also cynical that another investigation of 9/11 would achieve anything.

"Has there ever been a real investigation?," asked Ventura.

Qualifying himself in saying everything was not a conspiracy, Ventura later dismissed the possibility that anti-Bush Minnisota Senator Paul Wellstone was murdered in Minnisota (while Ventura was governor of Minnesota) as a result of his plane being sabotaged as "bullsh***t."

However, Ventura was adamant that Americans should never trust their government because "the government is people" and comprises a cross section of society.

September 27, 2006

Video interview of Mayor Governor Assassin Jesse Ventura


9/11 Truther Next British Prime Minister?

LONDON - Michael Meacher MP, former environment minister and 9/11 truther who attracted press attention for publicly questioning the official story behind the terrorist attack in a September 2003 article, could be in contention for the Labour Party leadership race and thus replace Tony Blair as the next British Prime Minister.

"Michael Meacher is "well on the way" to announcing his decision to stand in the forthcoming Labour leadership race, according to one of his key supporters," reports the London Guardian.

With Tony Blair set to stand down before September 2007, the party leader will be the de facto Prime Minister, at least until the next general election in 2009, where many expect David Cameron, a favorite of the Globalists, to reclaim 10 Downing Street for the Tories.

Meacher is set to rally the anti-war left sentiment of the Labour Party in an attempt to defeat current Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, who up until now has been widely tipped as a shoe in for Prime Minister.

Under the headline, This War On Terrorism Is Bogus, Meacher's 2003 Guardian piece sent shock waves through the political spectrum as he was one of the first respected former government cabinet members worldwide to openly attack the official fable of 9/11 and the manufactured reasons for going to war in Iraq.

Highlighting the complete failure of U.S. air defense systems on the morning of 9/11, Meacher asked, "Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could US air security operations have been deliberately stood down on September 11? If so, why, and on whose authority?"

He also pointed to the objectives of the Project For a New American Century, a cadre of top Neo-Cons who before 9/11 yearned of a "new Pearl Harbor" and wrote documents foretelling the exact imperial agenda that unfolded after the September attacks, stating that the documents offered proof that the war on terror was a "political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda - the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project."

In August 2005 I personally visited Meacher's south London home with my brother Steve Watson and Alex Jones during filming for the Terror Storm documentary. Simply judging from the books on Meacher's office shelves it was quite clear that he was well versed in a plethora of different topics including the real story behind 9/11 and the Iraq war. He was also the nicest politician you could ever wish to meet. Most people in that position get on power trips and think themselves to be above the general public but Meacher was cordial and very giving with his time and the interview was extremely informative as you can watch below.

Meacher has also featured in other documentaries about 9/11 including one that aired on Dutch television.

What are Meacher's chances of overtaking Bilderberg establishment pawn Gordon Brown and becoming Prime Minister? Slim to none - the British hierarchy would sooner hijack the outcome rather than see a fiercely anti-empire, anti-Neo-Con Prime Minister, but if Meacher teams up with any of the other popular candidates running alongside him as deputy head, the margin could get a whole lot closer.

But the odds are firmly stacked against Meacher because the elite have already chosen Gordon Brown - described by many as "Blair on steroids" - as the next PM. Brown and Blair cut a deal before Blair was even elected in 1997 that would see Brown take over the reigns at some point while Blair was still in office. The British public have been ceaselessly drilled into acknowledging the fact that Brown will succeed Blair simply by repetition alone.

As a young politician Brown was a staunch Socialist within the Scottish Labour party. When John Smith became leader of the Labour Party shortly before his premature death, he appointed Brown as Shadow Chancellor. Smith was a member of the steering committee, the inner core of the Bilderberg Group. He got Gordon Brown invited to the 1991 Bilderberg meeting where he was effectively groomed along with Blair as the next big thing in British politics. Incidentally this was the same meeting at which Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton was in attendance, he became President a matter of months later.

Brown has also, as far back as 1998 been listed in the "Global Leaders group" at the World Economic forum (otherwise known as the DAVOS group) . He has often been touted for high ranking IMF positions.

Brown was a traditional Labour figure, the economic spokesman who doesn't know much about economics. He took on an advisor - Ed Balls, a Financial Times leader writer - an ideologist for globalization, in effect - who learned his economic trade at Harvard. Balls is a regular Bilderberg attendee, his name can be found on the attendance lists almost every year since 2001. Brown soon started going to New England regularly for his summer holidays and became a true believer in the the neo-liberal line from Harvard - Globalization, the Washington consensus.

Meacher will have to overpower the might of elitist consensus to become Prime Minister but at the very least he can use his campaign as a soapbox to educate people on the hoax behind the war on Iraq and the fallacy of the official 9/11 story.

Britsh MP Michael Meacher accuses British and US Govt of perping 9/11 terror massacres


CIA MI6 terrorist bomber blows own legs off during False Flag crime spree

MALAYSIA - The City Prosecution Office on Friday tagged the American victim of an explosion in his hotel room four months ago as a terrorist.

City Prosecutor Raul Bendico said findings from the investigation of the case indicated that Meiring apparently attempted to set up explosives intended to blow up Evergreen Hotel when the accidental explosion went off, mangling his lower limbs.

Michael Meiring, 65, of California, was rushed to Davao Medical Mission Hospital on May 16 after the blast inside his room at the hotel located on Ramon Magsaysay Avenue here.

Meiring was charged with illegal possession of explosives and reckless imprudence "for failing to practice proper attention and diligence regarding the handling of explosive materials."

But he was reportedly whisked away by agents of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and brought to the United States.

Authorities want Meiring brought back to the country to face the criminal charges filed against him.

THE WHITE HOUSE RESCUES A TERRORIST

What is unusual about the case, The Manila Times reported, is that Meiring was: whisked out of Davao, past the Philippine National Police guarding him at the hospital, and on to a chartered plane, accompanied by what Immigration officials described as agents of the US National Security Agency and agents of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation.

The National Security Agency intervention, confirmed by Immigration Deputy Commissioner Daniel Queto, sparked intense local speculation as to why an agency that reports directly to the Office of the President of the United States would send an entourage of bodyguards to speed Meiring to a hospital in Manila.

Security tightened around the wounded man immediately. Press were told that only his doctor handpicked by the US Embassy had access, and Meiring was promptly airlifted to San Diego, home to a US naval base. The American Embassy has refused comment. Vice-consul Michael Newbill settled the hospital bills in Davao City.

The Manila Times quoted a friend of Meiring who said he was: told by a Filipino in Davao, carrying a message from the US Embassy that Michael would never be charged with a crime in connection with the explosion. The investigation will end up as a stonewall. Michael will be protected and...the incident will be shortly forgotten, if you re willing to forget it.

Officials in Davao City will not forget. The suspicious blast took place during a wave of terror bombings across Mindanao as US and Philippine troops conducted anti-terror exercises. President Arroyo threatened to declare a state of emergency and demanded that lawmakers rush through her tough new anti-terror bill. Rush it through they did.

Now Prosecutor Bendico says the US-shielded terrorist was trying to blow the hotel up.


Boston Tea Party for 9/11 Truth

BOSTON - Members of the 911 Truth Committee reenacted the Boston Tea Party on its 233rd anniversay yesterday by throwing boxes representing the 911 Commission Report from the Moakley Bridge over the Fort Point Channel near Boston Harbor. The committee, which called its event the 911 Truth Tea Party, rejects the findings of the 911 Commission. The Boston Tea Party, a protest against British taxes, was held December 16, 1773, at a site not far from here. British tea and heroin WMDs were thrown into the water, after American patriots stormed the British ships, in Colonel Paul Revere's midnight ride in a rowboat. December 2006


Town votes to reopen 9/11 criminal investigation

Burlington voters on Town Meeting Day will be the first in the country to vote 'yes' or 'no' on reopening the investigation into what happened Sept. 11, 2001.

As of Jan. 4, a local group had gathered 1,240 of the approximately 1,350 signatures (5 percent of registered voters) required to put the question on the ballot, and a member of the group, Burlington attorney Frank Haddleton, expressed confidence Monday that they now have more than enough signatures.

The question would ask the Vermont congressional delegation to "demand a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation" to answer "the many questions" the group says remain about what happened the day planes commandeered by terrorists smashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The group said in a letter to the council that it doesn't "advance any particular alternative theory" about what happened Sept. 11, 2001, but thinks the day's aftermath, including wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, are so serious that a new investigation is warranted "to get answers to hundreds of questions raised by independent researchers, members of the intelligence community and family members of 9/11 victims."

The attacks, the letter said, have been cited as justifications for the wars, "wiretapping, the USA PATRIOT Act, torture, indefinite detentions without charges, and the recently passed Military Commission Act that suspends the writ of habeas corpus. We maintain that until the serious, credible questions about 9/11 are addressed, the government has no right to ask us to compromise the Constitution or engage in any new wars again terrorism."

The group's spokesman, local author and musician Marc Estrin, said the ballot item would be the first of its sort in the United States.

"We're all very pleased that the council voted not to interfere and let it go forward if we come up with the signatures," Haddleton said.

January 10, 2007


9/11 was an inside job says MI5 Shayler

LIVERPOOL ECHO - EX-MI5 officer David Shayler, who will be in Liverpool to launch the Truth Movement, tells Paddy Shennan what he thinks about the New York terror attacks

FORMER spy David Shayler doesn't have a story to tell. He has a million. And a lot of them might even be true.

Talking to him was incredibly interesting – and not just because he reckons he could be bumped off by dark forces at any time, thereby becoming the UK's own Alexander Litvinenko.

We spoke on the ‘phone because, well, you can't be too careful. I certainly wouldn't fancy getting in a car with him – he says he has suffered three suspicious, potentially-fatal road accidents, in 1997 (driver fell asleep), 2002 (rear tyre exploded) and 2005 (dodgy brakes).

Call the writer and activist whatever you want, but don't call him boring. Because you'd be as wrong as wrong can be.

This is a man who worked for MI5 for five years, sold a story to a newspaper, fled abroad and, eventually, after being called a traitor to his country, jailed.

And now . . . he claims 9/11 was an inside job.

He has even been quoted (out of context, he protests) in a magazine saying: “Yes, I believe no planes were involved in 9/11 . . . The only explanation is that they were missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes . . . Watch the footage frame by frame and you will see a cigar-shaped missile hitting the World Trade Centre.”

However, he tells the ECHO: “I was misquoted. This was a clear and deliberate attempt to send someone in and stitch us up. They used the quote out of context.

“What I am still saying is go onto the internet and look at the footage . . . people have had a go at me saying there were no planes but there is little evidence to show that jets went into the buildings. I'm entitled to say they didn't and something else did . . . You can make some accurate calculations from Newton's laws of motion.”

This is where he's got me. I saw planes going into the World Trade Centre but Newton's laws of motion are a mystery to me. As is quantum mechanics, which David also mentions during another part of our conversation.

Now a member of the 9/11 Truth Movement – formed after the publication, in July 2004, of the official 9/11 Commission Report – Shayler and his partner and fellow former MI5 officer Annie Machon will be in Liverpool later this week, as support for the “inside job” theory gathers momentum.

The newly-formed Merseyside Truth Movement is hosting “An Evening With Real Spies Unravelling The Lies” event (free admission) from 7.30pm on Thursday at The Casa in Hope Street.

Gary Fletcher, 45, from Wavertree, a rescue boat driver in the North Sea, is one of 14 members of the local group. He says: “I saw the second plane hit the World Trade Centre on TV and my initial reaction was that it was a terrorist attack. But when I saw shots from the Pentagon I thought ‘There's something funny going on here' – especially with four planes being able to spend that much time in the air without being shot down.”

Short Changed, a documentary about 9/11 made by a group of Americans, will be shown at the Casa and then followed by talks by Shayler and Machon on state terrorism and the aims of the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Shayler, who worked in MI5's political and counter-terrorism departments in the early 1990s, says: “I'm not trying to blow my own trumpet but the credibility I add to the movement is enormous” (I can hear a trumpet!).

He adds: “Liverpool is one of our target cities, as it has a reputation for radicalism and questioning the powers-that-be. We are calling for the inquiry to be re-opened.”

There are, according to the non-believers, many more questions than answers – not least concerning the collapse of the twin towers: “All the evidence points to controlled demolition,” claims Shayler.

The Pentagon? “We can say, hand on heart, there is evidence of missile damage.”

Many will agree – many do agree, just look on the internet – but what about the danger of mass ridicule, in a David (“I'm the Son of God”) Icke kind of way?

“You must have the courage to tell the truth,” says Shayler.

David Shayler is 41. But will he reach 42? He says: “I believe in a higher power. I have no fear of death” – which may be just as well, as he claims: “There have been three attempts on my life in car crashes – two when I was an atheist” (he now practices Kabbalah, described as the world's oldest body of spiritual wisdom).

Regarding the future, he says: “This is the defining issue of humanity. We have never lived with such control .”

George Bush, though? Some might say he couldn't even control his own bowel movements. But, says Shayler, it goes much deeper than Bush and Tony Blair.

“Bush and Blair are puppets . . . Blair may be more intelligent than Bush, but they are both clearly patsies.”

But I can still hear people shouting: “This is madness!” How would you respond?

“I would say that in 20 years time their kids may be asking them ‘Why is it we used to live in a democracy and don't any more?'”

Told you – he's not boring, is he?

January 22 2007


Treasonous US Congress says fuck you to Vermont vote

Vermont's two U.S. senators and one congressman are not interested in urging a new investigation into the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

A Burlington group working through the fall and early winter gathered more than 1,350 signatures -- 5 percent of the city's registered voters -- to put an advisory question about 9/11 on the city's Town Meeting Day ballot.

The question asks whether Vermont's congressional delegation should be "advised to demand a new, thorough, and truly independent forensic investigation that fully addresses the many questions surrounding the tragic events of September 11, 2001."

Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, a persistent critic of the Bush administration, said in an e-mail from his spokesman, David Carle, that he "respects the work and the findings of the 9/11 Commission. Their report was highly critical of the failures and miscues they discovered, and they recommended a wide range of reforms.

"Since then," the e-mail continued, "some have come up with their own theories, and that's always the case after major events like this. The 9/11 Commission's report remains the most credible, the most thorough and the most constructive investigation that has been undertaken about those attacks."

Participants in the petition drive have noted the question doesn't offer a theory of what happened Sept. 11, but the group's Web site, www.vt911.org, refers to the findings of the 9/11 Commission Report -- the federal commission was created in late November 2002 -- as "the official conspiracy theory" and raises a number of questions about the day.

The Web site questions why Building No. 7 in the World Trade Center complex collapsed without being struck as the two towers were, and why all three buildings in the complex collapsed as though they were "brought down by controlled demolition." The Web site also provides links to books, videos and 31 separate 9/11 Web sites, including one to the online "Journal of 9/11 Studies."

The subject is emotional for people who doubt the official report. That has been reflected in numerous e-mails sent to the Free Press responding to articles about the local petition drive.

"Bless you for covering this important signature-gathering event," wrote Steve Dondanville of Ridgefield, Wash. "An investigation into what really happened on 9/11 is crucial if we are to continue as a republic."

"We do need a new, real investigation," Chris Noth of Iowa wrote. "The Kean/ Hamilton Commission failed terribly. The WTC complex was blown up by controlled demolition that had been planned for years most likely."

"I am proud to see Americans questioning what really happened on September 11," wrote Jim Brewer of Austin, Texas.

Laurie Van Auken, whose husband, Kenneth, was killed in the attack on the World Trade Center, said by telephone from her home in East Brunswick, N.J., that the Burlington ballot item is valuable because "it brings attention to these unanswered questions."

Van Auken said she was one of the "Jersey widows" who demanded for 14 months that an official investigation be mounted to explain what happened Sept. 11. She was unhappy with the commission's 2004 report. "It's pathetic," she said.

A thorough investigation, she said, would have included interviews with intelligence, aeronautical and military experts. "Every agency failed," she said of Sept. 11. "Intelligence, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), FAA (Federal Aviation Administration). ... We had just one great failure of everything. We wanted experts not just to be called, but to follow up on questions."

Van Auken said the many unanswered questions are important because the Bush administration "is using 9/11 as a reason to take our nation to war. We all need to understand what went down that day," she said.

Some who dismiss the thoroughness of the 9/11 Commission Report question whether the fires caused by the exploding jet fuel could have been hot enough to cause the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. Others say no videos have been released of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, and some say the area covered by debris from United Airline Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, suggests the plane was brought down by a missile.

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders and Democratic Rep. Peter Welch said they wouldn't push for a new investigation of Sept. 11, making the congressional delegation unanimous in its answer to the ballot question. Welch said, through a spokesman, he believed the official report was "both thorough and complete in outlining the events of September 11 and the mistakes made leading up to the attacks."

Sanders' chief of staff, Jeff Weaver, said in an e-mail that Sanders believes the official report was "thorough" and provided "important suggestions to help our country combat terrorism." Sanders also believes, Weaver wrote, "we should continue to work to make sure that all the recommendations of the commission are implemented."

January 22, 2007


ZioNazi Gulag Death Camps for 9/11 Truth Teachers

ARCTIC BEACON - Kentucky Teacher Placed In Psych Ward For Declaring 9/11 Was An 'Inside Job'

Michael Cook has been persecuted and placed in a psychiatric ward simply for saying 9/11 was an inside job and possessing firearms registered legally in Kentucky.

His story is just another in a long line cases where law abiding citizens have been systematically deprived of their due process rights and trampled on by a fascist mindset controlling America.

In a nutshell, Cook's case exemplifies how freedom of speech and the right to possess firearms are being taken away from Americans. His story further shows how a right to a fair is being replaced with psychiatric incarceration based on flimsy and often-times concocted doctor evaluations.

Cook appeared Monday on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal, on the Republic Broadcasting Network, telling how simply speaking his mind and exercising his rights under the 1st and 2nd Amendments of the Constitution are now leading to his second stint in a psychiatric ward.

"Right after this interview at 2pm eastern time, I have to surrender to the U.S. Marshall and then taken to a psychiatric facility. Who knows how long it will take, but the last time I was illegally held for 45 days," said Cook who lost his job as a special educator for the Covington Ky, Independent School District after talking 9/11 truth to a school district aide.

Cook's legal troubles began after he shared information to an aide about 9/11 being an inside job as well as telling the aide he legally possessed firearms, including a 45 caliber pistol locked safely away in glove box of his car.

"I have a concealed weapons permit and everything is registered in the state of Kentucky, but that doesn't seem to matter to authorities," added Cook, who has been relegated to working as a carpenter until his incarceration in a psych ward Monday.

6 Feb 2007

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?" - Dr Alexander Solzhenitsyn PhD Nobel Prize winner


New documentary film suggests 9/11 was a staged Neo-conservative psychological attack against the American people

THE CANADIAN - It began as a tiny internet film attacking the 'lies' surrounding 9/11. Now, millions of people have heard its message. Like it or loathe it, you can't ignore Loose Change, says Ed Pilkington in the British Guardian Newspaper.

Dylan Avery is the director and creator of Loose Change, the most successful movie to emerge from what followers call the 9/11 Truth Movement. The film alleges with presented evidence that the attacks in New York and Washington on September 11, 2001, were not the work of Osama bin Laden, but of neo-conservative elements, who are pursuing a "New World Order" . They reject the term "conspiracy theorists", arguing that if you accept the official line on 9/11 you have in any case signed up to a theory about a official "conspiracy" anyways, that has been falsely attributed to "al-Qaida masterminds".

The movement of 9/11 sceptics has had an astonishing success in sowing doubt across the US. Recent polls suggest more than a third of Americans believe that either the official version of events never happened, or that U,S officials knew the attacks were imminent, but did nothing to stop them.

That's an impressive statistic in itself. Now look at the success Loose Change has had. Google Video acts as a portal for the movie, where you can also see the running tally of the number of times it has been viewed since last August. It stands more than four million.

On top of that, the movie was shown on television to up to 50 million people in 12 countries on September 11 last year; 100,000 DVDs have been sold and 50,000 more given away free.

Then there are many more who have watched the film but are never counted, as a result of the active encouragement the film-makers give their supporters to burn the movie and distribute it to their friends. Avery says 100 million people - "easy" - have seen it. That may be an exaggeration, but it's fair to say that the documentary has become very popular, like as a result of many people across the United States and internationally, being fed-up of 9/11 propaganda in spread by various elite owners of the mass-media.

The Loose Change story begins in May 2002 on the opening night of a Mediterranean restaurant in Oneonta where Avery, then aged 19, is working as a dishwasher. A friend of the owner, James Gandolfini (aka Tony Soprano), is a guest at the party and Avery gets chatting with him. "We started talking about movies and shit," Avery recalls. "Gandolfini told me, if you want to do something that matters, you have to talk to the entire world. You have to have something to say."

The first edition of Loose Change, running at 30 minutes and produced on a battered Compaq Presario laptop (price $1,500), was finished in April that year. The second, longer, edition - the one currently available on the internet - came out in September 2005 with the help of a third partner and fellow Oneonta resident, Jason Bermas, aged 27.

And so to the message: The Twin Towers in New York didn't fall as a direct result of the planes hitting them and the fire that ensued; they were brought them down in a series of controlled explosions. The British Guardian reports that "George Bush's brother, Marvin, sat on the board of a company that insured the towers."

"I think what happened to the World Trade Centre was simple enough," Avery says in the film. "It was brought down in a carefully planned controlled demolition. It was a psychological attack on the American people and it was pulled off with military precision."

Flight 77, which supposedly flew into the Pentagon, could not have flown at that speed without going into a tailspin. There is no sign of any parts of an aeroplane in footage of the crash site, and the building looked as though it had been hit by a missile. Meanwhile, Donald Rumsfeld was safe on the other side of the Pentagon.

Flight 93, said to have come down in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, never did crash there. Instead it landed in Cleveland airport shortly after the airport had been evacuated. The emotive phone calls by the so-called passengers to their relatives before they "died" were staged.

"You can't stop this, you can't hold us back," Jason says. "Many outlets have tried to ignore us, but in the end they are all forced to listen to us because their viewers are demanding it." He is right. The exponential growth of Loose Change is gradually forcing the film on the mainstream media. Though it began as an internet phenomenon, its biggest spikes have come, significantly, after the film gained airplay on old media platforms such as Air America and Pacifica radio stations, local Fox TV outlets and on stations around the world, including state outlets in Belgium, Ireland and Portugal. So far though, no British channel has been rash -- or as the film-makers would see it, brave -- enough to bite.

"This is unlike anything I have worked on," says Tim Sparke of Mercury Media, which handles international distribution for the film. "It has forced millions of people to question whether they can trust big media, and by bypassing the broadcasters through internet distribution it has altered the media power balance profoundly. With a little money and passion, anyone can make an important film."

The final test for Avery and co is yet to come. They are putting together Loose Change: the Final Cut using an upgraded Power Mac G5 (price $US 5,000). They have filmed original interviews with Washington players, employed lawyers to iron out copyright issues with borrowed footage, commissioned 3D graphics from Germany, and recruited a theology professor to act as fact-checker and consultant. The end result, they hope, will be seen at Cannes and have a cinema release in America and across the world on the sixth anniversary of 9/11.

If that happens, they will have squared the circle. The underground film-makers will have come up for air, exposing millions more people to their argument -- and themselves to intense scrutiny. Stand back and enjoy the fireworks.

February 25, 2007


hustler magazine cover 911 truth


XXX Rated 9/11 Truth

HUSTLER MAGAZINE - Dr Steven Jones, Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen centerfold spread hits newsstands in March 2006. With Eric Hufschmid, Jim Hoffman, Dr Judy Wood, Dr Kenneth Kuttler, Dr Gordon Ross, Dr James Fetzer discuss Thermate, WTC7 and American Scholars Symposium. Loose Changers Dylan Avery, Jason Berman, Korey Rowe discuss their $20-MILLION budget? Pirate News TV first reported the diagonal cutter bombs used in explosive demolitions of skyscrapers, as broadcast by History Channel' s Demolition episode about University of Tennessee Knoxville alumni at Controlled Demolitions Inc. Larry Flint don't take kindly to assassination by CIA's Operation Northwoods sniper teams. In censorship court Flint wore a diaper made from an Amerikan flag

Alex Jones: "In the end, that's just decadence. Decadence is not raising your children right. Decadence is being greedy. Decadence is not being involved in your community. But the people who want to make our society decadent try to give us a limited view of decadence, by focusing on things like sex. And I'm not just saying this because I'm talking to Hustler. In the most repressive, corrupt societies throughout history, the ones really doing evil always try to suppress people by inventing false demons. They'll say, 'That hot-looking lady dressed in the short skirt, she's a devil.' No, the devil in our society is the guy stealing people's pension funds."

Hustler Page 5

Big Brother Corporation's Conspiracy Files - The BBC's "documentary" about 9/11 was a tissue of lies, bias and emotional manipulation from beginning to end. Producer Guy Smith should be ashamed of himself for inflicting this travesty of yellow journalism upon the 9/11 truth movement and he is assured to encounter a vociferous and outraged response in its aftermath.

BBC Conspiracy Files vs 9/11 Truth: The Smear Continues? - We wondered what kind of documentary the BBC was making about 9/11, and it's becoming clearer by the day. Guy Smith, producer of the upcoming BBC "Conspiracy Files" episode on 9/11, laid the groundwork in a piece called "We're all conspiracy theorists at heart" which was published by the BBC on Friday. In that piece, Smith claims conspiracy theories persist because people are natural story-tellers who instinctively look for elaborate tales to describe events beyond their control. Your nearly frozen correspondent replied with "BBC vs 9/11 Truth: The Smear Begins". I urge you to read both pieces if you have any doubts about our respective positions, or motivations.

BBC Conspiracy Files alleges 9/11 Truth Movement a cult of mythology - The BBC's promotional material for its upcoming documentary on the 9/11 truth movement, widely expected to be a sophisticated hit piece, attempts to dismiss serious questions about 9/11 by implying that anyone who distrusts the official version has a borderline psychological illness and is a member of a mythological cult.

Producer Struggles to Defend Flaws & Bias of BBC Hit Piece - The producer of the BBC Conspiracy Files documentary, a poorly researched and bias hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement, appeared on the Alex Jones Show yesterday and struggled to defend charges that the program was laden with glaring flaws and crass emotional manipulation throughout. Judge for yourself by listening to the MP3 audio.

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell - British Big Brother Corporation ESP video shows reporter talking about WTC collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background

BBC confesses it destroyed all BBC historical videos from 9/11 - "The 9/11 conspiracy theories are pretty well known by now. The BBC addressed them earlier this month with a documentary, The Conspiracy Files, shown within the UK. Until now, I don't think we've been accused of being part of the conspiracy. But now some websites are using news footage from BBC World on September 11th 2001 to suggest we were actively participating in some sort of attempt to manipulate the audience. As a result, we're now getting lots of emails asking us to clarify our position. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I've spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn't remember minute-by-minute what she said or did - like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error - no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today 'so the guy in the studio didn't quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy.'" I didn't see that footage - just the footage of Rudolph Giuliani with a bunch of people around him talking about Building 7 being unsafe and that it impedded 'our people getting into there to start the recovery/rescue and that it really needed to be PULLED'... he said flat out "do whatever it takes, bring it down". - Karen

BBC Has Lost Tapes Of 21st Century's Defining Moment - It has come to light this week that the most pre-eminent broadcasting company in the world has lost the original recordings of its output for the entire day on September 11th 2001, just over five years on, yet no major news agency has even bothered to report the fact. Despite being currently the biggest story on the internet and in the alternative media, the only place in the mainstream the story has appeared is on a small German news website. The BBC was forced into claiming that the recordings covering the 9/11 attacks have mysteriously vanished in response to fierce criticism over the fact that on the day the news agency reported that World Trade Center Building 7 had collapsed almost 30 minutes before it actually exploded. This means that if the footage was "lost" prior to September 11th 2006 then the BBC has broken British broadcasting law. This is not some two bit cable TV station, as a government agency the BBC is paid for by every person in the UK and thus has a strict legal responsibility to uphold its written policies.

Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance - If there was any remaining doubt that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 over 20 minutes before it fell then it has now evaporated with the discovery of footage from the BBC's News 24 channel that shows the time stamp at 21:54 (4:54PM EST) when news of the Salomon Brothers Building is first broadcast, a full 26 minutes in advance of its collapse. According to FEMA, WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Since British Summer Time is five hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time, the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 at 4:54PM EST, a full 26 minutes before it collapsed. If we factor in CNN's Aaron Brown reporting that Building 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing" at 4:15PM EST, then that's over an hour before the building imploded into its own footprint. First responders, firefighters and police are all on the record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be "brought down" and many took that to mean that it was going to be intentionally demolished by means of explosives. Some even reported a 20 second countdown preceding the building's collapse, which can only mean one thing - that it was deliberately imploded according to a pre-determined schedule. World Trade Center Building 3 (pictured above), known publicly as the 22-story Marriott Hotel positioned between the twin towers, was heavily damaged during the collapse of WTC 2, yet it did not experience uniform collapse either vertically or horizontally. We received an interesting e mail from a CNN archivist in Atlanta who stated their utter disbelief at the notion that BBC has lost any of their 9/11 archives. "I'm an archivist with the CNN News Library in Atlanta, and I can tell you with absolute certainty, the mere idea that news agencies such as ours would "misplace" any airchecks from 9/11 is preposterous. CNN has these tapes locked away from all the others. People like myself, who normally would have access to any tapes in our library, must ask special permission in order to view airchecks from that day. Multiple tapes would have been recording their broadcast that day, and there are also private agencies that record all broadcasts from all channels - constantly - in the event that a news agency missed something or needs something. They don't just have one copy... they have several. It's standard procedure, and as soon as the second plane hit, they would start recording several copies on other tapes machines all day long."

Media Blacklists BBC Fiasco; Google, Digg Censor 9/11 Truth - News 24 'timestamp' video disappears from Google Video, despite the fact it's under 30 seconds in length and clearly constitutes fair use, Digg lets small minority of morons decide its content

Santa Fe New Mexican Farewell Blog Covers BBC Building 7 Cockup - As today is my last day setting the homepage for The Santa Fe New Mexican I thought I would bid you all farewell. I resigned two weeks ago to better pursue my personal interests. It is to my great amusement however that this day coincides with an astonishing story to share in this blog. There is an uproar rising across the Internet over what is being called yet another blatant, 9/11 smoking gun.

Media Blacklists BBC Fiasco; Google, Digg Censor 9/11 Truth - In just 2 days the footage has been seen by an absolute minimum of 270,000 people. The version on YouTube has over 140,000 views, and the version on Live Leak has over 130,000. The amount of other versions, as well as the original version which was deleted, are innumerable. All the videos are still growing at tremendous rates and will no doubt continue to spread like wildfire over the coming weeks. One of the most significant aspects of this whole story, which I would like to highlight, is that it is a testament to the power of what one single individual can accomplish. One individual did the research, one individual found the footage, one individual created the film, and that one individual created a video and put it out for the world to see.

Controlled Demolition Inc on History Channel and PBS America Rebuilds - Alice Cooper sings "Welcome to my nightmare" during short clips from History Channels' "Wrecking Ball" episode, as CDI bombs perfectly good govt buildings all over USA, during their "Summer of Destruction" in 2001. CDI owner engineers graduated from University of Tennessee in Knoxville, home of mayor Victor Ashe, now Bush Jr's ambassador to Poland (CIA redition torture death camps). CDI's $7-billion partner at World Trade Center "after" 9/11/2001 was Browning Ferris Industries, the $40-billion waste cartel HQed in Knoxville. Notice how CDI installs British RDX "cutter charges" in a diagonal position on steel beams, exactly as seen at WTC scrap after 9/11. CDI was required at WTC, because many of the Thermate cutter charges did not explode, and had to be detonated by CDI before removal from the rubble, so this resulted in molten steel for days, weeks and months after 9/11, as the unburned Thermate was ignated by CDI, burned off, then was removed and destroyed in Communist China, and melted down in Knoxville.

Deconstructing the Naudets' propaganda film - Calculate the odds. Two French filmmakers, the Naudet brothers, are filming a documentary about a young, probationary fireman, Tony Benetatos, on September 11, 2001. Before the awful events yet to come, Tony is left alone at the 100 Duane Street fire station while Jules Naudet, the firemen and truck swing left from station, drive to the first corner, turn right onto Church Street, and drive seven blocks north to Lispenard Street and Church to investigate the report of an exterior gas leak. Then, while the fire team is investigating, Jules Naudet doesn't film them. For some reason, he turns his camera south, carefully finds a clear view, past the 440-foot high AT&T building, of the Twin Towers. Then, with a nano-window of six seconds in which to catch Flight 11 stream from behind the AT&T building at 450 mph, he catches perfectly the last two seconds of the hit into the North Tower at 8:46.30 am, what's commonly known in the film business as “The Money Shot.” So, calculate the odds. What's more, this kind of lightning does not strike once on this tragic morning, but twice on given targets. Gedeon Naudet, Jules' brother, just happens to be standing at the bottom of the South Tower 18 minutes later with his perfectly still camera looking up at exactly where Flight 175 zooms through the frame into the South Tower 2 at 9:02:59 am, leaving a gash from the 94th floor to the 78th. He said he “accidentally” captured the South Tower hit, while filming the crowds watching the North Tower. Consider doubling the odds.

New York City releases new 9/11 911 tapes - August 2006

New York City releases censored 9/11 911 tapes - Citizens voices are censored to prevent lynching of Mafia transvestite mayor Sir Rudia Giuliani Knight of the British Empire and transvestite lead hijacker George DWI Bush - August 2006

TulsaTruth crashes OK community college class - Nice logo. Too bad MK colleges fire professors who teach or research 911 Truth

"The individual is handicapped coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists." - J. Edgar Hoover, FBI director for 50 years and Mafia homosexual transvestite who murdered Dr Martin Luther King and President John F Kennedy sr


Lesbians for 9/11 Truth

ROSIE O'DONELL TM
THE VIEW

at 5 30 pm
9 11 2001
wtc7 collapsed

for the third time in history
fire brought down a steel building
reducing it to rubble
hold on folks
here we go

• The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.

• Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”

• Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.

• The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.

• Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency’s major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. …”Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive,” said Max Berger of New York’s Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. “This is a disaster for these cases.” [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service’s largest field office with more than 200 employees. …”All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building,” according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

lets start here
ok…go slow
remember 2 breathe
use google

March 15, 2007

Will The DonAld Trump next exit the 9/11 Truth closet? YES!

"Bush is probably the worst president in the history of the United States, and I just don't understand how they could have lost that election. Look, everything in Washington has been a lie. Weapons of mass destruction, it was a total lie. It was a way of attacking Iraq, which he felt was going to be easy and it turned out to be the exact opposite of easy. The war is total disaster. It's a catastrophe, nothing less. And Saddam Hussein, whether they like him or didn't like him, he hated terrorists. He'd shoot and kill terrorists. When terrorists came in to his country, which he did control and he did dominate, he would kill terrorists. Now it's a breeding ground for terrorists. So, look, the war is a total catastrophe, and they have a civil war going on. Well there's only one person you can blame and that's our current president. I mean obviously Rumsfeld was a disaster and other people that are giving him advice have been a disaster, and Condoleezza Rice, who's a lovely woman, but she never makes a deal. She doesn't make deals. She waves. She gets off the plane. She waves. She sits down with some dictator 45-degree angle. They do the camera shot. She waves again. She gets back on the plane. She waves. No deal ever happens. You got to make deals. The world is dying to make deals and we don't have the right people doing it. [Dick Cheney's] obviously a very hawkish guy on the war. He said the war was going fantastically just a few months ago, and you know, it's just very sad. I don't know if they're bad people. I don't know what's going on. I just know that they got us in to a mess, the likes of which this country has probably never seen. It's one of the great catastrophes of all time and perhaps even worse, the rest of the world hates us. You go throughout Europe, I travel, I do deals all over the world. The Europeans hate us. You go to Germany. You go to England, you go to places that, you know, we didn't have problems with. They all hate the Americans because of what's happened. You know, nobody talks about the soldiers that are coming back with no arms and no legs. I let returning Iraqi injured soldiers come to the premises. The most beautiful people I've ever seen. But they're missing arms and legs, they're with their wives, sometimes they're with their girlfriends. And the tears are coming down the faces of these people. I mean, thousands and maybe hundreds of thousands, and the Iraqis that have been just maimed and killed. This war is a horrible thing. Now, President Bush says he's religious. And yet 400,000 people, the way I count it, have died, and probably millions have been badly maimed and injured. What's going on? What's going on? And the day we pull out it's going to explode. We're keeping the lid on a little bit. It's still a catastrophe, but the day we pull out, because they're in a civil war. Whether we want to admit it or not, they're in a civil war. Look, everything in Washington has been a lie. Weapons of mass destruction. It was a total lie. It was a way of attacking Iraq, which he thought was going to be easy and it turned out to be the exact opposite of easy. He reads 60 books a year. He read as book a week. That's -- did you think that's -- do you think the president reads a book week? I don't think so. He doesn't watch television. Now, one thing I know is when I'm on television I watch. Or I try, because you do. Your own ego says, let's watch. Let's see. Whether it's good or bad, you want to watch. He doesn't watch television. So he's on television being interviewed by you or something else, hesdoesn't watch. Does anybody really believe that? Now they are doing this whole scandal with the U.S. attorneys. Now they're finding e-mails. And it's proven to be a lie. Everything's a lie. It's all a big lie." - Donald Trump, CNN, Situation Room with Jew Wolf Blitzer, March 16, 2007


Hollywood's 9/11 Patriot Brigade

By Dick Johnson

NEW YORK POST - Some celebrities don't know when to keep their traps shut - like Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell, who are throwing their weight behind the twisted theory that the United States government was behind the 9/11 terror attacks.

Page Six has learned that Sheen, the hooker-loving Hollywood hunk, has agreed to narrate a new version of the loopy YouTube [sic] documentary "Loose Change," which claims that a corrupt faction within the federal government orchestrated the mass murder at the World Trade Center.

Sources say Sheen - whose father, Martin Sheen, has been arrested 63 times protesting on behalf of various leftist causes - is in talks with [multi-billionaire] Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban's Magnolia Pictures to distribute "Loose Change." Sheen has called for a new independent probe of the attack, telling Alex Jones' radio show: "It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75 percent of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

Sheen's rep confirmed his participation. Cuban e-mailed us: "We are having discussions about distributing the existing video with Charlie's involvement as a narrator, not in making a new feature. We are also looking for productions with an opposing viewpoint. We like controversial subjects, but we are agnostic to which side the controversy comes from."

Meanwhile, on her blog, O'Donnell has pasted in a widely debunked [sic] rundown of the collapse of 7 World Trade Center from the whatreallyhappened.com Web site, created by conspiracy theorist Matt Rivero [sic].

O'Donnell repeats his discredited theories, which include the notion that because the fires were not evenly distributed, it made the building's perfect collapse into its footprint "impossible that landlord [sic - renter] Larry Silverstein told the FDNY that "the smartest thing to do is pull it," a phrase conspiracy theorists take to mean that he ordered the skyscraper's destruction; and that firefighters withdrawing from the building feared it was going to "blow up."

New York Post is owned by an Australian citizen, Jewish pornographer Sir Rupert Murdock Knight of the British Empire, foreign owner of anti-american Fox News TV, whose wife is a citizen of Communist China. Larry Silverstein s also a Jewish citizen of Australia, who speaks weekly in Top Secret meetings with the Jewish prime minister of Israel.

March 22, 2007


Rupert's daily Sun newspaper

We Hear Stern Questions Coming for boss of Page Six - Remember the Jared Paul Stern gossip-ethics kerfuffle? The FBI does. Stern, a longtime freelance contributor to the Post’s “Page Six,” was accused by billionaire Ron Burkle of trying to extort $200,000 from him in exchange for keeping negative stories about him out of the paper. Now the “Page Six” editor, Richard Johnson, has been contacted for questioning by a group that includes prosecutors from the Southern District and federal agents. Asked about a looming interview with the G-men, Johnson referred calls to a publicist. One of Johnson’s lawyers, Ed Hayes, says he is aware the Feds requested a routine sit-down with Johnson but believes it is unnecessary as Stern has not been charged with a crime. Because Hayes once represented Stern, he says another lawyer, Murray Richman, is representing Johnson in relation to the federal probe. Richman calls Johnson a “friend” but says he’s not involved; his daughter, Stacey Richman, is repping Johnson on a recent DUI charge.

Debunking NY Post's Tabloid Hit Piece On Sheen/O'Donnell - Choosing to focus on name calling and slandering character assassinations, Rupert Murdoch's Post cannot even get the most basic of facts correct. Johnson needs to stick to reporting on Britney Spears' latest haircut if he can't even be bothered to conduct cursory investigative research.

O'Donnell, Sheen Back 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - CBS JEWS - Comment: Rosie O'Donnell is not involved in the new Loose Change project - a fact none of these media outlets typically seems to be bothered to check up on. If they cannot get basic facts straight why should we give them any authority?

O'Donnell, Sheen Back 9/11 Conspiracy Theories - A controversial new film about 9/11 is raising eyebrows, not only for its content, but also for the people involved in the project: Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen. The sitcom actor and talk show hostess have both become spokespeople for the 9/11 conspiracy movement. "If the government is lying about flight 93, is it hard to believe the rest is a lie?" That line can be heard on the video "Loose Change," which has been floating around the Internet for years, but now Sheen is in talks with Magnolia Pictures to narrate a new version of the video and redistribute it. Sheen believes the government may have been behind the attacks, and said so in a recent interview. "I have a hard time believing a fireball traveled down the elevator over 1100 feet, and still had the explosive energy to destroy the lobby as it was described," Sheen said on "The Alex Jones Show." Meanwhile, O'Donnell has been using her Web site to reprint excerpts from the 9/11 conspiracy site, Whatreallyhappened.com. The conspiracy theorists believe that the government blew up the twin towers and covered up the evidence by making it appear that commercial airplanes flew into the buildings. They also believe al-Qaida had nothing to do with the attacks. "I know it's hard to imagine the government would intentionally murder almost 3000 innocent people, but once you begin to accept that possibility you can never go back to the 19 Arabs," the movie's narrator goes on to say.

Shaped Charge Bombs and the 3 World Trade Center Explosive Collapses - Here's what demolition experts use in steel framed buildings, the linear shaped charge. It generates around 3,000,000 psi pressure at a speed in excess of 27,000 feet per second. There are over 1000 different types of explosive. With the use of delays we can control where the debris lands, vibration, noise level. The job of a shaped charge is to cut steel H-beams. "The way we do this is by cutting the beam at an angle which through a series of beams cut at the same angle will tend to make the building shift over and 'walk'"

FOX News Threatens Sheen & Cuban Not to Make Film - FOX News' Bill O'Reilly warned actor Charlie Sheen not to do narration for a theatrical version of Loose Change , threatening " If he voices this, he's through " and stating plainly, " Don't do this. You're not gonna come back from it if you do." Despite mafioso-like tactics on the part of both O'Reilly and the Post , O'Reilly claimed that his attempt at intimidation was "not a threat" while his guest, Jewish NYPD dick Bo Dietl, dog-piled into the cryptic warnings that "Martin Sheen's kid there better watch it." While Dietl threatened "We won't watch that 2 1/2 kids thing at all," it was clear in O'Reilly's demeanor that full realization of defeat had sunk in-- the 9/11 cover-up had failed.

GE-MSNBC Carlyle Group Bushes, Bin Ladens, John Gibson attack Loose Change, Charlie Sheen - Charlie Sheen is reportedly talking with Mark Cuban's Magnolia Pictures to provide narration for a new release of the Internet movie "Loose Change," which challenges the official story of the events of 9/11 and suggests that elements within the US government may have allowed or even facilitated the disasters. Sheen does not believe the official accounts. On The Big Story today, "the Big Outrage" dealt with his dealings and with the "twisted theories" in the movie. 9/11 survivor and author Earl johnson was the sole guest to discuss and discredit the movie and the alternative theories. Gibson mischaracterized Sheen as "the mastermind" behind "what will be no doubt a ridiculous film." No bias there.

Access Hollywood covers 9/11 Sheen leak, gets basic O'Donnell facts wrong - Charlie Sheen has been lined up to take part in a 9/11 documentary, his reps confirmed to Access Hollywood. Sheen is involved in the production of "Loose Change," a new version of a documentary suggesting the US government was behind the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks. The current version of the documentary is availabe on YouTube. The actor's reps declined to reveal more details about Sheen's involvement in the project, but Page Six reports he will be narrating a new version of the film. In an interview on the Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network a year ago, Sheen expressed his views on 9/11 saying, "It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

Loose Change 2 to be In-Flight Movie for Virgin Atlantic - HAHAHAHAHA!

Rosie's video vlog - Hairdressing gossip and fan letters: "The World Trade Center 7 was a controlled demolition."

Rosie and wife of Jewish mobster Barbara Walters warn 100-million sheeple that Bush perped 9/11 terror massacres - This is the largest single exposure 9/11 truth has enjoyed to date and it represents a watershed moment in the quest to bring the truth to the masses. Even Court TV is now discussing Rosie's facts on prime time. The debate moves on to the "propaganda of the war on terror," with O'Donnell stating, "In America we are fed propaganda and if you want to know what's happening in the world go outside of the U.S. media because it's owned by four corporations, one of them is this one (ABC). Go outside of the country to find out what's going on in our own country because it's frightening. I think Democracy is threatened in a way it hasn't been in 200 years and if America doesn't stand up we're in big trouble," says O'Donnell.

Homeless alcoholic drug addict hired by Jewish Australian Communist Chinese British Empire pimp Fox News to order death penalty for Rosie - Actor and radio host Danny Bonaduce, appearing as a guest last night on MSNBC's Scarborough Country, hosted by former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough, advocated the death penalty in response to Rosie O'Donnell's statements about the Iran hostage crisis and her questioning the official story behind 9/11. "Personally I think at this point if anyone had a rope thick enough, I think that Rosie should be strung up for treason," states Bonaduce, claiming that O'Donnell is giving "aid and comfort to the enemy." Bonaduce was quick to cry foul after claiming his own family had received death threats after he appeared in a You Tube video being asked about 9/11 conspiracies, but it seems he has no qualms about advocating the murder of Rosie O'Donnell. Scarborough resigned from Congress when his female intern was murdered in his Congressional office in Florida, then was immediately hired by MSNBC owned by convicted felons GE, Carlyle Group, Georges Bush, Queen of England and Bin Laden families. Bonaduce's claim to political expertise was learned as a child on the Partridge Family sitcom TV show, and while living in his car behind Mann's Chinese Theater in Hollywood and his arrest for assaulting a transvestite prostitute. Bonaduce appeared on the Dating Game, created by psychotic Jewish mobster and comedic CIA hitman Chuck "Gong Show" Barris, author of the book and documentary Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, where he perped assassinations for Uncle Scam while chapparoning Danny Bonnaduce and other Dating Game contestants. Crackhead Bonnaduce met and married his handler, er, wife on the same day, after his arrest for assaulting a transvetite prostitute over a contract dispute for homosexual sex

Pervert O'Reilly mafia threatens O'Donnell over his sleazy sex lawsuit - ABC has now gagged O'Donnell from mentioning the subject on all future broadcasts. In October of last year, O'Reilly threatened Jim Fetzer and Kevin Barrett that he would use his influence to push for an FBI investigation of the 9/11 truth professors, in an attempt to discover if they had links with terrorists. "I'd put the FBI on you and that nutty Barrett and find out what the hell you guys are up to," salivated O'Reilly, making reference to Dr Sammy Al-Arian PhD, a former professor at USF who was charged and later acquitted of helping to lead a Palestinian terrorist group that carried out suicide bombings against Israel. During a September 2001 interview before his arrest, O'Reilly told Al-Arian, "if I was the CIA, I'd follow you wherever you went. I'd follow you 24 hours." As Kurt Nimmo writes, "Bill O'Reilly essentially had Dr. Sami al-Arian, an associate professor of computer engineering at the University of South Florida, not only bounced from his job but also arrested and indicted by the Justice Department on racketeering and terrorist charges due to his alleged association with Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Ashcroft went as far as to characterize al-Arian as "the North American leader of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad." Dr. Sami al-Arian survived a two month hunger strike so far in 2007, jailed without conviction in Gulag USA.

Prime News and Popular Mechanics Attack Rosie and 9/11 Truth - They promote stoprosie.com and ask people to sign petition to get her fired. This is Erica Hill's show on CNN Headline News from 04-04-07. James Miegs and Ethan Czahor from stoprosie.com are the guests. James Miegs claims that fire didn't have to melt the steel, it just had to be weakened by it. But it did melt! Look at the pictures, better yet, look at a portion of the FEMA report that was conviently left out of the NIST report. Here is the link - Go ahead, read how he tested steel from the site and discovered that steel was "liquefied".

Rosie Attacked by Jewish Miller Time - After a series of strong suggestions that Rosie-- accused of being in FOR the money-- can't have continued success in Hollywood after 9/11 statements, Dennis Miller admits that the country is split in "half" on this, and she won't lose any career. Meanwhile, Rosie is clearly NOT taking a stand for financial reasons, and knows the risks she is taking to fight for the truth. Also, a Pay-Per-View debate-for-charity with O'Reilly is proposed. Miller suggests that O'Reilly can use it for a pedophelia charity, as the two exchange interesting smirks.

Ro Blog - How to rip the heads off insane neocons, but with a smile on your face. dot writes: "Is your brother a member of the NY State Assembly?" Rosie: "he is..." Donna writes: "You mentioned your brother is in the Senate, New York, does your views affect his politics? Very interested in that answer. Peace out!!!!!" Rosie: "i have no idea..."

Rosie Must Die - Rosie odonnell must die for crimes against tyrrany. Climate change may kill all life on earth unless we raise taxes. Freed british sailors ready to kill for the queen one more time. By SurfingTheApocalypse.TV with Derek Jackson 6 April 2007

Vote for Rosie - For president CEO and chairman of the board of ABC

Lesbians for 9/11 Truth versus Trannies for 9/11 Terror - Rosie vs Sir Rudy Giuliani Mafia Knight of the British Empire

Rosie fires Disney ABC View - ABC has been unable to come to a contractual agreement with Rosie O'Donnell. As a result, her hosting duties on "The View" will come to an end mid-June. "They wanted me three years, I wanted one year, and it just didn't work," said O'Donnell on today's show. Barbara Walter's husband is a Jewish casino mobster, er, lawyer in Sin City. Rosie quit the same day Congressman Dennis Kucinich officially introduced bills of impeachment for Dick Cheney. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

The View will not discuss WTC7 - According to today's entry on Rosie O'Donnell's blog, The View will not have WTC 7 experts on

Loose Changers and 9/11 engineering experts appear on The View - Dr Steven Jones also invited by Rosie O'Donnell. Loose Changers discuss their multimillion dollar collaboration with Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen

Alex Jones Teams Up with Loose Change and Charlie Sheen - Alex Jones has publicly announced his role as an executive producer for Loose Change: Final Cut as Dylan Avery, Corey Rowe and Jason Bermas gear up for their much anticipated appearance on The View with Rosie O'Donnell next week. Alex will also reveal on his show today that he has been helping with financing the production and release of the film. Professor David Ray Griffin was also enlisted as a script editor and fact checker, ensuring the final release will be absolutely watertight and immune to the debunking attempts that will inevitably follow. Actor Charlie Sheen is also involved and will narrate the documentary. The Loose Change crews will feature on ABC's The View on Thursday May 24th, it was announced yesterday. William Rodruigez will also appear on the show. 9/11 truthers will not go head to head with debunkers, but it is expected that the pioneers of yellow journalism, Hearst Publishing's Popular Mechanics, will be given an opportunity to spew their deceit at a later date, hosted only by Australian Survovor loser Jew Elizabeth Filarski Hasselbeck, without Rosie to deal with.

9/11 Keymaster Questions Official Conspiracy Theory on NYC Fox News - William Rodriguez, the "Last Man Standing" on 9/11, appeared on Fox News in Boston, MA. He talked about explosions in the basement, before the plane hit, as well as secondary explosions occurring. Mr. Rodriguez also takes the time to mention the media blackout in the United States on 9/11 Truth issues.

NY Times Attempts To Debunk 9/11 Truth, Loose Change & Rosie; Fails Miserably - In a report detailing Rosie O'Donnell's confirmed plans to have 9/11 truthers debate the attacks on The View before she leaves in June, The New York Times has responded by penning an extremely poor attack piece which cites previous shoddy debunking efforts while completely ignoring key evidence often referred to by the many scientific experts, ex government officials, whistleblowers and truthers in general that have declared the event an inside job.

Neo-Con "Stop Rosie" Founder Admits Defeat - O'Donnell's new TV show to give 9/11 truth a new lease of life, absent censorship she endured at hands of Neo-Con ABC producer.

Exclusive: ABC Told Rosie Not To Talk About Dead U.S. Troops or WTC survivors - O'Donnell had met with 9/11 truth crusader and World Trade Center hero William Rodriguez before she went public with her comments on The View questioning the suspicious collapse of Building 7. Pictured is Rosie holding the famous key that Rodriguez used in the twin towers during the rescue efforts. Rosie has attempted to get William Rodriguez on the show as a guest on numerous occasions over the last few weeks but was rebuffed by program directors every time due to Rodriguez's vocal stance that 9/11 was an inside job. O'Donnell again attempted to simply mention Rodriguez's today but was shouted down. ABC Disney was managed by Jew Michael Eisner, who refused to allow release of Jew Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 911. Eisner paid himself $200-MILLION a year salary, and he owned 20,000 slaves in Communist China.

British Empire remanufactured Gulf maritime border map to falsely justify invasion of Iran - British navy crew was arrested due South of Iranian coast. In claiming HMS Cornwall was within Iraqi territorial waters, the British government and the media have covered-up the fact there is no agreed upon Iraqi-Iranian maritime border, as other bizarre coincidences and dubious circumstances surrounding the hostage crisis begin to emerge. Former British Ambassador Craig Murray and others are highlighting the fact that the maritime border between Iraq and Iran is contested, and the British have essentially manufactured a border to make it appear as if HMS Cornwall was within Iraqi territorial waters. The mainstream media mafia has uniformly failed to address this issue. "The Iran/Iraq maritime boundary shown on the British government map does not exist. It has been drawn up by the British Government. Only Iraq and Iran can agree their bilateral boundary, and they never have done this in the Gulf, only inside the Shatt because there it is the land border too. This published boundary is a fake with no legal force," claims Murray. Accepting the British coordinates for the position of both HMS Cornwall and the incident, both were closer to Iranian land than Iraqi land. Go on, print out the map and measure it. Which underlines the point that the British produced border is not a reliable one." As illustrated in the Encarta encyclopedia territorial map above, the position of the ship denoted by the red circle is nearer the Iranian border than the Iraq border. The blue circumference touches the edge of the Iranian border. As the Moon of Alabama blog points out, "That boundary is simply not well defined and Iran and Iraq have fought several wars about the Shatt al-Arab and its waterways. There is no binding or otherwise recognized international agreement about the maritime boundaries." Other highly suspicious circumstances surrounding the hostage crisis have also begun to emerge. During a BBC Newsnight feature story , it was demonstrated that the Iranian footage of the capture of the British sailors was in large part likely faked and the commentators all but suggested the entire incident was staged or at least constituted "gross negligence" on behalf of the British. Readers have also pointed out the bizarre coincidence of the fact that immediately before the sailors were captured, they were being accompanied by a BBC film crew onboard HMS Cornwall, who filmed a human interest interview with Faye Turney, who has become the poster child of the whole crisis. The interview was broadcast immediately after the sailors were taken hostage and portrayed Turney in a very humanizing light, with pictures of her loved ones in the background. In 1980 and 1981, fired CIA director Sir George Bush Sr Knight of the British Empire hired the Iranian government to kidnap US embassy staff and hold them hostage, in order to defeat President Jimmy Carter, which is the crime of treason, punishable by DEATH. The Iranian hostages were released within minutes of the Reagan/Bush inaugeration. Three months later, a family friend of Bush was arrested for shooting "president" Reagan, thus promoting Bush Sr to president 8 years early.

9/11 Truth from FDNY Fox FX actor Daniel Sunjata - Daniel Sunjata, co-star of the critically-acclaimed FX Network television series, Rescue Me, spoke out today for 9/11 Truth. In a lengthy statement to the PatriotsQuestion911.com website, Sunjata offered his thoughts about how a small group within our military and government could have been complicit in the terrible events of 9/11. Sunjata is a versatile actor who received a Tony Award nomination for Best Actor for his starring role in the Broadway play, Take Me Out. He appeared in Woody Allen's 2004 film, Melinda and Melinda and in the 2006 movie The Devil Wears Prada with Meryl Streep. He plays the starring role of Reggie Jackson in the upcoming ESPN mini-series, The Bronx is Burning. Here's Sunjata's statement (the rest of this post is Sunjata's direct quote; note that the Patriots Question 9/11 web page will be updated later tonight to include the quote): I would like to respond to the question, "How could a small group within our military and government have been complicit in the terrible events of 9/11 without the entire government being aware of it?"

Debunkaholic Michelle Malkin Is A 9/11 Truther - Malkin: "What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93? As the Philadelphia Daily News reported back in November, many folks in Shanksville, Pa., where the hijacked Boeing 757 crashed, believe the plane was shot down. The eight-mile-wide debris field seems to bolster claims of an on-board explosion. So did the discovery of a one-ton chunk of the plane's engine far from the rest of the crash site - which some say points to evidence that a heat-seeking missile targeted the flight."

George DWI Bush censors Rosie and 9/11 Truthers on The View - Did master political strategist Karl Rove schedule and script George Bush's speech in the Rose Garden yesterday to pre-empt the possible appearance of 9/11 truth movement heavyweights on ABC's The View? Guest appearances by William Rodriguez and the Loose Change crew on the show hosted by Rosie O'Donnell were cancelled, banned and censored at the start of the week, the ABC website still listed their names as being scheduled. Presidential news conferences that take place in the daytime and do not relate to any kind of breaking news or national event do not cut into regular programming on major non-news channels, and yet ABC chose to air the speech in its entirety after The View was cancelled for that day. Many 9/11 truthers now suspect that this was a Rovian ploy to distract attention or in effect completely displace the subject matter raised by Rodriguez and Loose Change that was set to be aired on The View.

Rosie O'Donnell Fires Disney ABC The View - Management and sources close to Rosie O'Donnell tell us that the host of The View is incensed with what seems to be a deliberate campaign to discredit her before she exits the show and that Rosie may cut short her contract and leave early next week. The show was again in the headlines this week following O'Donnell's blazing row with Jewish Neo-Con Stepford Wife Elizabeth Filarski Hasselbeck. Their latest exchange on Wednesday, perhaps their most heated, was a continuation of a debate over the Iraq war that began last week when O'Donnell said on the show, "655,000 Iraqi civilians have died. Who are the terrorists?" Prominent 9/11 truth activists William Rodriguez and the Loose Change crew were set to feature on the ABC broadcast as guests yesterday, but the entire show was cancelled in favor of carrying a Rose Garden Bush speech. We are told that ABC always knew Rosie wasn't going to host the show yesterday but misleadingly failed to alter the schedule stating that the 9/11 truth representatives were set to feature. We also understand that Rosie is seeking another forum to go fully public on 9/11 and present more evidence that directly contradicts the government's version of events.

Rosie Behind the Scenes - Behind-the-scenes sneak peek of Rosie educating the spectators on 9/11 facts

Jew Michael Moore says 9/11 an Inside Job - Academy Award winner Michael Moore answered questions on 9/11 truth during a sneak peak of his new documentary, SiCKO, in New York . Our reporters were initially avoided by Moore, but he subsequently decided to approach WeAreChange.org and Infowars.com reporters. Moore brought up his lingering questions on 9/11, which are a clear departure from the 'government negligence' picture he painted in his film Fahrenheit 9/11 , released some three years ago. Moore told reporters, "I've had a number of firefighters tell me over the years and since Fahrenheit 9/11 that they heard these explosions-- that they believe there's MUCH more to the story than we've been told. I don't think the official investigations have told us the complete truth-- they haven't even told us half the truth." Michael Moore brought up the blackout of video at the site of the alleged Pentagon plane crash on his own, appearing quite willing to discuss subjects that so-called left gatekeepers have previously refused to raise questions about. "I've filmed there before down at the Pentagon-- before 9/11-- there's got to be at least 100 cameras, ringing that building, in the trees, everywhere. They've got that plane coming in with 100 angles. How come with haven't seen the straight-- I'm not talking about stop-action photos, I'm talking about the video. I want to see the video; I want to see 100 videos that exist of this," Moore said. He went on to imply the implausibility of a pilot executing the flight pattern of the flight that allegedly hit the Pentagon. "Why don't they want us to see that plane coming into the building? Because, if you know anything about flying a plane, when you're going 500 miles per hour, if you're off by that much, you're in the river. So, they hit a building that's only 5 stories high. I believe that there will be answers in that video tape and we should demand that that tape is released." Jew Amy Goodman, who was also at the premiere, cowered from a question that brought up the fact that she witnessed WTC Building 7 collapse-- she was seen on video during news coverage of the apparent demolition. She declined even a brief response.

9/11 NIST Report - US Govt National Institute of Standards and Technology officially confessed it has no idea how World Trade Center 7 fell down when not hit by an aircraft and not on fire: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." 27 September 2007

9/11 witness and author Dr Green suicided by FBI death squad - Dr. David M. Graham met two 9/11 terrorists, ten months before 9/11, in his native Shreveport. He was a medical associate of Dr. Mohammed Habeeb Ahmed (now a resident of San Jose, CA, we believe) and an associate of current federal fugitive Mohammed Jamal Khan (now residing in his native Pakistan [MI6], we believe). Dr. Graham was meticulous about these meetings. He wrote a book he tried to publish (The 9/11 Graham Report) and even created a set of four video tapes in which he clandestinely recorded Khan and Ahmed in his office in 2002 and 2003, discussing the year 2000 meetings with 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Fayez Banihammad. In his book, Graham discusses cardboard boxes in Khan's apartment that indicated that Khan was supplying documents or supplies to Khalid al-Mihdhar, who with al-Hazmi, was later identified to be one of the "ringleaders" of 9/11. Graham was an independent radio journalist who stood up to local political corruption. He was a Vietnam veteran who volunteered for medical missions in a combat zone. Dr. Graham was likely poisoned, from propylene glycol, on May 29, 2004, between 11 AM and 1 PM, somewhere between Lake Conroe, Texas and Diboll, Texas. Two close friends, Richard Wilkes, and LeeAnn Scruggs, asked him, at separate times, during his painful 27 months of death-bed organ failure and paralysis, "Who did this to you?" Both times, he indicated it may have been the FBI. Agent Stephen Hayes indicated that Mohammed Jamal Khan may have in fact been the FBI's informant.



Top Secret Community Access TeeVee in NOxVile Tennessee
Pirate News' September 911 Surprise as seen on Japanese TV on September 11, 2004, and
US Dept of Homeland Security's Popular Mechanics magazine, March 2005
Required reading for North Carolina Wesleyan College, Political Science 495 - 9/11 The Road to Tyranny, Spring 2005
Dr Jane Christensen assassinated in November 2005
News archives are copyright free for Fair Use nonprofit educational use per 17 US Code 107
Website design, music and TV are copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by John Lee and Pirate News Productions
Difficile est saturam non scribere